Home Blog Page 72

Impromptu Worship Service Breaks Out Among Contestants From ‘The Voice’

The Voice
Screengrab via Facebook / Creigh Riepe

Creigh Riepe, a contestant on “The Voice,” shared two videos on social media of an impromptu worship service that took place among the Season 26 contestants at a hotel pool.

Riepe, who is on Team Reba, wrote, “POV: You come across Season 26 contestants of ‘The Voice’ having an impromptu church service by the pool,” in a post featuring a video of multiple contestants singing “The Blessing” by Cody Carnes, Elevation Worship, and Kari Jobe.

“Nothing quite like our worship times together at ‘West Pool Church’ during the @nbcthevoice 🙏,” Riepe said in video’s caption.

RELATED: ‘The Voice’ Finalist Moves Gwen Stefani to Tears With Worship Song; Brandon Lake Expresses ‘Gratitude’

A couple days later, the Nashville, Tennessee, singer shared another video following requests from followers. Riepe posted contestants singing “O Come to the Altar” by Elevation Worship.

The new season of “The Voice” debuted Sept. 23 and introduced viewers to Riepe during the season’s third episode.

Riepe received two chair turns from coaches Reba McEntire and Gwen Stefani while singing Benson Boone‘s song “Beautiful Things.”

The coaches who didn’t turn their chairs for Riepe, Michael Bublé and Snoop Dogg, both praised the singer for the authenticity in his voice and expressed disappointment for not pushing their chairs’ red buttons.

RELATED: ‘The Voice’ Contestant Uses Worship Anthem to Proclaim God’s Love

During his introduction, Riepe shared that he has been sober for two years after experiencing what he described as a “wakeup call.”

Lisa Victoria Fields: Resilient Ministry—Navigating Disappointments Without Burnout

lisa victoria fields
Image courtesy of PastorServe

As pastors and ministry leaders, how can we take our pain and disappointments and allow God to reframe them for his good and his glory? In this week’s conversation on FrontStage BackStage, host Jason Daye is joined by Lisa Victoria Fields. Lisa is a renowned Christian apologist who’s produced two documentaries. She serves as the CEO of the Jude 3 Project, and her most recent book is titled “When Faith Disappoints.” Together, Lisa and Jason look at some of the pain and disappointments that we often experience in our lives and leadership. Lisa then shares from her experiences as a ministry leader some keys in processing through these disappointments so we can avoid burning out in ministry.

FrontStage BackStage Podcast With Lisa Victoria Fields

View the entire podcast here.

Keep Learning

Looking to dig more deeply into this topic and conversation? Every week we go the extra mile and create a free toolkit so you and your ministry team can dive deeper into the topic that is discussed. Find your Weekly Toolkit here… Love well, Live well, Lead well!

Help Parents Help Their Kids With LGBT+ Questions

Source: Adobe Stock

There are most likely topics on your heart that you wish you could get your congregation fired up about. Many good and needful conversations never gain traction. But there is one conversation that comes preloaded with interest: how to navigate LGBT+ questions in our current cultural climate with Jesus’ truth and grace. Even more specifically, how can parents guide their children through these complex waters when they often feel ill-equipped themselves?

Let’s consider four steps towards providing the parents in your congregation with support on LGBT+ questions.

(1) Pray

I don’t need to convince you that the temperature is high in this conversation. There are many big emotions swirling around, the most prominent of which is fear. When we become afraid, we might instinctively rely on our flesh instead of seeking the help of the Spirit. And if your people are afraid, it can trigger fear in you as well.

An additional challenge is that there is strong spiritual resistance in our culture to what God has said is good about bodies and sexuality. For many, affirmation of LGBT+ identities takes on a kind of religious significance; it represents to many normal people values that are good, true, and beautiful. If we want to speak of a different value system and hold it up as better because it represents the vision of the true God, we can expect attacks. Think of how Gideon feared when he was commissioned to destroy the idol; people defend their gods.

We fail if our first step in helping our congregations is not prayer. First step, middle step, last step. We are not sufficient in ourselves to lead people to faith over fear. We are not sufficient to topple idols. We must pray for God’s power, God’s guidance, and God’s protection.

(2) Educate Yourself and Your Team

There won’t be progress on such a volatile topic if you don’t take the time to educate your team and align them with your church’s position, posture, and practices. Families will seek guidance from various deacons, elders, and leaders, and they will be better helped if everyone is speaking from a unified vision.

This may mean that you take a step back and draft or revisit your church’s position, posture, and practices on LGBT+ questions and sexuality broadly. What does the Scripture say? What resources does your specific theological tradition bring? What are the aspects of your local context that need to be considered? Is the church leadership team equipped to communicate the church’s vision and values? This is work that has to be done before parents can be resourced in a godly, effective way.

(3) Integrate Your Vision Into Church Life Broadly

Your church likely has a number of theological positions that members have no idea about. In the new heavens and the new earth, we will, all of us, possess and be possessed by full truth and full love, but we are not there yet. In the meantime, you have to consider which theological truths need special repetition and representation so that your people can stand firm in this generation. All truths are useful for all times; some truths are under special attack and need special attention.

Once you have established a rhythm of prayer and have done the work of training your team in your church’s theological vision for embodiment and sexuality, you can turn towards considering how that vision should be integrated into the whole life of the church. If you try to equip your parents on LGBT+ questions but they don’t understand how that information flows from the broader church vision for sexuality, the foundation will be unsteady. LGBT+ questions are a piece of a broader cloth, after all.

One place in which to consider doing this is in sermons and/or adult-education spaces. You could decide to have a short series on God’s positive vision for sexuality. You could audit how you will discuss your church’s position when you preach through texts that touch on sexuality, marriage, singleness, or embodiment. What is said during Sunday mornings upfront, or in other formal settings by authorized teachers, sets the tone and the agenda. It demonstrates what is “allowed” to be talked about. In my work, I still regularly encounter churches who have never talked about LGBT+ questions in a formal way. In these situations, congregants often feel lost. Good leadership looks like starting and continuing the conversation.

‘Embarrassed’ Church Safety Team Member Arrested for Allegedly Staging a Terrorist Shooting at TX Church

Jacob Wayne Tarver
Screengrab via KVUE

Jacob Wayne Tarver (45), a safety team member at Church at the Epicenter in Burnet, Texas, is in custody after allegedly “fabricating” a terrorist attack at the church. Tarver now faces felony charges for allegedly staging the church shooting and lying to authorities.

“Do not give in to the unfounded fears that are a result of this false story,” said the Burnet County Sheriff’s Office in a press release. “This falsehood can only be counteracted by the widespread announcement of the truth.”

Jacob Wayne Tarver Faces Felony Charges After Fabricating a Church Shooting

On Sunday morning (Oct. 6), the Burnet County Sheriff’s Office responded to a 911 call to Church at the Epicenter. The caller requested police, and then the call disconnected. When the police arrived, it was clear that shots had been fired and that the 911 caller, safety team member Tarver, had been the only shooter.

Tarver initially claimed that two suspicious males approached the church, one carrying a rifle. Tarver said that he then fired “multiple rounds,” prompting the men to flee via a white minivan.

After an investigation, the Sheriff’s office said, “There were no hostile actions taken or directed at the church by any persons, and no weapons brandished toward the church or the safety team member. At no time was the safety of the congregation in jeopardy.”

Tarver said he “fabricated significant details of this incident” and had “lied to law enforcement.”

According to local news, Tarver “recklessly fired three shots at a home and pond near the church, then lied to law enforcement about the incident.” Tarver admitted to being “embarrassed” for lying.

Tarver has been arrested and is in custody at the Burnet County Jail. A bond has not yet been set. He has been charged with two felonies (tampering with or fabricating physical evidence and deadly conduct) and a misdemeanor (false report to induce an emergency response).

The Burnet County Sheriff’s Office has pleaded with the public to widely share the truth about this incident in attempt to combat the “rumors and speculation surrounding this case.”


“For those of y’all judging. This man was a well respected man of this community,” commented one person who said she knows the family well. He “lost his daughter in a tragic car accident a few months ago. While it’s not okay he did this, he just sounds like he needs prayers and help.”

Another added, “I’ve known this man for a very long time. He has been a well liked and respected man who ran his own businesses and loved to help people. I can only imagine what he has been through to do something like this.”

Tom Ascol, Sam Rainer, and Willy Rice Among FL Pastors Bracing for Hurricane Milton

Hurricane Milton
Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies's visible infrared satellite loop of Atlantic Hurricane Milton. Oct. 9, 2024. SSEC/CIMSS, University of Wisconsin–Madison (Attribution or Attribution), via Wikimedia Commons

Hurricane Milton is barreling toward Florida, and it is the “11th hour”—or perhaps already past it—for people who want to evacuate.

Pastors who are in the storm’s projected pathway are posting updates about their situations and asking for prayer as the Category 4 hurricane approaches. A number are remaining in the area and preparing to serve their communities after Milton passes. 

“As most of you know, I am in the bullseye of Hurricane Milton,” said Sam Rainer, lead pastor of West Bradenton Baptist Church in Bradenton, Florida. “I am riding this one out along with several church members. West Bradenton has teams ready to help as soon as the storm passes. Some are trained in disaster relief. Others are first responders. And others are skilled tradesmen.” 

On Monday, Oct. 7, Rainer posted a photo of himself and a father and son, saying, “We’re gonna take a hit with Hurricane Milton, but my church is stepping up. I’m proud to serve with such incredible people. This father and son duo was helping board up homes for widows who cannot evacuate.”

Hurricane Milton Heads for Florida

Only two weeks after Hurricane Helene ravaged the Southeast, Hurricane Milton is projected to hit Southwest Florida, making landfall late Wednesday evening. Milton strengthened to a Category 5 hurricane on Tuesday but weakened to Category 4 status by Wednesday. It is expected to weaken more before making landfall but nevertheless still be a major hurricane when it arrives on land.

Milton already started impacting Southwest Florida Wednesday with rain, gusty winds, and tornadoes

RELATED: The Devastation From Hurricane Helene Is ‘Overwhelming’ but So Is the Neighborly Love

Hurricane Milton is projected to go through Florida starting on the Central West Coast. Rick Davis, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service in Tampa, told USA Today, “We’re telling people not to focus on the exact center because as the system makes landfall, the eye is going to be getting larger, and the wind field is going to be expanding.”

“Even if you’re not directly in the path, the effects will be felt far and wide at the point of landfall,” he added. Florida’s Attorney General Ashley Moody has advised people who plan not to evacuate to write their names on their arms so that volunteers can identify their bodies later if needed.

Hurricane Milton

Still image of Hurricane Milton off the coast of the Yucatán Peninsula on October 8, 2024 at 6:41Z as it takes aim at Florida. NASA’s Scientific Visualization Studio – Global Science and Technology, Inc./Alex Kekesi, NASA/GSFC/Greg Shirah, NASA/GSFC/George Huffman, Telophase/Jacob Reed, SSAI/Stephen Lang, NASA/GSFC/Peter H. Jacobs, ADNET Systems, Inc./Laurence Schuler, ADNET Systems, Inc./Ian Jones, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Lausanne: When Strategy and Vision Lead to (Dis)Order

Lausanne
Adobestock #200792738

Editor’s note: This article is part of forum discussing the fourth Lausanne Congress. It is not an official Lausanne Movement forum but an opportunity for Lausanne delegates to share their thoughts about the fourth Lausanne Congress, the Seoul Statement, and the future of the mission. You can read the entire series, from diverse voices around the world here.

Strategy and vision can lead to disorder even as we strive for order. In this article, I want to explore a few observations and loving critiques of the fourth Lausanne Congress (L4). Fifty years ago, the first Lausanne Congress responded to its own contextual challenges, and we now suffer from new disorders. These disorders are caused by an overemphasis on one sided-strategy, corporate technologizing at the expense of relationality, and urban mission at the expense of rural mission. Let me explain what I mean. 

One-Sided Strategy

Urban beautification projects generally aim to improve residents’ lives through refurbishing and embellishing existing public spaces to increase social interaction, heighten safety, provide accessibility, and generally make life for residents better. There is research, however, suggesting the outcomes of such strategies fail to meet the aims.1 The point hinges on a relation between a production, what gets made of them, and their broader impact. French scholar of spirituality and culture Michel de Certeau analyzed similar phenomena using what he called spatial language. I want to note a set of terms, strategy and place (lieu). For de Certeau, strategies are designed practices (the beautification projects) intended to produce effectiveness and some measurable gain (better resident life). Strategies require a vision for the order (what better life is) but also a differentiation of the environment to be acted in (urban centres).2 The place is the physical, material, or social thing produced by those strategies. The problem is that even as the thing produced can represent the strategy, it does not give any proof to what users make or do with the place or to any broader impact.

Technology and Relationships

At the recent Lausanne Congress in Seoul, participants were not provided a new declarative vision of the needs and methods required to carry the Great Commission forward over the next half century. In line with the overarching philosophy of Polycentric Mission, participants were invited to collaborate with others in main session table groups and at Gap Sessions to envision practical steps towards addressing key needs or maximizing key opportunities to heighten gospel impact. The strategy builds on the idea that at events like this much of the vitality is connected to and born out of the relational events that take place during that time. As much was said from the main stage. Beautiful moments of providential spontaneity and chance meetings or random connections from previous Lausanne events were noted as key points that resulted in personal transformation, lifelong friendships, significant partnerships, and new missional endeavours. Knowing the value of such relational moments the Congress organizers strategized the use of digital technology and software intelligence to synthesize, facilitate and track such relationality, providing a resource and platform that participants could use post-congress.

When the product of this technology is combined with session recordings and any forthcoming post-congress reports, the digital place will no doubt prove a quality resource about the Congress. What it will not be is a representation of those relational experiences. In fact, during the Congress, the strategy interfered with the relational experiences it tried to support. At times, the drive for the corporate technological application disturbed the relational aspect of the Congress—with frequent reminders to use the tech, the time spent trying to figure out how to use the tech, and the technology’s inaccessibility or crashing systems. This clash between strategy and the relational lead to some participants abandoning the tech entirely. The preference for the relational means their participation will not be represented in the digital place nor will the tech strategy be able to serve them as it was intended.

1 J. Antonio Lara-Hernandez and Alessandro Melis, “Understanding the temporary appropriation in relationship to social sustainability,” Sustainable Cities and Society (39), May 2018, pp. 366-374.
2 Michel de Certeau, “The Practice of Everyday Life.” (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1984), p. xix.

Gateway Church Applying To Join ECFA Amid Class Action Lawsuit Over Allegedly Misallocated Funds

Gateway Church
Pictured: Gateway Church elder Tra Willbanks gives the congregation an update (screengrab via YouTube / @Gateway Church)

Gateway Church is pledging greater financial transparency in the wake of a class action lawsuit filed against four current and former pastors at the church over how Gateway has allocated donation money. 

The lawsuit alleges that although Gateway promises to allocate 15% of all donations to local and global outreach efforts, it has failed to do so. The suit further alleges that leaders of the church have regularly promised that Gateway would return donations if donors were not satisfied with how their money had been spent, but the church has also failed to make good on that commitment. 

In response to the lawsuit, church elder Tra Willbanks told the congregation over the weekend that Gateway is currently in an application process to join the Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability (ECFA), a financial accreditation organization for nonprofit organizations, and that the church is investigating the allegations made in the lawsuit.

To start his announcement, Willbanks said that when he received the news of the lawsuit, it prompted “a moment of reflection” that was “kind of discouraging.” 

RELATED: Former Volunteer at Gateway Church Charged With Child Molestation

“But when I think about what I believe the Lord is doing in this place, and I think about this worship that we just entered into, I’m encouraged,” Willbanks said. 

“I want to tell you, personally,” Willbanks said, “that despite the news, I still give to Gateway Church. I am all in on this church. And the elders are all in on this church.”

Willbanks went on to express that the decisions of the leaders moving forward are not about “protecting an institution” but about “being obedient.”

Willbanks expressed that “some” church members have “raised concerns about Gateway’s financials and stewardship” and acknowledged that the new lawsuit “raises more questions and concerns.” 

As such, Willbanks said it was necessary to “share relevant facts.” Willbanks said that a third-party audit has been conducted on Gateway’s finances from 2005 to present and that no “wrongdoing” has been “revealed.”

RELATED: Another Gateway Church Pastor Gone for ‘Moral Failure’

As to the allegations made in the suit by a former employee that Gateway willfully ignored concerns about financial transparency, Willbanks said, “To this point, we have not been able to corroborate any of those specific allegations, but this work is still ongoing.” 

Recommendations From an Anthropologist and L4 Listening Team Member

listening Lausanne
Adobe Stock #662819216

Editor’s note: This article is part of forum discussing the fourth Lausanne Congress. It is not an official Lausanne Movement forum but an opportunity for Lausanne delegates to share their thoughts about the fourth Lausanne Congress, the Seoul Statement, and the future of the mission. You can read the entire series, from diverse voices around the world here.

As an anthropologist trained to analyze qualitative data from interviews and participant observation, I often refer to myself as a professor, author, and listener. I was thrilled, therefore, to learn that I was selected to volunteer at Lausanne 4 on the Listening Team.

Unlike most delegates, our team of six moved to different tables, tracks, and sessions throughout the week, taking notes as we listened to table conversations and asked about Lausanne experiences. This listening ministered to delegates and generated leads for the media team. As a qualitative researcher, I also found myself synthesizing what I heard. I’d like to offer a summary of the patterns I noticed, not as a comprehensive research study, but as a contribution to ongoing conversations about the Lausanne movement. 

In what follows, I’ll begin and end with two themes of appreciation bracketed around five recommendations shared by delegates. 

Connections and collaborations. L4 delegates loved to talk about the incredible people they were meeting. Placing participants with the same table groups of six diverse participants through each plenary and with another group through collaboration sessions facilitates a unique balance of depth and breadth in connections. L4 fosters a culture of openness to strangers that carries over into dining halls, shuttle buses, art tables, and hotel lobbies. I heard story after story of new encounters that will shape people’s work and ministry.

Caution about how we speak as “we.” Several disappointments during the week hinged on an ambiguous question: who is included in the “we” who speaks to and for this group? As delegates arrived to Incheon, many were confused by the email delivering the already-written Seoul Statement.

A Lausanne website describes the Seoul Statement in this way: “Informed by the listening process, this key document is expected to emerge from the Seoul-Incheon 2024 Congress. It will sound a call for collaborative action for the sake of God’s mission as an active response to the Lausanne 4 Journey.” Precedent of previous Lausanne gatherings further led many to believe that they, the delegates were the “we” who would contribute to this statement. 

The question of who speaks as “we” resurfaced throughout the week. When Lausanne leaders issued an apology after Ruth Padilla DeBorst’s talk, many delegates questioned what “we” had the right to apologize for her address. The question also entered Gap Collaboration groups. In the Gap group focused on gender and sexuality, for example, people who leaned both liberal and conservative expressed surprise at finding opposing views in the same room. Others pointed out that the words “delegate” and “congress” seem to imply democratic representation, when in reality delegates are neither elected nor representative and socioeconomic challenges inhibit many of those selected from attending.

Who, then, are “we?” Should Lausanne function as an organization or a movement? What methodologies might allow documents to emerge from this “we,” and how might they be communicated with transparency? In today’s politically polarized world, speaking as “we” will require more caution than ever.

Unity that celebrates diversity. For many, that word “unity,” frequently preached from the plenary stage, became a painful reminder of its absence. True human unity is impossible without also acknowledging diversity. Majority World delegates in particular experienced several key decisions by L4 organizers as a message that unity depended upon their willingness to assimilate or keep silent.

When musicians of color were tucked behind White leaders to play back-up; when nearly every song centered Euro-American songwriters, movements, symbology, language, instrumentation, and harmonies; when plenary speakers were required to speak English; and when many breakout sessions lacked interpreters, the experienced was diminished, not only for Majority World participants but for all. There was much talk of this being the most diverse gathering in the world, but numerical diversity in the absence of inclusivity comes at the cost of those in the minority. 

Lysa TerKeurst: How To Respond When Your Trust Is Broken

Lysa TerKeurst
Image courtesy of Lysa TerKeurst

Lysa TerKeurst is president and chief visionary officer of Proverbs 31 Ministries and the author of several New York Times bestsellers, including “Good Boundaries and Goodbyes,” “Forgiving What You Can’t Forget,” and “It’s Not Supposed to Be This Way.” Her latest book is, “I Want to Trust You, but I Don’t: Moving Forward When You’re Skeptical of Others, Afraid of What God Will Allow, and Doubtful of Your Own Discernment.”

“The Stetzer ChurchLeaders Podcast” is part of the ChurchLeaders Podcast Network.

Other Ways To Listen to This Podcast With Lysa TerKeurst

► Listen on Amazon
► Listen on Apple
► Listen on Spotify
► Listen on YouTube

Transcript of Interview With Lysa TerKeurst

Lysa TerKeurst on The Stetzer ChurchLeaders Podcast.mp3: Audio automatically transcribed by Sonix

Lysa TerKeurst on The Stetzer ChurchLeaders Podcast.mp3: this mp3 audio file was automatically transcribed by Sonix with the best speech-to-text algorithms. This transcript may contain errors.

Voice Over:
Welcome to the Stetzer Church Leaders Podcast, conversations with today’s top ministry leaders to help you lead better every day. And now, here are your hosts, Ed Stetzer and Daniel Yang.

Daniel Yang:
Welcome to the Sets of Church Leaders podcast, where we’re helping Christian leaders navigate and lead through the cultural issues of our day. My name is Daniel Yang, national director of Churches of Welcome at World Relief. And today we’re talking to Lysa Terkeurst, Lisa’s president and chief visionary officer of Proverbs 31 ministries and the author of several New York Times bestsellers, including Good Boundaries and Goodbyes, Forgiving What You Can’t Forget, and It’s Not Supposed to Be This Way. Her latest book is I Want to Trust You, but I don’t. Moving forward, when you’re skeptical of others, afraid of what God will allow and doubtful of your own discernment. Now let’s go to Ed Stetzer, editor in chief of Outreach Magazine and the dean of the Talbot School of Theology. Lisa, I think.

Ed Stetzer:
We have to comment on the fact that that is the longest subtitle book in the history of publishing, but it covers some some key things that are in there. We’re we’re glad to have you on the program and good to good to see you again. It’s been a, been a, been a long, long time. So we’re going to talk some about issues of, you know, of trust. Um, you know, and how do we engage in the kind of rightful building of those bridges that trust involves? And more so you write this, you say we aren’t made to let skepticism be our primary filter through which we see God and others, unquote. First of all, I want to say, you do say to you, do you realize it’s 2024? That’s how everybody looks at everybody else. And if so, why did you decide to write a book on trust and anything significant about the timing in your own journey?

Lysa TerKeurst:
Well, I have been through a pretty significant betrayal, not just within the death of my marriage and the divorce that I walked through, the very unwanted divorce that I walked through, but also the fallout of other friendships and, um, dynamics. You know, it’s interesting, the statistics today I read an interesting research project that said the average American lies or is deceitful on average four times a day. Um, actually, the statistics for men are a little higher. They say six times a day and then women are 3 to 4. So. But they say like on average Americans lie four times a day. So. And those aren’t always have to be big lies. But you know, like saying we’re fine when we’re really not fine or saying we that traffic is really bad when the truth is we left our house later than we wanted to, you know? Um, so we live in a in a world where sometimes truth is what ever protects us. And, you know, of course, as Christians, we want truth to be in alignment with the actual facts and and even more so in alignment with God’s Word. Um, but that’s not what we’re experiencing. And the gap between what we want. We want people to be honest, and we want people like we want to be able to believe that they are who they say they are. They’re going to do what they say they’re going to do. They’re going to be what they say they’re going to be. That’s what we want. But there’s a gap between what we want. And sometimes a lot of times what we actually experience. And so this book isn’t just for people who’ve experienced huge betrayals in relationships, but it’s also, for most of us, walking around with a general sense of skepticism. And maybe we don’t even know why.

Daniel Yang:
Lisa, can you define or frame for us the word trust, and then maybe share why you’ve struggled with the words specifically trust issues in the past?

Lysa TerKeurst:
Yeah, well, let’s do the second question first. So trust issues. Sometimes if people weaponize that phraseology then it could be like, oh, Daniel has trust issues. And that sounds like it’s like a disease or a bad diagnosis or some fundamental flaw in your psyche. You know when. So in the book I am very intentional about encouraging people. We all have trust issues. Let’s just level the playing field, you know, and just say, this is something that’s common to us all and not weaponize that phraseology as if there’s something wrong with this. But rather, let’s acknowledge, of course, we have trust issues. We all have them. Now, what do we do about our busted up trust so that that’s that? And then what is trust like? What makes up trust within the context of a relationship? In order to have trust in a relationship, you have to have safety and connection. So trust is really the oxygen of all human relationships. And in order to have it, we have to have safety and connection. What can happen sometimes is when we’ve had our trust broken, some of us start to prioritize connection so much like we’re so desperate to have this relationship, keep this relationship, um, that we we prioritize connection and we diminish our own need for safety. Um, and safety means not just physically safe, but it also means emotionally safe. Like, is this person being honest, truthful, you know, are they are they like, really going to come through for us all of that. Other people prioritize safety so high that they diminish connection. And so that’s more my tendency where I just want to isolate because I realize all connection is risky. You connect with another human and there’s inherent risk involved. And so I will prioritize safety so high that I want to I don’t want to experience any relational risk. So the goal of this book is to bring those back in more of an equilibrium, to say, our goal here is to go after connections that are safe, that can foster and breed real trust in relationships.

Ed Stetzer:
Yeah. I think one of the things that, of course, our audiences, pastors and church leaders and the book by the book title does remind everyone is I want to trust you, but I don’t. Moving forward, when you’re skeptical of others, afraid of what God will allow and doubtful of your own discernment. And you know, I will tell you that this is a really a defining life experience for pastors is how do we trust? Who do we trust? Um, you know, when you get that phone call, you know, and you look down at that caller ID, people get nervous, they feel their trust, you know? Hey, I just want to. I want to talk to you about something. Well, really, I’m leaving the church mad, and I’m coming to tell you. So I know that pastors really struggle with this issue of trust. And I think in some of it, it’s because trust is sort of placed in this Christian category that I, I mean, I just have to now abandon all skepticism, but and instead just offer complete trust to every person over and over again. So talk to us some about the you write about this in the book, but some of the misperceptions Christians tend to have about trust and forgiveness. And if you can help it, to apply it to some of the pastor and church leader world in which we’re talking to.

Lysa TerKeurst:
Absolutely. Um, so first of all, I want to say to any pastor or ministry leader out there, I get it. And of course, you’re struggling with trust. Of course. Um, because when you’re in a dynamic of leading people and especially people who are messy, you know, and I mean, that’s all of us, then you’re going to have dynamics often where people will say, I’ll be loyal to a fault. You know, like, no matter what, I’m with you, I’m a die hard. I’m, you know, I’ll never leave. But then over time, as you experience that dynamic of this person leaving, that person leaving, or this person betraying you, that person betraying you. Um, it can, it can. It’s not just what happens to us. Those things are hard. But then it’s the narrative that we start to tell ourselves behind what’s happening to us. So I want to say to church leaders and ministry leaders, of course you have this feeling because it’s been reinforced over and over and over, and now we can’t control what other people do. But what we do have to work on is the narrative that we’re telling ourselves. And that’s where the real work can happen. I think when we look at trust, especially in the dynamics of leadership, we have to understand that as we step into leadership, we’re kind of signing up for this. So the stability can’t be in making sure to always attract the perfect congregation or always attract the perfect employees. The real goal here has to be to create an inner stability. Recognizing our trust is going to get broken, but it shouldn’t break us in the process.

Ed Stetzer:
Yeah, and I think you’re right. We are signing up for this. And and I am not one of those people who thinks that. And I don’t go around saying pastor is the most miserable job in the world or anything of that sort. I know there are some people, and I think that’s an overstatement, but there is something, um, it’s just unique that you create these rapid bonds with people that go in ways that you don’t at work and, and family has, you know, sometimes decades. But you create these rapid bonds with people built on trust and mutual understanding of what you’re trying to do in the gospel. And I think pastors do feel betrayed a lot. So then what happens is it’s sort of like this, like this other direction. And it’s like, well, I don’t want to get close to people. And sometimes it’s to protect family, you know, kids. Well, we used to play with those kids at church and they’re gone now. So I mean, I feel this like deeply. So I guess the question is, is and this is, you know, again, I want to direct people to the book as well. And it would be helpful for you. I want to trust you, but I don’t. So you talked about that balance. Is that balance different when you’re dealing with people from, again, a clergy slash congregant kind of relationship or is it the same? Are there lessons to learn for both? And again, I hate the word clergy congregant, but I think you get what I’m trying to say.

Lysa TerKeurst:
I absolutely do. I think you’re very wise in pointing out that we go deep really fast when we’re in a church environment where we’re in an environment where we’re healing and learning and discipling and growing spiritually, emotionally, you know, all of that. So, yes, I mean, typically when people have come, when people are coming to the church, they’re bringing hurt, they’re bringing problems, they’re bringing questions that they want solutions and answers for. And so when when we can give them help for their hurt, then those bonds really do go deep and go fast. I do think what you said also earlier is really profound and really important, and it’s something I spend a lot of time in the book talking about, that there is this pressure on Christians and maybe even especially Christian leaders, to always believe the best about other people. It’s almost like, okay, if you love God, then you have to trust unconditionally. And I make a case in the book that not only is that not smart to do, but it’s not biblical either. We’re not to use foolish trust. We’re to use wise trust. And trust is built time plus believable behavior. And so when you have time with people and they demonstrate believable behavior over a long period of time, you have a track record with that person that. Yes, at that point you can absolutely believe the best about them, but also realize all humans are going to make mistakes. And a mistake or a breach in trust doesn’t mean that the relationship’s going to fall apart or that that person isn’t trustworthy. There’s a big difference between a mistake and a pattern of behavior. As church leaders, I think part of us recognizing wise trust, we have to know the difference between those two. We’re all going to make mistakes. But then we also have to recognize there are patterns of behavior that can become safe, unsafe not only for us, but also for other people around and respond accordingly.

Daniel Yang:
I like that time. Plus believable. Believable behavior. Lisa, let’s talk about, like, projection. Sometimes we project onto people things that we’re feeling, things that we’ve experienced. And so. And we’re triggered by a particular experience. How can somebody specifically church leaders, but anybody, how can they discern the difference between something that’s being triggered from a past experience and an actual experience that is actually maybe wrong or harmful to them?

Lysa TerKeurst:
Yeah, I tell about it. An experience in the book where, um, I, I had a new friend and this new friend had come to visit, and the goodbye was very rushed. And when it was time for them to, to say goodbye, they had a meeting that came up. And instead of leaving at 4:00 that afternoon, they had to leave at 8:00 that morning. And the goodbye was so rushed and the motion of them rushing out, just like, hey, I’ve got to go somewhere. I’m so sorry. And seeing a suitcase wheeled behind was a massive trigger for me because in my previous marriage, that kind of goodbye meant that my heart was about to get shattered. And so we all have experiences where a flash of something that’s just too close to a really hurtful experience that we’ve had before is going to trigger that kind of pain. There’s such a paper thin line between trigger from past hurt and discernment of like whether is, is this a warning or is this something that that I should just recognize as it’s okay, you know. And so in the book, I talk about talking to a betrayal therapist, someone who’s very, very educated in how to handle betrayal. And her answer to me was investigate. Now, I didn’t like that answer. That answer felt icky and sticky because what do you mean, investigate? And I don’t mean like, oh, start stalking this person and looking through their social media and all of that. That’s not what I’m saying, but I’m saying ask clarifying questions, get curious, not furious, and without placing judgment on that person, ask them some questions and say, hey, like I got a little, um, like weird feeling or maybe even a misunderstanding. And and so I just want to ask you a couple of questions about what I just experienced. And here’s the real telltale sign of whether it’s discernment or maybe a trigger.

Ed Stetzer:
The Setzer Church Podcast is part of the Church Leaders Podcast Network, which is dedicated to resourcing church leaders in order to help them face the complexities of ministry. Today, the Church Leaders Podcast Network supports pastors and ministry leaders by challenging assumptions, by providing insights and offering practical advice and solutions and steps that will help church leaders navigate the variety of cultures and contexts that we’re serving and learn more at Church leaders.com/podcast network.

Lysa TerKeurst:
If they get incredibly defensive, they get angry. They shame you for asking those questions. They act inconvenienced and put off. You might be experiencing some discernment that something’s off here. If they are kind and they’re like, of course you need to ask that question. Absolutely. I welcome providing clarity, you know, because clarity is just only a conversation away. Let’s have that conversation then. Maybe it’s trigger from past pain because when they respond that gently and that honestly and that openly, um, it’s not true all the time. But I would say most times that is the reassurance you need. Our brains are wired for the confidence of knowing. So our brain is always wanting to be in a situation where it can analyze that we’re safe. But when that’s disrupted by something that seems hurtful or fearful or something confusing we don’t understand. We must seek clarity. And when the other person provides it, oftentimes the trust is reestablished immediately and we carry on. And that relationship feels even more safe because of how that person responded.

Ed Stetzer:
You’re helpful. And that builds that. That trust and build trust builds on trust as well. So again, the book is I want to trust you, but I don’t. All right. So you I mean, you kind of talked a little bit about your own personal situation and that’s and you work through walk through obviously a lot of pain that makes news. And because of your prominence as a writer and a and a leader. So I know you’ve recently gotten remarried. Uh, you’ve been open about the betrayal, um, in just minutes ago. But in other places you experience in your, in your prior marriage. Um, and you also shared that some people then assume that, well, you’re in a new relationship, you’re in a new marriage, and all your struggles are resolved now that you’re in that new relationships, uh, relationship. So but you also indicate that’s a misconception? How about explaining how is God? Continue to work in your heart and when it comes to trust and your desire for things being made right?

Lysa TerKeurst:
Yeah, well, I’m a newlywed. And so, you know, when people say, is it really all it’s cracked up to be? I’m like, yes, I am so happy to be in a relationship where there’s trust. There’s no history of betrayal. Um, where I’m treasured and I’m honored. And that all feels amazing. And at the same time, it doesn’t fix anything that’s broken inside of me. And so I think it’s important for us to understand we can be in the best dynamic of our life. You know, as a church leader, we could step into this wonderful church where everybody is loving on us and and being kind and receptive to our ministry and where we are really engaging and connecting with them. And we see lives being changed and we see all of that. It can be the best dynamic in the world, and it’s not going to fix anything that is broken from previous past trust issues and previous past betrayals. So that’s something that’s a personal journey that external external circumstances don’t automatically fix, internal realities that need to be healed. And so that’s one of the main reasons I wrote I want to trust you, but I don’t, because I think a lot of us think, okay, things will be better when you know, things will be better when we get through the year end campaign and the budget looks awesome, things will be better when instead of only 200 people coming to the church, we have 400 people coming to the church.

Lysa TerKeurst:
Things will be better when I have a board of directors that better supports me, you know, and we we have all these things and we keep attaching our hope on this carrot that’s being dangled in front of us. But it’s it’s such a lie that that’s not that’s not that those things are never going to give us the stability that we want. Things will be better when we decide that there’s an internal stability that we need to gain, both in our relationship with God and in the healing that needs to happen, so that we don’t have so much unresolved hurt and pain that we’re carrying into future relationships, and potentially even projecting them onto people who don’t deserve it.

Ed Stetzer:
Yeah, there’s a pretty common pattern that I’ve seen in pastors and church leaders who, if they’re in an maybe an unhealthy, unhealthy church situation. Now, mind you, I don’t think that I think pastors and church leaders can cause their unhealthy church situations, but in this scenario, they’re in an unhealthy situation and they they get out of it to another one, and then they’re almost in the same situation. And I and I remember saying to one, you know, you keep bringing you with you and you haven’t addressed some of I mean, you change the as you put it, you change the external situation, but the internal still is there and it sort of keeps coming back up. And I think that’s again how because you keep talking about that place of discernment and, and I agree with you. And again, I want to I want to encourage people to get the book and read about it. Right. So so again, I want to trust you, but I don’t. But I also there’s a certain frustration, Lisa, that in the midst of agreeing with you, I don’t know where that fine line always is. So what advice would you give? Because if I don’t as a, as a pastor and a church leader and I’m just a teaching pastor at Mariner’s Church now, but even here, when I started here about a year in at the Talbot School of Theology at Biola University, I had to extend trust to a group of people. And so far I should say that that’s not been been a problem. But I had to, like, I don’t have time to see like, I got to trust you before I know you and pastors and church leaders need to do that all the time. So how do you encourage that? Again, this book is not just for pastors and church leaders, but you’ve been around. So how do you encourage pastors and church leaders to find that line? What does that look like as I wrestle through it?

Lysa TerKeurst:
Well, I think there’s wise trust and there’s foolish trust. So if we are believing the best about someone because the actions that we see right in front of us in the immediate interaction with them. Um, then, you know, recognize there’s going to be risk there, but it’s okay to believe the best about them because you’re making the wisest decision you can with the information that you have. Now. At the same time, I think it’s also good to pay attention to red flags so that our wise trust doesn’t turn into foolish trust. So in the book, I want to trust you, but I don’t. I spend quite a bit of time going through 11 red flags and really helping people see what to look for, and also the spectrums of severity. So for example, an integrity issue and broken trust because of an integrity issue is a lot different and a lot a lot more severe than an irresponsible like a tendency to be irresponsible with someone. And so I when we have distrust that starts to invade, we’ve got to ask ourselves where is the root of this distrust? And so that’s why I spend a lot of time breaking it down, because trust is such a big word. And like you said, we step into a dynamic dynamic and it’s like, wow, we have to trust these people in order to function because that’s just the job and that’s what’s required, you know? But at the same time, it’s also good. We’re not we don’t want to investigate people and expect the worst. Yes. Believe the best until they beg you otherwise. But there are red flags that we can pay attention to. And again, the quicker that we address something we’re seeing and we seek clarity for it, the less we will fill in the gap with our own narrative. And that’s how we can establish wise trust is by paying attention to the red flags, looking and and being honest with ourselves about what we’re seeing, and being willing to have some of the harder conversations that seek clarity.

Ed Stetzer:
Okay. So you mentioned the I mean, the list of flags that are in the book. And again, people can can pick up the book and they’ll be able to go through. I want to trust you, but I don’t. Okay. But as you look at them, I mean, you got them all in your head. Um, what are a couple others that you might say that pastors and church leaders should be aware of those red flags, which should then cause us to consider how quickly to extend trust.

Lysa TerKeurst:
One of my favorites that we need to pay attention to is an inflated sense of self. When someone tries to convince you that your success depends on their contribution to your life. Um, that’s a big red flag and inflated sense of self can play out like nobody will ever love you the way I do. Um, you know, or for a church leader, it could be, you know, they give major contributions to the church, or they’re always available to serve and and yet. And that’s awesome. Except they say to you, well, you know, the program is going to fall apart if without my involvement. Which kind of holds you hostage to any behavior that they have. Because if you believe that things will fall apart, then you have to weigh out the cost of addressing their issues. Right? And so that is a big red flag. Another one I would say that I think we have to pay attention to is incongruity. When someone says one thing, but their actions demonstrate another thing. And it’s not just a mistake, but it’s a pattern of behavior that things just don’t line up. Another one is insensitivity. You know, I mean, there is a place for being sensitive to other people’s issues and making sure that, you know, we are we’re kind and that, you know, we’re compassionate toward other people. Ministry kind of demands that. And if you get to a place where you’re so averse to being sensitive to other people’s issues, that insensitivity will breed trust issues. Hmm.

Daniel Yang:
Lisa, um, I’d like to talk about church hurt and how church leaders can lead through, uh, vision and growth, while still keeping in mind that there are some that have experienced real church hurt. And then there are others that may not have experienced it, but they’re highly sensitive to it now because of podcasts and because of blogs and those kinds of things. Um, so how can you lead in this environment in a way where you’re not insensitive, but also you’re not overly paranoid?

Lysa TerKeurst:
Yeah, that is such a good question. And honestly, I wish I had the end all be all answer for that. Um, because that’s a dynamic that I think it’s a tension we’re going to have to manage and not a problem to solve, because church hurt seems to be at an all time high. I read some statistics recently where one of the major groups of people leaving the church today are people are women in my age group, which is shocking because I would have told you that women in my age group are kind of the glue of the church, you know? Like, we’re the ones like bringing in the older generation and then also the younger generation because we have influences on both sides. But I think there’s a lot of hurt when the divorce rate is so high. Women who have gone through relational trauma, and maybe the church didn’t support them the way they thought that the church needed to support them. And maybe some of those expectations were unrealistic. Right. But maybe there’s some were realistic, and it was just a scenario where there wasn’t a pathway of complete support like what she expected. So I think there’s a whole lot of reasons. I want to I want to read you something from the book because, um, taking inspiration from C.S. Lewis and The Screwtape Letters, I think this will be something that will help pinpoint what the enemy, the part that the enemy plays in this. And I do believe that the enemy, you know, his great goal is division. And if he can isolate us, then you know, that’s where trouble can really happen. And so let me read you this, um, it’s it’s as if a demon is writing a letter to distract me.

Lysa TerKeurst:
Like, what’s the game plan to distract Lisa from being the woman she wants to be? You don’t need to worry about recruiting her to do bad things. Just keep poking at her unresolved hurt, and soon she’ll feel justified in doing and saying all kinds of things she wouldn’t normally do or say. Fill her social media feed that she looks at with images that make her feel intense feelings of how unfair her situation is. Feed her skepticism by surrounding her with others who don’t trust organizations like the one who hurt her. Make her too distracted to open up God’s Word so she’ll keep feeding on the lie that her bitterness protects her, and that feelings of animosity aren’t that big of a deal. Keep her blinded to the way she now walks around, feeling on edge as she gets more and more short fused, impatient and and untolerable with the daily mistakes of others. Give her a feeling of superiority that those issues are always someone else’s fault, you see. Unresolved hurt inside of us will always be multiplied outside of us if we don’t deal with it. So how do we deal with church hurt? I think we have to start with ourselves first because we can’t control the choices of another person. But one thing we don’t want to do is allow the hurt that’s happened to us, to change us in such a way that then we start unleashing that hurt on other people. And we can’t control them, but we absolutely can control us. And I think that’s where it has to start.

Ed Stetzer:
So good. And I hate that you’re so much better a writer than I am. But that’s another story for another day. Um, so the also, too, it’s worth mentioning in this conversation that we recognize that some of these hurt situations can can be bigger than a broken trust situation. Abuse is a category of its own and its category of evil. Um, and and again, you know, this this conversation even here, is not meant to replace. There might be a time to to address something that’s abusive with the authorities or more, but also to something that might be something to require a therapist and more, which you do mention yourself in the book that that’s that’s part of it. In our conversation here, you mentioned that. So all that being said, we’re still talking. We all can recognize that there are levels of this that are extreme and require a different response than the kind of response we’re talking about here. But, but, but I still think it’s important to talk about the kind of stuff we’re talking about here, because this is this is like every day. And again, I was excited to have you on.

Ed Stetzer:
I mean, because, you know, you’re you’re the lane you write in is, is probably different than the normal conversation you had, you know, pastor leader types that we have here. But I think the topic here is so important because even in the time we’re living, I mean, everything’s so divided. So many people have left churches mad and pastors feel betrayed and people feel betrayed and people feel betrayed by their pastor for not dealing with this or dealing with that. I mean, this, this the trust issues are just off the chart. And statistically we could look at those trust issues. I mean, again, it’s just off the charts. So in a distrusting time, I love the fact that you’re helping us think well through issues of trust. But in a time when we’re just skeptical and suspicious, do I need to, as a pastor or church leader, lead differently? In other words, you know, people were more more. Maybe we had trusted each other differently in the 90s. Do I lead differently because of the time, or is it just discernment needs to apply in all times, and if so, how would I do that?

Lysa TerKeurst:
Well, I think the Holy Spirit has given us such a gift when he allows us to see the fruits of the spirit of other people. So that should walk hand in hand with our discernment. You know, when we look at other people, the fruit that they demonstrate from their life love, joy, peace, patience, kindness that’s going to tell us so much more than their words ever will. But but let’s flip it on us. Because sometimes, you know, we’re hesitant to demonstrate love, peace, patience, joy with other people, especially if we have a history of other people burning us or hurting us. And so the temptation I see a lot is church leaders want to put a pretty big buffer between themselves as a teacher and a preacher, and then interacting with the people that are, you know, sitting in our congregation or following along and that we’re their leader. Um, I’m going to give just a quick little tidbit that has helped me so much because I relate to both sides of this. I am a leader, I have a staff of 70 people, and then a lot of people, you know, follow me online and read my books and people are down on what they’re not up on. And so people will fill in the gaps of narratives about me that aren’t true.

Lysa TerKeurst:
And it’s extremely hurtful. And my natural tendency is to want to isolate away rather than to press in. So a friend told me recently this statement and it has really helped me a lot. I need to make sure that my the first thoughts like I may not be able to control the first thoughts, or maybe even my first words as I process a situation or a relationship. But I should be very, very intentional about my second thought and my second word. And we don’t want our first words full of shock and bitterness to become our last words filled with hate and resentment. And so, you know, when we’re a leader and we get hurt, of course you’re going to have hard feelings. Don’t shame yourself for that. Like, that’s super natural because you’re human. But it’s that second thought. It’s that second word. It’s that second moment where we’re developing a narrative about people, or that person or that organization. That’s where we really need to to take a step back and ask for help if we need help, and then certainly getting into God’s Word. You know, I’ve found sometimes when I want to get into God’s Word the least is when I actually need to get into it the most.

Daniel Yang:
We’ve been talking to Lysa Terkeurst. Be sure to check out her latest book. I want to trust you, but I don’t. And you can learn more about Lisa at Lysa terkeurst.com. Thanks again for listening to the Stats of Church Leaders podcast. You can find more interviews, as well as other great content from ministry leaders at Church leaders.com/podcast. And again, if you found our conversation today helpful, I’d love for you to take a few moments. Leave us a review that will help other ministry leaders find us and benefit from our content. Thanks for listening. We’ll see you on the next episode.

Voice Over:
You’ve been listening to the Stetzer Church Leaders podcast for more great interviews as well as articles, videos, and free resources, visit our website at Church leaders.com. Thanks for listening.

Sonix is the world’s most advanced automated transcription, translation, and subtitling platform. Fast, accurate, and affordable.

Automatically convert your mp3 files to text (txt file), Microsoft Word (docx file), and SubRip Subtitle (srt file) in minutes.

Sonix has many features that you’d love including automated translation, world-class support, generate automated summaries powered by AI, share transcripts, and easily transcribe your Zoom meetings. Try Sonix for free today.

Key Questions for Lysa TerKeurst 

-How do you define trust and why have you struggled with the words “trust issues” in the past?

-What are some misconceptions Christians tend to have about trust and forgiveness?

-Could you talk about the difference between being triggered by a past experience and having discernment that something is truly wrong?

-How can church leaders lead with sensitivity toward people who have experienced church hurt but without being overly paranoid?

Key Quotes From Lysa TerKeurst 

“We live in a world where sometimes truth is whatever protects us…of course, as Christians, we want truth to be in alignment with the actual facts and even more so in alignment with God’s Word.”

“We want people to be honest…But there’s a gap between what we want and sometimes, a lot of times, what we actually experience.”

“We all have trust issues. Let’s just level the playing field, you know, and just say, this is something that’s common to us all and not weaponize that phraseology as if there’s something wrong with this.”

“In order to have trust in a relationship, you have to have safety and connection. So trust is really the oxygen of all human relationships.”

“What can happen sometimes is when we’ve had our trust broken, some of us start to prioritize connection so much…and we diminish our own need for safety…Other people prioritize safety so high that they diminish connection.”

“I want to say to any pastor or ministry leader out there, I get it. And of course, you’re struggling with trust, of course.”

“We can’t control what other people do, but what we do have to work on is the narrative that we’re telling ourselves. And that’s where the real work can happen.”

“We have to understand that as we step into leadership, we’re kind of signing up for this. So the stability can’t be in making sure to always attract the perfect congregation or always attract the perfect employees. The real goal here has to be to create an inner stability, recognizing our trust is gonna get broken, but it shouldn’t break us in the process.”

“There is this pressure on Christians, and maybe even especially Christian leaders, to always believe the best about other people. It’s almost like, okay, if you love God, then you have to trust unconditionally. And I make a case in the book that not only is that not smart to do, but it’s not biblical either.”

“We’re not to use foolish trust, we’re to use wise trust. And trust is built time plus believable behavior.”

Evangelicals for Harris’ Anti-Trump Billy Graham Ad Prompts Threat of Lawsuit

Evangelicals for Harris
Evangelist Billy Graham in 1994, left, and former President Donald Trump in 2023. (AP Photos)

(RNS) — The ad begins with a clip of renowned evangelist the Rev. Billy Graham, wearing glasses, a gray suit and tie, leaning in toward a pulpit.

“But you must realize that in the last days, the times will be full of danger,” Graham declares. “Men will become utterly self-centered and greedy for money.”

Suddenly, a clip of former President Donald Trump is spliced in. Standing before a row of American flags at a campaign rally in Des Moines, Iowa, Trump says: “My whole life I’ve been greedy, greedy, greedy. I’ve grabbed all the money I could get. I’m so greedy.”

RELATED: Franklin Graham Blasts Evangelicals for Harris for Using Billy Graham in Attack Ad Against Donald Trump

For the next few seconds, the ad, which has racked up over 30 million views, flips between Graham’s 1988 sermon, contrasting his points with shots of Trump using violent language, claiming to be “the chosen one” and talking about kissing women without their consent.

That ad, the result of a $1 million ad campaign by Evangelicals for Harris, is now the subject of a potential lawsuit from the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, a Charlotte, North Carolina-based nonprofit that supports the ministries of Billy Graham’s son and grandson. In late September and early October, Evangelicals for Harris, a grassroots campaign of the political action committee Evangelicals for America, said it received multiple letters from lawyers representing the association, including a “cease and desist” letter. An Oct. 2 letter, sent from outside counsel and obtained by RNS, threatened to sue Evangelicals for Harris on the basis of copyright infringement.

In this May 1, 2019, file photo, then-President Donald Trump greets Franklin Graham, left, son of Billy Graham, during a National Day of Prayer dinner gathering in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta, File)

In a statement to RNS, the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association said they do not generally comment on potential disputes, but they acknowledged having communicated with Evangelicals for Harris regarding their concerns about the “unauthorized, political use of BGEA’s copyrighted video,” and said they would continue to address the matter.

RELATED: SBC Pastor and Billy Graham’s Granddaughter Pledge Support for Kamala Harris During Evangelicals for Harris Call

“It may be worth noting that, in all of his years of ministry and across relationships with 11 U.S. presidents, Billy Graham sought only to encourage them and to offer them the counsel of Christ, as revealed through God’s Word. He never criticized presidents publicly and would undoubtedly refuse to let his sermons be used to do so, regardless of who is involved,” said the statement.

In August, the association’s president and CEO, Franklin Graham, turned to the social platform X to voice his displeasure at Evangelicals for Harris’ use of his father’s sermons.

“The liberals are using anything and everything they can to promote candidate Harris. They even developed a political ad trying to use my father @BillyGraham’s image. They are trying to mislead people,” he wrote. “Maybe they don’t know that my father appreciated the conservative values and policies of President @realDonaldTrump in 2016, and if he were alive today, my father’s views and opinions would not have changed.”

In response to the threatened lawsuit, Evangelicals for Harris released a statement saying Franklin Graham is taking a page from Trump’s playbook by trying to silence the group through legal action.

“Franklin is scared of our ads because we do not tell people what to do or think. We merely hold Trump’s own words up to the light of Scripture, the necessity of repentance, and Biblical warnings against leaders exactly like Trump,” they wrote in a post on X.

Those Who Cause War ‘Will Be Subject to the Inflexible Judgment of God,’ Pope Says

Pope Francis
Pope Francis attends a prayer for peace at Rome's St. Mary Major Basilica, Sunday, Oct. 6, 2024. (AP Photo/Andrew Medichini)

VATICAN CITY (RNS) — As the conflict between Israel and Hamas escalates, causing death and havoc in the Middle East, Pope Francis invited Catholics and non-believers to join him in a day of fasting and prayer on Monday (Oct. 7).

The prayerful event took place on the one-year anniversary of the violent attack by Hamas terrorist forces against Israel, which resulted in 1,500 deaths and the kidnapping of numerous civilians. The aggression led Israel to begin a forceful counteroffensive to weed out the terrorist group, which caused the death of over 41,000 Palestinians, many of whom were children, according to the Gaza Health Ministry. Israeli attacks targeted countries that offered support or refuge for Hamas members, including Iran and Lebanon.

“A year ago, the fuse of hatred was lit; it did not sputter, but exploded in a spiral of violence,” Pope Francis wrote in a letter addressed to Catholics living in the Middle East. “Anger is growing, along with the desire for revenge, while it seems that few people care about what is most needed and what is most desired: dialogue and peace,” the pope wrote.

RELATED: Pope’s Unscripted Remark About ‘All Religions’ Sparks Debate

Francis has repeatedly called for peace amid global conflicts and for a cease-fire in Gaza. Last November, he met with a delegation of Palestinians recounting their experiences of war and with the families of the Israeli hostages taken by Hamas. The pope also received the fathers of a Palestinian and an Israeli who both died because of the conflict and were campaigning for peace at the Vatican in March.

Pope Francis invited Catholics living in the Middle East to be “sprouts of hope” and underlined once again that “war is a defeat,” in his letter. He also voiced his closeness to not just Catholics, but also all men and women of any religious belief who “are suffering the insanity of war.”

“I am with you, the people of Gaza, long embattled and in dire straits. You are in my thoughts and prayers daily,” the pope wrote. In the letter he also expressed his closeness to those forced to flee their homes, those who lost their loved ones and every day fear rockets falling from the sky.

“I am with you, who have no voice, for despite all the talk of plans and strategies, there is little concern for those who suffer the devastation of war, which the powerful impose on others; yet they will be subject to the inflexible judgment of God,” Pope Francis said.

The Catholic Church is currently focused on a monthlong summit of bishops and Catholic representatives who are gathering at the Vatican to discuss how to make the institution more open, welcoming and inclusive to all its members. Last year, summit participants who were convening for a first gathering at the Vatican participated in a day of prayer as the war started in Israel. Today, as the conflict risks reaching new and devastating heights, Pope Francis invited participants at the summit to pray and fast for peace.

To inaugurate the day, Pope Francis held a recitation of the rosary in the Basilica of St. Mary Major in Rome on Sunday (Oct. 6). The pope asked Mary to “convert the hearts of those who fuel hatred, silence the roar of weapons that sow seeds of death, extinguish the violence that lurks in human hearts and inspire projects of peace in the actions of those who govern nations.”

With Our Help, Kids Impacted by Incarceration Can Flourish

incarceration
Adobestock #454102964

As I was leaving a back-to-school event recently, I spotted a mom snapping some pictures of her kids holding their new backpacks and school supplies. 

The kids had huge smiles on their faces. It filled my heart to see them so happy, but the moment was bittersweet. The children at the event all had an incarcerated parent. Smiles can be a little harder to come by for these mothers and children. 

This moment wasn’t really about the backpacks at all. The backpacks showed them that someone cared. I could see their mom felt that, too. That’s why we partner with churches to hold Angel Tree events like this one, for kids all over the country who need this support the most.

Many kids who have a parent impacted by incarceration come from a history of multiple, often significant, adverse childhood experiences—called ACEs for short. Research on resilience suggests that ACEs don’t inevitably lead to childhood trauma. 

But preventing this adversity from becoming trauma with lifelong consequences requires consistent, loving, intentional support from individuals and communities. We can make the difference for these vulnerable children. And because we can, we must.

We can counteract even bitter, lasting hardship with hope. 

Child welfare insiders call experiences of hope, care, trust, stability, and community “positive childhood experiences,” or PCEs. Recent research shows that rates of depression decline as exposure to PCEs increases. What’s more, children with higher numbers of adverse experiences respond most favorably to positive ones.

Far too often, children and families with an incarcerated parent or loved one lose their community. They feel alone and isolated. They have no one to connect with because of the shame associated with their lived experience. They often suffer in silence when they need connection the most. 

It is essential that vulnerable kids know that someone cares, that someone—or a group of people, such as a church—will be there as a stable presence in their lives. And that sense of stability and community becomes particularly important for these kids during the back-to-school season when their schedules and environments shift.   

As the body of Christ, we can welcome these relationships and say, “I see you.” We can say, “You can trust me,” and mean it. We can invite the hurting in. We can meet their needs.

But we can do more than just reactively meet needs. We can go out into our communities and find those in need wherever they are, to meet them and embrace them.

The Danger of Church Shopping

Church Shopping
Adobe Stock #298065443

Chapter 13 of Charles Taylor’s A Secular Age is an epic narrative of the rapid expansion of expressive individualism in Western culture in the postwar era. Aptly titled “The Age of Authenticity,” the chapter provides a devastating survey of the havoc wrought by “this new social imaginary of expressive individualism,” on culture at large but particularly on religion. It shows up in Christianity, in part, by church shopping.

The Danger of Church Shopping

Church Shopping in the AGE OF AUTHENTICITY & INDIVIDUALISM

Taylor describes how we came to this Age of Authenticity, where faith and spirituality are mostly understood within the “expressivist dispensation” of consumerism. Faith and spirituality are no longer seen as necessarily bound up within larger frameworks or associations like churches, particularly because such things impose external authority, which is incomprehensible in our individualistic Age of Authenticity. In this era, to be spiritual is simply to “accept what rings true to your own inner Self.”

Taylor describes how we went from a “paleo-Durkheimian dispensation,” where it was assumed that one’s connection to the sacred entailed belonging to a church, to a more consumer-friendly “neo-Durkheimian dispensation,” where one can “enter the denomination of my choice,” not by societal obligation but simply because it “seems right.” But then that gave way to a non- or post-Durkheimian disposition, where expressive individualism leads us to talk about church in the consumerist language of choice, preference and comfort. Though he doesn’t talk specifically about the “church shopping” phenomenon of modern Western Christianity, Taylor more or less describes it when he says:

The religious life or practice that I become part of must not only be my choice, but it must speak to me, it must make sense in terms of my spiritual development as I understand this. This takes us farther. The choice of denomination was understood to take place within a fixed cadre, say that of the apostles’ creed, the faith of the broader “church.” Within this framework of belief, I choose the church in which I feel most comfortable. But if the focus is going now to be on my spiritual path, thus on what insights come to me in the subtler languages that I find meaningful, then maintaining this or any other framework becomes increasingly difficult.

Taylor’s observations suggest that by perpetuating the “seeker/consumer” paradigms of expressive individualism, today’s churches are setting the stage for their own spiritual demise. By shifting the focus away from the fixed point of Jesus and to the fickle, frequently diverging “paths” of individual churchgoers, churches lose their bearings and become inherently unstable. When a church becomes less about the demands of Scripture on our lives and more about our demands on the church to fit our preferences (e.g., favored music style, ideal sermon length, etc.), it loses its power to transform us and subvert our idols. It merely becomes a commodity to be shopped for, consumed and then abandoned when another shinier, trendier, more “relevant” church option presents itself.

Church Shopping: BELONG BEFORE BELIEVE?

Similarly, the “meet individual people where they’re at” approach to church is unsustainable because of the simple fact that people are all over the map. For a church to meet and affirm every congregant in their totally unique, individuated spirituality is to fragment in a hundred different directions, losing any sense of a beautiful, transcendent core that makes church matter in the first place. A better approach for churches is to call the congregation in its diversity to meet Christ where he is at, even if it means asking people to redirect or abandon their various self-defined spiritual paths. The lordship of Christ, not the lordship of consumers, should always be central.

Think about a sport that’s declining in popularity. Maybe it’s a sport that, in a certain culture, used to be ingrained: everyone grew up knowing, playing and watching it together. It’s just what you did. But now, it’s no longer a given that most people enjoy the sport or even know how it’s played. For those who love the sport and want to see it endure, some amount of adaptation to the changing culture may be in order. But if the sport adapts itself too much according to what people want the game to be, soon enough it loses entirely its original beauty. By reworking the rules to fit the disparate desires of would-be-players, the game loses its very soul. Its DNA is changed, and soon enough any remaining elegance is lost in a mishmash of discombobulated ideas.

This is what happens to churches whose weakened position in a secular age leads them to seek survival by assuming they must adjust to the restless whims and new spiritual paths of the “marketplace.” It’s an unsustainable approach for churches, because it’s also a self-defeating path for churchgoers.

HOW TO THINK ABOUT CHURCH

When churchgoing becomes mostly about finding the church that best supports my own subjective “spiritual path,” it will eventually become an impossible task, more frustrating and draining than it’s worth. Why? Because no church will ever be perfectly tailored to my preferences and the “subtler languages” that I find meaningful. That’s the weakness of church shopping. There will always be something that makes me bristle, something that leaves me feeling unseen, unheard, uncomfortable. And so we keep church shopping for that “perfect fit” church, or (more likely) we give up the futile search entirely.

This is one of the reasons I wrote my new book Uncomfortable: The Awkward and Essential Challenge of Christian CommunityIt’s crucial that we challenge ourselves, and our congregations, to break out of this post-Durkheimian, expressive individualist approach to faith. This is a path to spiritual death. Spiritual vitality comes by understanding the necessity of being embedded within larger structures, namely a church that provides support and accountability and draws us away from the dead-end prison of “look within” spirituality and a kind of accountability that’s accountable only to our own sense of “authenticity.”

 

This article on church shopping was originally published at 9marks.org and has been reprinted by permission.

5 Tips That Will Definitely Make You a Better Communicator

better communicator
Adobe Stock #455904063

So you want to be a better communicator. You’re just not sure how to do that. Sometimes the art and science of becoming better seems so complex, you’re not sure where to start.

After all, most people who hear you talk can’t give you meaningful feedback. They can tell you whether they liked it or not, but rarely can they tell you why they liked it. Even if you did a great job, you will have a hard time repeating it if you don’t understand what made it great.

That’s why it’s so critical to get feedback and coaching from other communicators. They can often explain why your talk worked or why it didn’t, just like a hitting coach in major league baseball can help a .300 hitter become a .310 hitter by offering far more helpful tips than a simple “Hey, just strike out less.”

5 Tips That Will Definitely Make You a Better Communicator

So, let’s get better together.

Here are five simple tips that can definitely make you a better communicator before you give your next talk. They’ve definitely helped me.

1. Don’t memorize your talk, understand it

This may be my favorite speaking tip of all time. It just solves so many problems and reduces tension before you speak and while you speak.

I get asked all the time how I can speak for 45 minutes or even longer without looking at notes. I learned the secret when I was in seminary and asked Tom Long, a Princeton professor, how he did it.

He told me: Don’t memorize your talk; understand it.

He was right. Memorizing a talk is extremely difficult. Especially a longer talk. I personally find that trying to recall a memorized talk stilts your delivery because you can’t focus on the moment.

So instead of memorizing your talk, understand your talk.

Think about it. You do this intuitively when you talk to someone. For example, you don’t memorize inviting someone to dinner. (OK, maybe you memorized a dinner invite once, when you were asking that girl you had a crush on out on a first date…and remember how awkward that was? Point made…)

No, if you’re inviting a friend to dinner, you just intuitively know that you need to see if they’re free, set up the details, and maybe figure out where and when and who’s bringing what. Your conversation follows that flow.

Your talk is no different. It’s an introduction, a body, a conclusion and some transition points along the way. If you can grasp those main points, it’s amazingly easy to see how you will naturally fill the space in between with what you prepared.

You need to be familiar with your talk and you need to understand it, but you’ll never need to memorize it.

I wrote more on how to deliver a talk without using notes here.

Let Children Lead Worship!

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

Every once in a while, a child hits us with a profound thought that comes out of their innocent point of view. It causes us to rethink our preconceived notions, brings us back to reality, or merely simplifies our outlook. Then, we lovingly and a bit sarcastically quote, “And a little child shall lead them.” It’s true that kids can point out the obvious and teach us a thing or two, but what if we intentionally taught them to lead? What if we encouraged them to lead? And, are you ready for this? What if we let children lead worship?

Let Children Lead Worship!

Small and medium-size churches, sit up and take notice of what I’m going to say here, because you’ve got an advantage over megachurches. Because of the intimacy and the small community atmosphere of your congregation, you have an incredible opportunity to make something wonderful happen, not just with the children in your care, but also with the entire church. You’re at the advantage because of your size! As part of your program, children can learn about leading worship, and I’m not talking about leading other children. Children, when given direction and supervision, can be a remarkable addition to the leadership of the corporate worship service. In megachurches, there are so many talented and capable adults who can lead, but it’s not always the case at the more common size local congregation with its three-digit attendance. It’s a perfect environment to introduce children to what it means to lead in worship and to have instilled in them that they truly are important to this particular body of believers.

Here’s why you should let children lead worship:

The benefits to the congregation are numerous! When children are included in worship leadership, they bring with them a certain enthusiasm and lightheartedness, and that’s something everybody needs to be reminded of. After all, the scriptures tell us, “The joy of the Lord is my strength.” Children bring a smile, either to our faces or to our hearts, but really what they bring is strength. One of the most difficult things for anyone to do when they come into worship is to check their worries of everyday life at the door and give God their undivided attention. Children have a blessed way of breaking down barriers, refocusing our attention, and moving us physically into a more relaxed state. With that accomplished, everyone is definitely more ready to worship. I heard a lady say one day, “When I walk in the door on Sunday and see that the children will be singing, I know it’s going to be a good morning. They always set the tone for praising.” They change an atmosphere of quiet and tradition and stoic faces to one of celebration and praise!

Anxiety in Children: Helping Kids Cope With Worries

anxiety in children
Adobe Stock #554278200

Anxiety in children is on the rise. Read on for information about what anxiety is and how to help kids through anxious moments. Also learn what our Father God wants us to remember during anxious times. 

Anxiety in Children: A Personal Problem

I remember the exasperated look on her face. This parent of a 6-year-old was baffled by her child’s unwillingness to board the school bus. She didn’t want to attend Sunday school or venture away from the safety and comfort of home much at all.

This once-ambitious toddler had become an anxious grade-schooler who just wouldn’t budge. And no one knew why.

As her children’s pastor, I was puzzled too. My kind smile and small talk didn’t soothe her. Pairing her with a peer buddy didn’t help. Saying we’d miss her or promising to do her favorite things didn’t change her mind. She was not leaving mom and dad. Time passed and, much to her parents’ relief, she seemed to “grow out of it.” I was thrilled to see her sing solos, read Scripture, and love Bible adventures again.

Years later, I personally experienced debilitating anxiety—the kind that made me physically brace myself for undefined harm that could come my way. Anxiety told me that doing things I once loved would hurt me. It made me flee mundane situations that just felt like too much. Once again, anxiety baffled me.

As I worked through this new, unwelcome condition with a therapist, I recalled my young friend and her family from years past. I now have a new level of empathy, compassion, and patience for the children and families in my life who live with it, too.

Anxiety is no longer an issue—it’s personal. It’s not a problem to fix for kids. Anxiety is a valid, though unwanted, condition to acknowledge and work through. Perhaps you regularly work through it, too.

Anxiety in Children Is on the Rise

You may have heard that anxiety in children is increasing. It’s true. According to an article on American Family Physician’s website, “anxiety disorders are the most common psychiatric conditions in children and adolescents, affecting nearly 1 in 12 children and 1 in 4 adolescents.”

It’s tempting to become anxious and worried about the anxiety epidemic, isn’t it? But as people who love and care for children today, let’s take a deep breath (really!). Know that anxiety in children is also more treatable than ever. (This article from the American Psychological Association recognizes both the issue and the improvements in care that offer hope and help to families and individuals who now struggle with anxiety.)

Although anxiety impacts 21st-century life in new ways, it doesn’t change God’s steadfast love and care for his children—including you and me.

Overcoming Anxiety

The first step to overcoming anxiety is understanding it. For me, that came through personal experience and through helpful conversations with licensed therapists, like my friend Mandy.

Mandy Milner is a licensed professional counselor. She’s also a friend of God, a wife, a mom, and one of my closest friends. I wanted to understand anxiety in children better. So I asked her to explain 1) what anxiety is, 2) how parents and caregivers can help children work through anxiety, and 3) what our loving Father God might want to remind those of us who face anxiety with children we love. Here’s what she said:

What is anxiety?

Milner explains:

Anxiety happens when our brains detect danger and move us into survival mode but we’re not actually in a dangerous situation.

Our brain’s ability to detect danger and cue our body to move into fight, flight, or freeze is good and normal and God-given. It’s great that we have a system that kicks into place when we’re in danger and helps us get to safety as quickly as possible!

‘Jesus, Save Me’—7-Year-Old Boy Cried Out to God in Final Moments as He, Grandparents Were Swept Away in Asheville Flood

hurricane helene
Counterclockwise from top left: Micah Drye, Nora and Michael Drye, and Nora Drye on the roof of the house prior to its collapse. Images courtesy of Jessica Drye Turner

One family navigating unbearable loss because of Hurricane Helene is also glorifying God in the midst of their sorrow. North Carolina resident Megan Drye lost her 7-year-old son, Micah, and her parents, Michael and Nora, to the flood waters that devastated Asheville and other North Carolina communities. 

All four family members had taken refuge on the roof of their house before the flood caused the house to collapse. Drye said her son called on Jesus in his final moments and that, later, she heard God’s voice guiding her to safety.

“I’m so proud of my son because in his last moments, he wasn’t screaming for me. He was screaming, ‘Jesus, Jesus save me. Jesus I hear you. Jesus, I’m calling upon you,” Drye told the anchors on FOX Weather four days after the tragedy occurred. Drye’s sister, Heather Kephart, joined her for the interview.

Micah’s “goal in life” was to be a superhero—he had wanted to be Deadpool for Halloween. “Instead, he’s my hero because he reached for something past flesh…past anything that even grown adults I think would reach for,” said Drye, who was wearing one of her son’s shirts. “My son called out to the one God Almighty, and I think at that moment he was rescued. He became my hero.”

Asheville Flooding Sweeps Away Family Taking Refuge on Roof

Hurricane Helene made landfall in the Florida gulf as a Category 4 hurricane on the evening of Thursday, Sept. 26, wreaking havoc across the Southeast, particularly in Florida, South Carolina, Georgia, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia. Helene surprised and devastated inland communities unused to dealing with hurricanes. 

RELATED: The Devastation From Hurricane Helene Is ‘Overwhelming’ but So Is the Neighborly Love

In a statement to ChurchLeaders, Drye’s sister, Jessica Drye Turner, said of her parents and nephew, “We just keep thanking God that their deaths are bringing so many to Christ. It’s all worth it if even one is brought to Christ. We know they do not remember their fear, suffering and tears. Prayers have certainly sustained us. “

As the catastrophe unfolded, Turner posted a series of updates on her Facebook page, describing what had happened to the family. Michael and Nora Drye, who were in their 70s, Megan Drye, and Megan’s son, Micah, had taken refuge on the roof of their house in Asheville with only “the clothes on their back and one working phone.”

“They are watching 18 wheelers and cars floating by. In addition, part of the house they’re sitting on is in front of them,” said Turner. “They’ve called 911 but they aren’t the only ones needing rescue. This is definitely a moment when faith is all you have.”

Turner’s post includes two photos showing what the flood waters looked like from the roof of the house. Drye told FOX Weather the roof was “their only hope” because “everything else was covered in water.” When she took the photos, she thought the four of them were safe. They still had cell phone service at that point. “I thought we were ok still…until the house broke apart and until everything started to collapse,” she said.

‘I’m the Bible That People Read’: Iowa’s Owen Freeman, 19, Lives His Faith on and off the Basketball Court

owen freeman
Owen Freeman. Screengrab from YouTube / @TheHawkeyeBeacon

Ahead of his sophomore season at Iowa, 6-foot-10-inch forward Owen Freeman continues to stand tall for Christ. Yesterday (Oct. 7) at the Hawkeyes’ media day, last year’s co-Big Ten freshman of the year spoke candidly about his faith and its influence on and off the basketball court.

When asked why he doesn’t cuss, Freeman said, “I credit a lot of that to my faith. That’s a huge part of who I am.” The hoopster said he’s “a child of God, so I try to represent him as much as I can. I try to let him shine through me.”

Freeman, 19, said he might say, “Dang it!” or throw his hands up in the air when he gets frustrated. The reason he watches his words? “I feel like I’m the Bible that people read,” he said. “Not everyone’s going to open up the Bible, so I’ve got to shine God’s light.”

Iowa’s Owen Freeman: Jesus Is My Cornerstone

Owen Freeman has been talking about Jesus since high school, when he transferred to a new school for his senior year. The Illinois native quickly impressed teammates and coaches with his character and commitment to faith.

RELATED: UConn Basketball Star Paige Bueckers: ‘I’m a Living Testimony’ of God’s Power

“He’s just fully locked in on it, and it’s truly an awesome thing to see,” said Brock Harding, a teammate from both high school and college. “He’s always going to talk to you about God, and it’s just something that’s great to have on your side.”

In a Fellowship of Christian Athletes video from January 2023, high school coach Sean Taylor said Freeman is special because he lives his faith “day to day”—and not just while playing ball. “That’s him, that’s his family,” Taylor said. “He’s not afraid to show it…He lives it, and I think that’s why people respect him so much.”

As a senior in high school, Freeman was already determined to “use my platform as a way to spread the love God has for us, the mission he has for us.” Being in the public eye through sports is “an amazing opportunity,” he said in 2023. “Some unbelievers aren’t going to read the Bible, they’re going to read us.”

“So when we set that example of godly characteristics,” he continued, “they’re going to [notice] ‘Hey, he’s different. Let me go see what all that’s about,’ and that’s our way of being able to witness to people.”

Freeman’s faith was a huge help when he transferred high schools. “There’s been times where I might have felt lonely at first, but I’ve leaned on Jesus,” he said. “He’s that friend that you have when no one else is there…That’s really my stronghold, my cornerstone that I build upon.”

Owen Freeman: ‘I Lean On My Faith’

Last season at Iowa, Freeman was named Big Ten freshman of the week nine times. He averaged 10.6 points and 6.6 rebounds per game.

To prepare for his sophomore year, Freeman gained 15 pounds over the summer. Being bigger “helps me not get into foul trouble,” he said, “so I can hold my own on the block.”

Russell Brand Continues To Baptize People Following Heavy Criticism for Doing So in His Underwear

Russell Brand
Screengrab via Instagram / @russellbrand

Celebrity and professing Christian Russell Brand has posted another photo of himself baptizing someone. This time he traded his “tighty-whities” for swimwear.

Brand, who started posting about his faith journey late last year—sharing he was reading the Bible and C.S. Lewis and that he needed a personal relationship with God—was sternly criticized for baptizing someone while wearing only underwear less than two weeks ago.

“You know you can wear clothes to baptize people,” one person wrote. Another said, “Am I the only one wondering why the guy getting baptized is in surf gear and the two baptizing them are in their literal underwear???? This is quite odd.”

RELATED: ‘Are These Tighty-Whities Satanic?!?’—Russell Brand Defends Decision To Perform Baptism in His Underwear, Citing Philippians

However, some came to Brand’s defense, including Bobbie Houston, wife of former Hillsong Church global senior pastor, Brian Houston. “The comments are hilarious. Pretty sure we’re all gonna die laughing in heaven about all our lives down here! Jesus: ‘Dude, remember that time…’” Bobbie commented. “I personally love the innocence here.”

The criticism prompted Brand to address his baptismal attire on social media. He asked his followers if his “tighty-whities [were] satanic?”

“I suppose lookin’ at it now it does look a bit immodest, me doin’ a baptism in underpants like that,” Brand said. “But the truth is, I took off my clothes and my underpants is all I’m wearing underneath my clothes. That’s what I’m wearing right now.”

“It wasn’t a planned photo shoot,” he added. “Some of my mates took photos for their friend, actually. Evan was getting baptized.”

RELATED: Russell Brand Walks Readers Through ‘Mere Christianity,’ Will Tour With Tucker Carlson

Houston and others encouraged Brand to ignore the critics and continue growing in his faith. “Ignore them,” Houston said. “We think your new found faith and enthusiasm is delightful. You’re full of Jesus…hungry, curious, asking questions, reading ya Bible and quoting it…and that’s the most important thing.”

Pastor Released on Bond While Awaiting Trial for Murder of Man Pastor Believed Was in an Affair With His Wife

Matthew Dedmon
Photo courtesy of Christian County Jail

A former pastor has been released on a $30,000 bond as he continues to await trial for murder. Matthew Dedmon, who was pastor of Heritage Baptist Church in Rogersville, Missouri, is accused of killing Joe Newburn, a man Dedmon believed was having an affair with Dedmon’s wife.

The incident occurred on May 28, 2022. Investigators said Dedmon confronted his wife and Newburn after he discovered them having lunch at a restaurant in Ozark, Missouri. Dedmon allegedly accused his wife and Newburn of having an affair before shooting Newburn in the chest three times with a pistol. 

Investigators said that Dedmon then placed the pistol back in his vehicle. Police recovered it when they arrived on the scene. 

Newburn was taken to a local hospital, where he succumbed to his injuries. 

RELATED: Missouri Pastor Charged With Murder of Man He Believes Was in an Extramarital Affair With His Wife

Dedmon was originally arrested at the scene in May 2022. According to its website, Heritage Baptist Church, which is a KJV-only Independent Baptist congregation, installed David Dossett as its new pastor in September 2022. 

For more than two years, Dedmon has been held in jail without bond on charges of first degree murder and armed criminal action. Disputes between the defense and prosecution over discovery account for the delay in going to trial. 

According to Law&Crime, Judge Laura Johnson originally denied Dedmon bond because she believed Dedmon potentially presented a “grave danger” to the community.

“The evidence is that Defendant possessed a loaded gun on the square in Ozark outside a busy restaurant, and that gun was discharged three to four times, resulting in the victim’s death,” Johnson wrote in the decision. “This put everyone on the square in grave danger.” 

RELATED: Christian Ethics Professor Arrested for Alleged Possession of Child Sex Abuse Material

“There was evidence that this conduct was out of character for Defendant, which causes concern about Defendant’s decision-making and judgment,” Johnson added.

855,266FansLike

New Articles

New Podcasts

Joby Martin

Joby Martin: What Happens When Pastors Finally Understand Grace

Joby Martin joins “The Stetzer ChurchLeaders Podcast” to discuss what happens when a church leader has truly been run over by the “grace train" and understands the profound love and grace of God.