Agape vs. Phileo: Why We’ve Overcomplicated Jesus’ Question to Peter

agape vs phileo
Lightstock #300944 / 300942

Share

What John 21 Is Really About

In John 21, the meaning of Jesus’ three questions is not hidden in Greek vocabulary. John himself tells us what’s happening.

Jesus asks Peter the same question three times to mirror Peter’s three denials. The setting matters. The charcoal fire matters. Peter denied Jesus three times by a charcoal fire earlier in the Gospel. Now, by another charcoal fire, Jesus restores him three times.

This is not about Jesus lowering His expectations for Peter’s love. It’s about Jesus restoring Peter completely.

The third question, even though it uses phileo, is explicitly treated by John as a repetition of the first two questions (John 21:17). The narrator does not signal a shift in meaning. He signals repetition and emotional weight.

Agape in John’s Gospel

John uses forms of agape roughly 37 times.

Does John always mean “perfect, unconditional, God-like love” every time he uses it?

No.

John says people agape darkness rather than light (John 3:19). He says the Pharisees agape the praise of men more than the praise of God (John 12:43).

If agape always means God’s perfect love, those statements become nonsensical.

What About Phileo?

Okay, but what about phileo love?

Kenny Burchardhttps://kennyburchard.com
Kenny Burchard (M.A. New Testament), his wife MaryJo and their son Victor live in Virginia Beach, VA. Before his family's journey of reconciliation with the Catholic Church in 2019 Kenny served for 20 years as an ordained Protestant pastor, worship leader, church planter, and Bible teacher. Kenny works for The Coming Home Network, and is co-host on the popular podcast and YouTube show, On The Journey with Matt, Ken, and Kenny, and his own YouTube channel, YouTube.com/kennyburchard

Read more

Latest Articles