Home Blog Page 752

What Is Charismatic Catholicism?

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

Mathew Schmalz, Professor of Religious Studies, College of the Holy Cross

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.


(THE CONVERSATION) President Donald Trump has nominated Judge Amy Coney Barrett to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court.

Questions have been raised about her alleged association with the “People of Praise,” a nondenominational Christian charismatic community, seen by some as being a potential influence on her legal thinking, particularly concerning abortion rights.

The People of Praise leave it to individual members to disclose their affiliation, and Barrett has not spoken about her membership. And so, the question remains: What is charismatic Catholicism?

Pentecostalism in the U.S.

Catholic charismatics practice forms of Pentecostalism that embrace the belief that individuals can receive gifts of the Holy Spirit.

Modern Pentecostalism in the United States began on Azuza Street in Los Angeles.

Starting in 1906, African American pastor William J. Seymour led a congregation in the city that claimed to have received miraculous gifts from God, such as prophecy and the power to heal. The movement came to be known as Azuza Street revival.

Members of the Azuza Street congregation believed that they had been given the same blessings as those received by the disciples of Jesus. According to the Bible’s Acts of the Apostles, on the Pentecost—the Jewish Shavuot harvest festival 50 days after Passover —the Holy Spirit came down in the form of flames over the disciples’ heads. Afterward, it is believed, the disciples were able to speak in languages they did not know in order to proclaim “the wonders of God.”

In Christianity, the Holy Spirit is the third person of the Trinity and is associated with God’s action in the world.

The Catholic charismatic movement

These Pentecostal teachings went on to influence the Catholic charismatic movement that initially took hold in the U.S. in the 1960s.

During a 1967 prayer meeting at Dusquesne University in Pittsburgh, a group of students and professors spoke about special “charisms,” or gifts, received through the Holy Spirit.

Church Claims California Is Targeting People of Faith With Lockdowns

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

In a 2-1 ruling yesterday, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied an emergency injunction in a religious-liberties case involving Harvest Rock Church, a nondenominational congregation in Pasadena, California. The majority opinion rejected the church’s claim that Gov. Gavin Newsom’s pandemic-related restrictions on indoor worship gatherings discriminate against religious expression.

Liberty Counsel, the nonprofit group representing Harvest Rock, says the legal fight isn’t over. Thursday’s ruling involved only the emergency injunction; next up, the court will hear arguments related to the request for a preliminary injunction. 

What the Ninth Circuit Ruled

In a four-page majority opinion, Judges Johnnie Rawlinson and Morgan Christen said Newsom’s health orders apply “the same restrictions to worship services as they do to other indoor congregate events, such as lectures and movie theaters.”

On July 6, Newsom banned singing and chanting in churches. One week later, he banned all worship gatherings, including home fellowship groups. Several churches have defied the orders, risking fines of up to $1,000 per day and up to one year in prison.

In a 15-page minority opinion, Judge Diarmuid O’Scannlain acknowledged that protecting public health during a pandemic is “a worthy and indeed compelling goal of any state.” But he noted that the same counties that don’t permit indoor worship currently allow indoor malls, nail salons, and other businesses to operate. “At present, in 18 counties in California—home to more than 15 million residents and including its most populous county, Los Angeles,” O’Scannlain wrote, “indoor religious worship services are completely prohibited.”

His dissent continued: “The Constitution, emphatically, does not allow a state to pursue such measures against religious practices more aggressively than it does against comparable secular activities.” O’Scannlain added, “The State cannot evade the Free Exercise Clause merely by linking its severe restrictions on worship attendance to those imposed on one or two categories of comparable secular activity; it must also justify its decision to treat more favorably a host of other comparable activities which so evidently raise the State’s same expressed concerns about disease spread.” 

Liberty’s Mat Staver Decries ‘open assault on people of faith’

Mat Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel, is expressing gratitude for O’Scannlain’s “strong dissent that points out the constitutional flaws of Gov. Newsom’s orders.” He adds, “We look forward to the next round at the Court of Appeals on the full merits of our request to block the First Amendment violations.”

In a statement posted on Liberty’s website Friday, Staver summarizes some of the religious-liberty battles currently underway in California. The state “has gone off the deep end when it comes to attacks on churches,” he writes. “There is an open assault on people of faith in many parts of the country by governors who encourage rioters and protesters while restricting, even criminally charging, pastors, churches, and parishioners who gather for worship.”

Staver adds, “We WILL ensure that Americans retain their unalienable, constitutional RIGHT to worship according to their consciences instead of according to the whims of anti-god governors!” Liberty is currently involved in six federal lawsuits, and Staver expects the church-closure cases “will soon come before the Supreme Court.”

Jim Caviezel Says ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Sequel Is Happening

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

In a recent interview with Alex Marlow of Breitbart News DailyThe Passion of the Christ and Infidel actor Jim Caviezel revealed the latest update on the sequel to the most successful Christian movie of all time: “The Passion of the Christ.” Caviezel said referring to “The Passion of the Christ” sequel, “it’s going to be the biggest film in world history.”

The actor, who will reprise his role as Jesus, told Marlow that director Mel Gibson “just sent me the third picture, the third draft. It’s coming. It’s called ‘The Passion of the Christ: Resurrection.'”

‘The Passion of the Christ’ Sequel Is Coming

The interview also gave insight into the blacklisting that Caviezel has taken for his outspoken faith and since appearing as Jesus in the 2004 Christian blockbuster that brought in over 610 million dollars worldwide. When he was asked how his career was affected after the portrayal of Christ, he responded,

I had no choice. I had to defend it. I had to fight to survive. The film exploded. It was off the charts. You’d think, “Oh, you’re going to work a lot.” No, I didn’t. I was no longer on the studio list. That was gone…Because of what I do as an actor—that’s my skill—it was given to me from God. I didn’t give it to myself, but it’s something in which I have a great range…I really felt that faith was much bigger than the industry and Hollywood, and bigger than the Republican or Democratic Party or any of that.

Mel Gibson was interviewed by Stephen Colbert in 2016 and elaborated on some of what The Passion of the Christ: Resurrection may focus on. Colbert asked, “How do you tell the story of the resurrection; it’s a single event and then a revelation to the people in the upper room?”

Gibson responded, “It’s more than a single event. It’s an amazing event and to underpin that with the things around it is really the story. To enlighten what that means. It’s not just about the event. It’s not just some kind of chronological event.”

Faith-Based Organizations Express Outrage Over Plan to Cut Refugee Admissions to Historic Low — Again

refugee resettlement
Syrians who were displaced by the Turkish military operation in northeastern Syria, wait to receive tents and aid supplies at the Bardarash refugee camp, north of Mosul, Iraq, Thursday, Oct. 17, 2019. Hundreds of refugees have crossed into Iraq in the past week, mostly through unofficial border points. On Wednesday, a first group of 890 people were bused to the Bardarash camp, in northern Iraq's semi-autonomous Kurdish region, which up until two years ago housed displaced people from the Iraqi city of Mosul. (AP Photo/Hussein Malla)

(RNS) — The Trump administration has announced the maximum number of refugees it plans to admit into the United States in the coming year, and once again, it is a historic low: 15,000.

In recent weeks, several faith-based organizations involved in refugee resettlement had asked the administration to raise that number to its past average: 95,000.

Those groups expressed outrage Thursday (Oct. 1) over a number that came nowhere close.

“At a time of unprecedented global need, today’s decision to further cut the refugee admissions ceiling is a complete abdication of our humanitarian and moral duty,” said Krish O’Mara Vignarajah, president and CEO of Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service.

RELATED: Lutherans ask Trump administration to admit more refugees as deadline looms

The Trump administration sent notice of the new refugee ceiling to Congress late Wednesday night — just 34 minutes before the statutory deadline, according to The Associated Press.

The administration is required by law to consult with Congress before setting the presidential determination for the fiscal year, which begins in October.

The Rev. John L. McCullough, president and CEO of Church World Service, called the Trump administration’s cuts and delays to the U.S. refugee resettlement programmoral failures and a disgrace to the American legacy of welcome.”

“Our values as a nation and as people of faith demand that we take action when people’s lives are in danger. But for the past three years, President Trump and his administration have strayed so far from these basic principles in the name of their cruel, racist and partisan goals that the life-saving refugee resettlement program is a shadow of what it once was,” McCullough said.

“I urge all Americans to insist that Congress hold the White House accountable to operating the refugee program as required by U.S. law.”

This year’s proposed refugee ceiling is a drop from 18,000 in the fiscal year that just ended in September. The U.S. actually resettled 11,814 refugees in that time, according to LIRS, and AP reported refugee resettlement was halted in March amid the novel coronavirus pandemic.

President Donald Trump had set that number at 45,000 in his first year in office, then 30,000 and 18,000 — each a historic low in the U.S. refugee resettlement program, which has been around since the 1980s.

Most Congregations Are Doing All Right During COVID-19. But the Future Is Uncertain.

church performance
Valerie Hines worships during services at Cornerstone Baptist Church in Arlington, Texas, Sunday, June 7, 2020. After weeks without in-person services due to the pandemic the congregation opened for worshipers to attend church. (AP Photo/LM Otero)

(RNS) — The people who worship at First Baptist Church in Maury City, Tennessee, have been exemplary during the long months of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The rural West Tennessee church’s members readily embraced online services, sometimes watching over and over so they could sing along with the music. When in-person services resumed over the summer, they wore their masks and socially distanced in the pews.

But what might have surprised First Baptist’s pastor, the Rev. Mike Waddey, most is that his congregation has kept giving despite all the changes the pandemic brought.

“I probably sold our people short,” said Waddey. “I thought they would not give if they were not in the building. Shame on me for that.”

Waddey is not the only pastor to be pleasantly surprised, according to a new study from the Lake Institute on Faith and Giving at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.

David King, director of the Lake Institute, said the institute surveyed 555 congregations for the study, mostly from a wide range of Christian traditions, along with a few Jewish and Muslim groups.

While not a representative sample, he said, the study gives a snapshot of how congregations have fared during the COVID-19.

Most have done pretty well, with both participation and finances holding steady.

About half (52%) have seen more people participating during the pandemic. At more than half, giving has remained the same or increased, while 41% of congregations say giving has gone down. Only 14% have had to cut or furlough staff, in part because many congregations (65%) had received a Payroll Protection Program loan from the Small Business Administration.

King said he was surprised by how well congregations adapted during the pandemic, especially in the early days last spring.

“Congregations really buckled down and did amazing work, quickly pivoting to online services and responding in a lot of creative ways,” he said.

Churches have also cut costs, according to the study, while trying to keep essential ministries going. Just over a third of congregations (38%) reported cutting nonpersonnel expenses during the pandemic. About 1 in 10 reduced giving to their denomination (12%), drew from reserves (10%) or cut funding for missions and benevolence projects (8 percent).

Congregations have also reached out to others in need.

Three in 10 of congregations in the study say they gave financial support to other churches, while nearly a quarter (22%) created a fund to aid congregation members in need.

President Trump and First Lady Melania Test Positive for COVID-19

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

President Donald Trump has tested positive for COVID-19, and First Lady Melania Trump has tested positive for the virus as well.

On Thursday October 1, 2020, it was reported that Hope Hicks, a senior advisor who works closely with the president and first lady, had tested positive for COVID-19.

Later that day, President Trump who is 74, tweeted that he and the First Lady, who is 50, began quarantining and were awaiting their test results.

A few hours later after the president, in the beginning hour of Friday morning, posted on Twitter confirming that he and the first lady had tested positive for COVID-19. His tweet said, “Tonight, @FLOTUS and I tested positive for COVID-19. We will begin our quarantine and recovery process immediately. We will get through this TOGETHER!”

The President’s physician Sean Conley released this statement on Thursday night:

I release the following information with the permission of President Donald J. Trump and First Lady Melania Trump.

This evening I received confirmation that both President Trump and First Lady Melania Trump have tested positive for the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

The President and First Lady are both well at this time, and they plan to remain at home within the White House during their convalescence.

The White House medical team and I will maintain a vigilant watch, and I appreciate the support provided by some of our country’s greatest medical professionals and institutions. Rest assured I expect the President to continue carrying out his duties without disruption while recovering, and I will keep you updated on any future developments.

According to Forbes.com the White House has cleared President Trump’s schedule for Friday, which had a Florida campaign rally planned.

The next presidential debate is scheduled for October 15, 2020. According to the CDC someone who has tested positive for COVID-19 should quarantine for 10 days following no symptoms.

5 Ways to ‘Feel’ Scripture

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

The growing rate of biblical illiteracy within the Church is extremely troubling. More troubling still, however, is that this illiteracy is not for lack of reading scripture. According to a recent Barna Group study, 96% of those identifying as born-again Christians had read the Bible in the last seven days, while in another recent Barna study only 26% of born-again Christians claimed to base their moral decision-making on biblical principles. This means that we are reading the Bible, but it doesn’t appear to be making much of a difference in our lives.

Many of us go into Bible reading looking for anything but transformation, which is unfortunate, given that transformation is the primary reason the written word of God exists. Devotional Scripture reading requires discipline and consistency, but its aim is the treasuring of God’s word in our hearts and the delighting of ourselves in God’s statutes (Ps. 119:24). We have at our fingertips the very revelation of God to us, and yet we treat Scripture like a blunt instrument, like a reference book or a prop for our propaganda — anything but the wellspring of God’s truth to be drunk deeply from. Devotional Scripture reading means meditating on Scripture, chewing on it, savoring it, learning not just how to read Scripture, but how to feel it.

The Church by and large has lost her ability to feel Scripture. The great irony is that now when the Bible is more available than any time in history, we are perhaps more biblically illiterate than any Christian generation in history.

The crisis creates opportunity, however! The discipleship culture of the Church is now extra ripe for biblical transformation and a revival in commitment to the deep well of Scripture.

Here, then, are five ways one might begin to develop a greater feeling for Scripture. Some or all of these may not be new to you (and none were invented by me, of course), as they are basically good practices for essential Bible study. But put into regular practice, these approaches to study can condition us to feel Scripture more keenly.

1. Interpret Before You Apply

Too many Bible study classes are first asking, “What does this passage mean to you?” instead of leading with “What does this passage mean?”.

The primacy of application has dulled our understanding. Don’t jump the gun. Modern Christianity has really overestimated the value of “making the Bible relevant.”

Jesus says that if anyone wishes to follow him, he must deny himself and take up his cross (Mt. 16:24). When we leap to application first, we immediately diminish the powerful relevancy of this teaching. We make taking up crosses about dealing with irritating neighbors or a nagging boss, when these applications skip the primary meaning: taking up one’s cross is about death. Oftentimes, preoccupation with personal annoyances and aggravations is self-indulgence, not self-denial.

The Bible is already relevant! In our zeal to “make it” relevant to us, we often lose the excitement of its primary relevancy. Because Scripture is God’s revelation to us, it is imminently and enduringly relevant.

“Interpretation before application” is a fundamental element to all Bible study, but if our desire is to develop a greater feel for Scripture, we will more and more subject our feelings to Scripture’s unwavering revelation (interpretation) rather than subject Scripture to our feelings (what often happens in the applicational exercise).

2. Watch the Context

Sometimes those handy verse numbers in our Bibles are the culprit, or sometimes it’s the scattershot approach to verse presentation in the topical preaching popular right now in our nation’s pulpits. Maybe our soundbite and short-attention-span culture is the cause. Whatever the root, many of us have forgotten the cardinal rule of context.

Out of context, Jesus’ statement “I have come not to bring peace but a sword” (Mt. 10:34) makes him sound like Conan the Barbarian.

Out of context, Hebrews 6:4-6 seems to indicate that Christians can ultimately “lose” their salvation, and indeed many believers use these three verses to support that view. But two verses later (Heb. 6:9), the author of Hebrews is contrasting whatever is being described in Heb 6:4-6 with “things accompanying salvation.” If one isn’t looking at this full passage on the biblical page one may never see it.

We like to keep Scripture short and manageable, and that’s understandable. It’s certainly more convenient that way. But we will not be mastered by Scripture if we don’t occasionally allow it to overwhelm us, intimidate us, and force us to wrestle with it. Bite-size chunks are good for memorization and the like, but to feel Scripture, we have to drink from it deeply, exercising our minds and hearts, and we must do this constantly and repetitively. Keeping verses in context may prevent us from clearly understanding something right off the bat, but it will also keep us from inadvertently misunderstanding it right off the bat.

3. Make Connections

Scripture is cohesive, a great brilliant tapestry that is interwoven from the same fabric. Contrary to various theories both ancient and modern, God isn’t different from Old Testament to New, and Paul didn’t invent a different Christianity from Jesus’.

One of the most important things we can do in our Bible study time is make connections between the primary passage we’re studying and related passages elsewhere in Scripture. Typical topical study involves a pre-selected topic and then a few isolated verses that relate to the topic. But good Scriptural cross-connection involves a pre-selected passage and then a few other passages that are connected narratively, thematically, or theologically.

Losing our feel for Scripture has resulted from losing our sense of Scriptural continuity. It’s all connected; there are no coincidences. (Okay, that’s an exaggeration; there are some coincidences. But there are many more connections, particularly between Old Testament narrative and New Testament narrative, that testify to the premeditation of God’s revelation.)

For instance, in a small group study I once conducted, we looked at the story in John 6 about the disciples in the stormy waters and Jesus walking to them on the waves. One of our reflective exercises involved making connections. There is the obvious connection of the parallel narrative in Matthew’s Gospel. Then there are other, less obvious connections like Jesus’ declaration “It is I” recalling YHWH’s Old Testament self-declaration “I AM.” Jesus on the water reminded us of the Spirit hovering over the surface of the deep in the beginning of Genesis. The boat’s immediately going to the shore when Jesus boarded brings to mind God separating the land from the chaotic waters in the Creation story. The story itself reminded us of other stormy sea tales, as when Jesus slept below deck while the disciples fretted over a storm. Later in the narrative, the confused crowd and Jesus’ words about “food that does not spoil” reminded us of the disgruntled Israelites in Exodus and the manna that was only good for the day, of Jesus’ subsequent words on being the Bread of Life, and even of Jesus’ words to the Samaritan woman at the well about water that lives.

This is not to say that what one passage means in one place it also means in a place where you have made a connection. It is only to say that Scripture interprets Scripture, and that the more connections we make, the greater feel we will have for the brilliant unity of Scripture.

As you’re reading a particular passage, ask yourself, “What other passages does this remind me of?” Then track those down. Before you know it, you are making connections, and making connections cultivates in you a feel for the broader and fuller contours of the Bible’s story. Using the cross references listed in many study or reference Bibles helps tremendously in this regard.

4. Dynamically and Prayerfully Apply

When you’re ready to apply Scripture — remember, interpretation comes first — instead of applying a passage in a static sense, apply in a prayerful, dynamic sense. Here is the difference:

Static, Observational Application: Reading “Love bears all things” in 1 Corinthians 13:7 (ESV) and thinking, “This is important because my husband is really difficult to live with. He’s very burdensome.”

Dynamic, Prayerful Application: “Lord, give me the strength and passion to love my husband even when I find it very difficult. Change my heart to bear all things.”

The first approach is basic application. It is not invalid so far as it goes. But it is distressingly close to subjecting Scripture to our experience, rather than vice versa. Moreover, it is more observational than it is motivational. It only involves noticing something, not committing to something. This is why it is static; it doesn’t really move us.

The second approach, however, not only presses us to subject our feelings to Scripture — in the example, the application entails committing to doing something in response — but it also turns the application into a conversation with the One prompting the response. The reader isn’t just noticing, “Hey, this reminds me of my problem,” she is bringing that problem before the Lord and taking the initiative of being changed by Scripture’s addressing of that problem.

In the first approach the temptation is toward gracelessness, because the focus is on what must be endured (a difficult husband). This is counter to the core idea in the passage itself! This famous treatise on true love tells us that real love keeps no record of wrongs and that it believes and hopes “all things.”

In the second approach the impetus is toward grace, because the focus is on loving according to the Scripture’s call to deny ourselves.

This prayerful approach to application is a highly efficient way to begin feeling Scripture.

5. Make the Jesus Connection

Look for Jesus! All of Scripture either points to Jesus’ life and teaching or emerges from it. All of it.

To know God, you must know Jesus. And to feel Scripture most keenly, you must see Jesus between its lines and at the beginning and end of its many trajectories. He is there, all over the place, and Christians committed to following him closely will seek the glorious enlightenment of the disciples on the road to Emmaus (Luke 24). “Beginning with Moses and all the Prophets” Jesus himself “explained to them what was said in all the Scriptures concerning himself” (24:27).

When you’re in the Old Testament, wherever you are, ask yourself, “What does this say about Jesus? How does this point to Jesus? Did Jesus ever quote or refer to this? What is the importance of this in the light of Jesus?”

Finding Jesus in the Gospels is easy of course, but making the Jesus connection in the epistles is vitally important (again, particularly today when many are telling us that Paul’s teaching is wholly different from Jesus’). We ought to read the New Testament as if Jesus in the Gospels is giving us an artist’s palette and revealing a brand new array of colors never seen before, and as if Paul and the other New Testament authors are keen on teaching us how to paint with these new supplies.

Finding Jesus foreshadowed in the Old Testament narratives is a great way to infuse new life into study of those books. We suddenly do not read them as dry histories or moral tales akin to Aesop’s Fables but as the long, bumpy road to the Incarnation, where every sign along the way points to Jesus.

If you plan on keeping Christ at the center of your life, you must plan on keeping Christ at the center of your Christian practice, including your Scripture reading.

None of these practices are magic bullets, of course, and if you are a serious Bible student, you are no doubt already putting some or all of these tips into regular practice. If you are, you likely have a much greater feel for the brilliance and power of the Bible than the average disciple. Let us continue pressing further into the depth and breadth of the transforming Word of God, submitting our thoughts and feelings to it for the good of our neighbors and for the glory of the Author.

This article originally appeared here.

How Do We Explain Talking Donkeys and Burning Bushes?

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

DEAR pastor, I’m completely committed to the authority of the Word of God and to all it teaches including its inspiration, inerrancy, and infallibility. Unfortunately, I have this nagging doubt that I feel plagues me at times when I read certain portions of Scripture.

It’s not a doubt caused by “apparent” contradictions and the like, but a reservation and doubt as I read the portions that seem like they could be straight out of a fairy tale—things like a talking serpent, a special tree, a burning bush, Balaam’s talking donkey, Samson slaying a thousand men with the jawbone of a donkey, a pillar of cloud and fire that went ahead of the Israelites in the wilderness, and so on. On top of that, there are the difficult passages that gnaw at the question of God’s goodness when he deals out justice. When I read Scripture with my children and things like these come up, I feel perplexed and even a little disingenuous as I try to communicate why these stories are true but why those in The Lion, Witch and the Wardrobe are not. Could you help?

Dear Josh,

Thank you for your note. I appreciate your honesty. Please know that doubt isn’t a bad thing in and of itself. Doubt can be a sign that you are taking your faith seriously. I sometimes worry about Christians who have no questions. That can be a sign they aren’t paying much attention to their faith or the world around them.

You mentioned that you believe the Bible but sometimes struggle with parts that seem like they could be ripped from a fairy tale: talking snakes and donkeys, fish swallowing men whole then vomiting them up on land so they can preach God’s judgment, and stuff like the sun standing still for an entire day.

Things like these can offend our modern sensibilities, can’t they? Let me offer a few thoughts for you to consider.

We are often more deeply affected by our times than we realize. In our secular age we tend to see things through a skeptical lens without noticing—even when we’re trying hard not to. For starters, here are four ways our view of reality can be affected by the world around us.

1. Low View of God
Pretend we are having this conversation in a coffee shop. “Do you believe, if God wanted to, he could lift this entire coffee shop?” I ask. “Well, I suppose if he wanted to, he could,” you might respond. “Based on your answer, would it seem illogical if I suggested that if God is able to lift the entire shop, he is also able to lift up one packet of sugar off of our table?” I imagine you’d respond that the sugar packet would be a far smaller thing to do, given God’s ability to lift the entire shop.

As Christians we believe God created the world out of nothing. We believe he has revealed himself in nature, in Scripture, and in history in the person of Jesus Christ. These are the larger things, the lifting of the whole coffee shop, if you will. When we bristle at elements in the Bible that seem fairy-tale-like to us, we must recognize that they are actually lesser matters, the lifting of the sugar packet.

If God can do the greater, then surely he can do the lesser, too. If he is the author of life itself, can he not fill the chapters of his story with whatever he wants, whatever best suits his purposes—be it talking snakes or prophesying donkeys?

2. High View of Secular Science
A deficient view of God’s ability to do the lesser things is sometimes a result of thinking too highly of the sophisticated claims of secular scientists. It’s a terrible thing to place oneself against the prevailing scientific consensus of our day. You don’t want to look like a Neanderthal. I completely understand.

But the Bible does say we must look rather foolish to the world, doesn’t it? And yet, the atheistic scientists seem to have such a rock-solid, evidenced-based view of things. But do they really?

Consider Carl Sagan’s famous maxim: “The cosmos is all that is, that ever was, or ever will be.” That has more fairy tale in it than you might realize. Science can confirm none of it. For example, it’s widely held that some sort of matter and energy preceded the explosive event that led to our universe. So even according to scientific theories, the cosmos is not all that ever was.

Further, a number of atheist thinkers today are courting multiverse theory, the view that there’s an infinite number of randomly ordered universes that, through cosmic natural selection, finally gave way to our universe. Thus the cosmos is, according to them, not all that is. And how much hubris does it take to suggest that we can conclusively prove the cosmos is all that ever will be? Can you see the fairy tales at work here, too?

3. Tame View of Our World
Just look at our world. It’s filled with the stuff of fairy tales. For example, a caterpillar will literally digest itself, and turn into a mushy soup-like liquid that later grows into a colorful being capable of flight. See the fairy-tale elements lurking outside your very window?

In the mysterious quantum world, a particle can be in two places simultaneously. Electrons can exist as waves or particles at the same time. Beam me up, Scotty! Sorry for the old science-fiction pop-culture reference. But this all sounds rather fairy-tale-esque to me.

4. Lofty View of Ourselves
Before I close, I must raise an issue that is quite personal. Sometimes—not always, but sometimes—our doubts about the Bible can result from other issues in our lives. When I don’t want to accept a certain moral command in Scripture, for example, or if I have difficulty in keeping it, my conscience can feel comforted in doubting or questioning the command. In other words, if I’m not careful, my lifestyle can lead me to a place of doubt.

We will either place ourselves under the Bible, or we won’t. It’s not easy. It’s not a once-for-all decision; it’s a commitment that will be challenged daily.

That means I must ask of every doubt if it’s a sign of deeper unbelief. If God exists, and if he has revealed himself, then I must come to terms with his authoritative revelation. Is my doubt a sign of my wrestling against submitting to the authority of his Word? To stand in judgment of it,—when, if it is true, it stands in judgment of me,—would not be wise. As Paul said, “Let God be true through every one were a liar” (Rom. 3:4).

One True Fairy Tale
I would encourage you to face your doubts with belief. Not blind belief, mind you, but well-reasoned trust, to borrow an expression from the late theologian R. C. Sproul. God has given you good reason to trust him. So, trust him. Trust his Word even as you work through your questions and doubts.

The world is filled with fairy tales, but there is one grand tale that gives them all meaning. The God whose words brought time, space, matter, and energy into being, the God who in the fullness of time took on human flesh—the God who, after being crucified and buried in a borrowed tomb, stood with one foot on death and the other on the great deceiver—is worthy of your trust.

Sounds like a fairy tale, doesn’t it? Indeed, it’s the greatest fairy tale ever told. And it’s all true. Every word.

This article originally appeared here.

When Jesus Says ‘ Stay ‘

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

We all know that God calls many people to go. He calls them to leave behind all that is comfortable and familiar so they can minister in his name. But it’s clear that God also calls many to stay. He calls them to remain in comfortable and familiar surroundings so they can minister in his name. And one favorite example of this is in the tale of the man we call The Gerasene Demonaic. This man had been oppressed by demons, perhaps the saddest and most tragic figure we meet in the gospels. “Night and day among the tombs and on the mountains he was always crying out and cutting himself with stones” (Mark 5:5). But then he had encountered Jesus and, with a word, Jesus had set him free from his oppression.

When this man was freed by Jesus, we are told he begged Jesus to be able to go with him. It’s as if he said, “Please let me remain with you, let me learn from you, let me serve you. Where you go I will go.” This man saw Jesus for who he was and wanted Jesus more than anything. He wanted to go wherever Jesus went.

What has always fascinated me is Jesus’s response. This man begged to be able to go with Jesus as one of his committed followers. He was willing to leave all the comforts of home and family. He was willing to suffer. Jesus could have invited him along. He could have had this man as a committed disciple. I’d have thought this would be an offer Jesus wouldn’t refuse.

But Jesus had another plan. A better plan. Instead of telling him “come,” Jesus told him “ stay. ” He told him, “Go home to your friends and tell them how much the Lord has done for you, and how he has had mercy on you.” This man was to have a ministry, after all, but it was a ministry at home, not a ministry away. He was not called to foreign missions, but domestic missions. And he both heard and heeded that call. “He went away and began to proclaim in the Decapolis how much Jesus had done for him, and everyone marveled.”

There could be no better missionary to these people than one of their own. This man had the advantage of knowing them, of knowing their place, of knowing their culture. This man had the advantage of being known. These people knew who and what he had been. As he returned to live among them, they could see who and what he now was. And his task was simply to explain what had happened between times. His task was simply to explain what the Lord had done to liberate him from his demons and to liberate him from his sin.

Christian, God may call you to foreign missions. But until then I know for a fact he has called you to domestic missions. And here’s what that involves: Tell how much the Lord has done for you. You need to tell people about Jesus—the facts of who he is and what he has done. But be sure to also personalize it—tell the story of what Jesus has done in you and for you. There’s no better missionary to your friends, family, neighborhood, and culture than you. This is the calling of every Christian: “Go home to your friends and tell them how much the Lord has done for you, and how he has had mercy on you.”

This article originally appeared here.

‘Stand Back and Stand By’—Who Are the Proud Boys?

the proud boys
On September 26, 2020, a state of emergency was declared in Portland, Oregon as The Proud Boys and other far-right extremist groups rallied in defiance of being denied a permit. Antifascists staged multiple counter-protests around the city. (Photo by Michael Nigro/Sipa USA(Sipa via AP Images)

As many are calling the first presidential debate of 2020 a debacle, one of the most talked about moments was when former vice president Joe Biden and moderator Chris Wallace pressed President Trump to denounce white supremacy and to specifically denounce the group, Proud Boys. Controversy is swirling regarding how the president responded, and many are wanting to know: Who are the Proud Boys? 

“The Proud Boys?” said President Trump. “Stand back and stand by, but I’ll tell you what, I’ll tell you what. Somebody’s got to do something about Antifa and the left, because this is not a right wing problem.” 

The President Seems to Tell the Proud Boys to ‘stand back and stand by’

The above quote has been talked over quite a bit in the days following the presidential debate. Moderator Chris Wallace introduced the topic of white supremacy when he stated, “You have repeatedly criticized the vice president for not specifically calling out Antifa and other left wing extremist groups. But are you willing tonight to condemn white supremacists and militia groups and to say that they need to stand down and not add to the violence in a number of these cities as we saw in Kenosha and as we’ve seen in Portland?” 

The president responded, “Sure, I’m willing to do that.” When both Biden and Wallace then asked him to directly denounce white supremacy, the president responded, “I would say, I would say almost everything I see is from the left wing. Not from the right wing.” The other two men again asked Trump for an explicit denouncement, and the president asked, “What do you want to call them? Give me a name.”

Wallace answered, “White supremacists and right radicals,” while Biden said, “White supremacists. Proud Boys.” Trump then made the “stand back and stand by” comment that has generated so much attention. 

The day after the debate, President Trump told reporters he thought it went well, saying, “We got tremendous reviews on it.” When a reporter asked him what he meant when he said the Proud Boys should “stand back and stand by,” the president responded, “I don’t know who the Proud Boys are. I mean, you’ll have to give me a definition, because I really don’t know who they are. I can only say they have to stand down, let law enforcement do their work.” 

When the reporter continued to press him about what he meant by “stand by,” the president said, “Just ‘stand by.’ Look, law enforcement will do their work. They’re going to stand down…whatever group you’re talking about, let law enforcement do the work.”

The president repeatedly brought his answers back to law enforcement and Antifa. When asked again about his views on white supremacy, he said, “Any form—any form of any of that, you have to denounce.”

Since the debate, the Proud Boys have created t-shirts with the phrase “Proud Boys Standing By” and “Stand Back and Stand By,” which they are advertising on the social media app Telegram.

They also posted in their channel, “Standing down and standing by sir.”

Alabama Governor Apologizes to ’63 Church Bombing Survivor

Sarah Collins Rudolph
Sarah Collins Rudolph and husband George Rudolph discuss their worries about the upcoming Donald Trump presidency in their home in Birmingham, Ala., on Wednesday, Nov. 9, 2016. Sarah Rudolph survived a church bombing that killed her sister and three other black girls in Alabama in 1963, and neither she nor her husband is happy about the election outcome. (AP Photo)

Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey has apologized to a survivor of a racist 1963 church bombing that killed four Black girls, calling the blast an “egregious injustice,” but declining Wednesday to pay restitution without legislative involvement.

Ivey, responding to a request submitted by an attorney for Sarah Collins Rudolph, said the bombing of the 16th Street Baptist Church caused “untold pain and suffering” through the decades to the victims and their families.

“For that, they most certainly deserve a sincere, heartfelt apology—an apology that I extend today without hesitation or reservation,” Ivey wrote.

But Ivey said legislators would have to be involved in talks about Rudolph’s request for restitution. “For that reason, I would propose that our attorneys—as well as attorneys for the Legislature—begin such discussions with you as soon as possible,” she wrote.

Rudolph was unavailable for immediate comment, but her husband, George Rudolph, said they had yet to receive Ivey’s letter. “I didn’t know she had apologized,” he said.

An attorney for Sarah Rudolph, Ishan Bhabha, said he and other members of Rudolph’s legal team were “gratified” by the apology and looked forward to discussions about compensation that she “justly deserves.”

Five girls were gathered in a downstairs bathroom at Birmingham’s 16th Street Baptist Church on Sept. 15, 1963, when a timed bomb planted by KKK members went off outside under a set of stairs. The blast killed Denise McNair, 11, and three 14-year-olds: Carole Robertson, Cynthia Wesley, and Addie Mae Collins, who was Rudolph’s sister.

Blinded in one eye by the blast, Sarah Rudolph, 69, has spent a lifetime dealing with physical and mental pain from the bombing. Despite her injuries, Rudolph provided testimony that helped lead to the convictions of the men accused of planting the bomb.

Three Ku Klux Klan members convicted in the bombing years later died in prison, and a fourth suspect died without ever being charged.

A law firm working for free on Rudolph’s behalf sent a letter to Ivey arguing that the words of state leaders, including Gov. George Wallace, encouraged the bombing. Months earlier, Wallace had vowed “segregation forever” during his inaugural, and the bombing occurred as Birmingham’s public schools were being desegregated.

Ivey wrote that there were questions about whether the state could be held legally liable for the bombing.

“Having said that, there should be no question that the racist, segregationist rhetoric used by some of our leaders during that time was wrong and would be utterly unacceptable in today’s Alabama,” she said.


This article originally appeared on APnews.com

Liberty Disputes Reports About Falwell Severance Payment

Falwell
Rev. Jerry Falwell Jr., right, answers a student’s question, along with his wife, Becky, during a town hall on the opioid crisis at a convocation at Liberty University in Lynchburg, Va., on Nov. 28, 2018. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — Liberty University said it paid its recently resigned president, Jerry Falwell Jr., the two years’ base salary owed under his employment contract Tuesday.

The Lynchburg, Virginia-based Christian university issued a brief statement about the compensation that did not provide an exact figure but said previous “media reports regarding the size and terms” of Falwell’s severance were incorrect. Falwell stepped down in August from his post at the school founded by his late evangelical father after a series of scandals.

“By his pre-existing contract, Mr. Falwell is entitled to two years’ base salary as severance,” the statement said. “Additional compensation that Mr. Falwell receives under his agreement following his resignation are only accrued retirement benefits. These accrued retirement payments reflect reasonable terms after 30 years of service to Liberty, with 13 as university president.”

Falwell, who declined comment in response to questions from The Associated Press last month about the terms of his employment contract and exit package, has previously discussed the matter with other news organizations that reported he would receive $10.5 million. He could not immediately be reached for comment Tuesday.

Falwell’s “reportable compensation” from Liberty was $1,099,356, according to a 2018 tax form the school provided AP. Other compensation was listed as $59,655.

Liberty’s statement also said there was no severance or retirement negotiated in exchange for Falwell’s resignation last month.

Falwell, an early supporter and close ally of President Donald Trump, resigned after Reuters published an interview with Giancarlo Granda, a much younger business partner of the Falwell family, who said that he had a yearslong sexual relationship with Falwell’s wife, Becki Falwell, and Jerry Falwell participated in some of the liaisons as a voyeur.

Although the Falwells have acknowledged a sexual relationship between Becki Falwell and Granda, Jerry Falwell has said he had no role in the affair.

Falwell had already been on leave since earlier in August after a swift backlash to a photo he posted on social media. The image showed him with his pants unzipped, stomach exposed and arm high around the waist of his wife’s pregnant assistant. He also held a glass of dark liquid that he described in a caption as “black water.” Falwell has said the photo was taken at a costume party during a family vacation.

The week after Falwell’s resignation, Liberty’s board announced it had retained an outside firm to conduct a wide-ranging inquiry into Falwell’s tenure as president that would include financial, real estate and legal matters.

Liberty has so far declined to identify the firm it has retained, but spokesman Scott Lamb told AP Tuesday that the work had commenced.

“They have begun their investigative work and those who want to know should understand who they are in a week or so,” he wrote in an email.


This article originally appeared on APNews.com.

How Did Paul Write His Letters (Or Why His Letters Don’t Have Emotional Flourishes That Get Away With Him)

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

How did Paul write his letters?

Sometimes we read Paul and think, “Wow, his emotional intensity here really tells me how he feels” or “wow, he got lost in his argument due to his zealousness.” In fact, neither of these observations can be true.

We cannot psychoanalyze Paul nor gain insight into his emotional life in such a direct way. We cannot do so partly because of the nature of letter writing and because of Paul’s own testimony. These preclude us from making such judgments when we read him.

Paul could not have written letters with emotional flourish (at least not in a modern sense) for the following reasons:

Reasons

  1. Letter writing was a slow and laborious process. No one could write a fast email or a fast letter. It cost lots of money, took considerable physical exertion, and took time.
  2. Paul in 8 of his 13 letters explicitly names co-sponsors writings letters with him (Timothy, Silvanus, the brethren with me, etc.). He wrote letters as part of a team.
  3. Paul used a secretary (amanuensis) who would have considerable freedom. For example, Tertius physically wrote the book of Romans: “I, Tertius, who wrote down this letter, greet you in the Lord” (Rom 16:22).
  4. The diatribe and school-like Q&As in Paul as well as his midrashic exegesis imply his arguments spawned from conversation (perhaps among his coworkers?).
  5. Reading modern letter writing into the past anachronistically makes Paul feel like a romantic poet of the 19th century, laying it all out; or a modern blogger who writes speedily and makes mistakes.
  6. Ancient letters would have been delivered by someone who could explain the letter; and the letter would often be read out loud. Hence, letters were somewhat public. They were not the private affair of today.

All of this leads to the conclusion, as Luke Timothy Johnson notes, that Paul’s letters amount to persuasive rhetoric, thought-out, carefully crafted, and spawned from a community.

So what?

I agree. And I think this historical reality should in some ways change how we read Paul.

First, we likely should not see a rhetorical flourish and think: “Boy, that got away from him!” It did not. He planned it. It may come from his heart as even written sermons can today. But it was intentional. Writing was too cost-, time-, and effort-intensive to make the mistakes a blogger might today.

Second, we should step back and ask: what is Paul trying to persuade his audience of? What sort of things does his crafted argument aim to convey?

Third, we can appreciate the more communal writing style of Paul that conflicts with modern, western notions of the lone ranger writer. Paul wrote with friends, coworkers, and his secretary.

More could be said, but here are some thoughts!

This article originally appeared here.

Motherhood is Apologetics

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

Motherhood is apologetics.

It’s hard to think of a role in life that requires a more constant stream of explanations for why we believe what we believe about God and how he relates to everything: family, snack time, naps, friendships, sleepovers, food, medicine, chores, schooling, and whatever else is else under the sun. Because motherhood is apologetics, mothers must be good theologians. We must know God, his character, his words, and his ways.

Many of us enter motherhood thinking we have a fairly firm grasp on what we believe about God and ourselves––what is true and right in any given situation. But motherhood gives us experiences and situations we never could have anticipated, which means it pushes our beliefs about God into a thousand corners of our lives and the lives of those in our care. All the sudden the woman who always called herself “laid back” discovers she is anything but when her son has lost his third pair of shoes in a week. And the woman whose organizational skills kept her college schedule precise, whizzing along, and down to the minute finds that motherhood seems to have her always running behind on everything from getting to church to keeping up with the laundry.

The smallness and seeming randomness of our daily tasks don’t just challenge who we thought we were, but who we believe God is. Are these small, random assignments he’s given us evidence that he is small and random as well? What are we to make of the futility of socks without matches, dumped out bins, children who are never well-enough to make it to the well-child appointments, and vomit in the car seat? Can we trust a God who gives us blow-out diapers and sleep deprivation when we asked for peaceful nights and cozy clean rompers? The answer is yes, we can trust him. But we likely won’t if we aren’t relentlessly acquainting ourselves with him in his Word. We likely won’t if we our theology hasn’t permeated our minds and hearts.

Our Unexpected Blessings

One thing I’ve noticed about my own life as a mom is that I’ve been in the terrible habit of asking far too little of God. We think him small when he doesn’t answer our little requests, when really it’s our own small requests that reveal we have no appetite for him.

We want a day without spills or chaos. He doesn’t give us that, but he’s willing to give us something much bigger: the grace in Christ to be a patient, humble, loving mom in the midst of spills and chaos.

We want zero temper tantrums and kids with good grades and outstanding achievements. He may say no to those requests, but he’s willing to give us something that dwarfs those by comparison: the grace in Christ to shepherd and discipline our children through temper tantrums, apathy, and poor performances.

We want children who have memorized a hundred Bible verses and can impress their Sunday school teachers, but he wants to give us something far greater: the humility to be able to quietly help our children actually know him and love him with all their heart, soul, mind, and strength as we diligently teach them the ancient paths of God’s word and ways, which is just another way to say, theology.

We are teaching our children about God in every little thing that we do—by what we ask of him, how we speak, what we say yes and no to. Of course it’s not wrong to ask for good sleep and zero temper tantrums and a day that’s spill-free. God loves us—he isn’t put off by our asking. But don’t let your small asks make you forget that he has promised to say yes to some really big things. He’s promised to give you the grace you need to walk through the day as his blood-bought child; he hasn’t promised a day without trouble—quite the opposite. “In this world you will have trouble. But take heart; I have overcome the world” (John 16:33).

Mommy-Theologians

You might be asking God to make you the sort of mom who can effectively potty-train and meal plan, all the while forgetting that he has equipped you with everything you need for life and godliness through the knowledge of him. Christian mom, you have knowledge of God! You are a theologian. And you get to continually cultivate knowledge of him through ongoing study of his word. Your theology is shaped in massive ways by simply reading his words daily. It’s shaped by receiving the word preached every Sunday. It’s shaped through mid-week classes, Sunday school, small group Bible study, and family devotions. You might wonder what that has to do with potty-training and meal planning. Everything! A mother whose theology has been well-stoked and rightly applied, isn’t merely an encyclopedia of the Bible, she is a living apologetic of its message. Even in potty-training, we are teaching about God––that he is slow to anger and abounding steadfast love and that he always does what he says he will do. And even in meal planning we are teaching about God—that he richly provides for us in his Son and that his Son is the bread of life that came down from heaven.

We are theologians in everything we do, not to be mom-professors with rapt pupils, but rather more like a drinking fountain. Christ is the water and we are the means of getting that water to our children. If we run dry, it isn’t because Christ has ceased to be water, but because we have cut ourselves off from the source.

Consider Jesus. He gathered a band of twelve men to follow him around, to eat and sleep in his company, to be taught privately by him, to be granted the privilege of observing him and knowing him. He created a scenario that comes built-in to motherhood. So many of us are desperate to teach someone over coffee once a week with open Bibles and beautiful studies and highlighters. God might say no to that request, but when he gave you children he said yes to something much bigger. When he made you a mother he was affirming your calling as a theologian. Your theology informs and shapes your role as teacher, apologist, and ambassador for him in every tiny corner of your life, from sun-up to sun-down—not just when you’re out drinking coffee with a friend or at women’s weekly Bible study.

Chesterton gets right to the point:

How can it be a large career to tell other people’s children about the Rule of Three, and a small career to tell one’s own children about the universe? How can it be broad to be the same thing to everyone, and narrow to be everything to someone? No. A woman’s function is laborious, but because it is gigantic, not because it is minute. I will pity Mrs. Jones for the hugeness of her task; I will never pity her for its smallness.

Fellow moms, if we think teaching our children about the Triune God and the universe he made is small or pitiable or unimportant, we don’t understand smallness. We don’t understand the way God works. He takes what is small in the world’s eyes––a baby in a manger––and calls him, “the radiance of my glory and the exact imprint of my nature” (Heb 1:3). He is perfectly able to take the seemingly small, lowly job of motherhood and shine the glory of Christ on us and our children. Go to his word. Learn his ways. Know him. Love him. And share that knowledge––that theology––with the “least of these” that he has put in your care. You are their first and most formative theologian and apologist.

This article originally appeared here.

How the Pandemic Has Changed Church

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

Here we are—worldwide—in the ninth month of a pandemic. Economies have been shaken, social structures have been re-arranged, and worship gatherings have all been impacted deeply. The pandemic has changed church. And the end is not in sight: to be sure, a vaccine is not far away, but between manufacture and delivery, most of 2021 will still require changes in the way we have always done church. We should face it: we’re never going back to the old normal. The technological question facing churches is now, what will be the new normal? What technological necessities are part of doing church even after the development of a Covid vaccine?

These questions are not new. The church has always used technology, from ink on papyrus, to stained-glass images, to Gutenberg’s press, church liturgies and community life have leveraged whatever tech was available and affordable. In that sense nothing has changed at all, but forward-leaning churches should consider what technological changes will become a permanent part of the liturgy landscape, and how can we prepare? Here are three tech lessons we’ve already learned, and a one thing that will never change.

Every Church Should Have (or Get) a Reliable ISP

There was a time when no churches had telephones; then there was a time when all churches needed telephones; and then cellular technology rendered church land lines obsolete! Someday our ISP’s will go the way of fax machines, but until the next big thing comes along, all churches need secure, steady, and reliable access to the Internet. Even the smallest country church benefits from world-wide connectivity. Sunday schools and nurserys need access; youth groups now seem irrelevant without the latest videos; and the folks who show up Sunday mornings (for good or for ill) expect your sanctuary to provide great Wi-Fi—for free.

Live Streaming Is Now A Permanent Part of Doing Church

At least among first-world churches, live streaming is here to stay, even after we can pack thousands into church facilities. Plenty of churches were live streaming before Covid went viral, but now all churches should.

Live streaming is a blessing to those who cannot—or choose not to—make it to a Sunday worship meeting. Older church members no longer need to be classified as “shut-ins” because Sunday mornings can come to them. Young parents with sick babies can drink deep of praise, worship, and teaching from the trusted source of their local congregation—if only the church will continue to make it available. Outreach will increasingly come to depend on visitors “sampling” your church online first, perhaps months before they would feel comfortable walking through your church door.

This means that the quick-fix temporary solutions for live streaming must be replaced by quality gear and great upload speeds. Does your church budget for 2021 include significant upgrades?

ChMS Will Continue to Grow

Smaller churches can certainly keep track of their congregations without software, so why does every church need Church Management Software (ChMS)?

The newest versions of ChMS integrate text messaging technology that have become vital to any church that wants to quickly respond to any situation: bad weather, security concerns, or communicating urgent needs church-wide.

ChMS has made giving easier and more regular. One of the sad lessons of the Covid lockdowns has been that churches who relied on put-your-offer-in-the-basket giving have seen significant declines in giving. Most ChMS packages include online giving and text-to-give. Almost everyone uses PayPal, Venmo, or other financial service apps on their phone—why shouldn’t the church be willing to receive their gifts in the manner they want to give them?

One Thing That Will Never Change

God cares about people, not buildings or tech. Jesus didn’t go to the cross for nation-states, social institutions, or corporations: he bled, died, and rose again for people. And the church is made up of people—that’s the why God set the whole thing up! In a strange way, the Covid changes have helped bring us back to the foundational truth that we need each other. People have felt the loss of face-to-face fellowship, of handshakes and hugs, of looking others in the eye and saying, “You matter to God, and to me.”

The rise of megachurches, broadcast churches, and online churches has in some ways prioritized gadgets and gear over the shepherd and the sheep. Nine months (and counting) of separation has reminded us that the church is not simply in the message distribution business: we are not “in business” at all. The church is how God wants to demonstrate his love for each and every soul he created. To the degree that we recover this truth, we will be able to pivot toward tech change, without experiencing the loss of our divinely-appointed calling and task. At the end of the age, God will not ask how many page views or streaming customers the church gained. He will ask, “Did you care for my sheep?”

David Platt on the Problems With Saying ‘You Can’t Be a Christian and Vote For…’

pastor david platt
Screengrab YouTube @Radical

In an interview with Collin Hansen of Gospelbound, Pastor David Platt shared his thoughts on how believers and church leaders can navigate an acrimonious political election with wisdom and love. Platt emphasized the need for Jesus to take preeminence in all of our conversations and explained why he believes Christians should almost never say, “You can’t be a Christian and vote for” a particular candidate.

“We’ve got to work as members, leaders in churches, to foster a community where we really are quick to listen and slow to speak and slow to become angry and really hear each other out and hold on to God’s Word,”  said Pastor David Platt, who leads McLean Bible Church in the Washington, D.C. area. “How do we humbly relate to one another instead of giving into this constant temptation to demonize one another, just jump to polarization of positions, straw man arguments, all of these things that we see all around us in the world?”

Hansen pointed out that many people, pastors included, prefer to avoid discussing politics, much less write a book about it. The topic is perhaps even more fraught for Platt considering that the livelihoods of many members of his church depend on the outcome of the presidential election.

Platt responded that the reason why he has decided to share his thoughts on politics and voting is that if he does not pastor his congregation when it comes to these issues, someone else will. “I don’t want this toxic political climate that we’re in, and even the effects that it has on the church, to be what is discipling the people God’s entrusted to my care,” he said. He stressed that his purpose is not to influence people with his own political opinions, but to encourage them to put Jesus’ concerns at the center of their political values, actions, and conversations.

Pastor David Platt: We Need Empathy and Nuance

It seems more common in this election cycle than it has previously for people on both sides of the political aisle to state that it is not possible to be a Christian and vote for a certain candidate. “It comes from both sides,” said Pastor David Platt, adding that when he hears people make a statement like that, he becomes concerned that they are promoting unity around a particular candidate instead of around Jesus as per Ephesians 4:13

When people say, “You can’t love Jesus and vote for Donald Trump,” or “ You can’t love Jesus and vote for Joe Biden,” then what we end up doing, said Platt, is “questioning people’s orthodoxy based on how they vote.” He is not saying that either statement is right or wrong. Rather, “I’m just saying, how do we keep focus on the centrality of Jesus in the middle of it, love for one another in the middle of it?”

Platt does believe there could be a scenario where it would be fair to encourage every Christian to vote for one particular candidate over another. For that to happen, one candidate would have to be a wholehearted follower of Christ in every area of his or her life while the other was totally opposed to God in every way. “But I don’t think that it’s that clear cut in our current climate,” said the pastor. “But that’s part of the challenge…because people think it is that clear cut. And it’s interesting, there’s people on both sides that think it’s that clear cut.”

It is possible, Pastor David Platt believes, for Christians to have the same core values and end up voting for different candidates, a view that Tim Keller also recently voiced. To understand how this could be, Platt differentiated between biblical principles and practical consequences and explained how this concept might play out in the case of abortion. This, of course, is the next question that some people will inevitably raise: How could any true follower of Jesus vote for a candidate who is not running on a pro-life platform? 

To answer this question, Platt gave the example of a Christian he spoke to who was “zealously pro-life” and was planning to vote for Joe Biden. The reason why is that person had observed that a midterm election in Virginia had resulted in a Democratic governor and legislature being elected and in abortion becoming much more accessible. This believer was convinced those results were a reaction to the way that President Trump has led the U.S. Therefore, that person was planning not to vote for him. Plus, abortion, while an extremely important issue, is not the only matter to consider when voting for a candidate.

This example does not mean that person’s reasoning is correct, said Platt, but it does illustrate “it’s definitely possible for followers of Jesus to believe that abortion is wrong and still not vote for President Trump for a number of other reasons.” 

One significant challenge with discussing whom to vote for and why is that doing so requires people to be nuanced. Hansen observed it is not in the interest of most politicians and media outlets to be nuanced, and Platt added that social media and other online platforms also limit thoughtful conversations. What’s more, these platforms separate the dialogue “from good, loving, caring Christian community, where we’re quick to listen, slow to speak and slow to become angry.”

AWMI Seeks Emergency Injunction to Hold Ministers Conference

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

Ahead of its 2020 Ministers Conference, set to kick off October 5, Andrew Wommack Ministries International (AWMI) enlisted the help of Liberty Counsel to sue Colorado’s governor and health departments. The ministry argues the state’s 175-person limit on indoor religious gatherings is “arbitrarily imposed” and discriminatory, especially when large-scale protests have been permitted.

On September 29, U.S. District Judge Christine Arguello declined to grant AWMI an exemption, writing, “Numerous courts have considered, and persuasively rejected, nearly identical arguments.” Liberty then filed an appeal with the Tenth Circuit. 

AWMI Requests an Emergency Injunction 

Mat Staver, founder and chairman of the Orlando-based nonprofit Liberty Counsel, tells ChurchLeaders a decision about holding next week’s Ministers Conference will be made “as we get closer” to the start date. He expects a quick ruling on Liberty’s request for an emergency injunction, saying the appeal was essential because AWMI has several other conferences planned for upcoming months.

AWMI’s Ministers Conference, held at its Woodland Park headquarters, draws attendees from outside the community. Attendance also is required for the approximately 650 students currently enrolled at the ministry’s Charis Bible College. Its facilities can seat 5,000, including 3,100 in a main auditorium.

An Ongoing Battle

This summer, AWMI fought a cease-and-desist order, saying its First Amendment rights were being violated. The ministry held a Bible conference and an Independence Day celebration, which local officials later blamed for causing a COVID-19 outbreak. AWMI, which detailed a range of safety and sanitizing precautions being practiced, disputed their inclusion on Colorado’s “outbreak list.”

In this week’s lawsuit, AWMI claims Gov. Jared Polis’ crowd-size limits “interfere with and place a cloud of potential criminal and civil legal action” over its conference and attendees. Racial-justice protesters, meanwhile, face no such limits or threats but are “explicitly commended…as exemplars of First Amendment activity” by Polis.

Liberty’s Staver says Colorado’s governor “has clearly discriminated against religious gatherings” because “the distinction between religious and nonreligious gatherings has nothing to do with health and safety.” He adds, “There is no pandemic pause button to the Constitution, nor is there an exception for religious gatherings.”

Advocating for Religious Liberty

Staver expresses willingness to take AWMI’s latest fight all the way to the Supreme Court, if necessary, saying the case is “far from over.” Predicting the outcome is difficult, he tells ChurchLeaders. “We’re currently in litigation in federal courts in six different states,” he says: California, Colorado, Illinois, Kentucky, Maine, and Virginia.

While some states have loosened pandemic-related restrictions, Staver says the ones listed above remain “strict” with limits on religious gatherings. They also tend to be Democratic-led and have allowed protesters to assemble without wearing masks, he says.

Earlier this year, when AWMI was fighting the cease-and-desist order, evangelist Andrew Wommack said he’s “concerned about the virus and protecting people” but that his staff takes “every precaution—more precautions, certainly, than what they’ve had at these protests.”

Similar court battles have had mixed results. In Kentucky, Maryville Baptist Church received favorable rulings and continues to seek a permanent injunction. But South Bay United Pentecostal Church in California lost a Supreme Court fight in May, when justices rejected a challenge to Gov. Gavin Newsom’s shutdown orders.

Southern Baptist Publishing Arm, LifeWay, Sues Former President Thom Rainer

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

(RNS) — LifeWay Christian Resources, the publishing arm of the Southern Baptist Convention, has sued its former president and CEO, accusing him of violating a noncompete clause in his contract.

Thom Rainer, who announced his plan to retire as president and CEO in 2018, still serves as chief advisory officer for LifeWay. Under terms of a transition agreement, he was prohibited from working with a competitor for 12 months after his retirement, LifeWay claims in a suit filed in Williamson County, Tennessee, on Monday (Sept. 28).

Rainer, 65, was earning the same salary he received as president, plus a car, which he could keep after his term as chief advisory officer concludes Oct. 31, according to the transition agreement he signed with LifeWay in 2018.

But in April, the suit alleges, Rainer and Tyndale, a publisher of Bibles and other Christian books, reached “a multi-book, multiyear agreement” for publishing Rainer’s books, which LifeWay says violates the transition agreement.

“Tyndale is ecstatic about our long-term partnership with Thom Rainer and Church Answers. Thom is a gifted leader, teacher, and communicator whose personal mission aligns perfectly with Tyndale’s,” Tyndale senior VP and publisher Ron Beers was quoted saying in a news release.

Rainer, a prolific writer, runs a business called Church Answers, which is intended to help church leaders with “resources, experts and community” through the ups and downs of church ministry. A lifelong Southern Baptist and Alabama native, Rainer received his Master of Divinity and a doctorate from the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky.

Rainer said he was sad to hear about the lawsuit and said he received a written and amicable release from publishing with LifeWay on Oct. 1, 2019.

“Before learning of the lawsuit, I heard from a LifeWay representative about this concern only one time on September 8, 2020,” Rainer said in an email response to RNS. “LifeWay’s counsel sent me an email asking for an explanation of my relationship with another publisher. I gave a quick and substantive response that same day. Even more, I requested to meet with the board officers in my response. I assumed all was well until the lawsuit was filed yesterday.”

LifeWay claims Rainer’s agreement with Tyndale gives that publisher “a significant competitive advantage.”

“It is inevitable that he will disclose to Tyndale confidential information about LifeWay’s products, processes and services,” the lawsuit says.

In an email to trustees, LifeWay Board Chairman Todd Fannin said, “Board officers have requested an explanation from Dr. Rainer in writing on several occasions to resolve this issue, but have not received any substantive answer.”

The suit seeks compensatory damages at an amount to be determined at trial and an injunction to prohibit Rainer and Tyndale from continuing the partnership.

But at least some members of the LifeWay board of trustees have asked that the legal action be withdrawn. Jimmy Scroggins, pastor of Family Church in West Palm Beach, Florida, said in an email to the board that he was disappointed the full board was not consulted before the suit was filed and said he thought there were better options available for resolving the dispute with Rainer.

A spokesperson for LifeWay declined to comment further.


This article originally appeared on ReligionNews.com.

Faith Leaders React to Trump-Biden Debate

thank you notes for children’s ministry volunteers

President Donald Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden participated in the first of three scheduled debates last night September 29, 2020.

Highlights of the Trump-Biden Debate

The debate which came across more like a reality show pilot was moderated by Fox News’ Chris Wallace, who was seen multiple times trying to control the room due to both candidates constantly interrupting each other.

Comments heard throughout the 90-minute debate were:

“Will You Shut Up Man!”

“The fact is that everything he’s saying here is a lie!”

“It’s hard to get any word in with this clown.”

“You are the worst president America has ever had.”

“He doesn’t want to answer the question.”

“This is so un-Presidential.”

“47 years, you’ve done nothing.”

“Will he just shush for a minute?”

“He’s a fool on this.”

“Show us your tax returns.”

“He’s the racist.”

“He never keeps his word.”

“You make up a lot.”

“This is not going to end well.”

You can watch the entire debate here.

Faith Leaders Respond to Trump-Biden Debate

“After watching the debate last night, we’re reminded that the problems we face as a nation cannot be solved without God.” – Franklin Graham

“Could Chris please exchange their mics for a set of walkie-talkies so they can’t talk at the same time?” – Beth Moore

This wasn’t a debate, it was a debacle. Senseless obfuscation and grandstanding. This left us with fewer answers and more confusion. What a horrible example of leadership for my boys to witness.” – Tedashii

“I missed the debate, but it sounds like we lost.” – Jen Wilken

“I’m not looking for a president but a King and His name is Jesus!” #Maranatha – Dr. Eric Mason

“I’m going to have to listen to the Psalms and/or Sade before bed tonight because this whole debate is exhausting.” #Debate2020 – Jackie Hill Perry

“I rise grieved today. Time for a run and prayer. Concerned for the future of our country (and my grandkids experience).” – Eric Hogue

“I haven’t been this stressed out since the last 5 minutes of Infinity War when half of everything I loved disappeared.” – John Cooper

“This is just sad and embarrassing.” – Esau McCaulley Ph.D

“Everyone should be able to condemn racism and white supremacy without any “but.” – Trillia Newbell

“I turned it on for 2 minutes and then turned it back off. I can’t imagine it got any better.” – Carlos Whittaker

“Why am I laughing so much at this debate? I can’t decide if it’s funny or sad. Or both. I might start crying as I laugh.” #Debates2020 – Eugene Cho

“The country lost tonight…” – Kirk Franklin

“This debate is emblematic of our inability to listen, graciously debate and stand on convictions, instead we rely on personal insults and petty tirades. Civil discourse has long been dead.” #2020Debates – Brady Boyd

The next presidential debate will take place in Miami on Oct. 15.

 

855,266FansLike

New Articles

preschool praise and worship

Preschool Praise and Worship: Helping Little Hearts Worship in Big Ways

Preschool praise and worship experiences are bursting with joy. Learn how to nurture praise-filled preschoolers at Sunday school and church.

New Podcasts

Joby Martin

Joby Martin: What Happens When Pastors Finally Understand Grace

Joby Martin joins “The Stetzer ChurchLeaders Podcast” to discuss what happens when a church leader has truly been run over by the “grace train" and understands the profound love and grace of God.