Home Blog Page 700

Planned Parenthood’s New Clergy Advisory Board–‘Reproductive Rights Are a Matter of Faith’?

communicating with the unchurched

WASHINGTON (RNS) — The Planned Parenthood Federation of America is announcing a new slate of faith leaders for its clergy advisory board who mostly hail from states controlled by Republicans or in the South, a move officials say follows a “wave of lawmakers” such as Georgia Sen. Raphael Warnock who have worked to “proudly champion reproductive rights as a matter of faith.”

Alexis McGill Johnson, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, celebrated the announcement.

“Access to comprehensive sexual and reproductive health care — including abortion — is supported by people of all faiths,” Johnson said in a statement. “The Clergy Advocacy Board is a crucial part of our mission at Planned Parenthood to promote, protect and expand access to health care for all … Planned Parenthood is proud to have religious leaders of all faiths standing with us in this fight.”

The board has operated at Planned Parenthood for decades, but its newest iteration will feature representatives from states overwhelmingly run by Republicans. New names include the Rev. Emily Harden of West Virginia, the Rev. Tim Kutzmark of California, Rabbi Sarah Smiley of Kansas, the Rev. Katey Zeh of North Carolina, the Rev. Rebecca Todd Peters of North Carolina, the Rev. Elle Dowd of Illinois, the Rev. Elise Saulsberry of Tennessee, the Rev. Latishia James-Portis of Georgia and the Rev. Stephen Griffith of Nebraska.

For Zeh, who heads the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice, serving on the board is a kind of a homecoming.

“As a clergyperson who discovered my call to ministry within a Planned Parenthood, it was a no-brainer,” she told Religion News Service in a phone interview.

Zeh explained she felt called to ministry while volunteering as an “abortion doula” at a Planned Parenthood while in seminary, where she provided support and held the hands of women at a clinic as they underwent abortions.

“There are so few of us who are people of faith who are willing to be bold and audacious about supporting reproductive freedom because of our faith,” she said.

Saulsberry, who runs abortion rights advocacy group SisterReach, agreed. She said you “can’t put a price” on the role of faith-based abortion rights activism because “much of the pushback” to abortion “comes from the church.”

“There are folks — let’s just say evangelicals — who have the privilege of leading those conversations (opposing abortion) and inform the pushback against the type of care or advocacy that Planned Parenthood and SisterReach provide,” said Saulsberry, whose group advocates for “the reproductive autonomy of women and teens of color, poor and rural women, LGBTQIA+ people and their families through the framework of Reproductive Justice.”

“As leaders of faith and as clergy, we are to stand and speak out loud — as loud as other clergy — in support of reproductive health, rights and justice.”

According to a 2019 Pew Research survey, a strong majority of white evangelical Protestants — 77% — say abortion should be illegal in all or most cases. Evangelical and Catholic organizations are well represented at the March for Life, an annual anti-abortion gathering during which thousands of activists descend on Washington, D.C., to decry abortion and call for legislation to restrict or ban it.

This year’s gathering was virtual and featured a keynote address from former football star and evangelical Christian Tim Tebow, who invoked his faith while recounting how his mother decided to give birth to him despite doctors advising her to have an abortion.

But Zeh, Saulsberry and others represent a less discussed reality: broad support for abortion rights within many religious communities.

For example, the same Pew poll found that majorities of several other major faith groups — 64% of Black Protestants, 60% of white mainline Protestants and 56% of Catholics — took the opposite position of white evangelicals, saying abortion should be legal in all or most cases.

What’s more, PPFA’s announcement comes months after the election of Warnock, a clergyman who preaches at Atlanta’s historic Ebenezer Baptist Church and identifies as a “ pro-choice pastor.” His Republican detractors railed against his position on the issue throughout his campaign, including then-U.S. Rep. Doug Collins, who said there is “no such thing as a pro-choice pastor” before declaring “What you have is a lie from the bed of hell.”

Warnock’s Republican opponent in the race, then-Sen. Kelly Loeffler, a Catholic, also criticized him for invoking Scripture during a debate, saying, “I’m not going to be lectured by someone who uses the Bible to justify abortion.”

Their criticism may have been out of step with the Georgia electorate: A 2019 poll conducted by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution showed slim majorities of Protestants and Catholics in Georgia agreed with Warnock that abortion should be legal in all or most cases.

Saulsberry contends Warnock’s subsequent victory was in many ways the result of long-standing abortion rights activism — religious or otherwise.

“It’s a manifestation of what’s been happening all along,” she said. “Women, individuals and even clergy members are more adamant and bold in speaking out about the rights we are advocating for.”

Saulsberry said she wasn’t sure if PPFA’s selection of several clergy from Southern states was on purpose, but said she’s “on board” with the idea if it was. She noted many legislative efforts by conservative lawmakers to restrict abortion access are being passed in Southern states or conservative states, many of which also claim deeply religious populations.

“Georgia, Tennessee and North Carolina — our states lead in some of the most oppressive reproductive rights laws that we’ve seen in a long time,” she said.

This article originally appeared here.

Lesslie Family After Five Are Murdered by Ex-NFL Player: “We Do Not Grieve as Those Without Hope”

communicating with the unchurched

The Lesslie relatives of four family members brutally murdered by former NFL player Phillip Adams are turning to God amidst their grief.

“We do not grieve as those without hope,” read a statement by the family of Dr. Robert Lesslie.

The 70-year-old doctor, his wife Barbara, and their grandchildren, Adah, 9, and Noah, 5, were all fatally shot last Wednesday, along with one HVAC technician outside their home. Another wounded technician survived. Phillips later took his own life.

While the Lesslie family is absolutely devastated by the tragedy that took place in the doctor’s South Carolina home, they are refusing to harden their hearts in bitterness.

“To that end, our hearts are bent toward forgiveness and peace,” their statement continued. “Toward love and connectedness. Toward celebration and unity. We honor all of those involved in this story with prayers and compassion specifically for the Shook family, the Lewis family, and the Adams family.”

Investigators reported that Adams forced his way into the Lesslie’s house last Wednesday after fatally shooting two HVAC technicians who were working on their air-conditioning unit.

Thirty-two-year-old Adams later died from a self-inflicted bullet to the head after a standoff with officers. His body was found inside his parent’s home where he was living at the time.

Authorities are still investigating Adam’s motive for the heinous mass shooting. No doctor-patient relationship seems to have been established prior to the murders.

Dr. Lesslie was a well-respected physician in the area who had founded the Riverview Medical Center. He’d been married to his wife, Barbara, for 40 years, and had four beautiful children, as well as eight grandchildren. The proud father, grandfather, and family man was also a man of great faith.

“As Robert Lesslie would say, ‘When peace like a river attendeth my way, when sorrows like sea billows roll, it is well with my soul,’” the family statement read.

If you would like to do something for the family, Lesslie’s relatives left the public with a few heartfelt suggestions:

“If you would like to do something for the family, Adah and Noah would want you to stock the free pantries and libraries in your community. Barbara and Robert would want you to be good stewards of what you are given, leaving every place better than it was before you got there.”

This article originally appeared here.

Gregory Coles: It’s Possible to Be Same-Sex Attracted and Fully Surrendered to Jesus

communicating with the unchurched

Dr. Gregory Coles is writer, speaker, and academic researcher who has done important work in the field of rhetorics of marginality, focusing on the impact of language on marginalized groups. He is part of the collaborative leadership team at the The Center for Faith, Sexuality & Gender and the author of several books, including Single, Gay, Christian: A Personal Journey of Faith and Sexual Identity and his latest, No Longer Strangers: Finding Belonging in a World of Alienation. When he isn’t writing or speaking, Greg can usually be found playing piano at a local church, dabbling in songwriting, jogging, or baking homemade granola.

Other Ways to Listen to This Podcast With Dr. Gregory Coles

► Listen on Apple
► Listen on GooglePlay
► Listen on Spotify
► Listen on Stitcher
► Listen on YouTube

Other Podcasts in the LGBTQ and the Church Series

Juli Slattery: This Is How the Church Can Begin the LGBTQ Conversation

Mark Yarhouse: How to Pastor Someone Who Has Gender Dysphoria

Ed Shaw: How God Has Used Same-Sex Attraction to Equip Me As a Pastor

Sean McDowell: Scripture Is Very Clear About God’s Design for Sexuality

Rachel Gilson: How Jesus Helps Me Say No to My Same-Sex Desires

Caleb Kaltenbach: Do You See the LGBTQ Community Through God’s Eyes?

Preston Sprinkle: Jesus Left the 99 to Pursue the One—And That Means Trans People

Laurence Koo: A Call for the American Church to Welcome Single (LGBTQ) Believers

Key Questions for Dr. Gregory Coles

-What advice would you give to young people experiencing attraction to the same sex or wrestling with their gender identity? 

-How has the church been most loving toward you in your journey, and what are areas the church could grow in? 

-Can you help us to better understand some of the terminology related to the LGBTQ conversation? 

-Some Christians think that using a trans person’s preferred name and pronouns is loving them well, but others believe this is tantamount to lying. What advice would you give to people in this area?

Key Quotes from Dr. Gregory Coles

“There is something tremendously important I think about the way in which we as human beings are created to experience the love of God through other people.”

“It’s much more important to make the following of Jesus the primary thing than to insist to yourself, ‘Here’s how I want this story to end.’” 

“I think marriage is beautiful in a very distinctive kind of way, but to suggest that the only way to reach the best and truest form of human love that you can get to on earth is to be married is dangerous I think.”

“We need to honor both of these callings [to singleness and marriage] as distinct callings.”

“Especially in western twenty-first century evangelicalism, there’s a tendency for us to not think of taking up one’s cross as a particularly weighty task.” 

“If it’s really Jesus that we’re following, then it needs to be true that the story that we tell about our lives is one in which we’re making radical kinds of choices that only make sense through the lens of Jesus.”

“It’s impossible for me to tell the story of why singleness can be beautiful without talking about who Jesus is.”

“It’s beautiful and encouraging when folks are able to recognize the way in which my experience of sexuality can create a kind of a complicated relationship with Christian spaces and with the world at large. Because there are many people in both of those camps who would find my story something objectionable and throw proverbial grenades at me accordingly.”

“To have your soul constantly be in self-defense mode, to constantly be trying to convince other people that you do in fact love Jesus, is sort of an unconstructive space because it takes away energy that would be better invested in actually loving Jesus.”

Eugene Cho: How the Church Can Be a Better Evangelical Witness to Displaced People

displaced people
Despite the complexit of immigration policy, welcoming refugees in and listening to their experiences is one simple step to connecting. Image by Gerd Altmann courtesy of Pixabay/Creative Commons

(RNS) — The U.N. refugee agency reports that there are over 80 million forcibly displaced people currently in search of a home. In 2019 alone, one person suffered displacement every three seconds.

In these numbers are the makings of a once-in-a-lifetime crisis, but their sheer magnitude can sometimes make the problem seem abstract. We must always remember that, behind terms like “displaced,” “refugee” and “asylum-seeker” are global neighbors created in the image of God. They need comfort and care; they need attention and welcome.

Our mainstream discourse, far from encouraging us to show the displaced the welcome they deserve, is driven by political agendas, bigotry and half-truths to talk about refugees and other displaced people in a narrative of fear and outrage. This cycle of negativity may generate clicks, but it doesn’t generate compassion.

The church can and must be a better witness. If we build our Christian witness upon the foundation of authentic, welcoming love, the church can become a shining light of joy for the suffering and hope for the hopeless.

Immigration and refugee policy is, of course, a complex issue. Even within the church, there’s ample room for disagreement and debate. I understand that not every believer will have the same views about how best to run a country like the United States.

But as followers of Christ, we have a duty not to let our politics blind us to the image of God in our neighbors. We can disagree about policy; we can’t disagree about basic empathy and compassion. For the sake of Christ and his kingdom, we need to put politics aside and create a culture of welcome. We have to resist the urge to politicize the suffering and the needs of others.

Welcoming the refugee, the asylum-seeker or the immigrant starts with listening. Every displaced person has a story to tell of hardship, loss, difficulty and sorrow. Their stories usually intersect with the complexities of power, race, class and world religion. What’s more, these stories are often narrated against a background of trauma, oppression, colonialism and persecution. Listening gives the displaced the space they need to show us who they are and draw us into their lives.

When we listen to their stories and view their struggles in the light of Christ, we can see that these people from around the world are not so different from us. They want the same things that we want: a place to call home, safety and security for their families, peace and prosperity among friends and companions. If the church opens itself to the stories of refugees and the displaced, then it may become a place of transformative encounter where divisions no longer matter.

That’s not just important to our response to the refugee crisis; it’s also crucial for the church’s true identity, rooted in the evangelical mission to minister to the world and spread the good news of Christ. In our rapidly changing world, this evangelism is changing too. In the past, the church’s mission to evangelize the world took missionaries around the globe. Today, the people we are called to evangelize come to us as refugees and displaced people.

As a community of believers, we have to start asking ourselves the tough questions. How can we best speak Jesus’ message into the lives of refugees and asylum-seekers? How can we bring healing to those who have been hurt by violence, famine, racism or religious persecution? How can we help to give new life and restore the brokenness of trauma and loss?

How we answer these questions will determine whether we live up to our sacred calling to follow in Christ’s footsteps in spreading truth, hope and love to the vulnerable, the oppressed and the suffering.

We have a lot of work to do. I recently edited an anthology of pastoral, theological and refugee perspectives on the church’s evangelical mission called ” No Longer Strangers: Transforming Evangelism With Immigrant Communities.” From these different voices I learned that, yes, the church has a lot of growing and changing to do, but Christ is already and always among us, guiding us to incite that growth and that change.

Rebuilding our church culture, ministries and evangelization efforts on a foundation of authentic love for the refugee and the displaced will be the church’s task for years to come, but serving the vulnerable must be our Christian mission today. We can rise to the challenge and become unparalleled witnesses to the gospel.

If we do, we will discover that welcoming the stranger can be our most beautiful form of worship of the God of unconditional love.

(Eugene Cho is co-editor of ” No Longer Strangers: Transforming Evangelism With Immigrant Communities ” and founder of One Day’s Wages. The views expressed in this commentary do not necessarily represent those of Religion News Service.)

Brandon Cox’s Modern Creed of Faith

communicating with the unchurched

What will the next few years bring for the church in America? I don’t know. And honestly, I don’t know about you, but when things continue changing rapidly all around me, I find myself wanting to find something less volatile into which I can plunge my anchor. And for me, lately, that has been the historical creeds of Christianity–and studying the importance of creating a creed of faith for our church. I’ve now been in ministry for nearly twenty-five years. That isn’t long compared to a lot of my heroes who are still living and serving, but it’s long enough that I’ve seen plenty of change happen within the American Christian and Evangelical subculture.

The last five years of those two and a half decades have been far more tumultuous than previous years, and 2020 has been particularly challenging. The tension we’ve felt over social justice and political ideology has served as a mechanism for further splintering within the faith. Whereas we once aligned with a church or with other churches on the basis of our doctrinal distinctives, today we’ve seen a massive re-alignment over political allegiances.

The Apostles’ Creed, the Nicene Creed, and the Athanasian Creed have all inspired me to focus on truth that lasts longer than a single generation. While we can’t seem to agree on the outcome of a presidential campaign and its effect on the modern church, we can go back a millennia and a half to a time when the church collectively came together around the reality that God is Trinity – Father, Son, and Holy Spirit – and that Jesus Christ was born to a virgin, died for the sins of the world, and rose victoriously from the grave to defeat sin, death, and hell forever.

This desire for deeper roots in something historical and more eternally enduring than the latest trends and fads American Christianity may be wrestling with has driven me to articulate my own creed of faith. It’s more of a confession of faith, and it’s something that I want to share with our congregation, repeatedly.

A Modern Creed of Faith

We believe in one God, the Almighty,
Creator of heaven and earth,
Source of all life and all love.

We believe in Jesus Christ, his only Son,
Fully God, fully human,
Savior of the world,
The risen King of kings.

We believe in the Holy Spirit,
The very breath and power of God,
Sustainer of our life in Christ.

We believe in the church, Christ’s body,
God’s family for the spiritually homeless,
Called to be Love and Light,
To pursue justice and show mercy,
To proclaim the Good News of Christ,
To work for the common good of humanity.

I spent far too many hours working on each and every little phrase of this creed of faith so that it was all intentional, with nothing left to chance. I also wanted it to have a certain rhythm and cadence, similar to that of the ancient creeds that are still read by congregations in unison today. And I also wanted it to BE Grace Hills. That is, I wanted it to honor and reflect the culture we’ve built within our church family that, hopefully, honors and reflects the identity of God well.

This creed of faith is Trinitarian, affirming one God in the three persons of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. It’s Christocentric, proclaiming that Jesus is indeed the divine Messiah for which humanity had been waiting. It’s gospel-oriented in that it asserts the Kingship of Jesus. And it makes loud and clear that Jesus, the fully human, fully divine Savior has indeed risen from the dead – the cornerstone doctrine of the Christian faith.

And while most of the ancient creeds acknowledged the church’s existence in God’s plan, I wanted this confession to flesh out more the role the church carries out today. We extend the mission and work of King Jesus in the world by including spiritually homeless people, becoming love, pursuing justice, sharing the gospel, and working for the common good.

Like every creed of faith I’m sure this one will be revised over time, but my hope is that it nails down for me, and for any who wish to sit regularly under my teaching at Grace Hills Church, that we are a people united under a Triune Creator who has brought us redemption and assigned us the mission of telling everyone about him.

 

This article with Brandon’s modern creed of faith originally appeared here, and is used by permission.

Why Your Origin Story Matters

communicating with the unchurched

When the Oral Roberts University basketball team generated so much excitement during the Sweet Sixteen at the NCAA men’s basketball finals, I was reminded of the importance of our origin story. I remembered an incident many years ago when I was directing the national television ministry for the university founder, Oral Roberts.

Often when Oral would preach, he would tell the story of his dramatic healing of tuberculosis when he was a young man. Back in those days, there were few treatments, so Oral’s case was considered terminal. I’ll save you the details, but needless to say, his struggle and eventual healing made a powerful and compelling story – a story he was always ready to tell.

But he told the story over and over – so much that frankly, I got tired of hearing it.

I actually pulled him aside one day and said, “Oral, give the TB story a rest. People are tired of hearing about it.” Fortunately, he ignored me, and it was years later before I realized that I was a complete idiot.

Why Your Origin Story Matters

1. The story of how God healed him and eventually launched him into ministry – became the cornerstone of his brand story – and his entire ministry.

When people heard that story, they realized that if God could do that for Oral, he could do it for them. It inspired a generation of men and women to reconsider faith in a God who still worked miracles.

2. Since that time, I’ve seen the power and impact of origin stories over and over.

People are simply fascinated in how people launched a company, founded a nonprofit, or started a great church. People never tire of discovering what turned someone’s life around, turned them away from drugs or alcohol, or changed the direction of their life.

You see it everywhere you look. When it comes to collecting comic books, the origin stories of super heroes are often the most valuable. It’s the reason so many people meet business leaders and ask “How did you get your start?” Biographies and memoirs are the #1 selling category of hardcover books on Amazon. In fact, biography is so popular that it’s expanded way beyond books. Along with documentary films, a staple of Hollywood are feature films based on the lives of famous people. That popularity has led to the growth of TV channels dedicated to biography, including A&E, The Biography Channel, and The History Channel.

3. It’s also become a cornerstone of recovery programs.

Heroes in Recovery contributor Nadine Herring has seen the great power in the telling of these stories:

“The most powerful thing I’ve experienced … in sharing my story is that it allows people who have been suffering in silence to step forward and ask for help,” says Herring. “There’s something about reading or hearing about someone who has gone through what you’re going through and making it to the other side that lets you know that it is possible, you’re not alone, and there is help for you if you want it.”

4.  It’s time to start sharing your origin story.

If you have a message that needs to be told, how you got started is a great place to begin. If you want to share you faith with a friend, tell them how you met God. If you’re advertising a business or nonprofit, make the origin story a key part of the strategy.

5. Don’t be afraid of telling it over and over again.

People working with you may get sick of hearing it like I did with Oral Roberts. But for those on the outside, there’s nothing quite as compelling or inspiring.

 

This article about the importance of your origin story originally appeared here, and is used by permission.

Pastor Helping Migrant Children Gets Heat From the Right and the Left

communicating with the unchurched

Kevin Wallace, one of the lead pastors of Redemption to the Nations Church in Chattanooga, Tenn., has confirmed that his church is using one of its buildings to house unaccompanied migrant children from the U.S.-Mexico border. While some have criticized his views, Wallace sees the decision to house the children as showing God’s love “to the least of these.”

“I am surprised a little bit that some people can’t separate the politics from the compassion,” Kevin Wallace told the Times Free Press. “I have experienced the love of God personally, and because of that, I want to demonstrate it to the least of these. And this is, without a question, the least of these. These are the kids who have nowhere to go and no one advocating for them in some situations and circumstances. They’re being exploited in some situations and circumstances.”

Kevin Wallace: This Is Part of Our Vision

“In 2019, Redemption To The Nations Church leased a vacant and unused building to a non-profit, federally funded organization for the purpose of providing compassionate care and family unification services for children displaced from their families,” said Pastor Kevin Wallace in an official statement posted to his social media accounts. According to WTVC News, The Baptiste Group is the organization that is partnering with the church. Wallace continued:

The organization is required to comply with all local, state and federal laws. The services were part of a federal program initiated in 2019.  The Church is not affiliated with the organization providing the services. The Church’s decision to allow the organization to use the building for its services is an integral part of our vision to be a loving church that loves the world with the love of Jesus Christ, including children, who through no fault of their own find themselves in desperate and difficult circumstances.

The pastor’s statement follows a report published by The Tennessee Conservative, which claimed that “migrant children from Joe Biden’s border crisis” were being housed at a dormitory in the city. The media outlet published the dormitory’s address, a decision that has made Wallace concerned about safety. 

The pastor does not believe that helping displaced children should be a matter of politics, and his views have been criticized by people on both sides of the political aisle. In June 2018, he tweeted to the Department of Homeland Security and former President Donald Trump that his church was willing to offer a dormitory to house migrant children “while this mess gets fixed in Washington.” Around that time, the Trump administration had drawn criticism for its practice of separating migrant children from their parents. The pastor added that his offer was “not a joke.”

In July 2019, Wallace was part of a group of pastors who visited an immigration detention facility in Clint, Texas, shortly after Democratic Congress members toured several facilities in the area, including the one in Clint, reporting horrifying conditions. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., said that detainees were being forced to drink out of toilets.

The pastors’ account was different, however. Wallace appeared on Fox News and said that he had observed a clean, orderly facility and no evidence of abuse. Ocasio-Cortez responded to Fox on Twitter, saying, “The right is responding to what’s been exposed at the border by denying it & saying I’m lying.” Wallace later told Fox, “The congresswoman is entitled to her opinion, but her opinion should never shape the truth.”

Pastor Kevin Wallace: We’re Just Trying to Help

There is a real need that Redemption to the Nations Church is meeting. Reuters reports that the number of unaccompanied minors at the U.S.-Mexico border has spiked in recent months. President Biden has yet to fulfill his pledge to raise the annual refugee admission ceiling from the historic low of 15,000 set by President Trump. Biden has promised to set a new annual cap of 125,000.

In the meantime, said Pastor Kevin Wallace, the displaced children “are vulnerable and they have no one to advocate for them, and we’re just trying to help. That is in keeping with our vision as a church. It’s in keeping with the mission of the Gospel, and that’s why we made the decision. And I understand people aren’t always going to recognize why we do what we do.”

Beth Moore’s Twitter Time Out — “I Don’t Trust Myself”

communicating with the unchurched

Christian author and Bible teacher Beth Moore is leaving the social platform Twitter “for a bit.” Moore said, “I don’t trust myself. Gonna punch somebody. I can either get ugly or get off.” Moore recently announced she no longer identifies as a member of the Southern Baptist Convention and is leaving the largest Protestant denomination in the United States. 

Moore is extremely active on Twitter where she has has over 980k followers, usually posting multiple times a day. Recently she has been defending her views on complementarianism, one of the main reasons she gave for leaving the SBC.

A Twitter post she wrote a week ago led to over 500 comments on this single thread: “Let me be blunt. When you functionally treat complementarianism—a doctrine of MAN—as if it belongs among the matters of 1st importance, yea, as a litmus test for where one stands on inerrancy & authority of Scripture, you are the ones who have misused Scripture. You went too far.”

In the same thread, she issued an apology for supporting complementarian theology and pleaded with her followers by saying, “I beg your forgiveness where I was complicit. I could not see it for what it was until 2016. I plead your forgiveness for how I just submitted to it and supported it and taught it. I trusted that the motives were godly. I have not lost my mind. Nor my doctrine. Just my naivety.”

Moore followed that up with telling men not to respond boldly, saying, “And, dudes, do not DM me. Spend your energy tending to your house.”

On Friday, the Living Proof Ministries founder dropped a surprise on her social media page and let her followers know she is stepping away from Twitter “for a bit,” as she put it. She explained that she is focusing on writing again. The main reason she is stepping away is because she can’t trust herself at the moment.

Boldly standing by everything she has said recently on her Twitter account, she made sure her opposers knew they hadn’t won. She said “The fact is, I really do want to walk with Jesus in the Spirit and not burn stuff down. Mind you, I don’t take back a word I’ve said. (See? This is where I go awry. The longer I talk.) I just think it’s enough for now.”

Referring to the Twitter hiatus, she wanted to make sure everyone knew she was ok. “Please know all’s well & I’ll be back in these tweety bird woods soon,” she reassured her followers. “I was gonna tell you to behave but sometimes behaving’s overrated.”

You have to know when to hold them and when to fold them (Kenny Rogers) when it comes to a faith leader’s presence on social media. Maybe more Christian leaders should follow Moore’s example–knowing when to not say something on social media and just walk away.

California Lifts COVID-19 Limits on Indoor Worship Services

communicating with the unchurched

LOS ANGELES (AP) — California on Monday lifted its limits on indoor worship services in the face of U.S. Supreme Court rulings that struck down the coronavirus public health mandates.

However, the state Department of Public Health guidelines still said indoor gatherings were “strongly discouraged” and advised limiting the numbers to 25% of a building’s capacity for the two-highest levels of the state’s four-tier COVID-19 restrictions. The recommended capacity for the two lower levels — those areas with moderate to minimum spread — is 50% capacity.

“Location and capacity limits on places of worship are not mandatory, but are strongly recommended,” the new guidance stated and said the changes were a response to recent court rulings.

The Center for American Liberty, which had filed a string of lawsuits against Gov. Gavin Newsom on behalf of churches, applauded the move.

“Governor Newsom should have done this a long time ago,” said a statement from Harmeet K. Dhillon, the center’s founder. “For over a year, the state of California has targeted the faith community for discriminatory treatment depriving them of their fundamental right to worship.”

State or local restrictions on indoor worship to prevent the spread of COVID-19 had been in place for most of the pandemic. Most religious organizations had followed the restrictions but some churches fought them on grounds that they violated the constitutional freedom of religious expression.

Limits on indoor worship capacity were instituted in February to replace an all-out ban on indoor services that applied to most of the state because virus cases were high.

The U.S. Supreme Court struck down the outright ban in a case brought by California churches, although it left in place capacity limits and a ban on singing or chanting.

On Friday, however, the Supreme Court ruled that California can’t enforce virus-related limits on home-based religious worship, including Bible studies and prayer meetings. The case involved two residents of Santa Clara County in the San Francisco Bay Area, who wanted to host small, in-person Bible study sessions.

California previously announced significant changes will go into effect Thursday that loosen restrictions on gatherings, including allowing indoor concerts and theater performances. The changes come as infection rates have gone down in the state and vaccination numbers have surged.

The Supreme Court has dealt with a string of cases in which religious groups have challenged coronavirus restrictions impacting worship services. While early in the pandemic the court sided with state officials over the objection of religious groups, that changed following the death of liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg last September and her replacement by conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett.

In November, the high court barred New York from enforcing certain limits on attendance at churches and synagogues in areas designated as hard hit by the virus.

This article originally appeared here.

If the Missouri House Passes This Gun Bill, Pastors Will Have No Say in Who’s Packing at Church

communicating with the unchurched

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — Missouri lawmakers on Monday advanced a sweeping firearms bill that would allow concealed guns on public transportation and in churches.

The Republican-led House gave the measure initial approval in a voice vote. It needs another vote of approval to move to the GOP-led Senate.

Currently, people need permission from religious leaders to bring firearms into places of religious worship.

The pending bill would allow people with concealed carry permits to bring guns in churches, synagogues and mosques, as well as public transportation.

Missouri doesn’t require a concealed carry permit for gun ownership, but having a permit allows gun owners to bring their weapons into some otherwise restricted areas in the state.

Another provision in the bill would ensure that gun stores are considered “essential” businesses, meaning the state and cities couldn’t order them closed during emergencies such as the coronavirus pandemic.

Yet another part of the bill would allow 18 year olds to get concealed carry permits, which currently are only available to people at least 19 years old or 18 year olds in the military.

The bill also would make it a felony to fire a gun in city limits, with a number of exceptions.

This article originally appeared here.

How Complementarianism Became Part of Evangelical Doctrine

communicating with the unchurched

(THE CONVERSATION) Prominent evangelical leader Beth Moorewho announced in March 2021 that she was leaving the Southern Baptist Convention over its treatment of women, among other issues, recently apologized for supporting the primacy of the theology of “complementarianism.”

This belief asserts that while women and men are of equal value, God has assigned them specific gender roles. Specifically, it promotes men’s headship or authority over women, while encouraging women’s submission.

As a scholar of gender and evangelical Christianity who grew up Southern Baptist, I watched how complementarianism became central to evangelical belief, starting in the late 1970s, in response to the feminist influence within Christianity.

The Start of the Doctrine

In the 1970s, the women’s movement began to make inroads into a number of arenas in the U.S., including work, education and politics. Many Christians, including evangelicals, came to embrace egalitarianism and to champion women’s equality in the home, church and society.

In response, in 1977 evangelical biblical studies professor George Knight III published a book, “New Testament Teaching on the Role Relationship of Men and Women,” and introduced a new interpretation of “role differences.”

Other evangelical biblical studies professors, such as Wayne Grudem and John Piper, began to write about submission and headship in the mid-1980s and early 1990s, making the claim that women’s submission to men was not, as many Christians at that time believed, a result of the Fall in the Garden of Eden when Eve and Adam ate the forbidden fruit.

Rather, they argued, the requirement for women’s submission was part of the created order. Men, they explained, were created to rule and women were created to obey.

Southern Baptists Incorporate the Belief

Evangelical leaders began to hold secret meetings, conferences and evangelical associations to work out, and then promote, a fully developed framework for complementarianism.

In 1987, a group including Piper and Grudem met in Danvers, Massachusetts, to prepare a statement that came to be known as the Danvers Statement on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood. It set out the core beliefs of complementarianism.

Among other things, the Danvers Statement affirmed the submissive role of women. It said, “Wives should forsake resistance to their husbands’ authority and grow in willing, joyful submission to their husbands’ leadership.”

The Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood was created at the same time. The goal of the council was to influence evangelicals to adopt the principles of complementarianism in their homes, churches, schools and other religious agencies.

Within a decade, the council and the Danvers Statement began to have significant influence among evangelicals, particularly Southern Baptists, the nation’s largest Protestant denomination.

Entrenched Evangelical Beliefs

The Southern Baptist Convention soon incorporated these beliefs into its confessional statement – a document of generally shared beliefs. In an amendment in 1998 to the “Baptist Faith and Message,” the convention included the complementarian language.

The amended section on “The Family” stated, “A wife is to submit herself graciously to the servant leadership of her husband even as the church willingly submits to the headship of Christ. She, being in the image of God as is her husband and thus equal to him, has the God-given responsibility to respect her husband and to serve as his helper in managing the household and nurturing the next generation.”

For some, the theology of complementarianism became so deeply entrenched in evangelical belief that they came to see it as an essential doctrine of the faith. As Piper said in 2012, if people accept egalitarianism, sooner or later, they’re going to get the Gospel wrong.

While Moore has not entirely renounced complementarianism, she has now decried its use as a first-tier doctrine. First-tier doctrines are the ones that evangelicals believe people must accept in order to be Christians. For some evangelicals, however, complementarianism remains a litmus test for theological faithfulness, right alongside belief in God and acceptance of Jesus.

This article by Susan M. Shaw originally appeared here.

How the Supreme Court Found Its Faith and Put ‘Religious Liberty’ on a Winning Streak

communicating with the unchurched

(THE CONVERSATION) The Supreme Court’s current term is winding down, but there are still several cases to be decided – and, as with most terms, a controversy over church-state matters looms.

Fulton vs. City of Philadelphia is among the cases still to be decided. It centers on a requirement that private agencies that receive city funding – in this case an adoption agency – do not discriminate against any community they serve, including members of the LGBTQ community. This nondiscrimination requirement applies to both religious and nonreligious organizations. But the adoption service at the heart of the case – Catholic Social Services – refused to comply, asserting that not being allowed to discriminate against gay couples infringed upon its religious beliefs.

It would appear on first glance that the city’s position is strong – after all, it provides the money and has a legitimate interest in ensuring that funding does not perpetuate discrimination based on sexual orientation.

Yet, Catholic Social Services and its counsel, Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, believe that they have the wind at their back regarding their claim. From my perspective as a professor of law who has closely monitored such religious liberty cases, they could be right. Religious claimants have been on a winning streak before the Supreme Court in recent years. They notched up their latest victory on April 9 when justices ruled that California could not impose COVID-19 restrictions on religious gatherings at private homes.

A Noticeable Shift

The Supreme Court has become increasingly conservative over the past two decades, with five of the last seven justices appointed by Republicans. As a result, it has become increasingly sympathetic to claims by religious conservatives that mandatory nondiscrimination laws violate their ability to practice their beliefs, as protected by the Constitution and federal law.

Two recent studies have confirmed this trend. One found that since the George W. Bush-appointed John Roberts assumed the role of chief justice in 2005, the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of religious claimants 81% of the time. This compares with a rate of about 50% for the 20th century.

Some of the recent cases are familiar; others, less so. In 2014, the justices relieved the craft store chain Hobby Lobby from having to provide employees with health insurance that covers contraception, as mandated by the Affordable Care Act. Hobby Lobby had objected to the requirement on religious grounds.

And in 2020, the Supreme Court ruled that teachers employed by religious schools were not entitled to protection against age and disability discrimination as a result of the “ministerial exception” – which allows religious entities to ignore anti-bias legislation if they can assert that staff perform even minimal religious duties.

Meanwhile, in 2018, a majority of justices suggested that a small business – here, a baker – could refuse to serve gay customers because of the owner’s religious objections to same-sex marriage. The court has also held that states have to give the same grants and tax breaks to churches and religious schools that they do to nonreligious entities.

This trend has extended into the COVID-19 pandemic. Initially, a sharply divided court refused to overturn state restrictions – which for the most part classified houses of worship alongside restaurants and movie theaters as “nonessential,” distinguishing them from “essential” services such as medical offices, pharmacies and grocery stores. But in late fall and again in February, a majority including the newly appointed religiously conservative Justice Amy Barrett struck down such orders. In so doing, they ruled that states must treat houses of worship no worse than the most favored category of essential services.

Redefining Religious Freedom

In prioritizing religious liberty claims over health and anti-bias concerns, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority has, to my mind, promoted a skewed conception of what religious freedom is.

Religious freedom has traditionally meant more than simply the ability to practice one’s beliefs unencumbered, free from state interference. It is a condition that lives alongside other important democratic values – such as equal rights and a separation of church and state.

But the Supreme Court’s conservative majority has come down on the side of a narrower interpretation of religious liberty to mean the right of individuals or groups to practice their faith as they see fit.

The court’s new emphasis on protecting religious liberty has redefined the conventional understanding of the free exercise clause. Traditionally, that has meant the government could not impose a substantial burden on one’s ability to practice religion, but that lesser restrictions on that practice – such as adhering to health or safety regulations – were not unconstitutional.

But under the current Supreme Court, the degree of burden is less important than whether the state is treating religion differently from secular counterparts. Furthermore, in the view of another Trump appointee, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, religion deserves most-favored-nation status.

In this way, religious entities cannot be treated any differently in the pandemic from the most essential service – but they would be able to discriminate against customers or employees in a way the essential services cannot. It is, I believe the legal equivalent of having your cake and eating it, too.

This article by Steven K. Green originally appeared here.

The Gospel Coalition Has Over 5,800 People Attend Their 2021 In-Person Conferences

communicating with the unchurched

On April 9, 2021, The Gospel Coalition (TGC) hosted its first in-person conference in a post-COVID-19 world. This past Friday, TGC’s women’s conference (TGCW21) that was postponed in 2020 due to the pandemic had over 3,300 in attendance and over 5,500 streaming it online. And on Monday, TGC21 kicked off its in-person conference with over 2,500 people attending live in Indianapolis and another 2,300 attending virtually.

It has been well over a year since the pandemic put an abrupt halt to the majority of large social gatherings all around the world, especially here within the United States. Church worship gatherings, concerts, small group Bible studies, and conferences canceled early last year; some of which haven’t returned to in-person gatherings still today. With everything turning into entirely virtual, even concerts, it was completely unknown when humanity would start to return to what resembled pre-COVID-19 normal.

The TGCW21 theme was Steadfast: A Women’s Conference on the Book of James and featured keynote and breakout speakers Jackie Hill Perry, K.A. Ellis, Jen Wilkin, and Nancy Guthrie. The TGC21 theme was Jesus Is Greater and featured keynote and breakout speakers Kevin DeYoung, John Piper, David Platt, Tim Keller, John Onwuchekwa, Russell Moore, Albert Mohler, H.B. Charles, and Sam Allberry.

The Gospel Coalition’s President Julius Kim said in his TGC21 opening remarks. “I can’t believe that we’re back together after all that we’ve gone through after these last 12 months….Having been isolated from Christian community for long stretches of time, we’ve been stretched and our spiritual health has suffered…to gather like this is such a blessing.” Kim thought he was going to die after a long hard fight with the COVID-19 virus in 2020 and called it one of the most challenging years of his life. Encouraging the live crowd and those streaming the event, he said, “The challenges that are facing us right now are great, but friends, Jesus is greater!”

Director of Communications and senior editor for The Gospel Coalition, Brett McCracken spoke to ChurchLeaders.com. He said that in the fall of 2020 as they prepared for TGC’s men’s and women’s conference, they planned to offer both in-person and online options since they did not know what April of 2021 would hold. In December 2020, TGC launched registration for the events with the message, “Register now for TGC21 and decide later whether you want to attend in person or online.”

“We were hopeful the COVID numbers would decrease, vaccinations would increase, and more and more people would feel comfortable (and hungry!) for an in-person conference,” McCracken said, “Thankfully, they did!”

TGC’s operation and event staff have worked closely with the city of Indianapolis and the Indiana Convention Center to follow safety protocols, McCracken shared. “They have done a stellar job,” pulling off a top-notch conference during a pandemic, including state-of-the-art innovations in the virtual conference experience. TGC’s senior editor said, “While the pandemic forced these online innovations, some of them will probably be things we continue for future, post-pandemic events.”

Responding to possible critics who will question TGC for taking the risk of hosting an in-person conference during a pandemic, McCracken told ChurchLeaders.com, “I hope we have proven that events like this can be safely held. The Indiana Convention Center—which had just played host to the NCAA basketball tournament before our conferences—boasts that it has held conferences and events regularly in this facility since July 2020 with no known COVID-19 spread. They have been professional, careful, and a great venue partner for us. Registrants and speakers have felt safe. This can be done! And there is a hunger for it. After more than a year without gatherings like this, people are hungry for fellowship. That was evident in the atmosphere at both our conferences. Abiding by all state and local public health guidelines, we were thrilled to be able to serve our conference guests with a safe and memorable experience.”

The Gospel Coalition Conferences Create a Safe Environment

The men’s and women’s conferences have taken extreme caution and are going to great lengths to ensure the safety of its attendees. TGC requires each attendee to daily complete a five COVID-19 health related questionnaire that identifies any symptoms or known contact with someone recently who has tested positive for the virus. Attendees are given a different colored bracelet like the one below each day after they have their cleared personal health assessment.

TGC attendees are required to keep their masks (face coverings) on at all times while in the convention center–even while singing. TGC event coordinators set up directional markers throughout the entire conference area to help promote and enact social distancing.

The rows of seats set up in the speaking areas are strategically arranged to promote 6 feet of distance between those attending both in front, behind, and between the aisles.

Other Conferences Postponed, Cancelled, and Continuing

The United Methodist General Conference that was cancelled last year has already decided to postpone their annual event due to the ongoing pandemic. The conference is now scheduled to take place on Aug. 29-Sept. 6, 2022 in Minneapolis.

California’s Grace Community Church and senior pastor John MacArthur decided in early February 2021 to postpone their annual Shepherd’s Conference that is attended by 3,000 males each year because of “threats” the church received from the county of Los Angeles and the State of California.

The Southern Baptist Convention, which cancelled its annual meeting last year is currently planning to meet on June 15-16 in Nashville, Tennessee. The committee continues to monitor the COVID-19 situation and assesses advice from health officials.

The VOUS Conference is planning to meet in person at Miami Florida’s Watsco Arena on June 17-20, which will include Louie Giglio, Tauren Wells, and Rich Wilkerson.

Police and Protestors Face Off at the Fence Blocking GraceLife Church

communicating with the unchurched

Hundreds of people showed up Sunday to protest at the site of GraceLife Church (GLC) in Spruce Grove, Alberta. GLC has insisted that its members were not among the protesters, some of whom at one point started tearing down the fence surrounding the shuttered church. 

“Grace Life Church appreciates the public outpouring of support to fully open churches in Alberta,” said GLC in a statement issued by Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF), which represents the congregation and its pastor, James Coates. “Grace Life Church congregants were not at the protest that occurred on Sunday, April 11, 2021 near the Church’s facility. Grace Life Church recognizes the place for peaceful protest within the context of a democracy.” The church’s statement continues:

Grace Life Church has no control of our Church or grounds at this time. The Church grounds are fully under the responsibility and control of the RCMP [Royal Canadian Mounted Police] and Alberta Health Services [AHS]. The closing of the Grace Life facility has understandably resulted in significant public outrage and caused even larger crowds to gather in one place. Albertans have a constitutional right to assemble, associate, and worship. By taking the measures the government has, while the matter is still pending before the Courts, the Alberta Government has created an even more divisive situation.

It is time to end these unscientific, unjustified and arbitrary lockdown measures.

Hundreds Show Up to Protest at GraceLife Church 

AHS shuttered GLC last Wednesday, erecting a fence around the property two weeks after Pastor James Coates was released from prison for ignoring public health restrictions. The congregation has been disregarding a 15 percent capacity limitation on in-person worship. AHS released a statement saying it has “physically closed GraceLife Church (GLC) and has prevented access to the building until GLC can demonstrate the ability to comply with Alberta’s Chief Medical Officer of Health’s (CMOH) restrictions.”

Groups that organized Sunday’s protest included Walk for Freedom, which describes itself as “a UNITED front for various movements and peoples to rally and peacefully promote breeches to our civil liberties across Alberta.” Walk for Freedom told people to meet at 6 a.m. Sunday in Calgary and to arrive at GLC by approximately 10 a.m.

The Royal Canadian Mounted Police issued a news release ahead of the protest warning that there would be increased traffic enforcement Sunday along the roads near the church building. The notice warned, “Parking north of Highway 627 on Enoch Cree First Nation and parking or stopping on the highway itself is not permitted.”

In addition to increased traffic restrictions, police set up a blockade in front of the church. CTV News said “dozens of RCMP cruisers” were present and authorities also had tow trucks to remove vehicles that were blocking the highway. 

Video journalist Laura Krause, who documented the events of the day, reported that people had started arriving by 9:30 a.m.

Pastor: My Ushers Carry Guns, Have Orders to Kill

jeff jansen
Adobe Stock #73111724

At the REIGN Conference in Oregon over the weekend, evangelical minister Jeff Jansen said ushers at his Tennessee church “all pack” guns and will kill anyone who thinks “about starting something.” Jansen, a self-proclaimed prophet who leads Global Fire Ministries in Murfreesboro, Tennessee, was a guest speaker at Ignite Faith Church in Redmond, Oregon.

Pastor Jeff Jansen: ‘Jesus wasn’t a wimp’

Jansen contrasted today’s “effeminate” and “neutered” church culture with Jesus’ toughness, saying, “Jesus wasn’t a wimp. He was a tough guy. He was a man. OK? He was a man. When [money changers] were selling in his Father’s house, he went and he braided a whip. Now, that takes time. He’s braiding a whip, and he’s like, ‘I’m coming for you, coming for you.’ … He was very deliberate, and he was mad. He’s a man. He whipped them. Sorry. Just whipped them. ‘Oh, Jesus wouldn’t do that.’ The heck he wouldn’t.”

These days, says Jansen, “The church—the ekklesia, the government of God—has been so neutered and so turned effeminate, almost homosexual. … It’s just ridiculous. Where are the men? Where’s the maleness? Where is the ‘I will defend the children, I will protect the family’?

“My ushers at my church, they all pack,” he continued. “You come to my place, and you think about starting something, you’re dead. They’ll kill you. They’ll shoot you because they’re going to protect everybody else. … I said, ‘Listen, guys, if I’m up there preaching and somebody comes up running, make sure you get them. Just kill ’em. Just shoot ’em dead.’”

The group Right Wing Watch tweeted about Jansen’s conference appearance, specifically referencing his pro-gun words. In response, people wrote comments such as “They have normalized this rhetoric,” “Gee, I wonder where toxic masculinity starts?” and “Why is it that the more Christian these people get, the less Christian they behave?”

In its coverage, Newsweek says it contacted Jansen’s ministry to request more information about his “almost homosexual” comment. Global Fire Ministries reportedly responded, “Please don’t watch [Jansen] or listen to him with the intent of publishing things you do not understand.”

America Voted for Trump, Claims Jeff Jansen

On his ministry’s website, Jansen is described as “well-known worldwide for his Miracle/Healing anointing and Prophetic ministry, often giving revelatory directives for not only individuals but regions and nations.” A Trump supporter, Jansen wrote the book Trump: The Destiny of God’s America, published last summer.

The minister is among the prophets who predicted that former President Donald Trump would win re-election last November. Unlike some of the self-proclaimed prophets who’ve now walked back those claims or even apologized, Jansen is adamant that Trump will be reinstated.

The January inauguration of President Joe Biden was “fake,” says Jansen, adding that Biden is “not our president…nor will he ever be.” Of the November 2020 presidential election, Jansen says, “Everybody knows there was a red tidal wave. There was a Red Sea moment, which is a red tidal wave. And quite frankly, America voted in Donald J. Trump.”

UPDATE: Brian Houston Announces Dallas Hillsong Closing After Pastors’ Misuse of Funds

hillsong dallas
Video screen grab from YouTube

Updated April 12, 2021: A few months ago, Pastor Reed Bogard and his wife, Jess, resigned as pastors at Hillsong Dallas. Now on April 10, 2021, Hillsong’s global senior pastor Brian Houston emailed church members that leadership has decided to “pause all operations” at the Texas location.

The Bogard’s resignation came after Hillsong’s leadership suspended their pastoral duties as they investigated members’ complaints they weren’t upholding Hillsong’s leadership standards. These complaints included the misuse of worshipers tithes. It was reported that the Bogards used funds used to purchase ATV’s, expensive meals, designer clothes, and items for their children.

Before becoming the lead pastor at Hillsong Dallas, Pastor Reed Bogard served alongside recently fired Hillsong New York’s Pastor Carl Lentz. Lentz was found to have had at least one extramarital affair and abused his authority during his pastoral role at the New York location.

Houston wrote in his email that “it was very disappointing to learn that, while some of you experienced the Bogards as dedicated pastors, many others have experienced leadership that failed to meet the commitments and standards of Hillsong Church.”

The current pandemic was also cited as a reason for the Dallas church closure. Houston wrote, “Many factors, all amplified by the pandemic have resulted in the difficult decision.”

Leaving hope for Hillsong Dallas to meet again, Houston wrote, “We still have a huge heart and vision for the great state of Texas. When the time is right and we have identified and trained suitable lead pastors, we will consider relaunching.”


ChurchLeaders original article written on January 5, 2021 below. 

Reed Bogard, pastor of Hillsong Dallas in Dallas, Texas, announced Sunday that he and his wife, Jess, are stepping down as pastors in order to pursue health and to transition into a new season in their lives.

In addition to helping plant Hillsong Dallas and Hillsong LA, the Bogards helped plant Hillsong NYC while serving alongside recently disgraced pastor Carl Lentz. “It has been an incredible ride thus far,” said Reed Bogard in a prerecorded message prior to Sunday’s livestreamed sermon, which was delivered by Hillsong pastor Brian Houston. “We’ve had some crazy days, some great days seeing God do many, many miracles, and so we’re so grateful for that.”

Reed and Jess Bogard met at Hillsong International Leadership College in Australia and later returned to the U.S. to plant the three Hillsong churches with which they have been involved. “The last 10 years of being in church planting mode has really taken a bit of a toll on Jess and I and our family,” Reed Bogard continued, “and we just really feel like it’s time to transition off of our staff and take some time to remain healthy, get healthy, and to really see what this next season holds for us.”

Hillsong Dallas Looks to a New Season

Bogard expressed his gratitude toward Brian and Bobbie Houston, the global senior pastors of Hillsong Church, for supporting and trusting him and Jess. “I’ve never met two people who believe in people so much,” said Bogard, adding that he believes the best is yet to come for Hillsong Church in general and for Hillsong Dallas in particular.

Before the footage switched to a livestream of his sermon, Brian Houston shared his thoughts on Bogard’s news. “Reed’s announcement to you right now, not sure whether that comes as a shock,” said Houston, “but I must say Reed and Jess have given their heart and soul to the pioneering of Hillsong Dallas over the last couple of years, and we’re grateful for that, we’re grateful for the great work they’ve done. Reed and I have been talking over a period of time and we both agree that it would be a perfect time for them to come to a new season in their life, which means a new season also for Hillsong Dallas.”

The church will be getting new lead pastors, which is “exciting,” said Houston, although he added, “We want to make the right decision, so we’re not going to rush it.”

During the interim, Hillsong leaders will help to provide for and support Hillsong Dallas. “Let’s be more unified than ever before,” said Houston. “Let’s believe God for great things ahead.”

Hillsong Church has faced controversy recently after Hillsong NYC pastor Carl Lentz was fired on Nov. 4 for what Houston first announced as “moral failures.” The next day, Lentz published an apology in which he admitted that he was terminated because he had been unfaithful to his wife.

A leaked call later revealed that Hillsong leadership had concerns about Lentz prior to revelations about his marital unfaithfulness. The former pastor is reportedly undergoing treatment for depression, anxiety, and pastoral burnout, and Hillsong has launched an independent investigation into the culture at Hillsong NYC

Pop star Justin Bieber, who has attended Hillsong in the past and who was friends with Lentz, has distanced himself from Hillsong after a Dec. 31 report suggested that the star had plans to go into ministry at Hillsong NYC. Bieber responded on Instagram, saying that the story was “fake news” and adding, “And btw, Hillsong is not my church. For clarity, I am part of Churchome.” Churchome is a multisite, megachurch led by Judah and Chelsea Smith with campuses in Seattle and Los Angeles. 

World Vision Faces Pandemic’s ‘Perfect Storm,’ Seeks to Meet U.S., Global Needs

World Vision
In partnership with local communities and partners organisation, World Vision raised the awareness of personal hygiene and the children are using locally made tippy tap to keep their hands clean. Photo courtesy of World Vision

(RNS) — In Senegal, Christian relief staffers worked with Sunday school and Quran teachers to reduce stigmas about COVID-19 as they distributed masks.

In Oklahoma City, residents picked up free food boxes at a church that later became a vaccination clinic to inoculate against the coronavirus.

In the Democratic Republic of Congo, faith leaders demonstrated getting their temperatures taken in front of their congregations to model best practices for avoiding virus spread.

Across the country and the globe, World Vision is continuing a multi-pronged effort to meet the needs of people facing the health crisis and the secondary effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Globally, the crisis that began more than a year ago has claimed 2.89 million lives.

Worldwide, the relief and development organization has provided COVID-19 preventative materials such as soap and clean water to close to 15 million people, with the assistance of more than 128,000 faith leaders.

In the U.S., World Vision has long responded to natural disasters like fires and hurricanes, but its pandemic-driven provision of domestic supplies — from food to personal protective equipment — is unprecedented for the humanitarian organization.

“This has been our largest response, domestically and globally,” World Vision U.S. President Edgar Sandoval Sr. told Religion News Service in a late March interview.

U.S. staffers have worked across the country, “coming alongside the Navajo Nation, rural areas in Appalachia, urban centers in New York,” Sandoval said. “The common thread has been supporting our church partners.”

By March, he said, the evangelical relief agency had distributed fresh food boxes to feed more than 9 million people in the U.S. It has also sent more than 1.5 million units of protective equipment, such as masks and hand sanitizer, to schools often attended by low-income students.

In the developing world, World Vision’s emphasis is on aiding faith leaders to encourage social distancing practices, counter misinformation and urge acceptance of the vaccine when it is available.

“What the pastors and faith leaders say carries a lot of weight,” said Sandoval.

He cited findings in a recent World Vision report in Bangladesh that showed every responder who planned to get the COVID-19 vaccine “said that was the case because their religious leaders wanted them to get the vaccine.”

Beyond building awareness about preventing and eradicating COVID-19 and seeking equitable access and distribution of the vaccine, World Vision has been advocating for populations facing what Sandoval calls the “perfect storm” of the pandemic’s health consequences combined with economic losses and climate change.

“There is a tremendous secondary effect,” he said. “Because of the lockdown, because of the social distancing, because the world has come to a halt, there’s a real threat that 30 years of progress in our fight against extreme poverty could be reversed.”

His organization said on April 1 that more than 7 million people in six East African countries are at risk of starvation.

Sandoval said World Vision staffers are also trying to address misinformation and hesitancy about the vaccine.

“In Tanzania, for instance, we’ve heard from our team there are concerns the vaccine could lead to impotence,” he said of staffers who are seeking to correct such false claims.

Public health officials have said there is no evidence the COVID-19 vaccines lead to erectile dysfunction.

World Vision staffers have begun leading two-day, eight-hour training sessions to provide scientific information to faith leaders about vaccines and guidance on sharing it with their communities.

Olivia Wilkinson, director of research at the Joint Learning Initiative on Faith and Local Communities, spoke in March about a two-page “ quick analysis guide ” faith leaders and health and development officials created after working with World Vision and other organizations.

Among the questions in the guide is one asking if religious buildings owned or operated by a faith leader can be used as vaccination sites. It also asks what is driving hesitancy about the vaccine.

“We thought that people need to analyze their context and not just receive generic advice,” said Wilkinson at a webinar hosted by Georgetown’s Berkley Center for Religion, Peace & World Affairs.

“All research and evidence we’ve seen has shown that we should not isolate or essentialize the religious aspect as the only part that’s driving a hesitancy or resistance,” she said, noting questions are also asked about political, social and cultural factors.

Just as World Vision is working on building trust before vaccine rollouts in some parts of the developing world, a similar scenario has played out in the U.S.

Pastor Derrick Scobey of Oklahoma City said his teaming up with World Vision to meet other community needs paved the way for greater vaccine acceptance. His Ebenezer Baptist Church became a COVID-19 vaccination site in January, primarily inoculating Black people in his community when at the time the state reported just 2 to 3% of African Americans in the state overall had received the vaccine.

In the previous year, his church had received food boxes from World Vision to distribute to the community.

“When World Vision started to send all of these different items to us, we’ve had people 2½ miles lined up down the road,” Scobey said in January.

Once people knew they could trust the pastor and his church with supplies, they believed him about the vaccine, too, despite their recollections of medical mistreatment and experimentation on African American patients. Especially once he had gotten the vaccine himself.

Scobey said he heard over and over again at the clinic: “He took the vaccine so I’m going to go.”

This article originally appeared here.

High Court Halts Calif. Virus Rules Limiting Religious Gatherings in Homes

religious gatherings
FILE - In this Nov. 6, 2020, file photo, the Supreme Court is seen at sundown in Washington. The Supreme Court is telling California that it can’t enforce coronavirus-related restrictions that have limited home-based religious worship including Bible studies and prayer meetings.The order from the court late Friday, April 9, 2021, is the latest in a recent string of cases in which the high court has barred officials from enforcing some coronavirus-related restrictions applying to religious gatherings. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is telling California that it can’t enforce coronavirus-related restrictions that have limited home-based religious worship including Bible studies and prayer meetings.

The order from the court late Friday is the latest in a recent string of cases in which the high court has barred officials from enforcing some coronavirus-related restrictions applying to religious gatherings.

Five conservative justices agreed that California restrictions that apply to in-home religious gatherings should be lifted for now, while the court’s three liberals and Chief Justice John Roberts would not have done so.

California has already, however, announced significant changes loosening restrictions on gatherings that go into effect April 15. The changes come after infection rates have gone down in the state.

The case before the justices involved California rules that in most of the state limit indoor social gatherings to no more than three households. Attendees are required to wear masks and physically distance from one another. Different restrictions apply to places including schools, grocery stores and churches.

“California treats some comparable secular activities more favorably than at-home religious exercise,” allowing hair salons, retail stores, and movie theaters, among other places, “to bring together more than three households at a time,” the unsigned order from the court said. A lower court “did not conclude that those activities pose a lesser risk of transmission than applicants’ proposed religious exercise at home,” it said.

The court acknowledged that California’s policy on gatherings will change next week but said the restrictions remain in place until then and that “officials with a track record of ‘moving the goalposts’ retain authority to reinstate those heightened restrictions at any time.”

Justice Elena Kagan wrote in a dissent for herself and her liberal colleagues, Justice Stephen Breyer and Justice Sonia Sotomayor, that the court’s majority was hurting state officials’ ability to address a public health emergency.

“California limits religious gatherings in homes to three households. If the State also limits all secular gatherings in homes to three households, it has complied with the First Amendment. And the State does exactly that: It has adopted a blanket restriction on at-home gatherings of all kinds, religious and secular alike. California need not … treat at-home religious gatherings the same as hardware stores and hair salons,” she wrote. She added that “the law does not require that the State equally treat apples and watermelons.”

The case before the justices involved two residents of Santa Clara County in the San Francisco Bay Area, who want to host small, in-person Bible study sessions in their homes. In an email message Saturday, one of their lawyers, Ryan J. Walsh, said he and his colleagues were “thrilled beyond words” for their clients.

California had defended its policy of restricting social gatherings as “entirely neutral.”

The court has dealt with a string of cases in which religious groups have challenged coronavirus restrictions impacting worship services. While early in the pandemic the court sided with state officials over the objection of religious groups, that changed following the death of liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg last September and her replacement by conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett.

In November, the high court barred New York from enforcing certain limits on attendance at churches and synagogues in areas designated as hard hit by the virus. And in February, the high court told California that it can’t bar indoor church services because of the coronavirus pandemic, though it let stand for now a ban on singing and chanting indoors.

This article originally appeared here.

Amy Julia Becker’s Response to the Prayer ‘Please Help Me Hate White People’

Author Amy Julia Becker with her book, “White Picket Fences.” Images courtesy of DeChant-Hughes 

(RNS) — “Dear God, please help me to hate White people …”

So begins the prayer of Dr. Chanequa Walker-Barnes, a Black Christian woman and professor of theology who has been working toward racial reconciliation for decades. Her prayer, recorded in the bestselling book, ” A Rhythm of Prayer,” goes on, listing all the reasons why it would make sense to hate white people.

I learned about this “Prayer of a Weary Black Woman” on Twitter when Rod Dreher, a commentator I’ve read sporadically over the years, tweeted:

“Progressives preparing something terrible and violent for America. This left-wing prayer book embodies the spirit of Antichrist, petitioning God to grant one the spirit of anti-white racial hatred. It’s a bestseller, from a major publisher.”

He linked to his essay ” A Rhythm of Racist Prayer.” His tweet included a picture of a Black woman (Walker-Barnes, I now realize) speaking at Biola University with the words “Reconciliation without Justice is Cheap” written on her T-shirt. I was intrigued.

Dreher’s post is only worth reading as an example of a kind of knee-jerk reaction that demonizes rather than engages. Of course, in this case, Dreher, a Christian, is demonizing a fellow Christian, which makes it all the more awful. He misses the point and purpose of the prayer — a call to persevere in love — entirely.

Walker-Barnes wrote in the prayer she isn’t asking for help hating the really, really racist ones, the Ku Klux Klan members and neo-Nazis. And she doesn’t want to hate the ones who are allied with the cause of justice.

No, she explains, she wants to hate the “nice White people.” The ones who would have her over for dinner but feel squeamish about Black Lives Matter. Or the white progressives who have read enough books to sound like they understand and care about vague concepts like racial justice but who actually undermine the cause.

I could feel the tension in my chest as I read Walker-Barnes’ words the first time. She’s a Christian! She’s a minister! Why would she want to hate white people? Why does she want to hate me?

Her prayer got my attention. It reminds me of all the people in the Bible who don’t want to love the people God wants them to love. Walker-Barnes mentions Jonah, unwilling for his enemies to change. I think also of the Psalmists who ask God to kill their adversaries (in vivid and graphic detail). And of Jesus’ disciples, who hate the Romans even when their leader tells them to love their enemies.

This prayer also humbles me. I am the one on the other side of this potential hatred. I have been the nice white person who tried to explain away what seem like “little” racist remarks. I am the nice white person fearful of acting as an ally, worried about what other white people will think, wondering whether it is all too extreme, unwilling to give so much of my time, of my heart. I am the nice white Christian who has done little to repent or to proactively love the vulnerable among us.

It reminds me of the first time I heard a Black woman challenge white Americans to read themselves into the Bible in the role of the oppressor.

What if I imagine myself as a part of the Egyptian army, complying with Pharaoh’s wishes to capture the Israelites once again? What if I see myself as one of the religious leaders in Jesus’ day who wanted to keep the status quo and tamp down revolutionary words like his? What if I stop only identifying with and spiritualizing the poor throughout the Bible and instead recognize I’m the one who needs to reckon with my riches before God?

If I let this prayer make me uncomfortable, then I will begin to understand why Walker-Barnes might long to hate someone like me.

And then, like her forebears who wrote so many Psalms of lament and imprecation, Dr. Walker-Barnes prays, “But.”

“But I will trust in you Lord. You have kept my love and my hope steadfast even when they have trampled on it.” She prays for beloved community.

In the end, Walker-Barnes invites me to do the work of repentance. She invites me to reconciliation. Through a prayer that begins with hatred, she invites me to enter into love.

After this prayer began to spread on social media, the pile-on of vitriol from conservative voices was enough that Sarah Bessey, editor of the prayer book in which this prayer was included, moved her social media to private status. It was enough for the other contributors to the book to issue a statement of solidarity and support.

Walker-Barnes herself posted a statement, saying critics have “targeted me for attack, harassing me through email, phone, and social media. In addition, they have bombarded my institution.”

I am sickened by the vitriol, especially coming from the mouths of fellow Christians. And I am grateful for the courageous work of faithful, loving, truth-telling, Jesus-following women like Dr. Chanequa Walker-Barnes.

(Amy Julia Becker is the author, most recently, of “ White Picket Fences: Turning toward Love in a World Divided by Privilege. ” )

This article originally appeared here.

Former Desiring God Writer Paul Maxwell Renounces His Christian Faith

paul maxwell
Screen grab from YouTube: @Conversations That Matter

Author, former Desiring God contributor, former Philosophy professor at Moody Bible Institute (2015—2017), and Trinity Evangelical Divinity Ph.D. grad Paul Maxwell announced on Instagram last week that he is “not a Christian anymore.”

Almost in tears, Maxwell shared that he believes the internet has done a lot of damage regarding relationships [connections] with people and that he is ready to connect with people again.

The Trauma of Doctrine: New Calvinism, Religious Abuse, and the Experience of God author told his social media followers that he is ready to not be angry anymore. He said, “I love you guys, and I love all the support and friendships I’ve built here [Instagram]…I think it’s important to say that I’m just not a Christian anymore, and it feels really good. I’m really happy…I’m really happy.”

“I can’t wait to discover what kind of connection I can have with all of you beautiful people as I try to figure out what’s next,” Maxwell said. “I love you guys. I’m in a really good spot. Probably the best spot of my life. I’m so full of joy for the first time. I love my life for the first time…and I love myself for the first time.”

Maxwell said, “I just say, ‘I know that you love me.’ I know, and I receive it as love. I know you care about the eternal state of my soul and you pushed through the social awkwardness of telling me this, because you don’t want me to suffer. And that is a good thing. That’s a loving thing to do. And I hear where you’re coming from, and I respect your perspective.”

Maxwell joins other well-known Christians Jon Steingard from the band Hawk Nelson, I Kissed Dating Goodbyes author Joshua Harris, and Hillsong‘s worship musician Marty Sampson who have recently said they renounce or are losing their faith.

In 2019 after Josh Harris and Marty Simpson made the announcement they were no longer Christians, lead singer for Christian Rock band Skillet’s John Cooper asked, “What is happening in Christianity?”

Cooper said that he is shocked by how unashamed these leaders seem to be as they announce they are no longer Christians. He observed that essentially they are saying, “I’ve been living and preaching boldly something for 20 years and led generations of people with my teachings and now I no longer believe it…therefore I’m going to boldly and loudly tell people it was all wrong while I boldly and loudly lead people in to my next truth…Why be so eager to continue leading people when you clearly don’t know where you are headed?”

You can watch Maxwell’s Instagram video here.

855,266FansLike

New Articles

New Podcasts

Joby Martin

Joby Martin: What Happens When Pastors Finally Understand Grace

Joby Martin joins “The Stetzer ChurchLeaders Podcast” to discuss what happens when a church leader has truly been run over by the “grace train" and understands the profound love and grace of God.