Lausanne and the Voice of the ‘Flies’: Concerns From a Majority World Church Leader

Silencing of Voices 

Finally, I cannot not mention the treatment Ruth Padilla has received at the conference. Despite there being so many other issues that could have also caused pain (i.e., a remark that could be taken as a denial of missional complicity with colonialism, complete denial of Supersessionism, etc.), it was the only voice that was denied and apologized for. Considering the complexities of the brokenness in the world, disagreements and pain are inevitable. Yet, silencing and censoring in a top-down manner will only lead to cheap forgiveness. We need to learn to be uncomfortable; for discomfort is not a hindrance to unity, but the seed of humility. 

So, by voicing our discomfort, have we become flies? Perhaps. 

Yet, unbeknown to many, flies are essential for pollination! By getting rid of the flies and destroying the ecosystem, we will lose many of its beautiful flowers. The gospel is not good news that glosses over brokenness. Rather, the gospel is good news precisely because it shines through the darkest areas of the world and our lives. May we learn to listen to each other in humility, so that the body of Christ will be fully displayed in all of its brokenness and beauty. 

(Although I have consulted numerous leaders from IFES and other global contexts, I do not represent the global church, nor my own country. All opinions are my own.)