Home Blog Page 739

United Methodist’s 2021 General Conference Could Split the Denomination—It May Also Have to Be Virtual

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

With no end in sight to the deadly pandemic, a number of United Methodist leaders are urging that General Conference be virtual—if it’s to be held at all next year.

Others worry such an option is impractical and possibly unjust for an international meeting that typically lasts 10 days and draws nearly 900 delegates from across four continents and 13 time zones.

The stakes are high. The coming General Conference faces multiple proposals to resolve longtime debate over homosexuality by splitting the denomination along theological lines.

The United Methodist Church’s top lawmaking assembly was set for May this year until the spread of COVID-19 caused the meeting’s Minneapolis venue to cancel. Organizers have postponed the meeting to Aug. 29-Sept. 7, 2021 and kept it in Minneapolis.

Even that delay might not be enough, given the disease’s current menace. U.S. coronavirus case numbers are climbing across the country, and more than a dozen states have recently set record highs for COVID-19 hospitalizations.

“Many gatherings in the United States, including music festivals and concert series, are being postponed,” said Bishop Ken Carter, who leads the Florida Conference. “We are clearly in a third wave of the pandemic. And timetables for the vaccine and testing are still uncertain.”

Ultimately, the Commission on the General Conference is the body that determines when, where and how the lawmaking assembly takes place. The group’s next meeting is scheduled to be held online in December.

Carter—a former Council of Bishops president—is among multiple leaders encouraging the commission to consider online options.

They include Bishop Bruce Ough, who leads the Minnesota and Dakotas conferences. The conferences have spent years preparing to host the next General Conference. However, with the Minnesota Department of Health limiting gatherings to no more than 250 people, he said, “we have no choice but to be talking about this.”

United Methodist Communications, which has provided technical support for General Conference in the past, has been researching what a virtual event would entail, staff executives said. The agency has not received a request yet for assistance but is ready to be in conversation, they said.

Virtual platforms “are becoming part of our daily bread,” said Bishop Cynthia Fierro Harvey, the current Council of Bishops president and leader of the Louisiana Conference.

“With the proper preparation and training, I believe a General Conference could be held virtually,” Harvey said. “There are new technological developments every day that could make traversing the globe, languages and time zones possible.”

Bishops caution that any online meeting would need a compact agenda.

Falwell Sues Liberty, Saying School Damaged His Reputation

jerry falwell
FILE - In this Nov. 16, 2016 file photo, Liberty University president Jerry Falwell Jr., poses during an interview in his offices at the school in Lynchburg, Va. Falwell filed a lawsuit Wednesday, Oct. 28, 2020, against Liberty University with defamation and breach of contract claims alleging the school damaged his reputation in statements after his resignation. (AP Photo/Steve Helber, File)

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — Jerry Falwell Jr. has sued Liberty University, alleging the evangelical school founded by his late pastor father damaged his reputation in a series of public statements that followed his resignation as president and chancellor in August amid a series of scandals.

The lawsuit filed in Lynchburg Circuit Court on Wednesday includes claims of defamation and breach of contract. It alleges that Liberty officials accepted what Falwell says are false claims about his involvement in an extramarital affair between his wife and a business partner of the couple’s and “moved quickly” to destroy his reputation.

“When Mr. Falwell and his family became the targets of a malicious smear campaign incited by anti-evangelical forces, Liberty University not only accepted the salacious and baseless accusations against the Falwells at face value, but directly participated in the defamation. This action seeks redress for the damage Liberty has caused to the reputation of Mr. Falwell and his family,” the lawsuit says.

K. Todd Swisher, Circuit Court clerk for the city of Lynchburg, provided The Associated Press with a copy of the complaint, which contains a limited number of redactions in sections pertaining to Falwell’s employment agreement. Swisher said there would be a hearing within a week for a judge to consider whether an unredacted version of the complaint should remain sealed.

Liberty spokesman Scott Lamb said the school, which had not yet been served with the lawsuit, would have a formal statement in response later Thursday. The school’s board of trustees has been meeting this week.

An attorney for Falwell did not respond immediately to a telephone message left Thursday, and Falwell did not respond to a voicemail and text seeking comment.

Falwell left Liberty in August after Giancarlo Granda, a younger business partner of the Falwell family, said he had a yearslong sexual relationship with Falwell’s wife, Becki Falwell, and that Jerry Falwell participated in some of the liaisons as a voyeur.

Although the Falwells have acknowledged that Granda and Becki Falwell had an affair, Jerry Falwell has denied any participation. The couple allege that Granda sought to extort them by threatening to reveal the relationship unless he was paid substantial amounts of money.

Before his resignation, Falwell had already been on an indefinite leave of absence after an uproar over a photo he posted on social media of him and his wife’s pregnant assistant, both with their pants unzipped.

Falwell said it was taken in good fun at a costume party during a vacation, but critics saw it as evidence of hypocrisy by the head of an institution that holds students to a strict moral code of conduct.

Shortly after Falwell’s departure, Liberty announced it was opening an independent investigation into his tenure as president, a wide-ranging inquiry that would include financial, real estate and legal matters.

Earlier this month, the school identified Baker Tilly US as the firm handling the investigation and announced the launch of a website to “facilitate the reporting of potential misconduct to the investigative team.”

The Blessing of a Low-Tech Church in a High-Tech Pandemic

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

Pastoral ministry in 2020’s pandemic is a constantly-changing landscape.

From in-person worship one week, to online-only the next week, to a blend of both, to whatever is coming next. Plus, the need to adapt quickly and dramatically isn’t likely to stop when we turn the calendar to 2021.

A lot of churches are adapting really well. But it also strikes me that so much of our adaptation relies on technology that was not in common usage as little as 20 years ago – even ten years for options like live-streaming.

It makes me wonder – how would our churches have adapted if this pandemic had happened just 20 years ago? What would we have done without ready access to internet-based technology? I’m convinced that whatever we would have done then, we should also be doing it now.

While using all the technology we can, it’s important to lean into low-tech ministry, too. Here are some examples:

The Phone Call

Before your phone was a computer, it was a phone. And it still is.

While I’m grateful for all the extras my phone can do, when it comes to ministry – especially small church ministry – there’s no better way to reach out when you can’t be there in person than the voice-to-voice phone call.

The Drop-By

What if, when you were on that phone with your church members, you let them know you’d be happy to drop by their house for a face-to-face conversation? Masked and distanced, of course. For a lot of church members, especially our older folks, nothing will lift their spirits like an in-person greeting.

The Family Bible Study

If your church building is still closed, that doesn’t mean worship and Bible Study need to stop.

In addition to the online Bible Studies that many pastors are offering (including me) we can provide tools to help families read, study and discuss the Bible together.

The Store Run / Doctor Visit

Delivery apps are one of the great modern conveniences. And they’re really coming into their own now. Just a few taps of the phone and you can have virtually anything delivered to your door.

But delivery apps are not for everyone. For many church members, especially seniors, the technology is more confusing than helpful. And in many rural areas the apps don’t work at all.

Offering to shop and deliver food and other essentials is something we can do for our church members who need it. Or a drive to the doctor.

We can’t assume that people’s needs are being met by delivery apps. Even if they’re using them, no app can replace old-school helpfulness and friendship.CLICK TO TWEET

We can’t assume that people’s needs are being met by delivery apps. Even if they’re using them, no app can replace old-school helpfulness and friendship.

The Greeting Card

Ah yes, snail mail! There’s still something wonderful about getting a physical card or letter in the mail – especially from someone you haven’t seen in a while.

Unlike calls, texts and emails, people save cards. They display them and then refer to them with fondness.

The Multiple Service Option

If you can’t fit everyone into the room because of social-distancing needs, add more service times. No, it’s not ideal. It adds to the workload for staff and volunteers, and it means we can’t all gather together, but it does have some advantages.

First, it gets people out of their homes and back with other worshipers. Second, it does so more safely than everyone squeezing in for a single service. Third, it might be the nudge some churches need to move permanently from one service to multiple services.

Other Ideas

What other low-tech ideas is your church using during pandemic to help people stay connected to worship, ministry and fellowship? Let us know in the comment section.

This article originally appeared here.

The Subtle Difference Between Vindication and Justification, and Why It Matters

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

If you are a follower of Jesus it is relatively safe to assume that you know what to do with your guilt. We know that when we blow it, that we are to go to Christ in repentance for the forgiveness of sin. What we need in this moment is atonement and then justification. In other words, we need our guilt to be paid for and then for our record to be declared clean.

But what do you do whenever you’ve been wronged? Where do you go when you’re being slandered? What do you do when you need God to “justify you” not in the forensic sense but by way of vindication?

I’m convinced that it is the second question which is fixed on the mind of the apostle Peter and his hearers when he delivers the message of 1 Peter to them. Vindication. That’s the thrust of his encouragement to these elect exiles who are experiencing shame instead of honor. He is encouraging them to press on by showing that they’ll ultimately receive honor instead of shame. In other words, they’ll be vindicated.

But something interesting happened to me in my attempts to do a deep dive on this concept of vindication. I kept running into a road block. Most of my searches hit a dead end:

See Justification.

If I were creating one of those nerdy Venn diagrams there would be significant crossover between justification and vindication. They have similar roots, they’re both grounded in the work of Christ, they both have to do with us being declared innocent. But there is a subtle difference. And I think this difference is important.

In fact I think a good deal of our in-fighting, certainly as a nation but more specifically as believers in Jesus, comes from our lack of having a robust theology of vindication. Yes, we need to know that the justice of God is met and satisfied through the substitutionary death of His Son. We need to know and experience the depth of His forgiveness of our sin. But we also need to know that Jesus has something to say about all the slander against us, the injustices we’ve experienced, and all of the mocking and pain we’ve endured as followers of Jesus.

The gospel has something to say about this too. And to mute this aspect of our redemption is to miss an incredibly healing piece of the atonement. It’s also going to rob us of powerful fuel in our labor to love as Christ did. This was the fuel that Peter was putting in the tank of these Christ-followers who were enduring such trying times. “I know you’re being dishonored right now. I know you’re losing relationships and status. I know you’re losing face. But that’s temporary. The honor you receive from God will be eternal.” That’s the core of his message to them. And fueled them to love those who were reviling them.

What happens if I don’t have a sturdy theology of vindication? My efforts to love will collapse under the pain of my shame. My tank runs on fumes. And my heart, longing for vindication, lashes out instead of loves. If I don’t believe the gospel has anything to say about the slander against me, then I’m going to speak my fallen words into that void.

Of course there is much more to be said to develop a hardy theology of vindication. But rest in this simple truth today: you’re not only justified in the sin you’ve committed but you will also some day be freed of all the injustice against you. Eugene Peterson said it well:

“Nothing counter to God’s justice has any eternity to it.”

But your vindication in Christ? That’s eternal!

This article originally appeared here.

Prayers and Tears at the Poll

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

I went to the polling place to cast my votes, and ended up casting non-partisan prayers for all the candidates. As I stood over that ballot with pen in hand, looking at all the names and offices, tears dropped down indiscriminately on the ovals below. I turned that little space into a prayer closet and portal to the King of Kings.

With a heavy heart and zeal for Christ’s people to represent Him in their political engagements, I found the Lord’s Prayer surprisingly powerful and therapeutic. My prayer went something like this, and I offer it to you as you prepare to cast your own vote in the coming days.

Our Father in Heaven: You are on your heavenly throne, sovereign over all nations at all times. In this moment of national frustration and angst, you are still sovereign over history and over this nation.

Thy Kingdom Come, Thy will be done on earth as it is in Heaven: Oh, we need your Kingdom to break in like never before! Our earthly Kings and Kingdoms are continually botching things up. Somehow, someway, let your will be done through these candidates and offices we’re voting for.  As imperfect as these candidates are, guide their efforts in ways that advance the cause of justice. Forgive us for putting some much faith in this earthly kingdom, and neglecting to advance and promote your Kingdom with equal vigor and passion!

Give us this day OUR daily bread: Lord, we are voting today on taxes, the wise distribution of wealth, the poor and the rich, healthcare and minimum wage laws. In one powerful word, you remind us that Christians are to vote in ways that give US OUR daily bread, not give ME MY daily provisions. Help us to vote in ways that put others needs above my own, and to remember that I am my brother’s keeper. 

Forgive us our (political) sins, as we forgive those who sin against us (politically): Oh, Lord, we confess all the ways we’ve let politics divide us, and lament all the destruction of relationships over political disagreements. Forgive us for putting more energy into winning arguments than loving our neighbors and (political) enemies. Help us to extend grace to those who have offended us with their different views and attacked us with unfair criticism. 

Lead us not into temptation but deliver us from evil: Lord, the Devil is having a hey-day watching us tear each other apart. The lies and spin and slander and division and anger are delightful in his eyes. Lord, help your people, your church, become wiser to his tactics—“for we are not unaware of his schemes”(2 Cor. 2:11)—and not get pulled into the fray. Keep your church pure and un-compromised as we represent your radically different society and way of being human. Deliver us from political mudslinging and nationalistic idolatry.

For after the polls are closed and all the ballots are counted, and after all the victory celebrations and concession speeches are finished, this all-important truth will remain: The kingdom and the power and the glory [ultimately] belong solely to You forever and ever. Amen.

And that’s good news!

I have never spent that much time at the poll, and as I put on that red sticker and walked out into the crisp Minnesota air, I had the feeling that all the silent prayers of God’s people spread across the political divide will likely prove more effective than all the votes cast in this election.

“The prayers of the righteous are powerful and effective.” James 5:16

Reposted from November 8, 2018.

This article originally appeared here.

My Bride and Yours

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

From day one in our marriage, there’s one thing that’s been unspoken between my bride Bec and I. Something we’ve never had to have a conversation about, make an agreement on, or have someone tell us to do.

What is it?

We only speak well of each other to others. Both of us respect and love each other enough to only speak well, to only speak positive words, to only speak highly of each other to others. To be each other’s greatest spokesperson and cheerleader!

The other day, a random stranger found out I was a pastor and he immediately started talking to me about the church he attends. He shared about the leadership roles he’s served in at the church. He shared how long he’s attended the church. He shared about all the different things he’s done for the church. He pridefully handed me his religious resume through words.

(Confession: I was tempted to give him mine and say that I wasn’t impressed with either of ours, but that wouldn’t have been very Jesus-like.)

After sharing all of this, he began to repeatedly criticize his church.
How he’s never been thanked for all that he’s done.
How the church is making all kinds of bad decisions.
How the staff should be paid less.
How the church is trying to reach people they shouldn’t be trying to reach.
How everyone who comes to church is fake.

For 20 minutes straight, he went from one thing to the next, criticizing and belittling every aspect of his church, the staff and the people who worship there—a church that he still attends. Verbally bashing his church to a complete stranger. (Note: Nothing unbiblical or morally wrong about the church was ever mentioned.)

Once he finished, the questions I wanted to ask him were:
Do you speak the same way about your wife?
Do you speak the same way about your bride?
And one step further, would you mind if I, a random stranger, spoke the same way about your wife? If not, why would you do so about the Bride of Christ?

After talking with this guy, honestly, I felt sick.
I was grieved.
I was hurt.

I felt the same way you feel when someone is using words to destroy a close friend or family member you love behind their back. Even though I had no personal ties to the church he was criticizing, even though it wasn’t my church, my bride, everything in me just knew this was wrong.

You don’t talk about your friends, about your loved ones, but especially, you don’t EVER talk about your bride or groom like that.

Now, keeping churches in mind, I just have to ask: Is my bride, Bec, perfect? Let me answer a different question actually, “Is my bride’s husband perfect?”

Nope, far from it! Trust me, the dude needs serious help! He laughs at his own lame jokes. He’ll talk to anyone who has a pulse for hours (even if they’re trying to walk away). He never sits still for longer than five minutes. He’s far from perfect!

Here’s something important to note with all of this: Speaking well of someone to others is completely different than glossing over the truth or ignoring faults. It’s completely different than “speaking truth in love” to a loved one.

The truth is, more than anyone else, Bec is the main truth-teller in my life. How is this different? When she speaks truth, she speaks it to me, not about me. Lovingly. Respectfully. Humbly. Gracefully. Because she loves me. It’s not a hand grenade being thrown from afar. She’s committed to us and our relationship. Again, it’s done out of love. (Note: We don’t have a perfect marriage. We say “I’m sorry” to each other almost daily. We are, without question, a work in progress).

Now I just gotta ask: If you’re a part of a church, how do you speak about your “bride”? Is it in an uplifting and encouraging way or is it critical and belittling?
Are your words filled with grace, always looking for the positive?
Maybe a better question, how are you talking about someone else’s church? Someone else’s bride?

I pray we’d be slow, very slow, to speak poorly about the Bride of Christ.

Speaking of the church I’m a part of, Embrace, my bride, she’s beautiful. I’ve been with her for more than 11 years now (Embrace started in September 2006), and through this time I’ve seen the good, bad and ugly in her. I’ve been blessed and also hurt by her. And yet, I’ve never loved her and the people that make up the body more than I do now. She has a heart for the lost. She’s more concerned about others than she is about herself. She’s a hospital for the sick. She loves Jesus.

I truly believe she’s changing lives and is bringing glory to God, her Groom.

This article originally appeared here.

Top 3 Reasons Churches Avoid Evaluations

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

Whenever I’ve asked church leaders why they don’t encourage more feedback on their ministry work, I’ve heard familiar recurring reasons they don’t:

1. If you ask for feedback, all you get are complaints.

2. People don’t know what they really need.

3. You shouldn’t ask people to evaluate God.

As mere humans, we come up with all kinds of excuses for avoiding things that might lead to change. Change, for most people, is uncomfortable. And for many in the church today, change seems like a heretical concept.

But there’s nothing heretical about striving for improvement in how we go about ministry, how we go about helping people know, love, and follow Jesus. Inviting feedback is one way we can improve.

Even the corner cafe knows the value of feedback. “How was your dinner?” “How was the service?” The cafe owner knows your perceptions are real. And he knows that your perceptions of the food and service are more important than his own–if he wants to improve and grow.

But we in the church we have been reluctant to ask for feedback. Why? The Top 3 Reasons seem to get repeated over and over. But they’re just bogus excuses.

#1. Even if #1 were true, it’s a great reason to actually invite feedback! We learn to improve when we understand where we’re missing the mark. Every specific complaint is far more helpful than 10 meaningless repetitions of “Nice sermon, pastor.”

#2. This one, actually, is often true. But we can’t meet genuine needs until we become better at creating an environment of receptivity for the truth. Even if the cafe owner knows his patrons really need nutritious food, they won’t be back to eat it if the restrooms are dirty or waitress is surly. Those things are simple to evaluate.

#3. No, you shouldn’t evaluate God. But you aren’t God.

So how do you invite helpful feedback? First, know your ministry goals. Then ask specific questions related to progress toward those goals.

Throughout the national network of Lifetree Cafe ministries, we ask two key questions weekly: “Did you experience God today?” and “Did you grow closer to others today?” These outcomes are based on Jesus’ two great commandments. Incidentally, almost everyone fills out the Lifetree comment cards every week. And most weeks, we see very high affirmative answers, often with extra comments. Reading the comments is a favorite part of our week.

Some other sample questions for you to consider:

–What do you recall from last week’s sermon/lesson?

–How did you put last week’s message to use in your life?

–Did a leader or member greet you by your name today?

Feedback questions may be posed on comment cards, in mailings, online, and in person. You may invite feedback weekly, monthly, or sporadically. Just make the mechanism available and easy for everyone to participate.

Your ministry will be better for it.

Time now to heed my own advice. So what do you think? How helpful was this post for you?  

4 Ways to Tell Your Congregation About Online Giving

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

When it comes to digital giving, far too many churches and nonprofits take the “if we build it, they will come” approach. Don’t let this be you! Getting the right platform in place is just the first piece of the puzzle.

A successful digital giving program is an ongoing process, but don’t worry, it’s not nearly as arduous as it can sometimes seem. Here are four things you can do today to ensure you are getting all you can out of your online giving and text-to-give solution:

1) Optimize Your Website for Giving: Be proud of your giving page! Don’t hide the link on the footer or on a list of 15 other links. Get that “Donate” button on your homepage. Get it “above the fold.” It doesn’t need to be the first thing a giver sees when he visits your website, but it should be easy to find when she needs it.

2) Communicate Regularly: Tell your supporters about the digital options. And then tell them again. And again. And again. This will ensure that your givers know exactly where and how they can give back to your organization whenever the opportunity presents itself. Maybe this means regular email appeals. Maybe it means social media updates and a banner on your homepage. Maybe it’s a verbal reminder at your next service or event. Maybe all of the above.

3) Encourage Scheduled Giving: Why do we talk about scheduled giving so much? Because it can have a HUGE impact on your bottom line. When communicating with your members and supporters about digital giving, be sure to include regular encouragements to take advantage of recurring giving options. Even as little as $20.00/month can add up in a hurry.

4) Create a New Campaign or Two: In addition to making donations easier to manage on the backend, new campaigns are a great opportunity to remind your supporters to give online or via text and can be a great way to encourage more of them to engage with the online tools.

These are just four ways your church can get moving forward with digital giving and ignite a surge in participation financially for new projects as well as general funds.  

‘Peeing Pastor’ Hunt Comes to an End

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

(RNS) — After nearly two weeks of speculation that had pastors across North Carolina issuing denials, an online North Carolina news outlet identified the Rev. Danny Chalmers as the “well-known pastor” charged with disorderly conduct for allegedly urinating on a fellow passenger on a flight to Detroit.

The NC Beat published a police report Monday (Oct. 26) naming Chalmers, a charismatic Christian minister from Catch the Fire church in Durham, North Carolina. The news outlet obtained the report through a Freedom of Information Act request to the Wayne Metro Airport Police Department in Michigan.

Chalmers’ wife, Shara, told Religion News Service that her husband had a bad reaction to a sleeping medication and was sleepwalking at the time.

On Oct. 13, Michigan authorities took into custody a man described by the local Fox television station only as “a well-known” North Carolina pastor.

According to Fox 2 Detroit, Alicia Beverly was flying from Las Vegas to Detroit on Oct. 12. After falling asleep, she awoke to find another passenger relieving himself on her. The FBI later said a man was taken into custody and given a date to appear in court, but it did not identify him publicly.

The police report published by The NC Beat said that an off-duty officer saw Chalmers walking down the aisle of the airplane and then heard a scream coming from another passenger. The officer spoke to Beverly, who said Chalmers had urinated on her.

When the officer spoke to Chalmers, according to the report, he denied any involvement, allegedly saying, “I am a pastor, that is out of my character, I didn’t do it.”  When the flight landed in Detroit, Chalmers was cited on a misdemeanor charge of disorderly conduct, then released.

When questioned by police at the airport, according to the report, Chalmers admitted having a few drinks and taking sleeping medication. He also submitted to a blood alcohol test.

Shara Chalmers, a filmmaker and minister who runs Love Wins Ministries with her husband, said he never intended to hurt anyone. She told RNS in an email that he had an “extreme medical reaction” to the sleep medication Ambien and was sleepwalking when the incident occurred.

“He has or would never intentionally hurt anyone,” she said in the email. “He has never done this before and will never take more sleeping medicine. He has written the passenger and taken full responsibility, repented, asked forgiveness and asked if there was anything he can do to make things right, as it was obviously traumatic for her.”

During the protests after the death last spring of George Floyd in Minneapolis, Danny and Shara Chalmers helped organized an event in Cary, North Carolina, where faith leaders and police  washed the feet  of Black protesters, according to CBN.

The couple’s ministry has ties to Bethel Community Church, a California charismatic megachurch, and Danny Chalmers attended Bethel’s Bethel School of Supernatural Ministry, according to a biography found online.

Shara Chalmers said that the couple has been out of the country visiting a sick relative and was not aware of the online controversy the story had created after the initial news report.

Social media speculation about the identity of the pastor involved had led at least one well-known North Carolina minister in the past week to issue a denial.

The Rev. Will Graham, grandson of the legendary Billy Graham and son of Franklin Graham, posted a statement on Twitter last weekend, saying that he had been at the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association headquarters in Charlotte on Oct. 12 and at a family gathering in Asheville the following day.

“I was not on a plane, pure and simple, and I certainly wasn’t involved in the sort of thing they’re suggesting,” he wrote.

Southern Baptist Convention president and megachurch pastor J.D. Greear had also been a subject of social media speculation about the incident.

“It wasn’t JD,” said Todd Unzicker, a spokesman for Summit Church, where Greear is pastor.


This article originally appeared on ReligionNews.com.

Should Pastors Endorse Candidates Outside of the Pulpit?

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

A recent survey from LifeWay Research and Scott McConnell has found that while most Americans do not think pastors should endorse a political candidate during a church service, U.S. adults are more conflicted over whether ministers should do so away from the pulpit. At the same time, the number of Protestant pastors in the U.S. who have endorsed a political candidate outside of a church service in 2020 has increased since 2016.

“It may be hard for some Americans to ever see a pastor as being outside of their church role,” said Scott McConnell, who is executive director of LifeWay Research. “While every American is entitled to their political opinion, some people struggle to separate such personal comments from a pastor’s religious office.”

Scott McConnell: Americans Want Politics to Stay Out of Church

From Sept. 9 to Sept. 23 of this year, LifeWay conducted an online survey of 1,200 pre-recruited Americans, a sample that “provides 95 percent confidence that the sampling error from the panel does not exceed plus or minus 3.2 percent.”  

Based on LifeWay’s findings, the majority of American adults believe it is not acceptable for pastors to publicly endorse a political candidate during a church service. Sixty-one percent said they disagree that it is appropriate for pastors to do so, and 47 percent said that they strongly disagree with such an endorsement. “Americans prefer for churches to remain religious sanctuaries rather than political rallies,” said Scott McConnell. 

However, even though the number of Americans who oppose pastors making a political endorsement in church is a majority, that majority has been decreasing over the past several years. In 2008, LifeWay found this number to be 86 percent; in 2015, it fell to 79 percent. 

But what about outside of a church service? Is it appropriate for pastors to publicly endorse a political candidate when the pastors are not acting in an official capacity? Only 39 percent of Americans said that an endorsement in this context would be inappropriate. Forty-three percent had no problem with it, and 19 percent were not sure. 

LifeWay found a connection between people’s religious beliefs and practices and their answer to this question. Evangelical Americans and regular church attenders tended to be more willing to approve of pastors endorsing a candidate when acting outside of their pastoral role. These two groups were also more likely to agree with pastors endorsing a candidate during a church service, as well as to agree with churches using their own funds to support a candidate’s campaign. LifeWay also found that African Americans were more likely than Americans of other ethnicities to agree with churches endorsing a political candidate. 

Political affiliation was another factor in how survey respondents answered. Republicans, as well as Americans who plan to vote for Trump, were less likely than their Democratic counterparts to have a problem with a church endorsing a political candidate. They were also less likely to see an issue with a pastor endorsing a candidate outside of the pulpit. 

So what are Protestant pastors in the U.S. actually doing? Out of the pastors that LifeWay surveyed, only one percent said they had endorsed a candidate during a church service. Ninety-eight percent said they had not, and LifeWay says these numbers are consistent with research from 2016. Said McConnell, “The candidates endorsed by pastors may be local, state or national. But those who do so in an official church capacity are a rare exception.”

Regarding whether or not they have endorsed a candidate outside of their official role, 32 percent of Protestant pastors said they had. This number is up 10 points from 2016 when only 22 percent said the same. Put another way, in 2016, 77 percent of Protestant pastors said they had not endorsed a candidate in any context, but that number has dropped to 65 percent in 2020. 

There was a connection between political affiliation and pastors’ decisions in this area. Pastors who support Trump were more likely to have endorsed a candidate outside of the pulpit. Pastors who support Biden were less likely to have endorsed a candidate, even when not acting in an official capacity, and were more likely than their counterparts to have encouraged their congregants to register to vote.

According to Scott McConnell, “Pastors are more decided on who they are voting for in 2020, so it’s not surprising that more pastors have shared their opinions with others personally…But there is not complete agreement across different groups about what is right.”

60 Cases of COVID-19 Linked to Maine Church; Pastor Offers (Conditional) Apology

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

A Pentecostal pastor in Maine is speaking out about a COVID-19 outbreak that health officials link to a gathering at his church. After conducting contact tracing, Maine authorities say 60 coronavirus cases are now associated with an early-October fellowship event held at Brooks Pentecostal Church (BPC), located in the small town of Brooks, Maine. They’ve connected cases from that event to cases that emerged in four local public schools as well as a long-term care facility.

In an October 20 Facebook post, Pastor Matthew Shaw expresses “sadness over the resulting sickness that has been spread by the virus,” adding that “the origin of the virus is unclear.” Five days later, in a Facebook video Shaw expresses “regret” and apologizes to the community—but then clarifies that the apology applies to supporters of the church, not to people who have an “agenda” against it.

What Happened in Brooks, Maine?

During the first weekend of October, BPC and its affiliated school, Lighthouse Christian Academy, held a fellowship gathering that drew between 100 and 150 attendees. Masks were available, but few people reportedly wore them, say investigators. Although some activities occurred outdoors, most were held indoors.

Dr. Nirav Shah, director of the Maine CDC, says the COVID-19 outbreak traced to that event has affected individuals ranging in age from 2 to 80. As of October 22, three people had been hospitalized as a result; no deaths had been reported. Based on initial findings, Dr. Shah says cases associated with the outbreak will likely “increase significantly.”

BPC had been holding indoor worship services but has now moved online.

The Pastor’s Apology

Last week, Pastor Shaw urged anyone experiencing coronavirus symptoms or feeling “as though they need to be tested” to seek medical care. He acknowledged the “fear and frustration” that some local residents were experiencing and promised that the church would be “addressing all recommendations and guidelines” from local health officials.

In Sunday’s video, the pastor goes further, saying, “We regret what has happened. We ask your forgiveness. We apologize that the sickness came to our church, and we apologize for the consequences that maybe the community is feeling.” He also expresses gratitude about reports that patients are recovering.

But then Shaw backtracks, saying his apology isn’t to all residents. “When I say ‘the community,’” he says, “I don’t refer to every person that has taken this opportunity to further your cause and your agenda, that you have used this opportunity just to voice your opposition against the church, but rather those of you for 25 years that we have stood with and stood by.”

The pastor mentions various ways BPC has served the area, such as after tragedies and disasters. Supportive neighbors, Shaw says, “are the ones…we want to make sure you know that we are sorry.” Other community members, however, “have told me we will never be forgiven for this.”

Comments on the church’s Facebook page are mixed, with some people expressing gratitude for the pastor’s words and others chastising him. Sentiments range from “You didn’t need to apologize” to “That wasn’t a real apology.”

Francis Chan and Chip Ingram Share Their Best Advice for Growing in Ministry Faithfulness

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

Francis Chan and Chip Ingram joined us for a powerful conversation on ministry faithfulness that we’re excited to bring to you.

Francis Chan is the author of the crazy successful book, Crazy Love and popular conference speaker.

Chip Ingram is the senior pastor of Venture Christian Church in Los Gatos, California and the founder of Living on the Edge, an international discipleship ministry.

Big Questions:

Talk about “winging it” versus speaking spontaneously in preaching and teaching.

What do you do so you keep growing as a man of God and as a leader?

There are topics that people want to avoid and skirt around. How do you preach on tough issues in our world today?

Quotes from Chip Ingram:

“Someone told me, there are books and there is content that is timely and there are those that are timeless. If you will focus on the timeless, you will always be timely.”

“People don’t think they’re making idols. The biggest idol we’re making is we’ve made up a Jesus and we made up a God who doesn’t exist anywhere except in the salad bar of our mind.”

“There’s consequences of all sin. Some are physical and emotional. To me every command in scripture are borders and boundaries for God’s heart to say, “You may disagree, but this is so you get the best. My good, acceptable, perfect will.” God really is for us.”

Quotes from Francis Chan:

“I’ve got to grow in my understanding of who I am before God and so for me the struggle has been to get back to the holiness of God and dig deeper in that and maybe that is a life message.”

“Are we living for heaven? Am I speaking right now thinking about eternal consequences to my words? That’s not something you move past.”

Mentioned in the Show

More from Chip Ingram on ChurchLeaders

More from Francis Chan on ChurchLeaders

Around the Web:

Poll Chaplains Plan to Bring a ‘prayerful presence’ to Precincts This Election Day

New Georgia Project
Voters wearing masks wait in line to vote early outside the Chatham County Board of Elections office in Savannah, Ga., on Wednesday, Oct. 14, 2020. Black people are going to the polls by the thousands and waiting in lines for hours to vote early in Georgia. (AP Photo/Russ Bynum)

(RNS) — Billy M. Honor has been encouraging clergy to join him at the polls for the past three years.

Honor, director of faith organizing for the New Georgia Project, said clergy can be on hand to pass out snacks to voters waiting in long lines, maybe a poncho if it starts to rain. Somehow it always seems to rain on Election Day in Georgia, he said.

They can offer an uplifting word to people having a rough day, encouraging them to “stay in the fight,” he told Religion News Service.

But this year, amid the rancorous tenor of national politics and concerns about voter intimidation and even Election Day violence, Honor said he sensed there was a bigger role clergy could play than what he calls “line warming.”

Billy M. Honor participates in a a panel titled “Getting out the Vote in CoC” at the Religion News Association’s virtual conference in September 2020. Video screengrab

The New Georgia Project is one of several groups training clergy to be precinct chaplains this Election Day (Nov. 3) at polling places across the country.

“Essentially, this is about the defense of democracy. This is about how it is that we stand up for the democratic process and say it is a spiritual value for us to protect people who are trying to participate in the decision-making process for their own lives. It’s beyond the politics of the day or the current events or even what the president is saying,” Honor said.

“Politics is the art of how we organize our life together, and participating in that is deeply godly,” Honor said.

The role of precinct chaplain, or poll chaplain, combines the kind of care clergy are used to offering with monitoring the polls for any signs of voter intimidation or suppression.

Their posture is similar to protest chaplains who stand between police and protesters, not with either side, he explained.

For the New Georgia Project, the idea grew out of conversations with voters who felt disenfranchised or feared their votes weren’t counted. The organization, founded by Stacey Abrams, is a nonpartisan effort to register and engage Georgia voters, particularly those among the “New American Majority”: people of color, people ages 18 to 29 and unmarried women.

FILE – In this Oct. 12, 2020, file photo, hundreds of people wait in line for early voting in Marietta, Ga. Black people are going to the polls by the thousands and waiting in lines for hours to vote early in Georgia. Black people are going to the polls by the thousands and waiting in lines for hours to vote early in Georgia. (AP Photo/Ron Harris, File)

The organization realized this year it needed not just to emphasize voter turnout, but also voter protection, Honor said in September on a panel titled “Getting out the Vote in CoC” at the Religion News Association’s virtual conference.

“We’ve spent as much time talking about how to protect the vote as we have turning it out,” he said.

Ed Stetzer: How to Pastor People in an Age of Outrage

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

Ed Stetzer, Ph.D., is a professor and dean at Wheaton College and also serves as Executive Director of the Wheaton College Billy Graham Center. He has planted, revitalized, and pastored churches, trained pastors and church planters on six continents, has earned two master’s degrees and two doctorates, and has written hundreds of articles and a dozen books. Ed is a contributing editor for Christianity Today, a columnist for Outreach Magazine, and the author of Christians in the Age of Outrage: How to Bring Our Best When the World Is at Its Worst. He currently serves as teaching pastor at Highpoint Church in Chicago and has been the interim teaching pastor at Moody Church in downtown Chicago. Ed is married to Donna, and they have three daughters.

Key Questions for Ed Stetzer on Christians in the Age of Outrage:

-How can a local church pastor engage with political issues well?

-How engaged in politics should pastors be with their congregations?

-What do you say as a pastor when someone presses you on a political issue?

-How do you think the church should navigate the current divisiveness in our culture?

Key Quotes from Ed Stetzer on Christians in the Age of Outrage:

“We find ourselves in outrage and an outrage culture.”

“Sometimes it’s outrage from Christians, and sometimes it’s outrage towards Christians.”

“Don’t say things that convince the women in your church—and it’s not just the women—that you’re going to easily dismiss sexual abuse allegations, and furthermore, make sure people don’t think you don’t care about due process.”

“Jesus didn’t call you to be a politician—he’s called you to be a pastor.”

“My opinion is less important than my role as your pastor and your advocate, the shepherd of your souls.”

“Don’t be all in on anyone but Jesus. Because Jesus is not coming back on Air Force One. And when he comes back, he’s not going to be riding a donkey or an elephant.”

Pilgrims and Plymouth: 400 Years Later

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

On September 16, 1620, the crew of the Mayflower weighed anchor to leave Plymouth, England. The Pilgrims gathered on board were anticipating a new homeland, better economic opportunities, and freedom to follow God’s commands without interference. The ship held thirty-seven Pilgrims, sixty-five other colonists, thirty crew members, some small-breed livestock, and a few dogs. The ship’s decks were also filled with food, tools (including a blacksmith’s shop), clothing, water, beer, two cannons for defense, multiple firearms, and other items needed for the two month journey and settlement in the new world.

Everything was crammed onto this three-masted ship, which measured ninety by twenty-five feet and weighed 180 tons. Three such ships could be set end to end between the goal lines of an American football field; it was nothing near a cruise ship, yet nevertheless a good vessel, and not unusual in an era acquainted with crammed living conditions.b

Before continuing the narrative of the Plymouth Pilgrims, it is necessary to back-track and learn about who they were and what motivated them to leave for America.

* * *

The Pilgrims’ congregation began in the village of Scrooby on the River Ryton in North Nottinghamshire in the early 17th century. They gathered for worship in the manor house of one of their leaders, William Brewster, who had adopted Puritan teaching during his studies in Cambridge’s oldest college, Peterhouse.

Theologically, Pilgrims were Puritans. The definition of Puritan has been debated by historical theologians and sociological historians, with the latter often (and mistakenly) emphasizing their political motivations over their theological commitments. Puritans sought to reform (i.e. purify) the doctrine of the Church of England, pressing towards an adoption of Reformed theology and liturgy.

The Puritans have been unjustly caricatured as rough-and-ready factionalists, seeking out minor doctrinal errors in order to disrupt the Church of England. On the contrary, they sought thorough reform in the spirit of the Reformation’s sola Scriptura. Puritans had high regard for God’s universal Church as represented nationally by the Church of England, but they wanted changes that were more true to the teaching of the Bible.

As the years passed, however, growing hostility to change led many Puritans to leave the Church of England as Separatists (i.e. Non-conformists)—and such were the Pilgrims. Theirs was a road little traveled and fraught with peril. Separatists could face harassment, fines, even jail for worshipping freely. And their persecution extended beyond issues of worship. For example, they did not enjoy the same educational opportunities as those in the Church of England. Universities were overseen by the Church of England, and if one separated from its worship, then one also separated from the educational institutions it governed. Separatists were also social outcasts, as participation in England’s Church was a mark of national loyalty and status.

With several factors against them, the Pilgrims’ situation in England went from bad to worse, leading to their decision to leave for the bustling and prosperous trade center of Amsterdam. After meeting some impediments to their departure, they left in 1606 under the leadership of William Brewster, William Bradford, John Robinson, and the former Church of England minister, Richard Clifton.

In Amsterdam the Pilgrims found life among the city’s 100,000 residents a challenging cross-cultural experience. Language proved an obvious challange, but added to this was (despite the legal right to worship) interference with their gatherings by some individuals of the Dutch Reformed Church. Another difficulty was that back in Scrooby the Pilgrims experienced middling-sort respectability and prosperity, but in Amsterdam they were looked down upon and could not get similar jobs. The employment situation for them was so bad they moved to Leiden and worked in trades associated with the booming Dutch fabric industry. William Brewster, possibly the wealthiest of the Pilgrims, set up a printing business with Thomas Brewer and published tracts critical of the Church of England to smuggle into England for distribution.

After twelve years in Leiden, the Pilgrims had become increasingly concerned that their children were growing up Dutch instead of English, so they discussed options for relocation. They wanted a land with less government and more opportunities. Among the places considered were the Canary Islands, some of the Caribbean islands, and Guiana, which were all abandoned in favor of Virginia working with the support of the Virginia Company. In exchange for establishing the Pilgrims in a colony, the investors expected goods such as furs, fish, curiosities, lumber, and other saleable items to be shipped back to England for marketing.

The stipulated destination for the Pilgrims was the northern edge of the Virginia Colony near the mouth of the Hudson River. It was a good plan, the Pilgrims remained concerned about a number of factors, such as the ship sinking, starvation at sea, attacks by pirates, poor sanitation, dread they might fall overboard, and—the bane of many novice ship passengers—sea sickness. Heading to America was a major step involving innumerable decisions and logistics, but the Separatists from Scrooby eventually took up the challenge.

* * *

Let’s return now to the port of Plymouth: The Mayflower weighed anchor, and departed for the trans-Atlantic journey to America. During the sixty-six days of their crossing, passengers experienced the dangers, excitement, and sorrows of extended transit while living in close quarters. A child was born to Stephen and Elizabeth Hopkins and given the seaworthy name Oceanus. The fear of going overboard was realized when John Howland was tossed into the sea as Mayflower rolled in the waves, but he survived by climbing a rope to get back on deck. William Bradford meanwhile noted that “many were afflicted with sea-sickness.”

The relationships between the Pilgrims and others on board did not always go well. One crewman, a “very profane young man,” cursed and condemned the sick Pilgrims every day, saying they should all be thrown overboard. About halfway through the trip the crewman died. Bradford expressed his opinion regarding the deceased crewman saying, “Thus his curses light on his own head; and it was an astonishment to all his fellows, for they noted it to be the just hand of God upon him.” The weather meanwhile was mixed; the Mayflower did encounter some horrible storms, one of which bowed and cracked one of the main beams. Yet considering the length of the journey, interpersonal conflicts, and some violent weather, the trip progressed well.

As land came into view, roaring waves and numerous shoals led the master of the Mayflower to anchor off Cape Cod on November 11, 1620, instead of sailing on to the Hudson River as their contract stipulated. The Pilgrims went ashore and fell on their knees and “blessed God of heaven, who had brought them over the vast and furious ocean and delivered them from all the perils and miseries thereof, again to set their feet on the firm and stable earth.” Initially, the Cape Cod stop was intended to be temporary, but after consideration of their situation and the increasing dangers of sailing during winter, it was decided to remain at Cape Cod and search out the immediate region for a suitable settlement site.

Yet there was a problem: Since the settlers decided not to sail to the Hudson, their contract with the Virginia Company was broken. Some passengers became angry and made speeches, calling for people to join them and establish their own settlement and leave the Pilgrims and others to their own. Order and leadership were desperate needs. How would the mixture of Pilgrims, crew, and a variety of other colonists with varying religious commitments be governed?

The Pilgrims were experienced governing themselves. William Bradford commented that while they lived in Leiden, they never had to resort to the local magistrate because they policed their own people. Their church polity was congregational, which means each congregation shepherded itself with elders and all members were bound together by covenant. The covenant concept was important for those on board the Mayflower as they composed a document to direct their government. John Robinson was the pastor of the Pilgrims while they lived in Leiden and he had remained there with the members who chose not to leave. Well before the Pilgrims departed in July 1620, he sent a letter to John Carver. One paragraph is particularly important for the Pilgrims as they sought to establish civil government:

Whereas you are become a body politic, using amongst yourselves civil government, and are not furnished with any persons of special eminency above the rest, to be chosen into office of government, let your wisdom and godliness appear, not only in choosing such persons as do entirely love and will promote the common good, but also in yielding unto them all due honor and obedience in their lawful administration, not beholding in them the ordinariness of their persons, but God’s ordinance for your good; not being like the foolish multitude who more honor the gay coat than either the virtuous mind of the man, or glorious ordinance of the Lord. But you know better things, and that the image of the Lord’s power and authority which the magistrate beareth, is honorable, in how mean persons so ever. And this duty you both may the more willingly and ought the more conscionably to perform, because you are at least for the present to have only them for your ordinary governors, which yourselves shall make choice of for that work.

Robinson specifically noted that the responsibilities for the Pilgrims included not only governing themselves but also the other colonists as well as the crew until it returned the Mayflower to England. John Calvin’s emaciated remains had been buried in an unmarked grave for over sixty years, but his teaching from Scripture concerning separation of the ministry of the church from the ministry of the state was alive and well in that ship full of sea-weary passengers anchored at Cape Cod. With necessity for order at hand and the advice of John Robinson in mind, the Mayflower Compact was composed and signed:

In the Name of God, Amen.

We whose names are underwritten, the loyal subjects of our dread Sovereign Lord King James, by the Grace of God of Great Britain, France, and Ireland King, Defender of the Faith, etc.

Having undertaken, for the Glory of God and advancement of the Christian Faith and Honor of our King and Country, a Voyage to plant the First Colony in the Northern Parts of Virginia, do by these presents solemnly and mutually in the presence of God and one another, Covenant and Combine ourselves together into a Civil Body Politic, for our better ordering and preservation and furtherance of the ends aforesaid; and by virtue hereof to enact, constitute and frame such just and equal Laws, Ordinance, Acts, Constitutions and Offices, from time to time, as shall be thought most meet and convenient for the general good of the Colony, unto which we promise all due submission and obedience. In witness whereof we have hereunder subscribed our names at Cape Cod, the 11th of November, in the year of the reign of our Sovereign Lord King James, of England, France and Ireland the eighteenth, and of Scotland the fifty-fourth. Anno Domini 1620.

The Mayflower Compact echoes aspects of Robinson’s letter. Even though the Compact used “general good” instead of Robinson’s “common good,” the great sense of responsibility one to another is seen in their purpose to “Covenant and Combine ourselves together into a Civil Body Politic.” The congregationalist Pilgrims covenanted as a church; the Pilgrims and their colonist colleagues covenanted as a state. If the settlement of Plymouth was to be successful, everyone had to work together; it was a matter of survival. Thirty-nine of the approximately seventy-four males on board ship signed the Mayflower Compact. John Carver was the first signatory and he was the first governor of Plymouth until he died a in early spring leaving the responsibility to William Bradford.

The Mayflower was moved from Cape Cod to the harbor accessing the Plymouth site, December 16, 1620. The site appeared to have been a village abandoned by the Wampanoags, which provided the Pilgrims with a clearing and head start for building a village. The first project on their list was building a common house for meetings and worship. Logs were manually dragged to the construction site because the settlers had no draught animals. By the end of January, the common house was completed with a thatched roof and ready for the first worship service which was led by Elder William Brewster.

Fear of the Indians was realized when some were seen at a distance watching progress of the village construction. The two cannons on board ship were transported ashore. In the spring the Pilgrims fears were alleviated when they made contact with the Wampanoag people and discussions led to a treaty with their leader, Massasoit. Settlement of the situation with the Wampanoags helped compensate for the horrors experienced during the winter. Disease and a scanty supply of food took their toll, leaving only about fifty colonists alive. The Mayflower returned to England in April with its marketable cargo, but with its crew halved due to deaths from disease. The first months for Plymouth were difficult, but the Pilgrims and other colonists would continue to build their village, develop farms, worship in freedom, and provide goods for selling in England.

The Pilgrims should be remembered four-hundred years hence for their Christian dedication, virtue, persistence, work ethic, and commitment to covenantally govern themselves. The Covenant of Grace bound them redemptively to God and one another, while the political covenant of the Mayflower Compact bound them to their neighbors for the common good as administered by capable and pious leaders. Things did not always go well, but the Compact directed colonists to select civil leaders appropriate for the task of doing the best for all concerned. Working together was essential to survival and harmony in Plymouth.

It is terrible that during this year Plymouth Rock has been vandalized more than once with spray-painted graffiti and obscenities, but such actions are indicative of the fragmented society that is America today. In contrast to the Pilgrims, today we find more the spirit of Israel in the days of the Judges, when “every man did what was right in his own eyes” and cared little for either God or neighbor. Yet even as Israel repeatedly sinned, the Lord graciously sent Judges such as Gideon, Deborah, and Samson to deliver them. May God likewise deliver us from our selfishness, that we may better love Him and our neighbors—just as did the Pilgrims of old.

Notes

It is not unusual for events of the past to be recounted in different sources with conflicting information, thus the specific date for the move to the Plymouth site from Cape Cod seems to be up in the air. Maybe this is why Plymouth Rock has engraved on it simply, 1620. It can be said for sure that the landing occurred in December and the sixteenth is believed to be the best day. The editions of William Bradford’s Of Plymouth Plantation used are those edited by Samuel Eliot Morrison, 1993, and the two-volume edition published by the Massachusetts Historical Society, 1912. Due to the quadricentennial there are several websites remembering the Pilgrims’ Plymouth landing, including one for the United Kingdom.

This article originally appeared here.

Why the Pro-Life Movement Must Go on if Roe Is Overturned

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

Why the Pro-Life Movement Must Go on if Roe Is Overturned

Since shortly after Roe v. Wade was decided in 1973, Catholics, evangelicals, and many others in the United States have looked forward to a day when that ruling would be overturned. But in the intervening years, the Supreme Court of the United States has not moved any closer to doing so. Instead, it has reaffirmed the essential holding in Roe and buttressed its arguments in favor of a constitutional right to abortion with its 1992 ruling in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Even so, opponents of abortion have not met these legal setbacks with silence. Over the course of nearly five decades, they have created a flourishing, comprehensive, and nationwide movement centered around a positive message about the value of human life.

As we watch the Senate Judiciary Committee conduct confirmation hearings this week for Amy Coney Barrett, President Trump’s nominee to the Supreme Court, many pro-life advocates are once again considering the possibility of a United States where Roe v. Wade has been overturned. But what would achieving that kind of legal victory mean for pro-life advocates that have sought it for nearly 50 years? Writing recently for Christianity Today, Russell Moore suggested, “in some ways, the day after Roe will be the beginning of the pro-life movement, not the end of it.”

He is exactly right. Many people wrongly assume that a reversal of Roe would make abortion illegal in the United States. It would not. Instead, it would simply hand back the legal authority to restrict or protect abortion access to the states. Presently, some states have laws on the books—nine of which pre-date the Court’s 1973 ruling—that would immediately ban or significantly restrict abortion access if Roe were overturned. At the same time, 15 states have enacted protections for abortion in their state constitutions. This means that the legal battle to end abortion goes much further than the Supreme Court.

Pro-life work 

But there is a more important reason to think that the reversal of Roe would actually mark a new beginning for the pro-life movement. To reiterate what Moore said, in an America after Roe, the work of the pro-life movement will be needed more, not less.

Right now, in cities and towns across the country, selfless and sacrificial men and women give of their time, money, energy, and resources in support of the cause of life. They do this in innumerable ways, but all of their efforts are aimed at defending and preserving life. And all of this work is motivated by their common belief that every life is precious and sacred.

Honestly, I am in awe of the pro-life movement. Though it isn’t perfect, I find it remarkable that countless thousands of people of all kinds of faiths, backgrounds, and beliefs have come together to use their time and talents to protect and care for the vulnerable. They do this through advocacy and by showing up in Washington every year at the annual March for Life to honor and speak for those who cannot march or speak for themselves. They do this through legal efforts by supporting candidates and legislation intended to protect the lives of preborn children. And perhaps most importantly, they do this through innumerable forms of humanitarian work from adoption and orphan care to mentoring, counseling, and meeting material needs for mothers, fathers, children, and families in difficult situations.

Whether Roe is overturned or not, the work of the pro-life movement can and must go on.

 

A perfect example of this incredible work is the proliferation of crisis pregnancy centers. Often, numerous churches and community members band together to establish and support the work of these organizations. Crisis pregnancy centers are beacons of hope in their communities. They represent a refuge for young women facing unplanned pregnancies, a safe haven where they can turn for love, care, and support. And having witnessed this work firsthand in many different locations, I can attest that—contrary to the way they are sometimes portrayed in the media—these centers are amazing, life-giving places where young mothers and fathers are met with understanding and compassion. Because of the generosity of people who believe that every life matters, these centers are staffed by trained and competent professionals who put the love of Christ on display each day for those who don’t know where to turn, offering each person walking through their doors the resources and support they need at one of the most difficult moments in their lives.

Seeing abortion access restricted would not mean the end of unplanned pregnancies. Instead, pro-life advocates would need to be prepared to expand the critical work they are already doing. By God’s grace, we will see needs and opportunities multiply to love and serve our neighbors. More mothers will need support. More children will need care. More schools will need volunteers. More fathers will need mentors. These are just a few of the obvious reasons that pro-life work will last far beyond the end of Roe. As pro-life advocates—and especially as the people of God—we must be prepared for such a moment.

Conclusion 

There is, of course, no guarantee this will happen. It is known that Judge Barrett is personally opposed to abortion. And it is also apparent that the ideological makeup of the court would make it more favorably disposed toward such a legal challenge to abortion rights than it has been in decades. Still, neither Judge Barrett nor any of the current justices of the court have expressed any kind of commitment or intent to overturn Roe or restrict access to abortion. And we shouldn’t assume that they will.

Regardless of what happens, the work of the pro-life movement is critical. And it is not contingent on the legality of abortion. Roe v. Wade is the most tragic ruling in American history. Since 1973, more than 50 million children have been killed through abortion in United States. In response, millions of Americans have been galvanized to action to uphold the dignity of our unborn neighbors. Whether Roe is overturned or not, the work of the pro-life movement can and must go on.

This article originally appeared here.

A Modern Parable for Worship Leaders

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

The Master Worship Leader called three novices with various gifts, passions, and capabilities to lead worship in three churches with distinct characteristics and needs.

To the first novice worship leader the Master gave a worship band that included five stellar players on rhythm guitar, lead guitar, bass, drums, and keyboard.

To the second novice worship leader the Master gave an aging rockabilly guitarist and a high school cajon player.

And to the third novice worship leader the Master gave a long-retired kindergarten teacher to play hymns as long as they weren’t in sharps.

So the Master entrusted the three novices to fulfill their unique worship callings in equally unique and sometimes challenging church settings.

The first novice realized his church wouldn’t be able to begin more services or plant additional churches until new players were trained. He encouraged his original band members to give lessons to younger players so they’d be available for new plants and as substitute players throughout the year. He also began a school of the arts to cultivate younger players so his church could share some of those players with several smaller churches in their community.

The second novice quickly realized rockabilly didn’t fit the worship voice of his congregation so he used some of his worship budget to invest in more nuanced worship guitar lessons for his rockabilly guitarist and one of his rockabilly band associates. And since the high school cajon player would graduate in a year, he was asked to train a younger middle schooler to serve as his replacement upon graduation.

The third novice coasted, surfed ministry placement sites, went to conferences with his resume in hand, and waited for the Master to call him to a more favorable position.

The Master checked in with the three novices to see how they were responding to his unique call in their unique settings.

The novice with five players showed the Master how he had doubled the number of players originally entrusted to him. So the Master commended him: “Good work! It’s obvious you are not just a musician but also a leader of worship and worshipers. You are a worthy ministry servant that can be trusted with more.”

The novice with two players showed the Master how he had invested in the skills of existing players and trained younger players for the future. So the Master celebrated with him: “Great job! It’s obvious you aren’t doing this alone and value the calling and gifts of others. You are a model of servant leadership ready for additional responsibilities.”

The novice with one player said, “Master, I know you have high worship standards and are not pleased with poor musicianship. And since no other players here at my church can live up to those expectations, I have been doing it all myself. I’ve been waiting for you to call me to another church with more skilled players who appreciate my musical prowess.”

The Master was angry and disappointed at this response so he asked the third novice two final questions: “If you knew I was after high worship standards, then why haven’t you been trying to achieve them where I called you with what I gave you? And if you haven’t been giving your best to this place where I called you now and have been saving it for where you hope I will call you next, then why would I want to?”

The above post is an excerpt from my new book, Better Sundays Begin on Monday: 52 Exercises for Evaluating Weekly Worship, Copyright ©2020 by Abingdon Press. Print and E-Version copies are available at: Amazon, Barnes & Noble, GoodreadsBooks A MillionCokesbury, and Christian Book.

This article originally appeared here.

10 Ways to Have a Fantastic Worship Experience

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

If you are an avid worshiper of Christ and attend church on a regular basis, you probably already know what a fantastic worship experience is to you, right? Or, maybe you don’t attend church as often as you might because your past worship experiences never hit the mark. Having been to church more than many, I see the gamut and know that even when one person is soaring in their version of a worship service, another may be unaffected. There are many factors that contribute to why there is so much disparity, but I think I found 10 reasons that will aid you in your experience of worship. I hope these help you!

1. Foster good relationships

Nothing sours a worship experience more than when a worshiper has unresolved conflict as they arrive at church—especially so if with a brother or sister in Christ! Jesus said to “leave the altar” and make it right with that brother or sister for a reason. Our horizontal relationships when healthy allow us to be free to worship.

2. Learn the routine

If your church service always starts five minutes late and you keep coming way early, you might be disappointed at why people show up late. Acquire the culture and embrace it! If you were to go to a Brazilian BBQ and complain that they are rude to vegans you miss the point! (No offense to vegans, by the way.)

3. Don’t keep score

One Sunday the message blew you away. Unfortunately, the next week you were not as captivated by the sermon. Keeping score is not the point of a good experience, is it? A shorter memory can then serve you well. What if you simply saw each Sunday as something new to experience rather than something to compare to what you had before?

4. Try something new

We often look at worship like our favorite breakfast cafe where we are regulars. What if you tried something new on the menu? This might mean if you never have sat on the right side of the sanctuary, you choose to sit on the right. Or, what if you stayed for the refreshment time and met a new person? The opportunities to try something “new” abound!

5. Be in a pack

When we come to church “alone” we lose the power of a gathering. While it is good to be in healthy relationships, it is even better to have cohorts who actually desire to experience God in a more meaningful, deeper way. Knowing that a brother or sister is experiencing something more than you inspires you to share in that. Experiences are meant to be shared!

7 Things You Must Do TO and FOR Your Small Group Leaders

Can I let you in on a little corner of reality? Small group leaders are no different than the rest of us. A few of them (maybe 5 to 10 percent) are self-starters and have the internal wiring to take the right steps to grow on their own. The other 90 to 95 percent of all small group leaders need someone to develop and disciple them.

This is a very important concept to understand because whatever you want to happen in the lives of the members of your small groups must happen in the lives of your leaders first. No life-change in the leader, no life-change in the member.

Bottom line? If your leaders aren’t being developed and discipled, you cannot expect much to happen in the lives of the members of their groups.

Ready for another dose of reality? If you have coaches in place, this is what you need them do. If you don’t have coaches in place … developing and discipling your small group leaders is your job.

I’ve been saying for quite a while now that the primary role of a small group coach is to do to and for (and with) your small group leaders whatever you want your leaders to do to and for (and with) their members. What I haven’t said very specifically is what must be done to and for your leaders. See also Skill Training: Equip Your Coaches to Develop and Disciple Leaders.

Here is what I believe must be done to and for small group leaders.

Things you must do TO and FOR your small group leaders:

1. Offer encouragement and guidance, both unsolicited and upon request, from the very beginning. This is about technique and it’s what most of us would refer to as coaching. It is the tip of the iceberg, but it is where you need to begin in most cases. See also How Much of Coaching Is About Technique.

2. Get to know your leaders. Ask the right questions. Proactively listen. Lean in. It takes about three months for most leaders to learn everything they’re ever going to need to know about technique. If you want to develop and disciple them, you have to know them and they have to know you.

3. Give them a sense of family. Make getting to know them and their family a priority. Remember, a small group leader cannot give away what they have not received. If you want your groups to develop a sense of family, your leaders need to have already experienced it.

4. Pray for them. First, ask them how you can pray for them. Second, stop what you are doing and pray for them right then. Third, remember to follow up and ask them about their prayer request.

5. Help them identify their spiritual next steps. A key role that must be played by someone (whether that is you or a coach) is the same one Paul played with Timothy. The “follow me as I follow Christ” role is really played by someone who is known, not a distant role model. See also Equip Your Leaders to Help Members Plan to Grow.

6. Help them take their spiritual next steps. In order for a leader to become more than a good facilitator, they need to be able to help group members take spiritual next steps. To do that well, leaders need to have experienced genuine and loving accountability.

7. Model for them what they need to do TO and FOR their members. The right coach is really a role model for group leaders. You know you have the right men and women as coaches when they already have the habits you want your leaders to build. See also 8 Habits of a Life-Changing Small Group Leader.  

855,266FansLike

New Articles

New Podcasts

Joby Martin

Joby Martin: What Happens When Pastors Finally Understand Grace

Joby Martin joins “The Stetzer ChurchLeaders Podcast” to discuss what happens when a church leader has truly been run over by the “grace train" and understands the profound love and grace of God.