In 2023, Transformation Church in Tulsa, Oklahoma, led by Pastor Michael Todd, found itself at the center of controversy following its Easter service. The service, which was intended to be a grand celebration, instead sparked widespread outrage for what many considered to be blasphemous content. This incident has shed light on the church and its leadership, raising questions about the direction and decisions of contemporary religious organizations.
Michael Todd has been described as a dynamic and influential pastor, known for his engaging preaching style and leadership at Transformation Church in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Gaining prominence over the years, Todd has been recognized for his modern approach to ministry and evangelism, drawing in a younger demographic with his relatable sermons and vibrant church activities.
The Transformation Church Scandal
During the 2023 Easter service, Pastor Todd performed actions that many found controversial and disrespectful. Clips of the service circulated online, leading to a backlash from the Christian community and beyond. Critics accused the service of deviating from traditional Christian values and disrespecting the sanctity of the holiday, calling it “blasphemous” and “controversial.”
During the controversial Easter service at Transformation Church the event showcased an extravagant production titled “Ransom.” This two-hour performance included a range of elements such as dozens of dances, flashing lights, pyrotechnics, demonic characters, and stage fog. Additionally, it featured covers of songs by artists like Ke$ha, Justin Timberlake, and Beyoncé, albeit with several lyrical changes.
The play, which was heavily criticized on social media, included music from Ke$ha’s “Die Young” among other secular artists. It was noted for its dark attire and makeup, fire, and red lighting designed to resemble a scene from hell. One controversial segment depicted “demons” discussing their physical features, with one line stating, “I don’t have a fatty,” referring to their posteriors. Another segment showed these demonic characters pulling Jesus off the cross. Despite the backlash, the service ended with what appeared to be a regular praise and worship session.
Pastor Todd explained the rationale behind the production, stating his intention to reach out to those “who haven’t signed up to play the game yet,” meaning individuals distant from religious faith. He aimed to showcase the amazing aspects of Jesus and what God has done for humanity, pushing the boundaries of conventional church services to “do everything short of sin.” Todd wanted to engage those who felt neglected, unloved, or unforgiven by religion. This approach was meant to snatch them back from the brink, providing a new perspective on religious faith and redemption.
Related: ‘Somebody Got a Job’ — Transformation Church Addresses Carl Lentz Hiring
The service was prefaced with a disclaimer explaining that “Ransom” was a creative expression of the true story of mankind’s fall and redemption through Jesus Christ, as written in Scripture. It noted that while backstories and some characters or dialogue were added, the intention was to support the truth and teachings of the Scriptures. The production was described as a portrayal meant to draw in the lost and remind the faithful of the power, love, and grace of Jesus Christ. Attendees were encouraged to refer to the Bible for further context and understanding of the Easter story.
In response to the backlash from the Easter service, Michael Todd issued a public apology. He acknowledged the hurt and confusion caused by the service and expressed his commitment to learning from the experience. Todd’s apology was seen as a step towards mending his relationship with the church community and addressing the concerns raised by the incident.
Creative or Blasphemous? Transformation Church Puts on Extravagant Easter Production
While some attendees and online viewers praised the play for its impact and effectiveness, with claims that around 600 people were saved through the service, others believed the play overstepped boundaries and glorified sin, leading to a polarized response. Critics argued that the church’s primary role should be to glorify God and edify believers with the Word of God and the gospel, a sentiment not universally felt with this production.
