Home Blog Page 197

The Blessing of Constraints

constraints
Adobestock #243530350

In the spring of 2019, I shared with the shepherding elders of our church that we were going to be launching one new congregation a year for the next five years. Our directional elders were already on board, we had resources set aside for the first launch, and we were in the process of building the staff for the first new congregation.

In January 2020, the lease we were about to sign for the first of the new congregations fell through. We started looking for a new location and then…Well, you know what happened in March 2020. At this point, it seemed like the plan to launch new congregations would be on hold for…Well, you know there were a lot of opinions about how long.

Early in the pandemic, a friend recommended the book “A Beautiful Constraint” to me—a book for marketplace leaders that encourages them not to think like a victim when an unforeseen constraint happens, and not even to think like a neutralizer who simply works around the constraint, but to think like a transformer and view the constraint as a gift. The book helped me ask the question: “How can the pandemic actually help us launch new congregations?”

Also, early in the pandemic I offered a systematic theology course via Zoom to people in our church. One of the sessions was about God’s attributes. We talked about the amazing reality that God exists outside of time, that he sees this moment with equal clarity and vividness as he sees all moments. I was challenged by my own teaching. God fully knew the pandemic was happening when he led us to plan to launch new congregations.

So, in July 2020, we launched six “Mariners in the Neighborhood” locations throughout Orange County. We chose cities where we believed we would one day launch a new congregation. At first each gathering was 50-60 people in a parking lot watching our online worship services together. Then a worship leader with an acoustic guitar was added, then a kids ministry, then Bible study groups, then a youth ministry gathering.

A year later, four of the six had become new Mariners Church congregations and we folded the other two into other congregations. Today, all four of those congregations launched during the pandemic are healthy (not perfect) and growing. New leaders have been developed. People have met Jesus. Cities have been served in his name.

Because God exists outside of time, constraints can be beautiful.

I hope I will remember God’s faithfulness to us in that season the next time there is an unforeseen constraint placed on the ministry. Which there certainly will be. There will be new challenges always, but we can believe that God gives leaders direction with full knowledge and understanding of the looming challenges.

The constraint can actually be beautiful and helpful and not a reason to abandon what God has called leaders to do.

This article originally appeared here and is used by permission. 

Church Staffer, Elementary School Volunteer Faces Felony Peeping Charges After Being Caught Placing Camera Under Women’s Skirts

Thomas Elliott
Screengrab via X (formerly Twitter) / @SeaSeaBee

A North Carolina man has been arrested and charged with felony secret peeping after being caught on camera placing his phone under a woman’s skirt in a Greenville Target on Monday. Prior to his arrest, Thomas Elliott was on staff at Opendoor Church in Winterville and a volunteer at Eastern Elementary School in Greenville.

Elliott, 21, was apprehended after a Target customer noticed that he was behaving suspiciously and began filming him. In a video captured by this Good Samaritan, Elliott can be seen crouching down and placing his phone on the floor beneath the skirt of another female customer. 

The Good Samaritan then immediately confronted Elliott, calling upon a Target employee to get law enforcement involved. Elliott was later arrested. 

Following a review of store security footage, police said that Elliott may face two additional felony secret peeping charges. 

RELATED: Former San Jose Youth Pastor Charged With Multiple Sex Crimes After Years of Parental Complaints

In a statement to WNCT, Pitt County Schools said that it was alerted to Elliott’s arrest on Monday, adding, “We can confirm that the individual was a volunteer at Eastern Elementary School.”

“We are disturbed and deeply concerned by video footage of the individual that has been shared on social media and news outlets, and based on the footage, the individual will not be returning to our campuses as a volunteer or hired as an employee,” the statement continued.

Pitt County Schools said that Elliott had passed a background check before being allowed to volunteer at the school. 

Similarly, Megan Holland, lead pastor of communications at Opendoor Church, told WNCT, “Safety and security are of utmost importance to us. We are taking this situation extremely seriously. Thomas Elliott was immediately terminated upon notification of his arrest on Monday.”

“Additionally, he is no longer permitted on our properties,” Holland continued. “We continue to seek God’s wisdom in the aftermath of this situation. We pray for God’s healing and redemption for all those affected.”

RELATED: Suspects in Murder of Pastor’s Wife and Friend Are Members of ‘God’s Misfits,’ a Religious Anti-Government Group

The church did not disclose what role Elliott had served in prior to his termination. 

Jared Patrick Boyd: How Spiritual Formation in Community Links Lives

jared patrick boyd
Image courtesy of PastorServe

How do we draw people together in deeper and more meaningful ways that provides space for their questions and encourages them to flourish in their faith? In this week’s conversation on FrontStage BackStage, host Jason Daye is joined by Jared Patrick Boyd. Jared is a pastor, a spiritual director, and the founding director of The Order of The Common Life. His most recent book is titled “Finding Freedom in Constraint.” Together, Jared and Jason explore the hope we find in the midst of the strains the church is currently experiencing, including people walking away. Jared highlights the value of spiritual formation in community as a vital and beautiful way for relationships to deepen and endure.

FrontStage BackStage Podcast With Jared Patrick Boyd

View the entire podcast here.

Keep Learning

Looking to dig more deeply into this topic and conversation? Every week we go the extra mile and create a free toolkit so you and your ministry team can dive deeper into the topic that is discussed. Find your Weekly Toolkit here… Love well, Live well, Lead well!

Podcast Links

Orange Founder Reggie Joiner and CEO Kristen Ivy Resign After ‘Inappropriate Relationship’

Reggie Joiner Kristen Ivy Orange
(L) Kristen Ivy [R) Reggie Joiner screengrab via YouTube @Backstage with Randy Phillips

On Wednesday (April 17), Orange announced that its founder and chief creative officer, Reggie Joiner, “voluntarily resigned” after admitting to “past inappropriate adult relationships”—including one with newly announced CEO Kristen Ivy, who has also resigned.

Orange, which hosts one of the largest family ministries conferences in the world, describes itself as “a team of ministry leaders, educators, researchers, counselors, writers, editors, artists, musicians, and producers all committed to supporting churches and families as they nurture the faith and future of the next generation.”

The organization is well-known for its age-specific curriculums for churches.

The 63-year-old Joiner co-founded North Point Community Church alongside Andy Stanley and for 11 years served as the church’s executive director of family ministry. Prior to that, he was a youth pastor at Sherwood Baptist Church.

RELATED: Andy Stanley Tells Unconditional Conference That Rosaria Butterfield and Christopher Yuan ‘Have Nothing Helpful To Say to Parents’ of LGBTQ Kids

Joiner has also written over 30 books about parenting and church leadership. Joiner and his wife, Debbie, have four adult children.

Joiner’s website says that he has “changed the way churches and organizations create environments for and equip leaders, parents, and the next generation.” It continues, “Orange partners with over 8,000 churches internationally and is the architect of the Orange Conference and the Orange Tour, which provide national training opportunities for senior pastors, church leaders, and ministry volunteers.”

Ivy started at Orange in 2006 and has been instrumental in the development of Orange’s elementary school, middle school, and high school curriculums. She is the president of Parent Cue and a co-founder of The Phase Project.

In September 2023, Orange introduced Ivy as its new president and CEO, a transition that Orange said had been “thoughtfully planned over the past few years.” Joiner took the role of Orange’s chief creative officer.

RELATED: Lysa TerKeurst’s Husband Spent $118K on Extramarital Affair, According to Divorce Paperwork

Ivy has authored more than 20 books about parenting. She is married to her husband, Matt, and they have three young children.

Next week (April 23-25), Orange will hold its large annual conference in Atlanta. The conference will feature speakers John Onwuchekwa, Danielle Strickland, Jon Acuff, Rich Villodas, and others.

Nancy French Had It All—Then Along Came Trump. Her New Book ‘Ghosted’ Tells All.

Nancy French
“Ghosted” and author Nancy French. (Courtesy images)

(RNS) — Nancy French’s approach to life can be summed up in a line from a hit Van Halen song.

“Might as well jump.”

At age 20 she dropped out of college to get married and move to New York with a man she barely knew, later talked her way into a career as a ghostwriter by hopping on a plane to Alaska to interview Bristol Palin and once collided with Sen. Mitt Romney on a mountain in Utah while pretending she was an experienced skier.

That fearless approach to life made French a five-times New York Times bestselling author and the go-to ghostwriter for viral celebrities from “The Bachelor” and “Dancing With the Stars,” as well as conservative political influencers.

Things were going great. Enter Donald Trump.

RELATED: In ‘Exvangelicals,’ Sarah McCammon looks at the fragility and power of religion

When French and her husband, David, a conservative lawyer turned author and New York Times columnist, criticized Trump’s rise to political power, the two became pariahs in the conservative circles they once called home. Both friends and former clients cut her off as too radioactive to work with.

Things got worse when she shared about being abused as a teenager after hearing people dismiss allegations against former Alabama Supreme Court Justice Roy Moore for past sexual misconduct with teenagers.

French said she went from ghostwriter to ghosted in a heartbeat.

“I’d revealed my true self, and my fellow conservatives had found me contemptible,” she writes in her new memoir, “Ghosted,” out Tuesday (April 16) from Zondervan. The book traces her story, from her exploits as the best shot in her middle school hunter safety class to her surprising writing success to her post-Trump life, including a recent appearance on the “Moth Radio Hour,” recounting how David Lee Roth almost ruined her marriage.

The memoir is a story of friends lost and found and starting over after the life you thought you had vanishes.

Frederick D. Haynes Resigns Abruptly as Leader of Rainbow PUSH Coalition

Rev. Frederick D. Haynes
The Rev. Frederick D. Haynes III. (Video screen grab)

(RNS) — The Rev. Frederick D. Haynes III, who succeeded the Rev. Jesse Jackson as president of the Rainbow PUSH Coalition, has resigned suddenly from leading the Chicago-based civil rights organization.

“After continual prayer and deliberation, I have decided to step down from the
position of Chief Executive Officer and President of Rainbow Push Coalition
(RPC), effective immediately,” Haynes said in a statement issued Tuesday (April 16) on Rainbow PUSH letterhead.

Haynes, the pastor of Friendship-West Baptist Church in Dallas for four decades, could not be reached immediately for additional comment.

In a video statement, he called his work succeeding Jackson a “signal honor” but said it was time for him to continue his work in a different way.

“I felt it necessary, in light of the huge challenges faced by our community, in light of the challenges faced by this nation and world during this consequential year, to move in a different direction,” he said in the video statement posted on Instagram. “I will continue the fight for justice. I will continue to be a prophetic witness. I will just do it in another lane while continuing to honor the work of Rainbow PUSH and Rev. Jackson.”

The Associated Press reported that Jackson said in a statement that Rainbow PUSH had accepted the resignation of Haynes and said they would continue as “partners in the fight for peace, civil rights and economic justice.” He said his son, Yusef Jackson, would continue in his role as the chief operating officer of Rainbow PUSH.

In July, when the transfer of leadership was announced, the elder Jackson said he would continue to be part of its work.

“I am looking forward to this next chapter where I will continue to focus on economic justice, mentorship, and teaching ministers how to fight for social justice,” he said in a statement at the time. “I will still be very involved in the organization and am proud that we have chosen Rev. Dr. Haynes as my successor.”

Haynes, who is triply aligned with the National Baptist Convention U.S.A. Inc., Progressive National Baptist Convention Inc. and American Baptist Churches USA, told Religion News Service in a July interview that he was comfortable adding the additional role.

“I don’t know that it will be that much of a new juggle because I’ve been blessed to pastor Friendship-West for 40 years, and we have built a solid infrastructure,” he said at the time. “I have a great staff, a wonderful church, quite supportive. And the work I’ll be doing at Rainbow Push is, in reality, a larger platform of work I’ve always been doing.”

The Rev. Al Sharpton, president of the National Action Network, lauded Haynes’ work in a Tuesday statement posted on social media and said he appreciated his colleague’s contributions to Rainbow PUSH.

A Peculiar Perspective on Suffering

communicating with the unchurched

Editor’s Note: This post about perspective on suffering is adapted from Laughing at the Days to Come: Facing Present Trials and Future Uncertainties with Gospel Hope (RHB, 2019).


My once bright future suddenly seemed dark. The onset of a rare neurological disease was causing me to gradually lose my hearing, and there was no promise that I wouldn’t eventually go completely deaf. My happy, teenaged world was being turned upside-down and there wasn’t anything I could do to stop it.

One night, a family friend handed me a small piece of paper with Proverbs 31:25 written on it: “Strength and dignity are her clothing, and she laughs at the time to come” (ESV). Surely, I had read this verse before, but my current circumstances caused me to see it with new eyes and I was quite intrigued.

Perhaps the reason why I was so fascinated by this woman was because she had something I greatly lacked. I was not laughing when I thought about the days to come—I was crying when I thought about the days to come. Yes, things could have been worse, but that is one of the reasons I was not laughing—because things likely would get worse.

But here was something valiant. As in every earthly life, there are a host of potential circumstances this woman could set her mind on. But rather than living her life with a fearful prospect of what may be—tomorrow, next week, five years from now—she has chosen to live a life that reflects what is; namely, the present, abiding reality of God. Rather than being controlled by waves of emotion and impulsive assumptions about herself and her Creator, she is governed by a right and prevailing conviction of who God has revealed Himself to be in His word. This was the laughter I needed if I was going to endure a progressive neurological disease in a way that honored God.

A Different Perspective on Suffering

For many Christians, the necessity of this laughter does not come as a surprise. We are not afraid to acknowledge the reality of suffering in a fallen world.

But here is the honest dilemma: The Bible lets me in on the uncomfortable fact that I am not in control of my suffering. It shows me the smallness of my understanding, the limitations of my knowledge, and the very sobering fact that I am a lump of clay in the hands of a potter. I may readily acknowledge the necessity of suffering for spiritual growth; I may be sincerely convinced that my suffering will be not only for God’s glory but also for my own joy; I may nod my head in agreement that, yes, this is good for me, and therefore I want to embrace this.

But then I remember that I am submitting not only to God’s delegation of suffering but to His design of suffering—every detail of it. There is no questionnaire asking me my history, preferences, future goals, strengths, weaknesses, and so on. There is no catalog of options to comb through, where I can provide some hints to God by circling the trials that seem doable. God, as father, shepherd, potter, chooses—period. And it is to His lofty, even mysterious system I must humbly submit while steadfastly clinging to whatever truths He has chosen to reveal in His word. He reveals to us the character of the One who ordains the suffering, the truths that define the suffering, and the final, heavenly reward after the suffering, but He does not allow us to choose exactly what it will look like and what specific earthly purposes it will accomplish.

A Christian Perspective on Suffering

This is the Christian’s peculiar perspective on suffering, and I say peculiar because it is a different perspective on suffering from that of the world. It is natural for humans to resist anything that would cause them pain and discomfort. We are creatures who tirelessly seek comfort and ease. The world may readily declare, “No pain, no gain!” But what kind of pain does the world embrace? The pain of its own choosing. The overweight person chooses the pain of a strict diet for the desired gain of weight loss. The aspiring businessman chooses the pain of exhausting overtime for the desired gain of wealth. The insecure teenager chooses the pain of ditching his one loyal friend for the desired gain of popularity with the in-crowd.

When the world chooses pain for the hope of gain, it does so in submission to its own desires. If the pain becomes too costly or unbearable or the desired gain simply loses its luster, there is always the option of changing courses so as to lessen the pain or do away with it altogether.

This is not how we as Christians approach pain and suffering. We do believe there is gain—great gain—at the end of our suffering. And we are told over and over in Scripture to keep our eyes on that eternal gain, to hope for it, to live for it, to wait for it (e.g., 2 Cor. 4:16–18). But when it comes to the suffering we experience on the way to that final reward, we do not live in submission to our own desires and choose our suffering with the aim to serve self. Rather, we submit to the sovereign will of our Father and live with a dominating desire to see Him praised and glorified whether our earthly suffering is little or much, anticipated or one painful surprise after the other. And when we find ourselves walking through a trial that appears pointless, unprofitable, or even harsh, we don’t run around in desperation looking for a way to escape it. Instead, we turn to the unchanging truths in God’s word that tell us who God is and how He graciously and wisely uses the suffering of His choice to make His children holy and happy. We seek heavenly gain—oh yes! But we do so with hearts submissive to our Creator, who Himself has chosen a very specific path for each of His children to obtain that final gain.

God has already chosen His particular means to sanctify us. Some of these means we have already experienced, some we are experiencing now, and others await us in months and years ahead. To the world, this is a frightening reality that flies in the face of people’s natural attempt to control their own lives. That things may get worse (or already are worse) is hard for them to accept, but that they cannot opt out or fashion things to their own liking is simply too much to take.

Not so for the woman who fears the Lord, for she has the great privilege of drawing back the thick curtain of earthly suffering and by faith casting her gaze on “the city which has foundations, whose builder and maker is God” (Heb. 11:10). There is a work that has been accomplished, a herald of good news that she has believed, and it clothes her in a strength and dignity unknown to the fearful world around her. She knows not what bitter providences await her and all the intricate ways God will use them. But she does know this: By God’s grace she has believed Him, and by God’s grace she will continue to believe, trust, and obey Him until He brings her safely home in that unclouded day of eternity.

This article about perspective on suffering originally appeared here.

How Team Friction Can Help Your Team

team friction
Adobestock #329001243

An important leadership principle was shaped for me during what seemed to be a normal season in our organization. We were experiencing fast growth, but, thankfully, that was normal for us. It seemed things were healthy on the team. We had the right players and clarity of vision, however, team friction developed. It wasn’t major, but it was noticeable.

This isn’t unusual on teams. Even the best teams are made of imperfect people with differing views and opinions of how things should be done. So, the best teams will have friction at times. The only way to avoid it would be to institute a more controlled environment, where opinions don’t matter. However, friction really isn’t eliminated. It’s just silenced – for a time.

Some team friction can be good.

It means things are moving forward, change is occurring and there is the potential for future progress. You don’t get to progress without change. Change takes you into an unknown. So change, at least in the beginning stages, always creates a certain amount of friction.

But I knew this kind of friction was unusual for our team. It was more tense than usual. Progress was being curtailed some. Unnecessary stress was being created. I could see the potential for negative consequences long-term if, as the leader, I didn’t address it.

Thankfully, it was easy to diagnose the cause of our team friction. It isn’t always, but this time it was.

Our team friction resulted from:

  • Miscommunication
  • Unclear expectations
  • Unknown objectives

Have you ever seen any of those cause friction on a team?

We all have. Those are common reasons for friction in any relationship, and they can cause havoc on a healthy team.

Here’s the principle that emerged:

Apart from a system nothing was done wrong.

Here’s what I mean.

Sure, the friction was wrong if I allowed it to go on long-term. We have to get along to be a healthy team. Plus, without a doubt, the miscommunication, unclear expectations, unknown objectives were all wrong. They are common and all natural occurrences even on a healthy team, but we can’t let them continue without continually trying to address them.

Yet, when there is no system in place to address those concerns, or when the system isn’t good enough to address the issues in the current season, people will perform the best they know how to perform. When current systems don’t work people do the best they knew how or make up how they think things should be done. And, friction grows.

Systems are important:

  • If you want something repeated and done well you systematize it.
  • If you want something done better you create better systems.

Progress and change stretches current systems.

So, every system should continually be:

  • Evaluated
  • Reconstructed
  • Refined

Systems drive progress and if you want better progress keep creating better systems.

So, back to our team’s friction. As a leader, it was important for me to realize and remind people: No one did anything wrong. We were making decisions the best we knew how under the current stretched systems. In the process, unnecessary friction developed, which was totally natural.

What was important was that we learned from team friction and wrote a system – or a better system, in order to keep that type of friction to a minimum.

You can calm team friction on your team by:

  • Releasing people of a sense of guilt, which only causes them to be defensive and results in even more friction.
  • Identifying the need for improved systems.
  • Leading the process to create or develop better systems.

Here’s to writing better systems – until we need to tweak them again.

 

This article on team friction originally appeared here, and is used by permission. Check out Ron’s leadership podcast where he discusses issues of leadership nuggets in a practical way. Plus, check out the other Lifeway Leadership Podcasts.

Please: Protect Your Mac!

protect your mac
Adobe Stock #746530490

Please Protect your Mac! (I know, I know, this can be a controversial topic, but hey, it’s an election year.)

Apple fans aside, it is important to objectively look at the security of all devices on your network and with access to your ministry data. Whether BYOD or ministry issued, device security matters. The myth that Macs don’t need protected continues to live and the bad guys know it. So you must protect your Mac.

Data from 2023 indicates that Apple has an 8.6% share of the worldwide computer market, leaving Microsoft Windows with the majority of the rest. The myth that Macs don’t need protection is often hidden in the 8.6% market share of PCs.  If you’re a bad guy, do you attack 8.6% of the computers or 91.4% of them?  Market share does not equate to operating system security.

Protect Your Mac

MBS recommends that all computers have security software. While Apple and Microsoft include built-in antivirus and malware protection, they often fall short of the enterprise security features most ministries require. I grant you; they are better than nothing, but do you want protection that is robust and strong, or simply better than nothing?

SentinelOne is the security suite that MBS recommends. Since MBS exclusively serves churches and ministries, we can provide SentinelOne for less than $3 per device per month. To stay agnostic, so you don’t think we only recommend products or services that benefit us financially, we don’t sell licenses directly, but through an authorized provider where we’ve negotiated ministry discounts.

MBS can help you set up your SentinelOne console, where you can remotely manage all machines across all platforms, from one place in the cloud – no on-premises servers required. Since you are buying the licenses directly, you don’t have to be an MBS client as your ministry owns the licenses, not MBS or any other third part provider.  Our provider also invoices you monthly, so you only pay for active clients, saving money over multiyear contract purchases.

What Epaphras has to Teach Us About Small Groups

Epaphras
Adobe Stock #489734030

“You learned it from Epaphras, our dear fellow servant, who is a faithful minister of Christ on our behalf, and who also told us of your love in the Spirit.”

Colossians 1:7,8

Paul starts off by talking about Epaphras. Now Mr. E wasn’t just another follower of Jesus. Oh no, he had an important part to play in the lives of the Colossians. He’s the one who they learned from. Learned about Jesus and learned how it changes their lives. It changes everything. And the lessons of Epaphras can be applied to small groups today.

What Epaphras has to Teach Us About Small Groups

But out of the gate we’ve got a problem with the Apostle Paul and Mr. E. To be called a servant today is just about the ultimate insult. I can’t think of a more powerful word that puts a person down more than servant. Yes, there are many swear words and phrases that are meant to hurt, but I think servant is all the more hurtful.

When you’re a servant, it means that you don’t have the right to do things on your own. That you don’t have control over your life. You can’t make decisions for yourself. And when someone tells you to do something, you have to do it. There’s no room for discussion. No negotiation. Just blind obedience.

Funny thing though, Jesus doesn’t seem to have a problem with the word or the idea when it comes to our relationship with God and one another. It’s a voluntary submission to God and one another. Heck, Jesus even talks about himself like this.

Not so with you. Instead, whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant, and whoever wants to be first must be your slave— just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.”

Matthew 20:26-28

I know that we’re so much smarter and more sophisticated than those poor slobs back in the first century. But that’s what Paul calls Epaphras. But he’s not just any servant. Paul says that he’s a three-dimensional servant.

  1. Our – He’s not out there all alone, and neither is Paul. There’s a community within the followers of Jesus. A fellowship that must be fed, encouraged, cherished. Moving from being a friend to being an “our” takes time. You have to want it.

  2. Dear – Their relationship isn’t that he’s just one of the guys, but someone who’s beloved. There’s a God kind of love between them. They want nothing but the absolute best for each other and are willing to back it up with their time, energy, and resources.

  3. Fellow – They don’t just wear the same jersey because they’re on the same team. There’s a closeness that comes from time spent together. Doing things together. Working hard and sweating together as they give up their choices for the good of the group.

But this wasn’t enough. Mr. E. was oh so much more important to the Colossians. Yes, he was our dear fellow servant, he also was a minister. But Paul’s not thinking of a minister as the person up front behind the pulpit on Sunday mornings.

Student Ministry Longevity Matters More Than Personality: Here’s Why

communicating with the unchurched

Longevity in student ministry beats personality every time. Want to know how I know? Awhile back, a parent asked why our church youth program was so amazing. Between you and me, our youth ministry really isn’t amazing. It’s pretty average, numbers-wise.

Our program is fully mid-1990s, and I used to be in charge. I may be lots of things, but I’m definitely not a pied piper. I love teens and love walking through this season of life and faith with them. But I feel awkward when I show up on campus. And I struggle with one-on-one contact time.

Finally I tapped out. A few years ago, I brought on an incredible couple to continue our student ministry tradition. And though I’m no longer implementing our program, I’m overseeing and championing it. Plus, I’m clearing the way for our directors to crush it!

As I reflected on that parent’s impression of our “awesome” youth ministry, I realized our success has little to do with me. Instead, it comes from the church leadership and senior pastor long before it comes from me.

The Fallacy of Big Personality vs. Longevity in Student Ministry

Many churches hire the young, amazing, attractional, extroverted youth worker. These superstars actually turn into supernovas within two years. Before they implode, these youth workers work long hours for little pay, with little divide between personal life and ministry.

They do a great job gathering students and gain some momentum. But sooner or later these youth workers tire, burn out, and/or graduate from seminary. Then they realize they can’t support a family with this salary (or some combination of factors) and leave.

And the church loses the advantage of longevity in ministry. We quickly replace them with the next great personality. But after a few short cycles of this, students and parents grow reluctant to give their hearts to a new person who will be gone in a year or so.

All About The Benjamins?

I hate that this is true. But what separates an amazing student ministry program from a flash in the pan seems to come down to money. Like everything, you get what you pay for. You may be able to get away with hiring a superstar youth worker for peanuts. But as soon as they realize they’re a superstar and can make double the money elsewhere, they’ll leave.

If you pay bottom-of-the-barrel salaries, you’ll get great youth workers who leave too soon. Or bottom-of-the-barrel youth workers who stay too long.

John Lindell Calls Mark Driscoll To Repent for ‘Trying To Destroy James River Church’ and ‘Sow Disunity’ in the Lindell Family

John Lindell Mark Driscoll
Screengrab via James River Church

During an evening service on Wednesday (April 17), Pastor John Lindell of James River Church in Ozark, Missouri, accused controversial Pastor Mark Driscoll of attempting to sow division in the Lindell family. According to Lindell, Driscoll even encouraged Lindell’s son to seize control of the church. 

“I get absolutely no joy or delight out of doing this to someone I’ve called a friend,” Lindell said during an emotional address. “Mark, if you are listening to this message, we love you and it’s with a heavy heart that we are calling you to repent.” 

Lindell’s call for Driscoll to repent is the latest in a series of strange events that began over the weekend, when Lindell and Driscoll publicly feuded and then apparently reconciled at James River Church’s Stronger Men’s Conference. 

To open the conference, two-time Guinness World Record holder Alexandr Magala performed a death defying act in which he swallowed a sword before ascending and then rapidly descending a large vertical pole. 

Magala, who has reportedly performed as a pole dancer at women’s and gay nightclubs in the past, told ChurchLeaders that he has since come to faith in Jesus and hopes his act inspires audiences “to reach new heights of what’s possible in their lives.”

During his message on Wednesday, Lindell reported that Magala could even be seen sharing his faith at the airport after the Stronger Men’s Conference. 

Following Magala’s performance, however, Driscoll told attendees that a “Jezebel spirit opened our event.” He then compared the conference opener to both an erotic dance and ancient pagan worship. Before Driscoll could continue his diatribe, he was shouted down by Lindell and promptly left the stage. 

Later, the two men returned to the stage, and Driscoll acknowledged that he should have addressed his concerns with Lindell privately. The two discussed their long friendship, and Lindell recounted sitting with Driscoll after Driscoll resigned in disgrace from Mars Hill Church. 

Driscoll founded Mars Hill Church in Seattle in 1996 but was forced to resign in 2014 amid allegations of controlling and abusive behavior. The church dissolved shortly after his resignation. In 2016, Driscoll founded The Trinity Church in Scottsdale, Arizona, where he has again been accused of being an abusive leader. 

During his onstage appearance with Lindell, Driscoll said that Lindell and his wife, Debbie, “have been some of the greatest friends to me and my family through the hardest seasons of our life.” In turn, Lindell praised Driscoll for his “prophetic voice,” comparing him to John the Baptist. 

To conference attendees and online onlookers, it appeared that the two men had reconciled. On Wednesday evening, Lindell told his church that he and Driscoll even posed for a picture that Driscoll posted on social media to celebrate their reconciliation. However, Lindell said, Driscoll subsequently took the post down. 

Mark Driscoll Rebuked the ‘Jezebel Spirit’ This Week—But What Is That?

jezebel spirit
Sir Francis Dicksee (1853-1928), Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Mark Driscoll made headlines this week for being kicked off stage after he called out a performance at the Stronger Men’s Conference that he said displayed “the Jezebel spirit.” Driscoll later publicly reconciled with conference host Pastor John Lindell, but Driscoll has since been posting repeatedly on the idea of the Jezebel spirit, a topic Christians online are now fiercely debating. 

“The Jezebel spirit is a demon that has worked through men and women for centuries, from Queen Jezebel in 1st Kings to Jesus’s rebuke of the church in Thyatira in Revelation 2,” said Driscoll Monday on X, formerly Twitter. “This demon seeks to control and dominate, most often through seductive women but oftentimes through overbearing, domineering men.”

RELATED: Mark Driscoll Kicked Off Stage for Calling Out ‘Strip Club’-Like Performance at Stronger Men’s Conference

“There is no ‘Spirit of Jezebel’ or ‘Jezebel Spirit’ mentioned in Scripture,” said author and abuse survivor Jennifer Greenberg amid the online discourse on Driscoll’s actions. “There is a wicked Queen Jezebel in 1-2 Kings and a false teacher named Jezebel in Revelation 2:20, but the Spirit of the Anti-Christ is what the God warns us not to be seduced by (1 John 4:3).”

‘Jezebel Spirit’ Rebuked at Men’s Conference

Mark Driscoll, the controversial former leader of Mars Hill Church in Seattle and the current pastor of The Trinity Church in Scottsdale, Arizona, spoke at the Stronger Men’s Conference in Springfield, Missouri, on Saturday. Driscoll has been accused of controlling, abusive behavior during his time leading Mars Hill and during his time leading his current church.

The Stronger Men’s Conference, known for dramatic, over-the-top performances, had opened with an act featuring Alexandr Magala, a sword swallower and two-time Guinness World Record holder who has appeared on “America’s Got Talent: The Champions” and other iterations of the popular show.

In the past, Magala has performed in nightclubs as a pole dancer. In his performance at the conference, he took off his shirt, swallowed a sword, and then climbed a pole and slid down it. 

Between his speaking sessions, Driscoll addressed Magala’s act, telling attendees the “Jezebel spirit opened our event.” Driscoll went on to refer to the performance platform as “a high place” and the pole as “a pole of Asherah.”

“The same thing that’s used in a strip club for women who have the Jezebel spirit to seduce men,” said Driscoll. “In front of that was a man who ripped his shirt off like a woman does in front of a pole at a strip club.”

Former San Jose Youth Pastor Charged With Multiple Sex Crimes After Years of Parental Complaints

Brett Bymaster
Screengrab via ABC 7

After several years of ministry, former youth pastor Brett Bymaster, 47, was arrested on multiple counts of sexual assault of a minor.

Bymyaster served as a youth pastor at The River Church Community in San Jose, California. While on staff, he led students, engaged in events, and volunteered at an after school program. According to local news station, KRON4, Bymaster’s attorneys, Dana Fite and Renee Hessling, said that he “ministered on Christian ideas of sex health.”

Former Youth Pastor Brett Bymaster Faces Multiple Counts of Sexual Abuse Charges

According to the San Jose Police Department, allegations from the victim include repeated “sexual assault of a minor” from 2014 to 2019, when the victim was between the ages of 8 and 13. On April 11, authorities arrested Bymaster. He remains in custody at the Santa Clara County Jail with bail being set at $400,000, according to CBS News. His next court appearance is set for April 19.

Parents of teens who were in Bymaster’s care raised questions, concerns, and complaints to church leadership for years. Court documents said that these parents “claim church leaders covered up allegations.”

“Brett’s pattern of abuse—both spiritual and sexual in nature—inflicted immense damage. The River’s cover-up jeopardizes current youth and families who are exposed to Brett…(at) Healing Grove ministry,” parents wrote in court documents.

Reporters from KRON4 obtained a 63-page investigation report that contains statements from former youth group members and parents. Bymaster allegedly “groomed teens, took naked showers with minors on field trips, sexually harassed minors with unwanted touching, groped underaged girls, and pressured teens into sexually explicit conversations.”

Parents reported, “A teen girl attempted suicide in September 2018 in response to Brett’s bullying behavior, including ‘slut shaming.’” After this incident, parents pleaded with church leadership to fire Bymaster.

At least two females, now adults, have reported (one in January 2024 and another in April 2024) Bymaster’s abuse to the police.

One female described multiple sexually abusive incidents. Bymaster led her to an outdoor shed and stood “directly behind her with his entire body pressed up against her body and she could feel his erect penis on her buttocks.” She described an event that occurred years later, when Bymaster would allegedly touch her private areas and shove “his hands in her pants.”

“Brett would talk about his ‘porn addiction’ and heavily encouraged students to ‘confess’ their porn habits,” one girl wrote in a statement to the San Jose Police Department. “Beyond the sexual stuff, (Bymaster and his wife) were emotionally manipulative and abusive in numerous ways. The trauma they left me with affects me every day.”

The River Church Community stated that the “situation was initially explored in 2021 through a pastoral inquiry.” The church continued, “Those who experienced harm (the victims) have asked for a more extensive investigation and The River’s board and senior leaders have agreed that this action is necessary.” A third-party investigator has recently been hired to explore the details more extensively.

‘Don’t Give a S**t’—Perry Noble Cusses During Sermon While Apparently Plagiarizing From Progressive Christian Tony Campolo

Perry Noble
Screengrab via YouTube @Second Chance Church

A video clip of disgraced pastor Perry Noble swearing in a sermon circulated widely on social media this week. In the clip, Noble swears twice before joking about it.

The clip was from a sermon Noble gave on Super Bowl Sunday (Feb. 11), titled “30 Second Theology.” During the sermon, Noble asked the congregation, “What if we took the message of the gospel that seriously?”

RELATED: Perry Noble Removed from Leadership at NewSpring Church Due to Alcohol Abuse

“Because here’s reality,” he continued. “There are people outside these walls today in Anderson, South Carolina, that if they died today, they would go to hell. And there are some people in this room that don’t give a s**t.”

After taking a brief pause, Noble added, “Then there’s some people in this room more bothered by the fact that I just said the word s**t than you are worried about the people that are going to hell.”

“That’s on you, sir,” Noble yelled. “That’s on you.”

Noble then joked, “Some of you all are like, ‘I like this church,’” as the congregation laughed.

RELATED: Second Chance Church’s Pastor Perry Noble Got Remarried This Past Weekend

“I’m just saying, what would happen if we said this matters and I’m not going to show up at Second Chance next week alone—I’m bringing somebody that needs to hear this message?” he asked.

The person who posted the clip noted that Noble’s phrasing was similar to a quote from progressive Christian leader Tony Compolo:

I have three things I’d like to say today. First while you were sleeping last night 30,000 kids died of starvation or diseases related to malnutrition. Second, most of you don’t give a s**t. What’s worse is that you’re more upset with the fact that I said s**t than the fact that 30,000 kids died last night.

Noble Was Fired From NewSpring Church in 2016

Noble was removed as the lead pastor of NewSpring Church in Anderson, South Carolina, in July 2016 due to alcohol abuse and marital issues. Founded by Noble in 2000, NewSpring grew under his leadership to a weekly attendance of 30,000 across 17 campuses .

IHOPKC To Undergo Major Reorganization Amid Financial Crisis Following Bickle Abuse Scandal, Leaked Audio Reveals

International House of Prayer reorg
SunDawn, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

International House of Prayer Kansas City (IHOPKC) will undergo a major reorganization amid mounting financial struggles that have come in the wake of a sexual abuse scandal surrounding IHOPKC founder Mike Bickle.

IHOPKC cut ties with Bickle in December 2023 following an investigation into allegations that he had engaged in spiritually and sexually abusive behavior.

Among the allegations that have been made public is the accusation that Bickle groomed and sexually abused a 14-year-old girl while serving as pastor of a St. Louis church in the 1980s. 

Bickle has admitted to “inappropriate behavior” but has denied all abuse allegations, despite the credible testimony of survivors. 

While IHOPKC’s 24-hour prayer room is set to remain open, IHOP University will reportedly cease operations after this school year concludes.

In leaked audio from a meeting on Monday (April 15), IHOP University President Matt Candler indicated that “IHOPKC as an organization is beginning to wind down.”

“We’re going to be maintaining our prayer room and eventually beginning a new organization,” Candler said.

In an email following the meeting, the IHOPKC leadership team confirmed that the organization is no longer financially viable and “will be closing for good in a staggered fashion, with different things such as stipends, work emails, etc. being eliminated over the next couple of months to prepare us to close.”

“The leadership feels the best way to resolve the issues is to close IHOPKC as an organization and shift to a more missional church structure in the future,” the email went on to say. “This would still include night and day prayer with worship in the context of a church. It would also mean far fewer compensated staff members and a much bigger pool of volunteers.”

Additionally, Isaac Bennett, who leads IHOPKC’s Forerunner Church, indicated in the meeting on Monday that he believes dissolving IHOPKC in favor of creating a new organization will limit IHOPKC’s liability. 

RELATED: IHOPU’s President Resigns Less Than 2 Weeks After IHOPKC Permanently Cuts Ties With Mike Bickle

“We’re the people to sue at the end of the day,” Bennett said. “That produces significant liabilities there.”

Rebecca McLaughlin on Whether Christians Can Agree To Disagree About Same-Sex Relationships

Rebecca McLaughlin
Image courtesy of Rebecca McLaughlin

Dr. Rebecca McLaughlin is former vice president of content at the Veritas Forum, where she spent almost a decade working with Christian academics at leading secular universities. She’s the author of several books, including “Confronting Christianity: 12 Hard Questions for the World’s Largest Religion.” Her latest book, which releases May 15, is “Does the Bible Affirm Same-Sex Relationships? Examining 10 Claims about Scripture and Sexuality.”

“The Stetzer ChurchLeaders Podcast” is part of the ChurchLeaders Podcast Network.

Other Ways To Listen to This Podcast With Rebecca McLaughlin

► Listen on Amazon
► Listen on Apple
► Listen on Google
► Listen on Spotify
► Listen on YouTube

Transcript of Rebecca McLaughlin Interview

Rebecca McLaughlin on The Stetzer ChurchLeaders Podcast.mp3: Audio automatically transcribed by Sonix

Rebecca McLaughlin on The Stetzer ChurchLeaders Podcast.mp3: this mp3 audio file was automatically transcribed by Sonix with the best speech-to-text algorithms. This transcript may contain errors.

Voice Over:
Welcome to the Stetzer Church Leaders Podcast, conversations with today’s top ministry leaders to help you lead better every day. And now, here are your hosts, Ed Stetzer and Daniel Yang.

Daniel Yang:
Welcome to the Stetzer Church Leaders Podcast, where we’re helping Christian leaders navigate and lead through the cultural issues of our day. My name is Daniel Yang, national director of Churches of Welcome at World Relief. And today we’re talking with Doctor Rebecca McLaughlin, Rebecca’s former vice president of content at Veritas Forum, where she spent almost a decade working with Christian academics at leading secular universities. She’s the author of several books, including Confronting Christianity 12 Hard Questions for the World’s Largest Religion. Her latest is Does the Bible affirm same sex relationships? Examining ten claims about Scripture and sexuality. But first, let’s go to Ed Stetzer, editor in chief of Outreach magazine and the dean of Talbot School of Theology.

Ed Stetzer:
So we’re just going to jump right into the conversation with Rebecca. And you know, I remember I was on a panel, I don’t know, 15 years ago. And it was, uh, one, two, three, four of us. And there was the whole conversation, got a little got a little animated. And one of the people on the panel said, you know, I just think that, uh, that soon, uh, same sex relationship and our view of sexuality, uh, will become an agree to disagree issue among Christians, like in many ways. Um, you know, modes of baptism or or, you know, how we view, uh, egalitarian complementarian conversations across denominations that that would be in that category. So I just want to start with that question for you. Um, can Christians just agree to disagree? And maybe I should caveat that and say, can, uh, can evangelical Christians, um, you know, and people with their view of the scriptures and more so, but can Christians just agree to disagree on this topic? No. Okay. All right.

Rebecca McLaughlin :
Uh, I’ll say more. Yeah.

Ed Stetzer:
No, please. Please do say.

Rebecca McLaughlin :
More. Yeah. The reason and actually, I had this conversation recently with, um, a friend who is in, in a ministry context and in a college ministry context, was trying to navigate the fact that a lot of the students he was working with were either in a kind of affirming of same sex marriage position or unclear. And the way that he’d been navigating this was essentially allowing it to be functionally and agree to disagree issue. And I said, here’s one of the problems with that approach is that the question of whether same sex sexual relationships are or are not sinful is one that, you know, the rubber hits the road. If you like me as somebody who is attracted to people of their same sex, because it then becomes a question not just of sort of theory, but a question that could actually make a pretty major difference in your life. Because I think we can all agree that the New Testament takes sexual sin exceedingly seriously, that Jesus himself takes sexual sin exceedingly seriously. And if anything kind of tightens up the Old Testament law rather than relaxing it, you know, famously you have heard that it was said, don’t commit adultery. But I say to you, don’t even look at a woman with lustful intent. And then, you know, rolling right from that to if your eye causes you to sin, pluck it out, because it’s better to enter the kingdom of God without an eye than it is to to not. So the the seriousness with which the New Testament takes sexual sin is so high that if we cannot agree on what sexual sin is or isn’t.

Rebecca McLaughlin :
Or if we think it’s sort of unclear from the scriptures, like this is an incredibly high stakes. This is a life or death kind of situation, not a agree to disagree sort of scenario. Um, it seems to me as somebody who honestly, you know, one stage of my life, I’d have been more than happy to figure out a way to read the Bible that did allow for same sex marriage. I didn’t kind of come to the Bible hoping that it would say no, because I would have been more than happy to to pursue that path myself if I’d felt like that was an option. The more I have studied the scriptures, the more convinced I am that there is just a very clear no to same sex sexual relationships. But I feel like I’ve come to a better understanding both of the sort of gospel centered why to that, and of the gospel centered call that we all have to love one another as brothers and sisters in Christ. So I actually, I I’ve come to a point not of feeling kind of resentful or frustrated that there is a clear no in the Bible to something which I, you know, in my flesh would have been more than happy to to pursue, but actually feel like I’m kind of at least grasping the edges of quite how beautiful God’s vision for marriage is, and quite how beautiful God’s vision for brotherly and sisterly love between believers is, and how those are actually sort of different ways that we touch the edges of God’s love for us. It was a long answer to your question.

Ed Stetzer:
No, no, it’s but it’s I think it’s a it’s worthy of a long answer. I think this is the perhaps one of the most important issues of our day. You said it’s a life or death issue. That’s strong language. How is it a life or death issue.

Rebecca McLaughlin :
In two senses, one, for those who, um, feel a deep desire and for some, a sort of abiding desire for a same sex romantic or sexual partnership, the question of whether the Bible says yes to that or says no to that is, is a question that will then meaningfully shape their life. The even more important kind of life or death dimension to that is if this is something which my understanding of what Paul says in in first Corinthians six, you know, he says, don’t you realize that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? And then he lists a whole bunch of sinful practices, which if you kind of walking unrepentantly in those sins, you’re walking yourself out of the kingdom of God. And one of those is, um, men who sleep with males. Um, and then he says, and this is what some of you were, but you were washed, you were justified. You were sanctified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the spirit of our God. So if I’m understanding Paul correctly and I, I don’t see a particularly another way to, to understand him. This is unrepentant. Sexual sin is actually walking you out of the kingdom of God. Like this is a this is an eternal life level conversation that we’re having. Um, and so it is profoundly unloving to say to somebody who is a follower of Jesus and who is drawn to sexual or romantic relationships with their same sex, they’re like, well, maybe that’s okay, because actually, no, this is this is something that is, uh, we’re walking ourselves out of the kingdom of God if we’re unrepentant and in the area of sexual sin.

Ed Stetzer:
And you’ve indicated a couple times you’ve talked about same sex attraction, do you identify as lesbian, gay or some other terms in and around that, and why or why not? Would you identify because that is an issue that you’re aware of, maybe not of all of our listeners are aware of of how you identify that.

Rebecca McLaughlin :
Yeah. I think the Bible is exceedingly clear on how we should and shouldn’t use our bodies when it comes to same sex sexual relationships. I think how we then describe our experience or our patterns of temptation or however you, you know, we could kind of talk through different ways of of thinking about that is not a question on which the Bible is like, so crystal clear that I would want to call somebody a heretic who came to a different view from me. I think it’s more in the territory of of wisdom. So I would not refer to myself as gay or lesbian, even though. You know, as I sometimes said, if somebody kind of took a a video reel of my internal, what’s the best way to put this? I’ve been happily married to my husband for the last sort of 17 years. Anytime I’ve been attracted to somebody outside of my marriage has always been to a woman. Um, so on one diagnostic test, you could say, well, you know, it seems reasonably evident that this is somebody who is, um, strongly, primarily same sex attracted. Uh, fun fact or kind of interesting data point. About 16% of women experience some degree of same sex attraction, and about 7% of men do, but only 1% of women and 2% of men are exclusively attracted to people of their same sex.

Rebecca McLaughlin :
So whereas I might seem like a kind of strange outlier as a woman who’s happily married to a man, but is someone who is. As long as I can remember, I’ve always been primarily attracted to women. I’m not actually that atypical. Um, the reason I don’t find it helpful to refer to myself with either the sort of label lesbian or gay. Is a couple of things. One is that I think most people in our culture would understand both those words to refer to not only a pattern of attractions, but actually also a, um, a sort of living into those attractions. So, you know, some people say, well, I call myself a gay Christian, but I’m, I’m always ready to explain what I do and don’t mean by that. I understand that. I think the other piece is that because in our culture. The labels gay and lesbian and all sort of labels around sexuality and gender. Had become very much identity markers. I think there is meaningful risk or lack of wisdom for Christians to be taking one of those sort of identity markers to themselves, because I think it can, um, imply like a level of identification with, with something which at the end of the day is a is a sinful desire in my heart.

Rebecca McLaughlin :
Um, now, I could say, you know, I think of a friend of mine who’s an alcoholic and went through Alcoholics Anonymous, and so he’s used to saying, hi, I’m my name is so-and-so, and I’m an alcoholic. Like you could say, well, an alcoholic might identify themselves as an alcoholic without saying this is a good thing. That’s that’s true. I think often when, um, we identify ourselves with a label like gay or lesbian or bisexual or whatever, the implication in our culture is that we’re saying, like, this is a good thing, right? Um, so those are those are reasons why I wouldn’t want to use any of that language of myself, though. At the same time, I do want to hold space for people who, um, thoroughly agree with me on what the Bible teaches when it comes to same sex sexual relationships, but feel like that language describes their experience and makes most sense to the people around them, even though they have to do a bunch of explaining work to say what they do and don’t mean. Yeah, but.

Ed Stetzer:
It is interesting how like I started and I asked, is this agree to disagree? And you were very clear. No. And but now as we talk about how maybe identification it’s it’s no but I hold some space for that. So and I think this is a lot of people aren’t aware that this is part of the big conversation that’s going on right now is how best do we navigate, even among those who we would call orthodox on issues of sexuality, how best do we navigate how we articulate this? How do we help people to deal with their same sex attraction? Um, you know, and more. And so this has sort of blown up into the public sphere. Uh, we see we see crew has been in talked about and online in the news and more as they’re trying to kind of navigate some of that. So what’s your posture. I mean we talked about crew but and feel free to but what’s our posture in general, do you think our posture in general should be towards people who like, as you said, hold and shared that view, but are also maybe taking different approaches to to best navigate it?

Rebecca McLaughlin :
Yeah. I mean, say crew is actually a great example here because, um, our brothers and sisters who are working in campus ministry are in a context where they are trying to uphold clear Christian orthodoxy. And also, you know, especially for a campus ministry like crew that isn’t sort of denominationally, um, fixed. So it’s not like, you know, Reformed University Fellowship, for example, it doesn’t have its confessional statement is one that is not tied to a particular kind of denominational view. And so crew holds space for people who take a range of views on, on a number of issues. Um, you know, whether it’s sort of baptism or, you know, a whole, whole range of different, different things. And when it comes to the questions around sexual ethics and same sex sexual relationships in particular, um, crew has drawn a very clear, um, orthodox and to my mind, um, bold in the best sense stand when it comes to same sex sexual and.

Ed Stetzer:
I would say costly in some settings for them as well.

Rebecca McLaughlin :
Yeah. Exceedingly costly. I mean, any campus ministry that’s willing to, um, put a stake in the ground and say we do not affirm same sex sexual relationships under any circumstances is asking to be thrown off campus often. Um, you know, there’s a there’s a real kind of cost. Cost there, um, I think crew. Has done actually a really good job of saying to its ministry staff who are missionaries in a particular kind of ministry context. Um, we recognize that people are going to take different views on exactly how they. They want to approach students and how, um, how they might want to use language or not use language. They’re going to be conscience issues there. Um, and yeah, I feel like it, contrary to some of the claims that are being made about Cru’s lack of orthodoxy, I actually find Cru’s position to be extremely orthodox and and quite helpful, um, in, you know, difficult circumstances because you’re talking about a large organization that’s working on a whole range of campuses and on all sorts of other contexts as well, but trying to, um, you know, be clear and faithful when it comes to what the Bible teaches. Um, and also holding space for people to, not to not to teach anything that’s not aligned with that, but to, um, have conversations around language and around, um, you know, precisely how do we relate to those with whom we might disagree, for instance?

Ed Stetzer:
And I want to I want to go through some of the ten claims in particular. Does the Bible affirm same sex? The book title is Does the Bible Affirm same sex relationships? Relationships affirm examining ten claims about Scripture and sexuality. But I would be remiss if I didn’t ask about Richard Hayes and about the, you know, shift that we actually saw just just recently published. Now, we don’t know all the details of it because the book’s not out as well. But the moral vision has been something that a lot of us have quoted over the years. Uh, one person said that, you know, this this was the one scholar that conservative people like us could point to. And now that scholars changed his mind, uh, what are your thoughts around that?

Rebecca McLaughlin :
Yeah. I mean, I’ve only like any of us, I think at this point, read the the blurb published by, um, Yale University Press about the book, but I found it. Exceedingly disappointing. Um, sorry. I got a frog in my throat here. Uh, one of the ways in which I found it disappointing is that it the language of the widening of God’s mercy. Um. And even the sort of first line of of the blurb I’ll read out here a fresh, deeply biblical account of God’s expanding grace and mercy, developing a theological framework for the full inclusion of LGBTQ people in Christian communities. I’m part of a community group here up in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Um, I go to a little Southern Baptist church here. We have a Bible study group that meets every Tuesday night. And several, like many, in fact, at this point of my friends and the people I’m discipling and ministering to and being encouraged by are people who were they not Christians would be identifying as LGBT, um, or people who previously identified as LGBT and have now become Christians. For example, one young woman who literally has, um, tattoos of naked women on her body from the period when she was identifying as a lesbian and exclusively dating women who became a Christian just last year, got baptized in December. Um, there is no question as to whether people who identify as LGBT are have access to God’s mercy.

Rebecca McLaughlin :
All of us do. And anyone. It is. It has the offer of Jesus made to them, where they can repent and believe and put their trust in him. But none of us get to come to Jesus without repentance, and none of us get to say, do you know what? Um, well, let me put it the other way. Any of us who repent and believe and put our trust in Jesus must then recognize that he is our Lord and that he has the right to tell us what to do. He has the right to tell us what to do with our bodies. He has the right to tell us to deny ourselves. He has the right to tell us to to not fulfill our sexual dreams and romantic desires. He has all of that right over us. And so, so even the positioning of, um, those who like me hold to, uh, orthodoxy when it comes to same sex sexual relationships. The positioning of that as like. Somehow keeping people out of the realm of access to God’s mercy. I find. Um. Frustrating. Let’s put it that way. And then some of the, the other language and again I mean, I don’t I don’t want to judge a book by its cover or just by its blurb. And I look forward to reading the book when it comes out.

Ed Stetzer:
To be fair, it is more than the cover. I mean, it really is. I mean, it’s they’re articulating some. There’s a change of mind. Yes.

Rebecca McLaughlin :
Um, and some of the language around, um. You know, they remind us of a dynamic and gracious God who is willing to change his mind, consistently broadening his grace to include more and more people. I’ve read the Bible cover to cover, and I have not found a God who is changing his mind. You know, like I at a basic theological level, I find some of these claims to be.

Ed Stetzer:
I found that I thought that there might be a couple of places where they said the person prayed and God, you know, responded. And I I’m trying to figure out what you know, but but again, it’s a little bit hard to tell from, from the blurbs that we have.

Rebecca McLaughlin :
Yeah. So I think, um. When when we get to the point of saying actually. We’re going to figure out a way to read the Bible that doesn’t say no to same sex sexual relationships. We will tend to find ourselves in all sorts of other. Theological messes, for want of a better word. Um, and at least from what I can tell from the blurb, like this is. There’s going to be some a whole bunch of theological mess here.

Ed Stetzer:
Yeah. It was, it was um, of course that made a this was in early April, made a big, big, big news. And and I think more to come as the, the book is read and more. But but I do think I wanted to hear your a bit of your reaction. It kind of in some ways reminds me of of when Sam Albury responded to Andy Stanley’s in Christianity Today. Um, that, you know, I mean, I’m, I’m my, my, my journey is, you know, I’m you’re experiencing inclusion. You’re experiencing the community that’s there and others are there as well. And, and and you’re doing so I would say at a way that reflects a, a personal cost. And let me just say, maybe on behalf of evangelicalism, I’m thankful that you have maintained a biblical view, orthodoxy, when there’s a personal cost that’s there. And and it does certainly close closes conversations, closes doors and and has cost you personally. So so that’s why I think one of the reasons why I when I knew when I heard you had a new book coming out again, the book is Does the Bible Affirm same sex relationships examining ten claims about Scripture and sexuality? Uh, your book Confronting Christianity, sort of, you know, just everyone was talking about that. We had you speak at the amplify conference, and I was there, Wheaton and others. And I know you’re just back there as well. Um, so, so with these, uh, realities that are there, let’s talk some about those claims. Um, um, the you talked about ten claims in your book most often come across what how do you account what are the most what are the most common ones, and how do you kind of counter some of them?

Rebecca McLaughlin :
Yeah, I tried in the book to address what seemed to me to be the most common claims. Now, it may be that there was an 11th one that was more common and popular than the ones that I addressed. I didn’t do like a kind of scientific study of, um, exactly what people are saying. Um, but what I tried to do is to take each claim, um, seriously, because many of these claims actually, at first glance, sound quite persuasive and compelling. So I wanted to kind of look carefully at the claim that was being made and then to explain why. Actually, if we look in a bit more detail, we will see that this claim doesn’t hold up. Um, now, the one exception to this, I guess you could say, is I have an early chapter that’s looking at God’s judgment on Sodom. And that passage in Genesis is often referred to by Christians as like clear proof that God does not affirm same sex marriage. And I actually think the way that it’s been wielded by Christians, if that was the only evidence that we had from the Bible, I don’t think it makes that case. Now, I think it’s not inconsistent with the evidence of the rest of the Bible. So I’m not saying it like has nothing to contribute to this conversation. Um, but the situation in Sodom is a situation of sort of the attempted gang rape of these two men who were in fact, angels.

Rebecca McLaughlin :
But like, nobody on any side of this conversation is saying that, um, clearly God affirms gang rape like that. Um, so, so that’s a that’s a claim which I think has, um, you know, when people say actually you’re illegitimately applying the story of Sodom to the question of same sex marriage for Christians today, I think there’s an extent to which it is an illegitimate, illegitimate application. And interestingly, when Jesus talks about the story of Sodom, his application of it is not, um, therefore don’t have same sex sex. His application of it is, um, if the people of Sodom had had the kind of access to me that you guys have had and my teaching, they would have repented. So it’s going to be worse for you on on Judgment Day than it is than it was for the people of Sodom. Sort of startling, really. I mean, there’s, um. The more I read through, and the more I kind of looked at all of the different passages in the Bible that do speak to this issue, the more clear I’ve become on God’s, um, the seriousness of God’s judgment and the beauty of the gospel, and that actually any of us who are entering into these conversations from a posture of sort of superiority. Um, and looking, looking down on those sort of sinners over there.

Rebecca McLaughlin :
We’re not reading the passages carefully. Um, you know, even, for example, Paul in Romans one, when he, um, clearly portrays both male male and female female sexual relationships as, as sinful. Um, then at the beginning of chapter two kind of slaps you in the face if you’re somebody who was sort of reading this from a self-righteous perspective. So I think we have the the gospel baked in all around all of these passages. Um, and we, we end up kind of robbing the gospel of its power if we’re trying to just, um, position on what the Bible clearly says is sin is not sin. You know, the gospel is about the forgiveness of sins, not about, um, us sort of trying to reinterpret things that God says as sinful as as not sinful. Um, I think one of the, one of the areas which I found particularly interesting was looking at how the the word that Paul uses in a couple of places. Um, to describe men who sleep with other men. Um is aware that he’s essentially coined, based on the Greek translation of the verse in Leviticus 18, where, um, the law says that a man must not sleep with another male. And a sort of just interesting to see the connective tissue between the Old Testament and the and the new. Um, on that point and some of the ways in which I think affirming arguments try to say, well, we can’t really know what Paul was meaning there.

Rebecca McLaughlin :
I’m thinking it’s actually really hard to sort of look at this carefully in the, in the Greek and not to know what Paul is meaning there. Um, or when people say, well, the Bible’s only really talking about unequal and exploitative sexual relationships between an adult man and a teenage boy, which was very common for sure in in the Greco-Roman context into which Paul was writing. You know, one of the problems with that is that there was language for that that Paul didn’t use. Instead, he went straight back and sort of pulled those terms out of Leviticus and the languages of a of a man sleeping with another male. It’s the same word that’s used in Genesis when God creates humans, male and female. It doesn’t comment on the age of the person. It’s just like another male is what’s not. Okay. So I think it’s it’s often the case, I think that Christians are hearing an argument which says, oh, if only you’d read the Greek, or if only you’d read the Hebrew, or if only you knew about the cultural context. And actually, when you dig into any of these things, you find no. Once I know the Greek, once I know the Hebrew, once I know the cultural context, it’s still saying what it looks like. It’s saying.

Ed Stetzer:
The Setzer Church Leaders Podcast is part of the Church Leaders Podcast Network, which is dedicated to resourcing church leaders in order to help them face the complexities of ministry. Today, the Church Leaders Podcast Network supports pastors and ministry leaders by challenging assumptions, by providing insights and offering practical advice and solutions and steps that will help church leaders navigate the variety of cultures and contexts that we’re serving in. Learn more at Church leaders.com/podcast network. I think. I think it is a some people are feeling intimidated in the conversation and I think sometimes like, you know, the casually, flippantly referencing Sodom and Gomorrah is is without, you know, knowing you understand the argument in Romans one is probably not enough in 2024. And again, I think that’s one of the reasons why your book does the Bible affirm same sex relationships is going to be helpful for people. Now, again, we’ve got ten claims, but we don’t have time to go through all of them. But, you know, I mean, Jesus never mentions this, so why are you making this such a big deal? Let’s just start there.

Rebecca McLaughlin :
Yeah. Well, so Jesus, in his ministry on earth, was predominantly addressing his fellow Jews, and it was the occasions when Jesus is interacting with with Gentiles. But the large majority of time he is talking to his fellow Jews and and then obviously, at the end of his ministry on earth, sends his disciples to make disciples of all nations. And then he specifically commissions Paul to be the apostle to the Gentiles. But because the Jews of Jesus’s day were were familiar with the Old Testament law, they were not debating whether it was okay for a man to sleep with another male. That was something that they kind of knew pretty well. Um, you know, similarly, Jesus doesn’t, uh, spend time teaching that you shouldn’t worship idols. Now, is that because Jesus doesn’t care about idol worship? Not at all. It’s patently clear from the Old Testament that God’s people should not be worshipping idols. Um, but Jesus doesn’t feel the need to to teach on that specifically because he’s got, you know, he’s got a Jewish audience. He already knows that when it comes to Paul’s writings, we see quite a lot of condemnation of idol worship because he’s writing often to Gentiles who were coming to Christ out of a context of idol worship. And we see a number of references to same sex sexual relationships. Again, because he’s writing to Gentiles in a context where certain kinds of same sex sexual relationships were seen as perfectly normal and fine and and good. Now, I think it’s an exaggeration to say that Jesus doesn’t say anything, um, about same sex sexual relationships for two reasons.

Rebecca McLaughlin :
One is that the Greek word porneia, which is typically translated sexual immorality, was kind of a catchall terms for any kind of sexual relationships outside of male female marriage, and absolutely would have included in people’s minds, um, same sex sexual relationships in the terms of his day. And Jesus specifically condemns porneia um. Often adjacent to condemning adultery. So it’s not just, you know, that adultery is not okay, but also any form of sexual immorality is is not okay. And I find it particularly interesting in terms of our cultural context today that Jesus, um, says that sexual immorality is something that might come out of our hearts and make us unclean, because I think one of the arguments, or one of the kind of areas of concern people have today is like, you know what? Since it seems that for some people, myself included, same sex attraction seems sort of arise in us quite naturally. Like that’s how it feels. Like, how could you possibly say that something that arises in me so naturally is wrong? Well, the bad news is, Jesus says all sorts of things that arise in our hearts, seemingly naturally, are in fact sinful. So. We can’t come to Christ without recognizing we have a profoundly sinful heart that is going to like sinful desires are going to come out of my sinful heart, and I need Jesus’s forgiveness, and I need the Spirit’s help, um, to to to resist that.

Rebecca McLaughlin :
We also, in Matthew 19, see Jesus being asked about divorce and once again giving a kind of stricter version of the law than the the Old Testament gives. Um, and defining marriage as a one flesh union between one man and one woman. And it’s fascinating because Jesus could have only quoted Genesis two when he defines marriage, when he says, um, you know, quoting therefore a man will leave his father and his mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh. That would have been sufficient to make the point that Jesus was making about, um, sort of against divorce. But Jesus actually begins by saying, have you not heard that in the beginning God created them, male and female? Coming back to Genesis one. So it’s almost like Jesus sort of underscoring the male female nature of marriage, um, in a way that wouldn’t have been completely necessary to the point that he was making. So, yeah, I think it’s a I think it’s a misinterpretation of Jesus to say he had nothing to say and that, you know, we could, um, we could make Jesus’s words sort of accommodate same sex sexual relationships. But I think since it is so clear in the Old Testament and in the other New Testament writings that same sex sexual relationships are out of bounds, I think it’s an illegitimate read to say, well, Jesus, you know, clearly wasn’t concerned about this because he didn’t major on this when he’s talking to a different audience.

Ed Stetzer:
I think this is the the kind of things that people will find helpful in the book. Does the Bible affirm same sex relationships? Because I think, Rebecca, a lot of people are nervous about how to articulate this. And, and, and I and I actually tell them they need to be careful not just, you know, get up and regurgitate talking points, but they need they need to lean in on the topic. This is an issue of today, and I think clarity is kindness. And, you know, our own church has done a series on where we are on some of these issues and taught what the Bible teaches with, I think, pastoral wisdom and biblical orthodoxy. So why don’t we just say to people like, I just maybe I should just not talk about this issue at all.

Rebecca McLaughlin :
I think sometimes people feel, um, like they don’t want to talk about this issue because it feels like a distraction from the gospel. And it’s such a barrier to belief. I mean, certainly where I live in Cambridge, Massachusetts, there are so many people who wouldn’t even consider Christianity because in their minds, it’s homophobic. I think actually, if we are talking about Christian sexual ethics in a biblical way, we will find that it is completely centered on the gospel. And so one of the things that I sometimes say to to non-Christians is Christian sexual ethics is actually weirder than you think. You know, it’s not only that. I think that the Bible says that sex only belongs in marriage between one man and one woman, one woman, but that actually this is all about a metaphor. And it’s a metaphor that we see started in the Old Testament, when God is compared by prophet after prophet to a loving, faithful husband and Israel to his often unfaithful wife. Then Jesus comes sort of steps onto the stage of human history and declares that he is the bridegroom. It is very weird comment for a man to make who never married in his life on earth. But actually, if you understand the Old Testament context, it’s one of the ways in which Jesus is stepping into the shoes of the creator God revealed in the Old Testament scriptures. He’s saying, I am the bridegroom. Come to claim God’s people for myself.

Rebecca McLaughlin :
And we then see Paul in Ephesians five, when he describes Christian marriage as like a little sort of scale model of Jesus’s love for his people. Um, and says at the end of that passage in, um, Ephesians 533 that actually the whole point of marriage from the first, you know, he goes back to Genesis two and quotes that verse, therefore a man will leave his father and his mother united his wife. Two will become one flesh. He says, this is a profound mystery, but I’m saying that it refers to Christ in the church, um, that we see, oh, actually, just like God has built us, um, biologically, so that there is a thing called fatherhood. Um, and so that the, the absolute best human father can give us a tiny little glimpse of God’s fatherly love for us. So God has built us in such a way that we can enter into marriage and that we can have children in that context as well, to give us a tiny kind of glimpse of Jesus’s exclusive love for us. And we see it. Then at the end of the Bible, in the book of Revelation, multiple times, um, it’s described as the wedding of the lamb, as Jesus’s marriage to his people brings heaven and earth back together. So actually, I think when we talk about questions of sexual ethics, we need to lean right into the gospel. Because actually, if we’re not, we’re not really talking about Christian sexual ethics.

Rebecca McLaughlin :
Like at the center of this conversation is that love that Jesus has for his people. And at the same time, we need to remember that Jesus, on the night that he was betrayed, said to his disciples, this is my commandment, that you love one another as I have loved you. Greater love has no one than this, that he lay down his life for his friends. And actually, if we look through the the New Testament from soup to nuts, we will find time and again that we are commanded to love one another. And we’ll find the occasional verse about marriage and the occasional verse about parenting. Large majority of the time when we’re hearing about love in the New Testament, it’s God’s love for us. Or it’s it’s the brotherly and sisterly love that we are to have one another. And so rather than, as Christians, having a sort of shriveled and, um, uh, inadequate view of love between believers of the same sex, I actually think we have a beautiful and glorious vision for it. It’s just a different vision from the sexual and romantic kind of exclusive love of marriage. Um, and again, that’s something that I not only believe from reading the scriptures, but I like, see, in my life here as, as brothers and sisters sort of learn to love one another and find in the Christian community more love than they ever had when they were seeking their own sexual fulfillment.

Ed Stetzer:
The. Of course, you’ve written on this in No Greater Love A Biblical Vision for friendship. You might not know this, but we originally talked about having you on to talk about that and then found out that your new book was coming out. So I do want to commend again the book No Greater Love A Biblical Vision for friendship, which I think is really essential to this whole conversation. So last question. And, you know, the reality is you have a significant and generationally growing population that is identifying as LGBTQ plus. And so what would you say to pastors and church leaders, our audience, how can they best minister to and disciple people who come to them, who express their their own struggle with their sexual identity? What would you say? Um.

Rebecca McLaughlin :
I would say the harvest is plentiful. And I said that for for a couple of reasons. Um, one is that whereas there are some people who, like me, have grown up, you know, all all through adolescence or through young adulthood or whatever, like I, for whatever reason, um, have always been attracted to their same sex. There is there are also millions of Gen Z women right now who have had exceedingly bad experiences with men. And again, I have like close friends who’ve walked this path of. Basically coming to the point of saying, do you know what? I think I must be a lesbian because I find the sexual relationships I’ve been having with men to have been so awful. The fact is, in in secular culture today, and more so than it was 10 or 20 years ago, like the sexual revolution as a whole has been exceedingly bad for women. And I’ve read like non-Christian authors saying this as well. It’s I’m not even just saying this from a Christian perspective. And the idea that casual sex is something that women in general are going to want to be made happy by. It’s actually, um, demonstrably false on average. What we’ve introduced in in the last several years is a normalization of sexual violence. So, for example, you know, women being choked by their sexual partners. Um, and women are being told, oh, this you should absolutely be in favor of this.

Rebecca McLaughlin :
Isn’t this so great? Actually, it’s awful, like profoundly terrible. And so we have today. Millions of young women who are dating other women, um, as a sort of refuge from the horrors of dating young men. Now, again, I want to be clear. I’m not that that is not the story of every young woman who identifies as as a lesbian or as, um, as same sex attracted or whatever. Um, there are plenty of people with more of my story, but that’s I do think that explains, um, at least some of the the rapid kind of uptick of of young women in particular in this situation. Um, and alongside all of this, the decline in church attendance over the last 25 years has gone hand in hand with a massive upswing in depression, anxiety, suicide attempts, etc., especially among young women. And those are distinctly related things. Um, in fact, Harvard School of Public Health has been. Um, publishing studies on this like it’s we have a a generation in particular, um, Gen Z that is actually desperate for what we have to offer in the church. Um, and I say that not only because I believe the gospel to be true, which I do, but also just at a purely empirical level. Um, what people need is love, not the kind of sexual culture that they’ve been pushed into.

Ed Stetzer:
So that person comes to the pastor, church leader. How do how do we walk alongside on that journey with them?

Rebecca McLaughlin :
Um, I think a lot of it is going to be. Finding people within our congregations who are who are in a good position to love these young people. Now, what do I mean by that? Now, last Tuesday, for instance, I, um, invited a one of the young women in our community group who, um, as a student, started dating another girl and to end up engaged that girl. And then. While they were engaged decided, like, actually, I can’t, I just can’t go through with this. Ended up moving to Boston, started coming to our church, like properly engaged with Christianity in a meaningful way for arguably the first time. And, um, is now at a point where, you know, she’s very seriously following Jesus. Um, I asked her to share her story with a young woman who sort of figuring out what she believes and who has herself a history of same sex sexual relationships. Um. It’s finding those people within our communities who can, um. It empathize with in in the best sense. Um and love. Um, those who who might be feeling really hurt. Um, sometimes by church experiences as well as by what they’ve experienced sort of outside in the secular world and, um, us all growing in our capacity for genuinely, um, developing community love. Because. Even if somebody profoundly disagrees with you. Often if they know that you are acting with genuine love towards them. They’re actually ready to listen to what you have to say. Um, I say that not least, like this morning, I was given a bunch of flowers by the atheist lesbian barista at the the coffee shop where I routinely work, who we’ve had all these conversations. But she knows that I love her. And so we have a great relationship and we, you know, chat a lot. We give each other thoughtful gifts and I pray for her pretty much every day.

Ed Stetzer:
Thanks for taking the time. These are these are not easy conversations, particularly when a culture has overwhelmingly changed its mind on sexuality in the last maybe 15 or 20 years. But there are important ones. And this is our day. This is our time. So we walk through the moment that we have seeking to be faithful to the scriptures that we love and under the Lordship of Jesus Christ. So thanks for taking the time to have the conversation with us.

Daniel Yang:
We’ve been talking to Rebecca McLaughlin. You can learn more about her at Rebecca McLaughlin. Org. Be sure to check out her book Does the Bible Affirm Same Sex Relationships? Examining ten claims about Scripture and sexuality. And thanks again for listening to the Sister Church Leaders Podcast. You can find more interviews, as well as other great content for ministry leaders at church leaders, compered casts. And through our new podcast network, Church Leaders Compered network. And again, if you found our conversation today helpful, we’d love for you to take a few moments. Leave us a review that will help other ministry leaders find us and benefit from our content. Thanks for listening. We’ll see you in the next episode.

Voice Over:
You’ve been listening to the Stetzer Church Leaders podcast for more great interviews as well as articles, videos, and free resources, visit our website at Church leaders.com. Thanks for listening.

Sonix is the world’s most advanced automated transcription, translation, and subtitling platform. Fast, accurate, and affordable.

Automatically convert your mp3 files to text (txt file), Microsoft Word (docx file), and SubRip Subtitle (srt file) in minutes.

Sonix has many features that you’d love including automatic transcription software, share transcripts, world-class support, automated subtitles, and easily transcribe your Zoom meetings. Try Sonix for free today.

Key Questions for Rebecca McLaughlin

-​​Can Christians just agree to disagree on this topic?

-Do you identify as lesbian or gay, and why or why not?

-What are some of the most common claims that try to use Scripture to affirm same-sex relationships, and how do you counter them?

-How can pastors and church leaders minister to people struggling with their sexual identities?

Key Quotes From Rebecca McLaughlin

“I think we can all agree that the New Testament takes sexual sin exceedingly seriously, that Jesus himself takes sexual sin exceedingly seriously.”

“This is a life or death kind of situation, not an agree to disagree sort of scenario.”

“The more I have studied the Scriptures, the more convinced I am that there is just a very clear no to same-sex sexual relationships. But I feel like I’ve come to a better understanding both of the sort of gospel-centered ‘why’ to that, and of the gospel-centered call that we all have to love one another as brothers and sisters in Christ.”

“Unrepentant sexual sin is actually walking you out of the kingdom of God. This is an eternal life level conversation that we’re having.”

How Not to Comfort the Mourning: Hospital Chaplain JS Park Talks Grief in New Book

J.S. Park
Author J.S. Park and the cover of his book, "As Long as You Need." (Courtesy images)

(RNS) — “Everything happens for a reason” might be one of the least helpful things you can say to someone who just lost a loved one, according to veteran hospital chaplain J.S. Park.

But while Park understands why people grasp for what he calls “Swiss cheese theology” in moments of loss, working as an interfaith chaplain at a Level 1 trauma center in Tampa, Florida, has taught him that grief is less about letting go and moving on, and more about letting in and moving with. In his latest book, “As Long as You Need: Permission to Grieve,” Park draws on nearly a decade of sitting with people on the worst day of their lives, offering vivid stories from the bedside and his own life to show why an unrushed, authentic approach to grieving allows people to honor their loss for what it is.

RELATED: ‘There Are Many Worlds in Me’: Asian American Christians Reject Conformity

Religion News Service spoke to Park about how not to talk to the grieving, how Park lost and found his Christian faith as a chaplain and where he finds moments of resurrection in a career that routinely faces death. This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

What are some of the myths about grief you hope to debunk in this book?  

The biggest myth I see is that grief is a poison to get past. There’s positive intent there, because the sadness of grief is so hard to deal with. But grief is part of our human process. Trying to insert future hope in the present loss can only harm us, because it’s rushing us towards a conclusion that so many of us are not ready for. The first step out of that myth is to not look away from grief, but to let it in. The reason that loss hurts so much is because that person, that dream, the thing that we lost meant so much to us. How do we honor that?

What have you found to be some of the most unhelpful ways to respond to grief?

There are sugar-coated cliches we use: This is God’s will for your life. Everything happens for a reason. God is using this to refine you. God needed another angel in heaven. We’re offering Swiss cheese theology. It’s handing someone a cobweb on the way down this abyss. I’ve seen it in pop culture too. Be strong. Just think positive. Phrases that try to wrap up grief in a single sentence can be some of the most harmful things you can say. What you’re really telling this person is, if you just believe this, then your grief will be gone. And it’s almost telling this person their loss doesn’t matter. Instead, the helpful thing would be to look it in the face, name what it is and validate feelings.

What responses do you find more helpful?

Everyone grieves differently. We know the people we love. And if we pause for a moment and empathize, we can find what they need. It’s not necessarily going to be words. Sometimes we’re tired, we’re hungry, or we just want to do something fun. I remember one time I was going through something particularly difficult, and I texted my friend and said: Can I just call you, but I don’t want you to say anything? Just once in a while, breathe kind of loud on the phone so I know you’re there. That’s what I needed at the time.

You write that you lost your faith in two parts. How so?

I did lose my faith during my residency, and since then, I probably lost my faith a couple more times. It’s come back, but each time very different. That first time, I lost it in two stages. The first stage was that sugary scaffolding or Swiss cheese theology. Ideas like, if I remain positive, or if I read the Bible enough, things will turn out all right. These kind of transactional ideas about God all fell through. My patients’ suffering just seemed random and haphazard. I would say the harder loss of faith was my loss of a complete sense of safety and security in the universe. I was questioning, is everything without meaning or purpose? I see what the nurses and doctors do, I even see what the machines do, but what does God do? My trust in this person was broken. It almost felt like at the heart of the universe was this neglectful force.

Our Church Sponsored a Refugee Family—It Bridged the Political Divide.

Refugee Family
Photo by Wes Dillon

The divisiveness of this election year is reminding me how welcoming a refugee family united our politically diverse community.

As we passed the second anniversary of the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan and also International Women’s Day in early March, both markers are meaningful to my church in New Hampshire. In 2022, we welcomed a refugee family with five daughters from Afghanistan following the fall of Kabul. 

The impact of welcoming this family has been positive for our small church and community. At a time when America faces another election and our politics divides us more than ever, this act united us. It holds valuable lessons for the country, and I hope that when they hear about it, other pastors and community leaders across America decide to follow our lead. 

After seeing desperate families crowd the Kabul airport, our church volunteered to welcome refugees through a pilot initiative from the U.S. State Department that expands beyond the excellent work refugee resettlement agencies are already doing.

You only need five people in your community to come together and agree to welcome a refugee family. Through the State Department’s program Welcome Corps, our church partners with Community Sponsorship Hub and WelcomeNST, organizations that empower and train people like you and I to be in private sponsor groups all over the country.

This work is a bridge in our community. It offers hope for divided communities across America. We have seen people on different sides of the political spectrum unite to help refugee families. For example, March 28, 2022 was the first day of school in New 

Hampshire for the two teenage Afghan girls. On the same day, the Taliban announced the end of school for girls in their country. Their parents cried as the doors closed on the yellow bus. For those on different political sides, this story of the first day of school for the two Afghan girls here began to unite them. 

To begin with, some members of our church were concerned about welcoming immigrants, even from war-torn countries. And yet when they met the Afghan family, they recognized a family like their own. One of our church members is a good example of what I mean. By his own admission, he is conservative on immigration and his social media offers the latest hot takes. Still, he agreed to teach the Afghan father, Mohammad, to drive. The two men found respect for each other, and a friendship bloomed.

Months later, the conservative church member went in for surgery and when Mohammad heard the news, something remarkable happened. Mohammad drove to the hospital, brought flowers, and sat with his new friend through his recovery. Now the two men have inspired others in our community to see past labels and division. Theirs is a story about two people finding a common connection. It transcends lazy soundbites and partisan politics. 

Whatever our politics, most of us aspire to be kind, generous, and have the depth of character to help vulnerable people. But living in America in 2024 can make that difficult. Welcoming refugees has helped our community to be generous and kind. It’s a simple act, but it has turned us into better people.

Worried about increasing divisions in our church and community, we asked: What do we want to stand for? Welcoming the stranger is our answer, drawn from Jesus’s teachings. In the gospel of Matthew, he also talks about giving food to the hungry, drink to the thirsty, and clothing those in need. These are things all of us can stand for if we have the simple courage to follow through.

8 Reasons Pastorless Churches Should Consider an Interim Pastor

communicating with the unchurched

I admit my bias here. I’ve served as an interim pastor when my schedule has allowed, and I’ve loved the experiences. I’m not asking for offers here, though. I’m simply encouraging pastorless churches to think about this option.

  1. It gives the church time to work through the emotions of the previous pastor’s departure. If the departure was a healthy one, the church likely needs time to grieve. If it was a difficult leaving, the church may need time to heal. An interim allows for that time.
  2. It’s good to hear from a consistent voice during an interim period. It’s tough for a church to move forward when they’re hearing each week from a different voice—often from someone not associated with the church. An interim offers consistency in the leadership voice.
  3. An intentional interim can still lead the church to move forward during an interim period. My general philosophy as an interim pastor is this: lead the church to be so moving forward that the new pastor doesn’t need to “jumpstart” them; he needs to catch up with them. We don’t always get there in my interims, but we do move in that direction.
  4. An interim can guide and encourage the remaining church staff. Too often, a church doesn’t think much about how the departure of a lead pastor affects the staff. An interim pastor can give direction to the staff and be “glue” to strengthen their unity.
  5. Having an interim saves the hassle of finding a speaker for every week. Frankly, it’s not always easy to find a large number of available speakers who also preach the Word well. The task of enlisting a speaker for every week can be tedious, time-consuming work—but a church with an interim avoids this task.
  6. An interim in place gives the pastor search team space for not rushing the search. Generally, the search process takes longer than expected (longer than it needs to be, in my opinion). But, a search team that rushes the process too often later regrets their pastor choice. It’s good to give them time to prayerfully work through the search process.
  7. An interim pastor can look at the church with outsider eyes. Every church I know could benefit from outside eyes. An interim period is a good time to assess the church and “fix” some things before the next pastor arrives. An interim can take a look at the church as both an outsider and insider.
  8. Some interim pastors feel called to this task at this point in their ministry. They’re not doing it just to get to preach; they’re doing it to honor the Lord and bless His church. I encourage pastorless churches to find out if any of these leaders live in their area.

Church leaders who’ve experienced an interim pastorate, what would you add to this list?

This article originally appeared here and is used by permission. 

855,266FansLike

New Articles

New Podcasts

Joby Martin

Joby Martin: What Happens When Pastors Finally Understand Grace

Joby Martin joins “The Stetzer ChurchLeaders Podcast” to discuss what happens when a church leader has truly been run over by the “grace train" and understands the profound love and grace of God.