ACNA Is Tested and Chaplains Scramble as Chaplain-Endorsing Nonprofit Exits

ACNA chaplains
Chaplains attend a leadership session at the 2025 I Corps Chaplain Annual Sustainment Training at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Wash., Sept. 9, 2025. (U.S. Army photo by Sgt. Elizabeth DeGroot)

Share

(RNS) — When churches split from the Episcopal Church and the Anglican Church of Canada in 2009 to form the Anglican Church of North America, the denomination’s church leaders hoped for a fresh start. Though they had broken with their mainline Protestant church bodies because of their conservative views on LGBTQ+ clergy, same-sex marriage and women’s ordination, ACNA also aspired to be a more nimble, less hierarchical church, free of the infighting that came with too much oversight.

But in recent years ACNA has suffered repeated clashes over clergy misconduct protocolsbishop accountability and women’s ordination. On Monday (Sept. 22), another crisis broke out, as the Jurisdiction of the Armed Forces and Chaplaincy moved to exit the denomination and attempted to take its chaplains with it. The JAFC, a nonprofit organization, is the body that officially “endorses” ACNA chaplains, providing them a necessary credential to serve military personnel and in other settings.

On Sunday, Archbishop Steve Wood, who heads ACNA, temporarily restricted Bishop Derek Jones, who oversees the JAFC, from ministry, citing “credible complaints” alleging “abuse of ecclesiastical power.” But by the time he announced the restrictions, the JAFC had already announced its departure from ACNA.

Leaders at JAFC and in the ACNA differ on what led to the clash and on where it has left those involved. Jones told Religion News Service that since he had already withdrawn from ACNA by signing a letter to that effect on Sept. 20, he is no longer under its jurisdiction. ACNA leaders claim that even if Jones and JAFC leaders leave, ACNA retains the power to endorse its chaplains and the 300-odd chaplains affiliated with JAFC.

JAFC leaders responded in a cease-and-desist letter directing Wood and other ACNA leaders to stop claiming “any ecclesiastical or practical right of supervision over the Jurisdiction or its chaplaincy program.”

Thursday evening, the ACNA announced that its endorsing body will be led by newly elected Bishop Jerome R. Cayangyang, who serves as deputy chaplain of the Marine Corps for Reserve Matters. “Bishop Cayangyang will provide leadership, pastoral care, and oversight for Anglican clergy serving as chaplains in the United States Armed Forces, federal and state agencies, hospitals, and other specialized institutions,” the announcement said.

“It’s an evolving situation, and there’s ongoing conversations with all those involved,” said David Wake, executive director for the Armed Forces Chaplains Board at the Department of War, on Friday. “And, chaplains should not be concerned about their certifications to serve.”

Jones faces several allegations, including that he misused ACNA’s clergy misconduct protocols and fabricated or back-dated official church documents. Six people have said Jones inflicted psychological and emotional stress on people under his care.

Jones spoke to these allegations in a video call with JAFC chaplains Monday evening. During that call, which has now been made public, Jones denied fabricating or backdating documents and said the confusion over document changes was because they were edited by multiple people.

“We have counselors. We have psychologists. We have deans and deaneries to help with emotional and psychological things,” said Jones in the video call about the stress allegations. “And when they come to me and you’re seeking help from me, if I’m not providing good emotional and psychological help for you and I’m only stressing you, you don’t have to talk to me.”

He later told RNS that the six people’s claims were nebulous and unfounded and charged that at least one was a product of society’s “woke” mentality.

The Rev. William Barto, an attorney and priest in the Reformed Episcopal Church, a subjurisdiction of ACNA, said that the misconduct allegations are substantial. “It amounts to abuse of clerical authority, extortion and, if we were in a civil arena, intentional infliction of emotional distress,” he said. “These are not things that the archbishop should ignore.”

Continue reading on the next page

KathrynPost@churchleaders.com'
Kathryn Post
Kathryn Post is an author at Religion News Service.

Read more

Latest Articles