Home Blog Page 681

Dwight McKissic: Why I Will Leave the SBC If They Rescind Resolution 9, Affirming Limited Beneficial Aspects of Critical Race Theory

communicating with the unchurched

Dwight McKissic says he will leave the SBC if Resolution 9 is rescinded.

When one reflects on the history and current reality of systemic injustice in America, there are some tenets that have been handed down to us that are beneficial in discussing and assessing structural racism in America. Structural racism in America today is not as potent and prevalent, or as visible and vicious as it was in previous generations, but it still exists. Therefore, it must be prophetically, educationally, and legally addressed and readdressed. We see it present in real estate appraisal differences based on color, prison sentencing differences based on color, job hiring discrimination toward names indicative of minority ethnicities, school discipline disproportional meted out toward minorities, income and net worth disparities that are generationally impacted, etc.

What are some tenets that have been handed to us that can inform society in grappling with structural racism today?

Let me identify just three:

1. The value of storytelling.

Many Americans are simply unaware of the racial atrocities of the past, that have an economic impact on today, regarding passing on generational wealth. The 1921 Black Wall Street in Tulsa, OK, was a massacre of 300 African Americans and the destruction of their buildings and businesses by an angry White mob over an alleged sexually inappropriate contact between a young Black male and White female. The White female refused to press charges; and the Black male was released after several months in jail. Yet, vigilante justice ruled. The most vital economic center for Blacks in America was destroyed, and insurance companies refused to make them whole. Not one arrest was made, for the White Tulsa citizens, who perpetrated this vicious and violent act. Similar stories can be repeated in at least 19 other southern cities.

An 88-year-old man in my congregation, with tears in his eyes, told me the story of being physically and sexually violated by a White male in a rural area, of a southern state he was raised in. When I asked him if he reported this incident to the law at the time, he said, No! Because law enforcement at the time in America would arrest you if you reported a White person violated you sexually. He has simply had to live with the pain and shame. All the White pastors and the Council of Seminary Presidents have never had to listen to such stories. Every SBC Black pastor have people in their congregations with similar stories. We dare not allow the SBC to devalue, regulate, or invalidate the stories of our people due to their misunderstanding and biases against a theory designed to acknowledge the value of telling these stories.

2. The value of recognizing and including diverse people racially in all aspects of American society.

We learn from the past that if we exclude persons on the basis of race, it prohibits a segment of America from contribution to society at large in a way that is beneficial to all. Can you imagine baseball without Jackie Robinson, Willie Mays, and Hank Aaron? Can you imagine golf without Tiger Woods or Lee Elder? Can you imagine historical theological contributions without J. Deotis Roberts, James Howard Thurman, James Cole, Tony Evans, or Martin Luther King, Jr.? Can you imagine the American church landscape without the AME Church, founded by Richard Allen, and the Pentecostal churches and the Church of God in Christ, whose roots can be traced back to William J. Seymour, Charles Harrison Mason, and C.P. Jones? Even the Assembly of God roots spawn from these movements.

Can you imagine the suffrage movements without Sojourner Truth, traveling across the country preaching “Ain’t I a Woman?”

More Right-to-Carry in Church? NC Gives Final Legislative OK

communicating with the unchurched

RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — The North Carolina General Assembly on Tuesday finalized another bill seeking to expand gun rights — this time in churches — and will send it to Gov. Roy Cooper, who vetoed a bill containing the same idea a year ago.

The Senate agreed 30-19 to House changes to Republican legislation that would allow members or visitors at churches that meet on private school campuses to carry a handgun if they have a concealed weapons permit.

Current law treats these places of worship differently than standalone religious venues, and bill supporters say these worshippers should have access to the same level of security when churches have been targets for violence. Ministers of several evangelical churches with affiliated schools spoke in committee earlier this year to request the option.

While a few Democrats joined all Republicans in voting for a broader gun bill in 2020 that contain the church language, Cooper managed to return enough Democrats to the fold last year to uphold his veto.

This year, five House Democrats and three Senate Democrats also joined with Republicans in approving the scaled-back measure.

The governor focused on the church provision in the 2020 measure, saying it threatened the safety of students and teachers.

There was no Senate debate before Tuesday’s vote. House Democrats said last week that the gun access sought in the measure wouldn’t help prevent violence. They suggested these congregations should hire off-duty police officers instead for security. But that the cost can be prohibitive for small churches, according to the Rev. Mark Creech with the Christian Action League of North Carolina.

“They’re not able to develop their own (armed) security team,” Creech said in an interview, adding that the churches “are vulnerable to some crazed soul that might walk in and want to start shooting.”

Cooper’s office didn’t immediately respond Tuesday to an email seeking comment on the bill heading to his desk.

As with last year’s bill, sponsors of the current measure say it contains protections for the schools that meet on the property. Permit holders can only carry a gun outside the school’s operating and activity hours, and these churches could still prohibit concealed weapons by posting a sign.

The bill also contains a separate provision also inserted into the 2020 bill that allows additional law enforcement employers — such as a civilian front desk worker at a police station — to carry a concealed weapon on the job if the police chief or sheriff allows it and the person has a concealed handgun permit.

This article originally appeared here.

Black Pastors in Georgia Press for Federal Voting Rights Bills

voting rights
A person listens to prayer during a voting rights rally at Liberty Plaza near the Georgia State Capitol on Tuesday, June 8, 2021, in Atlanta. (AP Photo/Brynn Anderson)

ATLANTA (AP) — Black church leaders in Georgia vowed Tuesday to keep up their fight for federal voting rights legislation, with one pastor urging President Joe Biden to use his bully pulpit and strike deals with lawmakers to get the bills passed.

“We need you to utilize every ounce of influence that you have,” Pastor Lee May, head of the Transforming Faith Church in Decatur, said in a plea to Biden at a rally outside the state Capitol in Atlanta. “We need you to not just say what you’re for, but to do something about it.”

Martin Luther King Jr.’s daughter, the Rev. Bernice King, said the “crown” of her father’s work — the 1965 Voting Rights Act — was under attack. Republican lawmakers in Georgia and other states have approved a slew of new restrictions on voting that experts have blasted as the greatest assault on voting rights in a generation.

But a bill in Congress that Democrats view as an antidote to those state measures appears doomed in the narrowly divided Senate. Democrat Joe Manchin over the weekend expressed opposition to it and any effort to end the 60-vote requirement to break a filibuster in the chamber.

“I call upon my brothers and sisters of the U.S. Senate to not allow filibuster to become your stumbling block to do what is just and what is right,” King said.

Republicans have defended the states’ recently passed voting restriction measures as necessary to restore confidence in the election system, though members of their party, including former President Donald Trump, have made false claims that the 2020 election was stolen. Bishop Reginald T. Jackson, who heads the African Methodist Episcopal Church in Georgia, said the laws were an effort to suppress minority voters who helped Democrats win.

He said Black pastors plan to head to Washington next week to persuade U.S. senators to support a voting bill named for the late Congressman and civil rights icon John Lewis, who died last year. Jackson singled out Manchin, saying the pastors needed to “clarify his thinking.”

“Does Sen. Manchin believe that the filibuster is more important than the United States Constitution?” he asked. “Our democracy is at risk. Does Manchin think the filibuster is more important than our democracy?”

This article originally appeared here.

Biden’s DOJ Says Its Interests Align With Those of Christian Universities Named in Suit

communicating with the unchurched

The Department of Justice (DOJ) is opposed to a motion from the Council for Christian Colleges & Universities (CCCU) to intervene in a class action lawsuit brought by current and former LGBTQ students at Christian institutions of higher education. The DOJ says the motion to intervene made the—false—assumption that the Biden administration’s interests and those of the Christian institutions are not aligned. 

“In an attempt to establish that their interests will not be adequately protected,” said the DOJ in a June 8 court filing, “the Proposed Intervenors cite a variety of statements and actions taken by the current Administration regarding protecting LGBTQ+ individuals from discrimination in a variety of contexts and then leap to concluding that ‘the current defendants will not defend the Religious Exemption as vigorously as Religious Schools’…or may even be ‘openly hostile’ to defending the Religious Exemption as applied to LGBTQ+ students.” 

The truth is, said the DOJ, that the federal government has a vested interest in defending the religious exemptions being challenged in the suit.

LGBTQ Students Bring Lawsuit

In Hunter v. U.S. Department of Education, filed March 29, 2021, 33 current and former LGBTQ students at Christian colleges and universities said their schools should be ineligible for federal funding because of anti-LGTBQ discrimination. The plaintiffs argue that the schools have discriminated against them as a result of the religious exemptions to Title IX that allow Christian institutions to create policies around sexuality and gender.

The Religious Exemption Accountability Project (REAP) filed the lawsuit on behalf of the plaintiffs, and the suit names 25 Christian institutions, including Liberty University, Baylor University, and Azusa Pacific University. The following article from ChurchLeaders offers more background on the suit: UPDATE: Religious Colleges Face a Lawsuit Related to Protections of LGBTQ Students.

On May 12, 2021, CCCU announced that it had filed a motion to intervene in order to be a participant in the case, as well as filing a motion to dismiss the case “based on the frivolous legal claims.” For more information on the CCCU’s decision, see LGBTQ Student Experiences Are Valid, but Lawsuit Is ‘Frivolous,’ Says CCCU.

According to the DOJ’s court filing on Tuesday, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allow non-parties (in this case, the CCCU and three Christian universities) to be granted either mandatory or permissive intervention if the non-parties meet certain requirements. One of the requirements for mandatory intervention is “the existing parties [the U.S. Department of Education] may not adequately represent the applicant’s interest.” 

The CCCU and the universities expressed concern that the federal government will not “vigorously” defend the schools named in the suit and might even be “openly hostile” toward them. But the DOJ argues that this will not be the case because its interests are not in opposition to the interests of the Christian organizations named in the lawsuit. Rather, they all “share the same ‘ultimate objective’…namely, to uphold the Religious Exemption as it is currently applied.”

“The Federal Defendants are a federal agency and federal official represented by the Department of Justice, and the Complaint challenges the Federal Defendants’ application of a federal statute,” said the DOJ. “Specifically, the Federal Defendants’ ultimate objective is to defend the statutory exemption and its current application by ED [U.S. Department of Education], which is the objective sought by the Proposed Intervenors here.” 

The DOJ also said that permissive intervention would not be advantageous on the grounds that if the CCCU and the Christian universities became parties in the suit, they would simply complicate it: “The presence of additional parties will complicate resolution, for example, by multiplying the number of motions that need to be resolved, increasing the amount of discovery requests, if the case proceeds to discovery, and/or making settlement more complicated.” 

REAP director Paul Carlos Southwick told the Washington Post, “What this means is that the government is now aligning itself with anti-LGBTQ hate in order to vigorously defend an exemption that everyone knows causes severe harm to LGBTQ students using taxpayer money. It will make our case harder if the federal government plans to vigorously defend it like they have indicated.”

CCCU president Shirley Hoogstra told the Post that this filing from the DOJ is a relief. She said, “We’ll see what happens. We’re pleased they want to defend religious exemption.”

Slate magazine’s Mark Joseph Stern, however, sees the DOJ’s opposition to the motion to intervene as a way of preventing the CCCU from having influence in lawsuit. “The best way to prevent the federal judiciary from adopting CCCU’s extreme stance,” he said, “is to stop the organization from making it before a court in the first place.

Kara Powell on the #1 Reason Youth Leave the Church—And How to Reverse the Trend

communicating with the unchurched

Dr. Kara Powell is the Executive Director of the Fuller Youth Institute, a faculty member at Fuller Theological Seminary, and Fuller’s Chief of Leadership Formation. Named by Christianity Today as one of “50 Women You Should Know,” Kara serves as a Youth and Family Strategist for Orange, and also speaks regularly at parenting and leadership conferences. Kara is the author or coauthor of a number of books and resources, including “Sticky Faith,” “Growing With,” and “Faith in an Anxious World.” Kara lives with her husband Dave and their three children, Nathan, Krista, and Jessica, in Southern California. 

Other Ways to Listen to this Podcast With Dr. Kara Powell:

► Listen on Apple
► Listen on GooglePlay
► Listen on Spotify
► Listen on Stitcher
► Listen on YouTube

Key Questions for Dr. Kara Powell

-What has changed the most in youth ministry over the last decade?

-What’s the number one reason this generation walks away from the faith?

-What is needed to bridge that gap between the youth and the church?

-How should the church approach doubt in ministering to students?

Key Quotes From Dr. Kara Powell

“At its core, I think youth ministry is really about helping students understand the grace and love of Jesus Christ, and normally, I certainly recommend, that that is done through incarnational ministry.”

“Of all the youth group participation variables we’ve seen, being involved in intergenerational worship and relationship was one of the variables most highly coordinated to young people’s faith.”

“Almost half of all young people drift away from God and the church after they graduate.”

“I think often a senior pastor or youth pastor‘s best point of leverage is to motivate and equip parents to create that team [of five adults for every teenager].”

“Know your senior pastor’s love language…know what it is that is most meaningful to your supervisor.”

“Our vision is that churches and youth ministries would be the first place where young people feel like they can go with their tough questions.”

3 Factors for Leading Into The Future — Beyond COVID

communicating with the unchurched

We’re in the middle of something. It’s a crisis. A pandemic. We’re physical distancing (“social distancing”). We’re in-between life as we knew it and something different.

Things are different after 9/11/2001 than they were on 9/10/2001. I believe “normal” will be different after this passes, too.

While we’re in-between, what if God desires to prepare us for something different. Something He’s about to do? What if God is about to do something that we could use this time to get ready for?

Check out this passage from the Bible:

Joshua 1:1-3 (NIV) After the death of Moses the servant of the Lord, the Lord said to Joshua son of Nun, Moses’ aide: 2 “Moses my servant is dead. Now then, you and all these people, get ready to cross the Jordan River into the land I am about to give to them—to the Israelites. 3 I will give you every place where you set your foot, as I promised Moses.”

Take Note: GET ‘READY’ & ‘ABOUT TO’

Joshua was leading a group of people who were in between two places. They were no longer in Egypt, in captivity. Yet, they were not yet in Canaan, the Promise Land. They were in-between.

Do you ever feel like you’re living in-between? We are right now… We’re in-between pre-COVID-19 and post-COVID-19. In-between is the space situated somewhere between two extremes or recognized categories.

What if God uses times of in-between to prepare His people for greater impact and purpose?

Is there anything that would change in your life or leadership right now if you began to view this in-between time as space separating the place God has delivered you from and the place God is developing you for?

God never wastes anything. He doesn’t waste His Words or His Promises. God is also known for using bad things for the good. I believe this means staying in between the past and the promise is never God’s final plan for us.

It’s possible to stay in-between. It’s possible to live as if nothing changes.

What if it’s possible to long for “normal” so badly you overlook that everything is different?

I do not know exactly how things will be different for us a nation or culture. I do know God is directing me toward a new normal that will look different from how things used to be.

Is it possible He is doing the same with you? Is it possible God is drawing people toward Him?

What if it’s possible God will use the Church in ways that only those who are willing to do things differently will experience it?

Before you get a bunch of ideas about what I mean, let me say this: There are some things that do not change: God and His purpose. He is still good and He still loves people. He still is righteous and desires for His righteousness to influence our lives.

How could God use this time of in-between to sharpen, re-focus, or even redirect your life and leadership?

If you’re open to using this time of in-between to prepare for something different, something better, below are three practices to begin implementing:

After God instructs Joshua to GET READY for what He is ABOUT TO do, God puts things into perspective for Joshua.

Joshua 1:5-6 (NIV) “5 No one will be able to stand against you all the days of your life. As I was with Moses, so I will be with you; I will never leave you nor forsake you. 6 Be strong and courageous, because you will lead these people to inherit the land I swore to their ancestors to give them.”

1. When God is ABOUT TO, realize that it’s not just about you.

What is God leading you toward that others will benefit from, too? Essentially, God is saying the Promised Land is never just for you. Whatever God is doing within you in some way is for others, too.

Do you believe that?

Is God preparing you for something new and different? Is He creating a new “normal” in His people that will reach far beyond them — kinda like, “for God so loved THE WORLD”?

This may seem harsh, but I believe we miss out on the greater blessing when we only reserve it for ourselves. God will never take you to the Promised Land if you are neglecting Him and others along the way.

Based on the Israelites’ journey, it is possible to stay IN-BETWEEN until we have a vision for how the promised land is for others too!

2. When God Is ABOUT TO, recall what He’s said to you.

God is so gracious. He actually promises to “never leave us or forsake us.” The same promise He extends to us a long time ago He shared with Joshua, too.

Joshua 1:8-9 (NIV) “8 Keep this Book of the Law always on your lips; meditate on it day and night, so that you may be careful to do everything written in it. Then you will be prosperous and successful. 9 Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous. Do not be afraid; do not be discouraged, for the Lord your God will be with you wherever you go.”

Joshua could have based his condition upon how he felt or on God’s Word and His Presence. Like us, Joshua had reason to feel afraid and discouraged.

Joshua was leading people into a war, not on a hike. Joshua could have been fearful that rather than fighting the nearing enemy the people would fight each other; it wouldn’t have been the first time.

Joshua could have been fearful…that he didn’t have what it takes. …that it could be another 40 years before they entered the Promised Land. …that they would turn away from God again like they had in the past.

What has a grip on your heart that needs reminding of what God says and where God is?

In times of crisis, we have the option to base our condition on:
1. What God has said (commanded).
2. Where God is (with you).

Or, on fear.

Ask a kid: “Was there ever a time you were really afraid? Did you ever run to a friend or parent who was bigger and stronger? If so, why?”

The adult’s presence eased your worries. The adult’s words comforted your concerns.

Fear is pacified when Someone Greater is with you.

Like Joshua, God wants us to recall two things: His commands and His Presence.

3. When God is ABOUT TO, decide what you will do.

Joshua had enough of being in-between. He was ready to move on.

Joshua 1:10 (NIV) “10 So Joshua ordered the officers of the people: 11 ‘Go through the camp and tell the people, “Get your provisions ready. Three days from now you will cross the Jordan here to go in and take possession of the land the Lord your God is giving you for your own.” ’ ”

Joshua had made up his mind. His decisions influenced his actions. Movement requires a decision. The decisions Joshua determined the promises He’d experience. Joshua decided to partner with God.

Joshua allowed God to use the time in-between the past and the promise.

Will you?

CategoriesThis article originally appeared here.

Pastoring: The Gloriously Grueling Gift

communicating with the unchurched

Through the years I have had many conversations with seasoned and retired pastors who, at some point in the conversation, share that pastoring today is harder than it’s ever been. Many who are retired go so far as to ponder whether they would even be able to pastor successfully in this current situation. I am confident that they could, but I appreciate their thoughtful humility.

Pastoring Is Hard

Recently, I was thinking about the fact that I started pastoring in 1991. It hit me that moving into my fourth decade of pastoring means that my voice would now be considered by many as one of those seasoned voices. From that posture, my assessment of the current experience of pastoring is consistent with what I have heard from others: Pastoring is hard.

It has always been hard, but it seems to be getting increasingly difficult in the American context where I find myself. Recent events and responses seem to have only accelerated the steady decline that we have been witnessing in American churches since the last third of the twentieth century. Study after study in recent days indicates that many pastors are feeling the growing difficulty of pastoring. Many are experiencing burnout and depression and are choosing to walk away from the ministry altogether. Among those who stay at it, statistics indicate that a large percentage would rather do something else.

This leaves me asking the question, “What do pastors need right now?” Reflecting on that question has led me to the Apostle Peter’s first letter. Peter writes as a shepherd to fellow shepherds. He is acutely aware he is writing to those pastoring suffering churches in troubled times. What he offers them is comfort, encouragement, and inspiration in hopes of strengthening their resolve to remain faithful day in and day out to the finish. In three different relational contexts, Peter drives home the message that pastoring is a privilege gifted by God Himself, providing what I believe pastors needed then and continue to need today, a healthy dose of encouragement.

Pastor to Pastor

“I exhort the elders among you as a fellow elder and witness to the sufferings of Christ, as well as one who shares in the glory about to be revealed:”  1 Peter 5:1 (ESV)

Peter has just finished speaking to Christ-followers who are suffering because they follow Jesus. Churches and individuals are suffering and Peter has sought to put their suffering for Christ in a proper perspective – rejoicing. Now, he begins his direct address to pastors in the relational context of one pastor speaking to other pastors. These pastors are experiencing their own suffering while also leading churches full of individuals plagued by suffering.  These suffering pastors are tasked with regularly reminding others to maintain rejoicing hearts amidst suffering. In light of this, Peter wants these church leaders to be encouraged in their call. The humility and confidence Peter displays are striking. He encourages pastors to action and engagement in the midst of pastoring suffering churches. With clear-thinking realism, he acknowledges the grueling and glorious nature of the call to shepherd a local church.

Peter does not identify himself by his authority as an apostle or by his denying of Christ on the night before the crucifixion. Instead, he steps into the world of his fellow pastors identifying himself with them in the context of their shared relationship with Christ. Pastors are in this together, not in competition with one another. There is no place for one-upping one another either by flashing our impressive credentials or by drawing attention to another’s ministry failures. We are equally ministers of the gospel of Jesus Christ, proclaiming His sufferings for the salvation of all who place faith in Him. In this truth, we find our security and significance to partner in humility with fellow elders beyond the four walls of our local churches and across denominational lines. Peter recognizes the vital importance of encouraged pastors for healthy local churches. Pastor-to-pastor, we need to repeatedly remind one another to focus on the reality that pastoring is a privilege gifted by God himself.

Does Social Media Burden You With the Weight of the World?

communicating with the unchurched

I have several friends in ministry who recently unplugged from social media. When a particular flashbulb, social media incident precipitated angst and outrage on “Christian twitter,” my friends remained calm and steady. When I asked if they had heard about such and such an occurrence, they nonchalantly shrugged it off. I was envious of the freedom they were evidently experiencing. They were not carrying the weight of the world, burdens they did not need to carry. They were proving something I have thought about for years. If Neil Postman was right when he warned that we are “amusing ourselves to death,” I am concerned that we are “burdening ourselves to death.” We are carrying burdens that we were never meant to bear. 

Since the advent of the internet, globalized news has become a localized phenomenon. Information about some event or tragedy that happened on the other side of the world becomes our news. What would have taken several months to reach a certain part of the world now takes seconds. We are more informed than ever, and simultaneously more stressed out and outraged than ever. The sensory overload of the world streaming into our brains has an impact on how we process what is in front of us. I have heard of pastors and congregants in otherwise solid churches having nervous breakdowns this past year, on account of an inability to handle the stress of what they read online.

If a particular event wasn’t a burden we were meant to carry, our response will be one of the following: a) We can simply ignore it, b) we can endlessly lecture everyone else about what went wrong and why it went wrong, c) we can seek to advance a supposed solution to something that may not be directly pertinent to our context and calling, or d) we could be feeling so utterly overwhelmed and discouraged by the combination of things that are and aren’t our concern, that it leads to inaction in both areas and crushing guilt. While the first response may be most fitting, indifference will be met with condemnation by those who choose to respond in the latter two ways. The problem with the second response is that it results in virtue signaling. All of us feel better about ourselves when we have pontificated on a particular matter, even when we know it is not without the power of our hands to do anything about it. The third response places a burden on those around us to give the better part of their time and energy to something that is not within the immediate sphere of their context and calling. The fourth response is where most people find themselves at present–unnecessarily demoralized and defeated. So how can we navigate life in this information, reaction, and weight of the world, overload world?

How to Avoid the Weight of the World

1. Abide in the Word.

A friend of mine recently said, “I wish there were a book that could help us navigate these treacherous times. Oh wait, there is. . .the Proverbs.” Christians are called to keep their minds focused on the revelation of God in Scripture. As the Apostle Paul taught, “let the word of Christ dwell in you richly” (Col. 3:16). This means that believers should be filling their minds with God’s word throughout the day. We need to be reading and meditating on the word of God. As we do so, we will be better equipped to rightly respond to whatever is streaming through the internet. Robert Murray McCheyne once famously said, “For every look at self–take ten looks at Christ.” In the same way, we can say, “For every one look at media, take ten looks to Scripture.” As we do, we will find that we will be equipped to better navigate whatever streams in front of us. We will know if, when, or how to respond to a national or global matter. Most importantly, we will keep the gospel central to our response.

2. Continue in Prayer.

The best way to respond to weight of the world, or any burden we feel, in our souls is to carry it to God in prayer. If the Lord tells us to cast (lit. roll) our personal burdens onto Him, how much more should we instinctively feel the need to roll the burdens of the world onto Him. Who can better deal with the tragedies and injustices of life than the infinite and eternal God who is sovereign over all (Rom. 11:36). If we would turn to Him in prayer, rather than to the internet in outrage, we would find that promise of the peace that passes all understanding (Phil. 4:6–7). This is the solution to carrying the weight of the world and burdening ourselves to death.

3. Prioritize Immediate Relations.

There will be plenty of burdens for us to carry in our personal lives, among our family members, and in our local churches. It would do us good to embrace Augustine’s principle of moral proximity. In On Christian Doctrine, Augustine wrote, 

“All men are to be loved equally. But since you cannot do good to all, you are to pay special regard to those who, by the accidents of time, or place, or circumstance, are brought into closer connection with you. For, suppose that you had a great deal of some commodity, and felt bound to give it away to somebody who had none, and that it could not be given to more than one person; if two persons presented themselves, neither of whom had either from need or relationship a greater claim upon you than the other, you could do nothing fairer than choose by lot to which you would give what could not be given to both. Just so among men: since you cannot consult for the good of them all, you must take the matter as decided for you by a sort of lot, according as each man happens for the time being to be more closely connected with you.”

There are plenty of need with which to concern ourselves among our immediate connections. There will always be those around us who have suffered loss and need to be comforted. There are those who are going through times of sickness, trial, loneliness, or need. Add to this, the fact that every local church has need of its members to be engaged in a variety of capacities in Christian service. The church needs members to help it fulfill its divine calling by giving, praying, worshiping, and serving. There is always a need to care for the children and elderly in the church. We can never be fervent enough in helping the church in its outreach and hospitality. We have more than enough opportunities to encourage and pray for the members of the church we attend. 

God calls us to focus on what He has placed in front of us in our personal lives, families, and the church. If we are not neglecting these, and we have time left over, we are called to care about the needs of the community. However, we should never reverse the order. As Paul told the Galatians, “As we have opportunity, let us do good to all–especially to those of the household of faith” (Gal. 6:10). The Apostle Paul charged the members of the church in Galatia to “bear one another’s burdens” (Gal. 6:2), not to “bear the burdens of the entire world.”

We must resist the temptation to carry the weight of the world, burdens we were never meant to carry. If we fail to settle into the callings to which God has called us, we will find that we are merely “burdening ourselves to death.” The Lord calls His people to be useful and fruitful in the service of His kingdom. In order to do so, we have to be a people who abide in His word, continue in prayer, and prioritize our immediate relations. As we do so, we will discover that we are helping to unburden a people who are seeking to carry weight of the world, the burdens they were never meant to bear.

 

This article appeared here.

There’s Help for Overcoming Teenage Porn Addiction

communicating with the unchurched

Despite the damage that pornography causes, church workers are often unwilling or afraid to talk openly about the subject. This is especially true regarding teenage porn addiction.

I’m so tired of hearing about this! It breaks my heart when I see the grip that porn has on Christian leaders. And it’s so tough knowing that our youth groups are full of teenagers who are dying in this battle.

Every week, I meet with a small group of 10th-grade guys I love deeply. They’re great kids, yet I know every single one of them struggles with lust or porn. These teenagers are always one click away from a self-defeating spiral. The trap of teenage porn addiction has such a high cost!

Youth worker and Christian apologist Sean McDowell wrote an interesting post about “The Social Costs of Pornography.” He writes: “Today’s pornography is different from any in the past in three ways. (1) Accessibility. The Internet has made porn ubiquitous. (2) Quality. Today’s porn is much more hardcore. (3) Consumption. Porn consumption has increased radically with the advent of the Internet. 69 percent of men and 10 percent of women report viewing pornography more than once a month. 87 percent of men admit using it in the past year. The researchers conclude, ‘In sum, there is evidence that more people—children, adolescents and adults—are consuming pornography—sporadically, inadvertently or chronically—than ever before.'”

The good news is that help is available for teenage porn addiction. You and I can assist the awesome kids entrusted to our care. Their struggle with pornography doesn’t need to continue.

Take these 3 steps to combat teenage porn addiction:

1. Be educated.

If you yourself aren’t or haven’t been or won’t likely be tempted by pornography, that’s great. But recognize that you’re in the minority. Don’t assume that teenage porn addiction isn’t a serious problem. Don’t assume it can’t happen to your youth group kids. Get the facts. Stay current with what’s ensnaring teens. Do your homework. Know what’s happening.

2. Model accountability.

Dozens of great anti-porn software and filter options are available. But I love the software developed by XXXchurch.com because it promotes accountability. We’re only as sick as our secrets, and this software shares your “secret” with a friend. When you fail, the program forces you to talk about the situation. Check it out! For just $7 a month, this should be mandatory for all family computers.

3. Talk openly.

When my small group was in 9th grade, I took a risk. I said, “I’m just going to assume that pornography is an issue in your life. If it’s not, that’s great. But based on my conversations with a lot of guys, I’m betting you struggle with it to some degree.”

Wow, did that risk pay off! Because I dared to speak up, a bunch of great conversations followed. Guys signed up for filters and offered to provide accountability for one another. Now teenage porn addiction is an open subject in our small group. Knowing they’re not alone provides comfort as well as healing for kids.

A lot more could be written about teenage porn addiction. In fact, on my blog I’ve devoted a bunch of posts to what essentially became Porn Week. (Although it’s not as much fun as Shark Week, it’s just as dangerous!)

Question: What are you doing to help young people in your ministry deal with teenage porn addiction?

Burger King Takes a Shot at Chick-fil-A Over LGBTQ Stance

chicken sandwich
Source: Facebook

Burger King has announced it will donate a portion of the proceeds it receives from its new chicken sandwich to the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), the largest LGBTQ advocacy group in the U.S. In its announcement, Burger King targeted Chick-fil-A (CFA), which has has been under fire again this week for its stance on sexuality. 

Burger King introduced its new “Ch’King Sandwich,” on Thursday, June 3, the same day the company made the announcement that for every chicken sandwich sold, 40 cents will go to HRC. Burger King will donate up to $250,000 total, and the campaign will run from June 3 to June 30 in honor of Pride Month. In its announcement, Burger King specifically mentioned that the donations apply “even on Sundays,” a comment clearly aimed at Chick-fil-A, which is closed on Sundays.

READ: LGBTQ and the Church Podcast Series: A Conversation We Need to Have

Chicken Sandwich Wars 

Chick-fil-A is well-known for being a company that is driven by Christian values, one example being its decision to close on Sunday in observation of a Sabbath day of rest. Christian values drive Chick-fil-A’s efforts at efficiency and hospitality, as well as the company’s decision to invest in ministry through the WinShape Foundation.

In 2012, Chick-fil-A CEO Dan Cathy drew heat for expressing his position that marriage is between one man and one woman when he said the U.S. was “inviting God’s judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at him and say we know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage.” 

In the past, critics of Chick-fil-A have taken issue with its philanthropic efforts, particularly when the company was supporting Fellowship of Christian Athletes (FCA) and the Salvation Army. FCA takes the stance that God intended sex to be between a man and a woman within the covenant of marriage.

Criticism of the Salvation Army was based on allegations that the ministry had discriminated against transgender people and employees in same-sex marriages. At times, hostility toward Chick-fil-A for its position on sexuality has led to people boycotting the company when it opens new locations.

At the end of 2019, Chick-fil-A announced that it would no longer make charitable donations to FCA and the Salvation Army and would instead focus its charitable giving “exclusively in the areas of hunger, homelessness, and education.”

However, despite Chick-fil-A’s decision to limit which charitable organizations it supports as a company, Chick-fil-A came under fire again this week after a Daily Beast report came out claiming that Dan Cathy is one of the main donors to the National Christian Charitable Foundation, “one of the biggest bankrollers of organizations currently on the front lines in the fight against the Equality Act. Two days later, Burger King posted the tweet about its chicken sandwich campaign for Pride Month. 

Chick-fil-A has not commented on Burger King’s tweet as of this writing. 

For further reading on this topic, see the following posts from ChurchLeaders:

Gregory Coles: It’s Possible to Be Same-Sex Attracted and Fully Surrendered to Jesus

Caleb Kaltenbach: Do You See the LGBTQ Community Through God’s Eyes?

Preston Sprinkle: Jesus Left the 99 to Pursue the One—And That Means Trans People

Robby Gallaty: ‘God Turned Off Our Megachurch’s Power — So We Could Witness His Power’

gallaty
Screenshot from YouTube

Pastor Robby Gallaty of Long Hollow Baptist Church in Tennessee posted Sunday on his Facebook page a testimony of how God worked in spite of a full-blown power outage that took place during their 11:15 AM service this past Sunday.

“We just encountered something I haven’t experienced before at Long Hollow or at any church for that matter,” Gallaty explained. He said the event happened while he was preaching on 2 Corinthians 3:17-18, where Paul tells the Corinthian church: “Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. We now with unveiled faces are looking at the glory of God are being transformed.”

Gallaty said halfway through his sermon, all the power went out. “The back-up lights continued to work for 15 minutes. Unbeknownst to us, the transformer caught on fire, and blew out at the substation right when I was ending my sermon. We heard a loud bang, and then, boom! We were sitting in pitch-black darkness.”

Having never been faced with this type of scenario before, the pastor said most people took out their cell phones and turned on their flashlights, lighting the room. Gallaty considered ending the service, thinking, The power is out, my TV is out, my mic is out, the worship team can’t play their instruments, so I’ll just close the service in prayer.

‘The Enemy Will Not Get the Victory’

As the pastor prepared to say, “Let me pray as we close the service,” Gallaty said something stopped him. Instead, he said, “We are not going to let the enemy get the victory today.” Gallaty said he listened to the Holy Spirit’s prompting and changed course. “What happened next was unreal,” he said.

Because the there was no electricity, the only power was the sound of his voice, so he began yelling so everyone in the auditorium could hear him. Gallaty invited anyone in the congregation to come forward who needed to be set free from addiction, resentment, bitterness, shame, guilt, porn, drugs, pride, or any other sin that might have a foothold in his or her life.

“There was a palpable presence of God,” Gallaty said, as he knelt to pray. The pastor began to uncontrollably weep as many in the audience also came forward to the altar and began to weep.

Southern Baptist Pastors Demand Inquiry Into Handling of Sex Abuse Claims

sex abuse claims
Messengers hold up an SBC abuse handbook while taking a challenge to stop sexual abuse during the annual meeting of the Southern Baptist Convention at the Birmingham-Jefferson Convention Complex, June 12, 2019, in Birmingham, Alabama. RNS photo by Butch Dill

(RNS) — Two Southern Baptist pastors will seek an investigation into allegations that the highest echelons of the Southern Baptist Convention mishandled several sex abuse claims and bullied sex abuse victims.

The pastors — Ronnie Parrott of Christ Community Church in Huntersville, North Carolina, and Grant Gaines, pastor of Belle Aire Baptist Church in Murfreesboro, Tennessee — have said they will make a motion at the upcoming meeting of the Southern Baptist Convention asking the denomination’s newly elected president to hire an outside firm to investigate.

“The intention behind the motion Grant and I are making is to seek the truth,” Parrott said. “We don’t need any more of the ‘he said this,’ and ‘he said that’ comments. We need the truth. An independent, third-party investigation is the only path forward for the truth.”

The allegations were detailed in two letters written by outgoing SBC ethics chief Russell Moore, detailing internal conversations that revealed how top leaders of the convention resisted sexual abuse reforms and tried to intimidate those pushing for them.

Southern Baptists will meet June 15-16 in Nashville for their annual convention, and the ongoing scandal of sex abuse in its churches will be high on the agenda.

Moore, who resigned his position as head of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, wrote two scathing letters detailing the inner workings of the SBC’s Executive Committee, the group based in Nashville that runs the business of the denomination.

Moore’s first letter, addressed to the ERLC executive committee and written more than a year before his resignation, was first published on RNS. In it, Moore explained his troubles with the SBC’s leadership in bitterly frank terms, focusing especially on resistance he’d met around advancing issues of racial justice and sexual abuse reform.

A week after the first letter was leaked, a letter by Moore to SBC President J.D. Greear was published on the site the Baptist Blogger. In the May 31 letter, Moore said leaders sought to “exonerate” churches with credible allegations of negligence and mistreatment of sexual abuse survivors.

“You and I were critical of such moves, believing that they jeopardized not only the gospel witness of the SBC, but also the lives of vulnerable children and others in Southern Baptist churches,” Moore wrote.

Moore said members of the Executive Committee then became enraged when he invited Rachael Denhollander to speak at the conference. Denhollander is a lawyer and former gymnast who was the first woman to publicly accuse Larry Nassar, former Michigan State University and USA Gymnastics doctor, of sexual assault. At that conference, Denhollander, a Southern Baptist, detailed the mistreatment of a fellow survivor at the hands of the Executive Committee. That survivor’s name is not mentioned in the letter, but it is believed to be Jennifer Lyell, a former leader in Christian publishing who went public several months ago with allegations of sexual abuse against a prominent SBC leader.

Communion Ban for Pro-Choice Politicians Is an Old Story, But the Stakes Have Grown

communicating with the unchurched

VATICAN CITY (RNS) — As bishops in the United States prepare to discuss the drafting of a document that could ban pro-choice Catholic politicians like President Joe Biden from receiving Communion, experts say while this is not a new debate, the stakes are higher than ever.

In 2004, when Catholic Democratic politician John F. Kerry ran for president, some members of the U.S. bishops’ conference considered the possibility of barring him from receiving the Eucharist because of his support of pro-choice legislation.

The support for such a ban was not limited to U.S. bishops; indeed Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger — who would later become Pope Benedict XVI — was in support of banning Catholic politicians who “with obstinate persistence” support abortion legislation.

The head of the Vatican’s doctrine watchdog department at the time, Ratzinger wrote a letter to two prominent U.S. Catholic leaders laying out his case for the ban.

“When a person’s formal cooperation becomes manifest (understood, in the case of a Catholic politician, as his consistently campaigning and voting for permissive abortion and euthanasia laws),” his pastor must meet with him to instruct him on Catholic teaching on abortion and encourage him to refrain from receiving the sacrament, Ratzinger wrote in the letter, sent to the president of the bishops’ conference, Bishop Wilton Gregory, and to the head of the bishops’ “domestic policy division,” then-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick of Washington, D.C.

If the individual insists on presenting himself to receive Communion, Ratzinger continued, the priest must refuse. “This decision, properly speaking, is not a sanction or a penalty,” Ratzinger wrote, but due “to the person’s public unworthiness to receive Holy Communion due to an objective situation of sin.”

The U.S. bishops decided in the end to take a middle-of-the-road approach. During their general assembly in 2004, they chose to let the individual bishops decide whether or not to administer Communion to pro-choice Catholic politicians.

McCarrick was later stripped of his cardinal status and positions following reports of his sexual abuse of seminarians and a child. Gregory was made a cardinal by Pope Francis in 2020 and is the new Archbishop of Washington, D.C.

Seven years later, the second Catholic president of the United States — who frequently quotes Pope Francis in his public speeches and regularly attends Mass — is embroiled in the same debate, but while some of the main players remain, insiders say the context in the U.S. Catholic church and the Vatican has changed.

As bishops in the U.S. objected to pictures showing Biden receiving Communion and urged fellow bishops to support the drafting of a document to ban pro-choice politicians from receiving the sacrament, the Vatican sent a letter suggesting the episcopacy think long and hard about the possible repercussions this decision might have.

In a May 7 letter sent to the U.S. bishops, Cardinal Luis Ladaria, the head of the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, urged that “dialogue among the bishops be undertaken to preserve the unity of the episcopal conference in the face of the disagreements over this controversial topic.”

While the 2004 letter sent by Ratzinger was private, Ladaria issued his letter publicly to Archbishop José Gomez, the current president of the U.S. bishops’ conference. This latest Vatican letter “is a much more public intervention by a high-ranking figure of the Holy See, than the previous letter,” said the Rev. John P. Beal, Stephan Kuttner Distinguished Professor of Canon Law at the Catholic University of America, in an interview with Religion News Service.

Jill Biden and Dr. Anthony Fauci Visit Vaccine Site at Harlem Church

Jill Biden and Dr. Anthony Fauci
First lady Jill Biden, left, and Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, visit a vaccine clinic at the Abyssinian Baptist Church in the Harlem neighborhood of New York Sunday, June 6, 2021. (AP Photo/Craig Ruttle)

NEW YORK (AP) — First lady Jill Biden and Dr. Anthony Fauci toured a COVID-19 vaccination site at a historic Harlem church on Sunday.

Biden, Fauci and U.S. Sen Kirsten Gillibrand, a New York Democrat, watched as people got their shots in the basement of the Abyssinian Baptist Church.

Biden asked a teenager about to get his shot how old he was, and when he said he was 14, she responded, “You’re 14, that’s exactly what we want! Twelve and over.”

The Abyssinian Baptist Church has often hosted elected officials and other dignitaries, including in February when former President Bill Clinton and former Sen. Hillary Clinton attended a memorial service for actor Cicely Tyson.

The church first started offering vaccine doses in January in an effort to boost the vaccination rates in New York City’s Black and Hispanic communities.

This article originally appeared here.

I Believe! … In QAnon? What Nonbelievers Don’t Get About Conspiracy Beliefs

conspiracy beliefs
David Reinert holding a Q sign waits in line with others to enter a campaign rally with President Donald Trump Republican U.S. Senate candidate Rep. Lou Barletta, R-Pa., Thursday, August 2, 2018 in Wilkes-Barre, Pa. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)

(RNS) — What is the difference between being faithful and being faith-filled, and how might that difference be shaping politics and culture today?

Those questions matter more and more, as we learn more and more about the role of faith in the lives of QAnon followers and the place of QAnon in the lives of many people of faith.

A recent report by Public Religion Research Institute indicates that 15% of Americans fall into the category of “QAnon believers,” defined as anyone who agrees with any of three statements: “the levers of power in the U.S. are controlled by a cabal of Satan-worshipping pedophiles”; “American patriots may have to resort to violence in order to save our country”; and “there is a storm coming that will sweep away the elites and restore the rightful leaders.”

While 15% may not sound like a critical share of the population, given the nature of those claims and the fact that the recent presidential election was decided by a margin of about 4%, it’s a hugely concerning figure. QAnon believers are able to seriously change the future of the nation.

This is doubly true because QAnon believers are concentrated in one party: About 25% of Republicans are receptive to QAnon, while only14% of independents and 8% of Democrats are. When compared with the number needed to sway an election, though, we see that this is an issue for all of us, regardless of party.

This is about more than partisan politics. We need to look beyond the pollsters’ three statements if we want to better understand and address the popularity of these beliefs. We need to look toward religion and the nature of belief itself.

The new data from PRRI’s report is very helpful in doing just that.

PRRI polling indicates that white evangelical Protestants, Hispanic Protestants (who are largely evangelical), and Mormons are more likely than other groups to agree with each of the tenets of the QAnon conspiracy movement mentioned above.

White and Hispanic evangelicals tend to agree with QAnon at 25%, LDS members at 18%.  But the numbers are relatively high for other groups as well, including Hispanic Catholics (16%), Black Protestants (15%), other Christians (14%), non-Christian religious (13%), white Catholic (11%), white mainline Protestant (10%).

These conspiracy theories and the violent fantasies associated with correcting them, in other words, cut across political and denominational lines. As painful as it might be for some of us who are animated by faith, the data suggests that the issue is not simply about those who are faithful to a particular religious path, but about people who are “faith-filled” — animated and informed by belief that transcends the purely rational. This is not about who has the “right faith” or the “wrong faith.”

Nor is this an attack on the arational or the mystical elements of faith. Quite the opposite, in fact. We need to appreciate those elements for what they are, taking responsibility for their full potential, and more effectively addressing people with genuine respect for their faith, even when we have no regard for the conclusions to which that faith has led them.

Hobby Lobby Seeking $7M in Lawsuit Against Oxford Professor Over Stolen Bible Fragments

communicating with the unchurched

UPDATED June 8, 2021: Arts and crafts supply giant Hobby Lobby filed a $7 million lawsuit against former University of Oxford Professor of Papyrology Dr. Dirk Obbink for stealing ancient Bible fragments and selling them to the multi-billion dollar retail store.

The Green family, who founded and owns Hobby Lobby, used the Bible fragments in their Museum of the Bible (MOTB), which opened in 2017 in Washington, D.C. The evangelical Christian family bought the papyrus fragments and other ancient artifacts from the 64-year-old Obbink between 2010 and 2013. The fragments were to be displayed at MOTB, but the Greens later discovered the ancient samples belonged to the Oxyrhynchus Collection in the Sackler Library located at Oxford.

Obbink was arrested March 2020 for allegedly stealing the fragments and selling them. He has since been released and the investigation is ongoing. The professor claims he is innocent and said, “The allegations made against me that I have stolen, removed or sold items owned by the Egypt Exploration Society collection at the University of Oxford are entirely false. I would never betray the trust of my colleagues and the values which I have sought to protect and uphold throughout my academic career in the way that has been alleged. I am aware that there are documents being used against me which I believe have been fabricated in a malicious attempt to harm my reputation and career.”

The MOTB returned the stolen artifacts safely to the Egypt Exploration Society, which owns and curates Oxford’s Oxyrhynchus Collection.

MOTB has since established an extensive vetting process for acquiring artifacts and displays in its state-of-the-art, one-of-a-kind Christian museum.


ChurchLeaders original article written on October 16, 2019, below.

The business of biblical antiquities, which has been described as murky and even seedy, is dealing with another scandal. After a six-year investigation, University of Oxford officials revealed that “First-Century Mark,” reportedly one of the oldest Bible fragments, apparently had been looted from its collection by a renowned professor. That fragment and 12 other biblical artifacts eventually ended up with the Green family, owners of Hobby Lobby and founders of the Washington, D.C.-based Museum of the Bible.

The investigation points to Dirk Obbink, a highly regarded classics professor and recipient of a MacArthur “genius grant.” Obbink, who’s still working at Oxford, is suspected of the “removal and alleged sale” of items from the university’s Oxyrhynchus Papyri Project, excavated in 1896 from an Egyptian garbage dump. The non-profit Egypt Exploration Society (EES) owns and curates the Papyri Project, which is housed at Oxford’s Sackler Library. The EES insists the materials were never for sale.

Biblical Artifacts Had Questionable Provenance

This week, the EES said the 13 items “were taken without authorization,” and 11 ended up in the care of the Museum of the Bible “after being sold to Hobby Lobby Stores by Professor [Dirk] Obbink, most of them in two batches in 2010.” (Two items were sold by another buyer.) Obbink, who has previously denied the allegations, has been banned from accessing EES archives.

Along with the artifacts, identifying materials such as catalog cards and photographs of text also disappeared. Through backup records, the EES was able to identify what was missing.

The Museum of the Bible, saying it purchased the artifacts “in good faith,” confirmed the items were “sold illegally” to them by a “known expert.” Four of the items are currently property of the museum, and the rest belong to Hobby Lobby as part of its Green Collection. Although the artifacts weren’t on display, some were part of a traveling exhibit before the museum opened.

Steve Green, president of Hobby Lobby, founded the Museum of the Bible in 2017 as a charitable organization to engage people with God’s Word. Within just a decade, he built one of the world’s largest private collections of biblical artifacts.

Jeff Kloha, the museum’s chief curatorial officer, says, “We have collaborated with EES in the investigation, have shared all relevant documentation with them, and will continue to assist them in recovering other items that may have been removed without authorization from their holdings.” 

The EES expressed gratitude for the museum’s cooperation with acknowledging the items’ ownership and arranging their return. The Museum of the Bible provided EES with photos of its entire collection, allowing the group to research other items that might have gone missing.

According to a museum spokeswoman, former employees accepted those fragments at a time before the museum established tougher policies for assessing provenance. “Since then,” says Heather Cirmo, “Museum of the Bible curators and registrars began rigorously reviewing all acquisitions and researching documentation and dealers, with special attention on antiquities, items that may originate in modern conflict zones, and agents who are now known to [have] sold items of questionable origin or authenticity.”

Antiquities Buyers Must Proceed With Caution

These latest allegations in the antiquities world reveal a perfect storm of complicity between seller, buyer, and institution,” says biblical scholar Candida Moss, co-author of Bible Nation: The United States of Hobby Lobby.

Museums are obligated to perform “due diligence” with acquisitions, experts say. Documentation should include the item’s export date, ownership history (provenance), and supporting paperwork. The invoice that the Museum of the Bible released in June for the Mark fragment simply said “Egypt,” which is insufficient.

Jill Hicks-Keeton, a religious studies professor who co-edited The Museum of the Bible: A Critical Introduction, calls these latest revelations “bad news” for the Museum of the Bible and “worse for Obbink, whose scholarly credentials are often raised by [museum] advocates as evidence of the museum’s legitimacy.” She adds that the scandal “should raise serious questions in all of our minds about the Museum of the Bible,” including why it is releasing this evidence.

The Altar: A Meeting Place With God

communicating with the unchurched

Altars were significant in the Old Testament. They are mentioned over two hundred times, with many of them related to the Tabernacle and the Temple. Yet, altars were used far before these formal meeting places were erected. Noah (Genesis 8:20), Abraham (Genesis 12:7–8; 13:4;18; 22:9), Isaac (Genesis 26:26), and Jacob (Genesis 33:20; 35:1–7) all constructed sacrificial altars.

Four Hundred Years and No Altars

Abraham’s use of altars is perhaps the most notable. He made it a practice to build an altar to commemorate when the Lord made a promise or gave a command. At the altar, he would make a sacrifice and “call upon the name of the Lord” (i.e., Genesis 12:8).

An altar was built where there was a significant encounter between God and man.

Many altars were built prior to Israelites living in Egypt.  For 400 years, we have no record of any altars being built or any sacrifices being made. If you think about it, that is significant!

Four hundred long years without any blood sacrifices; four hundred years without any significant meetings between God and man. 

Four hundred years of what felt like silence from God. 

Four hundred years of what felt like man not making a blood sacrifice for his sins. 

Four hundred years of silence, slavery, and no sacrifices. 

A case could be made that the first blood sacrifice was made by God to atone for the sins of man in Genesis 3:21 when an animal was killed to cover Adam and Eve. A little while later, God was pleased by Abel’s blood sacrifice (Genesis 4:4; Hebrews 11:4).  Then, as soon as Moses was able to confront Pharaoh, his continual request was to “Let us go… three days journey into the wilderness, that we may sacrifice to the Lord our God (Exodus 3:18; cf. 5:1-3; 8:25-28; 10:24-26).

They wanted out of captivity so they could go do what had been done prior: build an altar, make a sacrifice, and get right with God.

At the end of their captivity, God gave the Israelites a command to make a blood sacrifice. Each household was to kill the Passover lamb (Exodus 12:6) and put the blood on their doorpost. This was a return to sacrifices and altars at the very end of their captivity. This act prophetically painted a picture of the sacrifice that would come through Jesus Christ, our ultimate Passover Lamb.

The Significance of Meeting With God Again

With my western mindset, I can’t understand the longing to to get out of slavery to build and altar. I can think of about one thousand things (or more!) that I would probably want to do right out of slavery. Yet, for the Ancient Near East Israeli, all they wanted to do was get back to doing what the patriarchs had done centuries before.

They wanted to please God. They knew that a burnt offering was literally the “smell of satisfaction” to God.

This week, let me ask you — are you in a period of no “altars” or “sacrifices” to the Lord? Has your slavery to sin kept you from drawing near to God?

By faith, the blood of Christ is over you. Return to God and let this week mark a significant meeting between you and God. 

This article originally appeared here.

How to Share Your Church Financial Report With the Congregation

communicating with the unchurched

Like any family, the church needs money to take care of its members and to do its job with a church financial report to the congregation. Most church staffs will agree, but beyond that there is often disagreement about how and when to share church financial information with the rest of the church. My ministry, Effective Church Communications, once received an email where the pastor asked if, when, and how it was appropriate to put financial information in the bulletin. I know he wasn’t the only one with this question and following are some thoughts that might be useful.

How to Share Your Church Financial Report With the Congregation

Define “Church Bulletin”

The exact form of the bulletin isn’t what’s important. Bulletins today come in a variety of print formats and many are online or in digital format. Many aren’t even called “bulletins” but something that fits in with the particular culture of a particular church. Though we’ll call this communication “the bulletin” for the sake of this article, what matters is whatever you call the communication piece that you use to regularly communicate with your church, that it does contain financial information.

Why Put a Church Financial Report in the Bulletin

There are some churches that don’t do this for a variety of reasons, but this is a mistake. Here are some of the reasons why it’s important:

  • Churches need money to function; this is not something to be ashamed of, but to be treated honestly.
  • The church is a family and every family needs to know its financial status.
  • If you don’t share, the finances can be seen as a staff secret and not a shared responsibility. The staff does not have time to individually discuss the financial situation with each person in the congregation.
  •  People need to know where the church is financially so they can give and pray.

What to Include About Finances in the Bulletin

On a weekly basis include:

  • What was given for the past few weeks AND what was budgeted. It’s also nice to include the sum over and under (saves people trying to figure it out).
  • The reason both numbers are important is that if you only give what comes in people have no idea if that meets the budget or if it falls short. Numbers without context don’t mean anything and don’t provide either cause for praise or concern.
  • If you conducted a special offering, also include the results of that.
  • If you have a special offering coming up, let people know and what your goals are for it.
  • Have a link to your website where you have year-to-date totals and other information that might be useful, which I’ll explain more below.

Periodically Communicate Church Financial Report

Additional information on Biblical giving overall and the specifics of how it is practiced in your church can be shared in shortened form in the bulletin, in longer formats on your website, and in the church newsletter. This will help grow your people in biblical giving practices and wise money management. Here are some suggested topics:

  • Provide church giving information. For example, if you use envelopes, let people know how to get them. For unchurched visitors this can seem very confusing.
  • Church budgeting process—how the church decides how much money is needed each year.
  • Designated fund giving rules—many churches have rules about what goes into the general fund and what qualifies as designated funds. If this isn’t clear to the congregation, it can cause confusion. This happened when a church I was working with published in their newsletter a lengthy plea for people to give more to the church because of a serious budget shortfall. In the same newsletter there was an article about a huge memorial donation given to the music department for organ repair. Needless to say, the church office got a number of very confused and a few angry inquires the following week. The church contacted me and asked if they should put out an article explaining the difference between the general fund (which was seriously low) and designated giving (which was the source of the memorial donation). My answer: “YES!  Do it immediately and explain the difference in detail!”
  • Biblical teaching on the commands and benefits of generous giving.
  • Sound financial family resources.

Design Matters, Too!

The key characteristics of church financial communication should be:

  • Clear
  • Understated
  • Tasteful
  • Consistent

A simple chart in the same place every week works well. A simple, clear headline, something like “Church Financial Report” is all that is needed. I’ve seen many well-done ones in the bottom corner of a page of the bulletin. However, don’t make it the last page—you don’t want financial needs to be the last thing people see when they are reading information about your church.

One More Thing . . .

The church bulletin is not the place to share lengthy pleas for money or to post dramatic appeals.

I will never forget a church bulletin that said in huge letters across the front:

Bridge to the future is taking place!

XXX amount given so far; XXX to go….

Have you made a pledge yet?

I doubt if anyone visiting the church for the first time that Sunday would be highly motivated to return. A message like this confirms a fear many people have about churches that all they want is your money.

Critical giving needs and similar information is better communicated in a letter or emails to committed members of the congregation. Again, remember the church is family and we don’t share our entire financial situation with everyone who visits our homes.

As with many things in the church, ask for the Lord’s wisdom and share your financial information “decently and in order” so that He will be pleased and your church will be a good witness to the world of financial integrity.

 

For more information and training in church communications from Yvon Prehn and Effective Church Communications, go to: http://www.effectivechurchcom.com

Separate Funds Make Church Accounting Easy

communicating with the unchurched

In church accounting, tagging transactions with “the dad fund’ (DF for short) or ‘the mom fund’ (MF for short) can help with financial reporting. How does this play out using the previous numbers from the for-profit scenario and can we report those numbers with more accuracy? Let’s use the same table with the expenses and checking; but also include those designations (MF or DF) for each transaction – noted in bold.

A Church Accounting Example:

Checking: Expenses (5001 Trips): Expenses (5002 Movies)
Bal (01/01/2013) – $1,500.00 Bal (01/01/2013) – $0.00 Bal (01/01/2013) – $0.00
Trip to Lodge – $350.00(DF) Trip to Lodge – $350.00(DF) Movies – $20.00 (MF)
Movies – $20.00 (MF) Trip to Coast – $425.00(MF) Movies – $45.00 (DF)
Trip to Coast – $425.00(MF)
Movies – $45.00 (DF)
Equations:
$1,500 – trips – movies = $660 $0.00 + $350 + $425 = $775 $0.00 + $20 + $45 = $65
Ending Balance – $660 Total Spent = $775 Total Spent = $65

As stated in part one, the DF has $750.00 and the MF has $750.00 which would total $1,500.00 for the entire family’s checkbook.

Summary: After these transactions, $350.00 (DF) Trip to Lodge, $20.00 (MF) Movies, $425.00 (MF) Trip to Coast, and $45.00 (DF) Movies:

  1. The Dad Fund (DF) would have $355.00 ($750.00 – $350.00 – $45.00 = $355.00).
  2. The Mom Fund (MF) would have $305.00 ($750.00 – $425.00 – $20.00 = $305.00).
  3. Combined balance in the family’s checkbook of $660.00 ($1,500.00 – all expenses = $660.00)

Using the above table with the expenses and also fund designation (MF or DF), can we answer the questions that were posted from part one, easily? Yes. Let’s get to it.

  1. How do you know what dad spent on his recent fishing trip?
    1. Answer: looking at the trip expense, find the one marked with a “DF”– it is $350.00.
  2. How much did mom spend when she went to CA to visit her aunt?
    1. Answer: looking at the trip expense, find the one marked with a “MF” – it is $425.00.
  3. How much did each spend on the movies?
    1. Answer: looking at the movie expense, mom (MF) spent $20.00 while dad (DF) spent $45.00.
  4. How much did the entire family spend on movies?
    1. Answer: looking at the total for the movie expense line it is $65.00 (no need to separate it because it asks for the whole family – not just dad or mom).
  5. How much did dad and mom spend separately (a)? And also together (b)?
    1. Answer: (a) looking at each DF expense for dad it would be $350.00 + $45.00 = $395.00 and looking at each MF expense for mom it would be $425.00 + $20.00 = $445.00. (b)What they spent together is a grand total of $840.00 which leaves $660.00 in the checkbook ($1500.00 – $840.00 = $660.00).

This example is a very simple one, but imagine hundreds of transactions in church accounting with various funds for ministries. Trying to figure out what expenses, revenues, and the balances of assets and liabilities on a report would be a daunting task if all the treasurer had was an ambiguous description in a checkbook register — and no fund designation as shown here.

How accounting funds and the chart of accounts work together to ensure compliance with government regulations.

What we did above is essentially fund accounting (using the MF or DF designation). Fund accounting was created for churches so they can properly account for money in their various ministries and decrease burdensome paperwork. When funds (DF and MF) are used in conjunction with a chart of accounts (COA) and double entry accounting for each ministry, there are several advantages like the ones listed below.

  1. It eliminates the need for separate COA for each ministry, which removes duplication across the COAs.
  2. It eliminates a separate section for every ministry within the COA structure, keeping the COA small and manageable.
  3. It helps in creating independent financial statements for each ministry which tells the organization how financially sound the ministry is.
  4. It can create a combined financial statement including all funds on one statement and show overall how the organization is financially.

Any church accounting system that doesn’t record both the fund and the individual accounts on the COA, more than likely, fails the necessary requirements for fund accounting for churches according to GAAP, FASB, and other church accounting requirements. This creates headaches for the end users when the church council has questions similar to the ones below, and in the worst case scenario can force the church to forfeit their tax-exempt status during an audit.

  1. How much does the General Fund have in it? Or the Youth Fund?
  2. After liabilities, what is the Youth Fund’s ending balance?
  3. During the month of March, what did the General Fund pay for? How much did the Youth Fund bring in and pay for?
  4. According to the budget for the Youth Fund, are we on target or are we over our budget? How about the General Fund?

Christian Leadership Podcasts Geared Toward Church Workers

communicating with the unchurched

Podcasts and their audiences continue to grow rapidly. As a result, the number of people producing Christian leadership podcasts is increasing too. In such a dynamic and changing media landscape, it can be easy to miss some gems.

Christian leadership podcasts are ideal for helping church workers develop, grow and serve their congregations.

Consider adding these 10 Christian leadership podcasts to your audio queue:

1. The Carey Nieuwhof Leadership Podcast 

This lawyer-turned-pastor has been creating a podcast since 2014. Nieuwhof’s early days as a part-time DJ in Canada haven’t hurt his endeavors at producing radio programs either. The podcast features a mix of well-known and everyday leaders. Their insights bring tremendous value to your development as a church leader.

2. Bridgetown Church Podcast

This Portland, Oregon, church describes itself as “practicing the way of Jesus, together.” The messages from pastor John Mark Comer and others on staff will challenge your faith. They’ll also encourage you to walk with God in ways you might not have considered before.

3. ChurchLeaders

This longtime podcast features a wide variety of Christian leaders sharing ideas and insights. Host Jason Daye sits down for in-depth conversations with pastors and other church leaders. Topics of discussion include church planting, missions, serving in a small town and more.

4. Shauna Niequist Podcast

This best-selling author and speaker shares personal conversations with leading writers, thinkers and leaders. Subject matter ranges from family and relationships to life and faith and purpose. Niequist’s books have produced a passionate fan base, especially among millennial and Gen X women. She frequently headlines national conferences, offering insights about faithful Christian living.

5. Breakpoint

The late Charles Colson started this program back in 1991 on traditional radio. It continues today as a podcast with a Christian perspective on current news and trends. On “BreakPoint This Week,” John Stonestreet and co-host Ed Stetzer converse with leading Christian writers and thinkers. Eric Metaxas provides commentaries.

6. Dr. Michael Horton – White Horse Inn Podcast

This podcast asks, “How important is it for you to know what you believe and why you believe it?” Horton contends that what you know matters more than what you feel. And he backs up his belief with solid biblical insight.

7. Craig Groeschel Leadership Podcast

The senior pastor of Life.Church says he designed this podcast to help leaders make the most of their potential. It’s a valuable resource as you work to become the leader God created you to be.

8. Waking Up Podcast with Sam Harris

Yes, we know Sam Harris is an atheist. But knowing how an atheist thinks might just help you reach others who question Christianity’s validity. The neuroscientist, philosopher and best-selling author explores questions about the human mind, society, and current events from his atheistic worldview.

9. The Liturgist

This is another podcast that helps you answer objections from people who are questioning their faith. It looks at spirituality through the lens of those who’ve walked away from organized religion but consider themselves spiritual. This growing segment of society is known as the “nones.” Disclaimer: The hosts occasionally use language that some listeners may find offensive.

10. Truth’s Table

This roundtable discussion features three seminary-educated women. They engage in lively conversations about the cultural, social and political issues of our day.

What other Christian leadership podcasts do you recommend?

Happy listening!

855,266FansLike

New Articles

Bible games for kids

Bible Games for Kids: Fantastic Sunday School Activities

Use these Bible games for kids at Sunday school, midweek programs, children’s church, or at home.

New Podcasts

Joby Martin

Joby Martin: What Happens When Pastors Finally Understand Grace

Joby Martin joins “The Stetzer ChurchLeaders Podcast” to discuss what happens when a church leader has truly been run over by the “grace train" and understands the profound love and grace of God.